Always good to read things from days of yore, before the TV's "cone of silence" descended upon the goy nations of the world.  The text is Jew as Criminal (Keller and Andersen, 1937; intro by Streicher). This is a real meal and will require some time to digest.

Here's the Table of Contents:

Table of Contents

Chapter One: What Linguistics and Statistics Show

Chapter Two: The Jew in Court

Chapter Three: Fences and Thieves

Chapter Four: Imposters

Chapter Five: Swindlers and Racketeers

Chapter Six: Gambling Cheats

Chapter Seven: Pimps and White Slavers

Chapter Eight: Sexual Offenders

Chapter Nine: Murderers

Jewish "Humor" -- The Crime of Fritz Saffran -- Monk Eastman, King of the Gangsters -- The Murder of McKinley -- The Attack on Otto von Bismarck -- The Murder of Count Stürkgh -- The Attempted Assassination of Stefan Tisza -- The Beylis Case -- Mordko Bogrov, Murderer of Minister President Peter Stolypin -- The Master Provocateur Asev - - Jakob Blumkin shoots at Mirbach -- The End of a Kaiser -- Murder of Hostages -- The Ship of Death -- The Worker-Murder of Astrakhan -- The Executioner of Tiflis -- Ssadowaya 5 -- Comrade Rosa -- Samuel Schwartzbart -- A Jew has shot. . .

And now an excerpt. I've added bolding for those in a hurry:

Chapter II : The Jew in Court (p. 25)

As wire-pullers and mouthpieces of the criminal and political Underworld, Jewry leads a concentrated attack upon the law and order of the people. The Jewish fence helpfully stands by the Jewish thief, the Jewish psychologist and expert stands by the Jewish sexual offender, and the Jewish attorney stands by both; the judgement is not in doubt if a Jew is also sitting on the judge's bench, as was so frequently the case in the German System(1). As if this were not enough, Jewry got ahold to the furthest extent even of the science, interpretation and execution of criminal law. It moulded and undermined the law in order to render it an impotent tool against Jewish criminality. To whatever extent these methods fell short, the goal was accomplished through the corruption of the procedures of criminal law and through Communist propaganda. The President of the Senate, Professor Dr. K. Klee, justly emphasized in his lecture concerning Judentum im Strafrecht [Jewry in the Criminal Law]: (2)

"Everywhere they (the Jews) were fighting in the front most ranks when it was a matter of blunting the sword of punishment in the struggle against crime." Professor Klee mentions a small selection of Jewish 'penal law theorists,' such as Moritz Liebmann, James Goldschmidt, State Counselor of Law Löwenstein, the Prussian Justice Minister Kurt Rosenfeld, Kantorowicz, Gumbel, Freymuth, and others.

Among these corruptors of criminal law, the known Communist Werthauer assumes a remarkable place. He denies that the State has any right at all to punish(3). Naturally [26] he demands the decriminalization of all offenses against morality, of abortion and homosexuality and finally escalates his shamelessness so far as to demand the decriminalization of fraud(1).

The working hand-in-hand of the Jewish criminal world, the Jewish 'criminal jurisprudence' and 'administration of justice,' and the Marxist propaganda jumps immediately to the eye. The Jewish theorists demand freedom from punishment primarily in the areas which are the domain of Jewry: sexual offenses, fraud, and treason, high and regional- level.

If, as defenders of common criminals, the 'celebrated' Jewish advocates of republican Berlin stepped to the bar, it was the same 'attorneys-at- law' who, in the 'sensational' trials of the Weimar system, defended the Communist functionaries and terrorists (2). Especially notorious were the 'attorneys' Löwenstein, Löwenfeld, Rosenthal and Rosenfeld, the Werthauer who is already known to us, and Felix Halle, the specialist for sexual offenses, and also Litten and Appel. Concerning the role of Litten in the notorious Felseneck trial in the summer of 1932, which had as its center the murder of several National Socialists during a Communist attack in the north of Berlin, Professor Siegert reports in his lecture about Judentum im Strafverfahrensrecht [Jewry in Criminal Law Proceedings](3) in the following manner:

"In the Felsen trial. . .by means of influencing witnesses and co- defendants, a defense counsel, the Jewish attorney Litten, was guilty of preferential treatment of his followers. The Court expelled him for this from the Office of the Defense Counsel. Instead of now joining the Court in the interests of justice, the Jewish state's counsel Siegfried Löwenstein addressed the legal [profession] public in the Deutsche Juristenzeitung [German Legal News] published by the Jew Otto Liebmann with an essay, Verteidigernot [Defense Counsel's Dilemma], and requested opinions in favor of his racial comrade Litten, the man who gave preferential treatment to the Communist accused. One hundred seventy-eight (178) members of the Berlin bar proposed in his favor an extraordinary meeting in chambers. The chamber -- occupied for the most part by Jews -- under the leadership of the Jew Ernst Wolff -- thereupon unanimously decided in favor of [27] the allegedly endangered independence and liberty of the defense and thereby aided and abetted the Jewish Communist Litten. Now, the Jew Max Hachenburg, as author of the Juristische Wochenschau [Legal Newsreel], appears as the last in line in the German legal newspaper.

He praises the "calm objectivity" of his racial comrade Ernst Wolff and supports the safeguarding of the independent attorney class. As if not the Jewish Communist Litten, but on the contrary, the impartial Court had imperilled the legal profession in the present case. Thus the racial comrades from the apparently most disparate political camps met in common struggle against good administration of justice."

When a Jew appears before any court whatsoever, he is secure in the sympathy of Jewry and of the Jewish 'public opinion.' Until the take over of power by National Socialism, the German press stood under decisive Jewish influence(1). Naturally this press was gentle in its judgement of Jewish criminals. Had any sort of poor devil stolen a bicycle, perhaps out of need, his full name was printed in the paper: "a certain Fritz Schulze"; when, however, some Kohn committed a fraud and injured other people without scruple, it read shyly "a merchant, K." -- why should his name be trumpeted about?

That was the sympathetic atmosphere in which the accused Jew appeared before the Court; judges, state's attorneys, jurors, witnesses -- all were more or less -- often unconsciously -- influenced by the Jewish 'public opinion.'

The fact is significant that, of the Jewish judges -- their names read: Ruben, Glücksohn, Hirsch, Jacobi, Katzmann, Manasse, Schlome, Schmoschewer, Peltasohn, Kohn, Seligsohn, Mensch, Nothmann, Rosauer, Loewy, Moses, Noah, Bukofzer, [28] Citron, Schuftan, etc. -- three quarters of them had as their fathers Jewish businessmen and dealers. Already, in their parental house, they breathed in the atmosphere of doing business and of the Jewish 'notion of right'; understanding and solidarity with the Jewish law-breaker was already in their blood.

And then the witnesses: witnesses from whom the truth often was in no way to be gotten, witnesses who could speak for hours at a time without saying anything, witnesses who commit any perjury with iron brow and sell their testimony to the highest bidder -- Jewish witnesses.

Then the Jewish 'experts.' At all universities, at all academies, in every focus of economic and cultural life, Jews had encysted themselves, always they monopolized discourse and occupied the best places: 42% of Berlin physicians were Jews, they had gotten control of 68% of the positions in school and welfare institutions. Naturally the experts cited by Jewish defendants were themselves Jews, who boldly sprang to the aid of the threatened racial comrade.

Their own publications throw a glaring light upon the mind-set and the activity of these Jewish 'experts,' as for example the 'monographs' from the Institute for Sexual Science in Berlin, Sexus, published by the notorious Magnus Hirschfeld, the evilest sexual Bolshevist of the Weimar epoch. Volume 4 of these 'monographs' is filled with "critical contributions" for the "reform" of the law concerning sexual offenses.  With the exception of a Herr v. Treskow, who reports on the topic of blackmail on sexual grounds, the contributions originate from the pens of the following Jews: Werthauer, Kronfeld, Juliusburger, Alsberg, Kurt Hiller and Hirschfeld, the very notables of the Weimar epoch. It fits the whole picture that Herr Hirschfeld was lodging the Communist Reichstag Deputy and major businessman Willy Münzenberg in the building of the Sexual Institute at number 10 In den Zelten, Berlin. The 'State Counselor' Dr. Werthauer, incidentally a friend of the Jewish black marketeer Kutisker and known as defender of Communists, was later sentenced to a year's imprisonment and a fine of 80,000 RM on account of tax evasion. This character had the brazenness to give his opinion for the benefit of the 'reform' of German marriage law, while Herr Hirschfeld, in his accustomed manner, offered his dirty hands for the protection of every perversity. The Jew Hirschfeld, who was allowed to bear the title of "Counselor for Public Health," and whose 'Institute' was financed by the Prussian state, was for years therecognized "scientific expert" for the German courts. The inconceivable nerve of this Jew seduced him into appending, in his contribution to the already mentioned [29] monographs, the following sentence: "The thing that matters (particularly in the disposition of sexual crimes) is the proof furnished, after the most careful study of the offender, of his previous life, his antecedents, his motives, his entire metaphysical personality, that the accused has no guilt." In this, therefore, the Jew Hirschfeld saw his "mission" before the Court: to furnish the proof that the criminal is no criminal.

His colleague and co-director of the Sexual Institute, Doctor of Medicine and of Philosophy Kronfeld, expressed himself in great detail in the same monograph, concerning the "job of medical expert before the Court." He sees the single mission of the "medical expert" in Court to be the obtaining of freedom for every criminal by means of the corresponding application of "psychology," "medical science," and "knowledge and conscience" and thwarting any use of the penal law.  To what a sublime art of pseudo-scientific abetting of crime the Jewish "experts," "scientists," and "psychologists" have gradually brought the criminal law, the infamous "psychoanalytic method" of a Sigmund Freud is sufficient proof and example.

The results of the court proceedings? 'Public opinion,' attorneys, witnesses, experts, and defendants supported one another in the effort to confuse the whole affair and to construct an inextricable tangle out of distortion and lies. That the non-Jewish state's attorneys and judges seldom succeeded in proving the guilt of the accused under such circumstances, is clear. This means that it was incomparably more difficult to convict a Jew than a non-Jew: the number of acquitted Jews was always disproportionately great. In other words: the Jew could break the law without being convicted.

Submitted by Fester on Sat, 2010-05-15 20:38

• Fester's blog
• Login or register to post comments
• 385 reads
•