You are here

AJP Taylor on Nuremberg Fraud

The following are from winstonsmith's wonderful blog.

British historian A.J.P. Taylor published The Origins of the Second World War in 1961, in which he writes of the Nuremberg Trials:

The evidence of which there is too much is that collected for the trials of war-criminals in Nuremberg. Though these documents look imposing in their endless volumes, they are dangerous material for a historian to use. They were collected, hastily and almost at random, as a basis for lawyers's briefs. This is not how a historian would proceed. The lawyer aims to make a case; the historian wishes to understand a situation. The evidence which convinces lawyers often fails to satisfy us; our methods seem singularly imprecise to them. But even lawyers must now have qualms about the evidence at Nuremberg. The documents were chosen not to demonstrate the war-guilt of the men on trial, but to conceal that of the prosecuting Powers. [....] The verdict preceded the tribunal; and the documents were brought in to sustain a conclusion which had already been settled. Of course the documents are genuine. But they are "loaded"; and anyone who relies on them finds it almost impossible to escape from the load with which they are charged.

Thanks to The Gas Chamber of Sherlock Holmes

Josef Kramer's Cyanide Salt Switch

Josef Kramer, initially denied the Nazis gassed anyone at Auschwitz

"I have heard of the allegations of former prisoners in Auschwitz referring to a gas chamber there, the mass executions and whippings, the cruelty of the guards employed, and that all that took place either in my presence or with my knowledge. All I can say to all this is that it is untrue from beginning to end."

But after meeting the the French interrogation specialist used by the British, Kramer begged to be killed, and admitted the Nazis did gas people after all.

"The first time I saw a gas chamber proper was at Auschwitz. It was attached to the crematorium. The complete building containing the crematorium and gas chamber was situated in Camp No.2 [Birkenau], of which I was in charge."

Kramer admitted at his trial, that he had personally gassed people at Natzweiler (ignoring his earlier testimony, with "cyanide salts" from a bottle (shake and bake??). And that he drove to the gas chamber in a "small car" with "fifteen women."

Comments

[1] Fester, you know I’m with you all the way in these matters, but I can’t support Samuel Crowell's The Gas Chamber of Sherlock Holmes. I'm glad that Crowell debunks the holo-hoax, but he imagines that by upholding some aspects of Jewish lies, he will encourage readers to question other aspects of Jewish lies.

That's futile. For Jews and their worshippers there is no possibility of reason. In their eyes, anything other than total surrender constitutes total rejection. There is no middle ground. You are with the Jews, or you are with the terrorists. Period.

Example 1: Crowell in his book advances Jewish propaganda that Nazi racial policy was a “shameful and disgraceful chapter in German history.”

Oh come on. Jews themselves are the worst racists on earth. They were the major slave traders in North America (the state of Rhode island was named after one of them), and their racism toward Arabs and all “Goyim” is notorious. Ashkenazi Jews hate everyone, even non-Ashkenazi Jews. Consider their endless wailing about intermarriage and “assimilation” by the filthy Goyim.

And where does Western civilization get off branding the Nazis as uniquely racist? This is total hypocrisy, and Samuel Crowell upholds it. If you’re going to debunk the holo-hoax, then there is no need to include the standard line: “Yes the Nazis were the worst racists ever, but…” By saying this, you contradict yourself. You destroy your case with your opening statement.

Example 2:  Crowell in his book writes that even without the holo-hoax, “We would still be dealing with about a million dead European Jews, who died as a direct result of Nazi persecution, plunder, forced labor, deportation, and yes, mass killing.” Crowell further writes, “There was certainly was a Holocaust in the sense that Nazi Germany persecuted and massacred many Jews," with the likelihood “that this massacre ran into the millions.”

This is a lie, but even if it were true, so what? In WW II there were massacres on all sides, involving all races and ethnic groups. Are Jewish deaths exceptional? For Jews they are. Jews see things as an equal one-to-one ratio. One dead Jew equals one million dead Goyim.

Fuck that.

What about the MONSTROUS EVIL of the holo-hoax lie? Jews use it condemn and extort the Goyim, and to excuse Jewish atrocities.

By granting all Jewish lies about the Nazis  -- except the gas chambers -- Crowell leaves open a back door for the gas chambers. Does he think he will please Jews by "sort of" defending the holo-hoax? For Jews, Crowell is worse that a holo-hoax denier. He is a holo-hoax "minimizer." Six million Jews were gassed. Period! 

Crowell assumes that Jews and their worshippers can be reasoned with. This is foolish, since the holo-hoax is a faith-based cult whose members regard reason as holo-hoax "denial."

Besides, no matter what we do or say, we remain filthy Goyim from birth to death. We are inherently "anti-Semitic." The more we deny this, and the more we worship Jews, the more we are trying to hide our "anti-Semitism" and our evil Goy nature. This is why Jews hate all Goyim, and especially Goyim that love Jews. Consider those evangelical "Christians" that worship Israel. Jews secretly hate them even more than Muslims.

And the Goyim accept this false “guilt,” since they have a mass Stockholm syndrome with Jews. The more Jews hate the Goyim, the more the Goyim adore Jews. Jews shame the Goyim by saying, "You're anti-Semitic." By saying, "You hate me," Jews make the Goyim hate themselves.

We went through this shit in the 1980s when everyone called everyone else "racist"and "insensitive." Women called everyone "sexist." Homosexuals called everyone "homo-phobes."

Fortunately that crap was a passing phase, but Jews are the only ones who get away with it forever-and-ever, since the world adores Jews. Likewise, the holo-hoax is the only genocide worshipped by the entire world, and only one that never happened.

Regarding the Nazis, two Great Lies sustain each other: [1] Gas chambers, and [2] the Nazis were uniquely evil. You cannot get away with questioning #1 while defending #2. Logically, either both assertions are true, or both are false. If the Nazis were uniquely evil, then there were gas chambers. If there were gas chambers, then the Nazis were uniquely evil. You can't have one without the other.

So if you’re going to dismiss one, why not dismiss both? Why not go all the way and dismiss ALL the lies about Nazi Germany and World War II? Otherwise your attempts to debunk the holo-hoax will strengthen the holo-hoax. If you agree that the Nazis were infinitely evil, then you automatically support the holo-hoax, regardless of your protests that you do not support it. Any book you write will be a waste of time.

I’ll bet that Crowell believes the British lie that the evacuations from France (Dunkirk etc) were a “miracle.” In truth they were a peace offering from Hitler, who did the same thing previously in Norway. The British invaded Norway first, and then the Germans counter-invaded and defeated them, and allowed all the British (and Poles, and Frenchmen, etc) to peacefully pack up in Norway and return to England. Another “miracle”!

These matters have implications today. By leaving back doors open for the holo-hoax, Crowell supports the Western plutocracy, which vilifies National Socialism to ensure that we can never have any system other than capitalism or communism. Since the masses are brainwashed to condemn all forms of socialism, we are left with only the plutocracy’s faux capitalism.

[2] I’m confused by your references to Josef Kramer, the Commandant of the Bergen-Belsen detention facility who “confessed” in order to stop the torture -- and was then hanged. Are you saying the “confession” was false? If so, I agree with you.

As for Schirer’s Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, its pages are not fit to line a birdcage.  

Thanks for reading.

Heydrich, your commentary is greatly appreciated.  Hadn't read the book, but I concur on all points.  Kramer decided to lie about the "death camps" after falling into "allied" hands.  That's a familiar pattern.

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer