In his day, “Douglas Reed was on everyone’s lips; his books were being sold by the scores of thousand, and he was known with intimate familiarity throughout the English-speaking world…one of the world’s leading correspondents,” says the writer of the Preface, Ivor Benson. But by the end of the 1940s Reed had almost vanished from the scene. The likely reason for his exile was Reed’s book, Far and Wide (.pdf), which took a critical look at the history of the United States. We might say the second and decisive reason was his discovery of Israel’s connection to that history. Of himself Reed says, “I am a fairly obscure person and when I went to America in 1949 was almost unknown…the publication of most of my books having been prevented by the methods above described. I found that the ADL watched me like a hawk from my arrival and from this first realized its immense spread and vigilance.” After having been invited to a dinner party by the “cousin” of a friend, Reed says, “I learned a year later that he was head of the ADL’s New York office…and thereafter the ADL knew my every movement. They knew about the book I was writing and when it was ready for publication the ‘cousin’ approached the American publisher of an earlier book of mine with a pointed request to know if he contemplated issuing this one; a man of discretion, he answered No. Three years later, in 1952…the American Legion’s magazine at Hollywood published some five hundred words from it. The ADL at once demanded a retraction from the Hollywood commander of the Legion…No inaccuracy was alleged; the deputation just called the book ‘antisemitic.’”(346) Commencing in 1951, Reed spent three years in the New York Central Library amassing this 300,000 word treatise, The Controversy of Zion, which itself became a controversy and remained in obscurity for almost 20 years before it was published. After his research, Reed concluded: “The peoples of the Western nation-states are deprived of information in the matters most vitally affecting their present and future, by a press which (they are continually told) is ‘the freest in the world.’”(346-7) I must say, by the time one gets to the end of Reed’s book, if it is all true, one cannot escape the conclusion that almost everything we see, hear and feel is an illusion created by the powers-that-be, and an overwhelming amount of those powers reside in the Zionist cartel of bankers, politicians, government officials, lobbyists, journalists, educators, scientists, professionals and Hollywood producers.
Reed’s book is filled with many facts, figures and original source quotes and thus his case is very convincing and formidable. Notwithstanding I can hardly do justice to the book in the limited space I have. I can only reveal the major themes and ideas running through his 585 pages. For the record, statements bracketed by double quotation marks (“xxx”) are quotes of Reed’s words, and those in single quotation marks (‘xxx’) when Reed is quoting from a source. Page numbers of Reed’s quotes are superscripted and bracketed at the end of sentences. Words in italics are Reed’s emphasis. At certain times, for brevity and space, I have taken the liberty to remove unnecessary words from Reed’s sentences and either replace them with ellipses or truncate the sentences for easier reading, but it is not the responsibility of my review to verify each and every source and quotation cited by Reed. I have also adopted American spellings to replace Reed’s British spellings. Because its viewpoint seems to confirm much of what Reed says about the 19th century, I have quoted the Jesuit journal under Pius IX, La Civiltà Cattlolica quite frequently. Although some may consider it unusual, throughout my review I have sprinkled in current events so as to give more relevance and impact to past events. Lastly, something Reed never envisioned while being censored by the ADL is that the Internet has published Reed’s book. Unfortunately, the page numbers in the PDF version are different than the actual printed book which I used.
Disclaimer: Before we get into the meat of the book, let’s start with a disclaimer: this review, as even Reed would agree about his own book, is not about the Jewish people in general, of which a good portion, at least by the world’s standards, are decent human beings who want to get along with their fellow man. It is about the Jewish minority (today known and/or mixed with Zionists, Communists, Marxists, Bolshevists, Neocons, Likudniks, Dispensationalists, etc.) who, if they had it their way, would control or destroy every government and every religion in order to place themselves as the sole leaders of the world, eventually forcing every man, woman and child to become their slaves. As Reed puts it, “This book has shown throughout that the staunchest opposition to Zionism came from Jews, but today the racial bloc has had Zionism thrust on it like a straitjacket.”
Supporting this assertion is the fact that much of Reed’s research was gleaned from well-known and respected Jewish writers. It was Reed’s belief that “the Jews of the world are equally beginning to see the error of revolutionary Zionism…and, as this century ends, will at last decide to seek involvement in
common mankind.” So far his wish has not come true. The reason is that the Zionists have waged a relentless campaign to persuade the rest of Jewry that they, too, must be Zionists.
As the prime minister of Israel, David Ben-Gurion, once insisted in 1952: “The Jewish state is not the
fulfillment of Zionism…Zionism embraces all Jews everywhere.”(419, vii, 514)
Zionism’s Modus Operandi
God took a great risk with the Jews. He instilled in the mind of the Old Testament Jews the idea that they were the ‘chosen race’ to do God’s bidding. But he was a gentle God. He told them not to lord their power over the nations but to teach all about Him; one group to lead the world, led by the wisdom and love of God. They were given great gifts and talents to accomplish the goal. But something went terribly wrong. The Jews began to believe that they were smarter than God and superior to the rest of the world; and that they could get away with all kinds of unethical and immoral living if they would just play the religion game to pacify this somewhat demanding God. God, of course, is no one’s fool and before long he took away their ‘chosen’ status and made them wander the earth in shame. Not long after, the Jewish minority decided they had enough. The divine punishment for their alleged sins was dismissed and the image of the Jew as the superior specimen of the human race was resurrected, only this time God was not behind it. The Jews once again proclaimed themselves the Chosen People, destined to restore their fate and fortune over the world. Their ultimate goal is to replace Jesus Christ as the world’s savior and to put themselves in that position. Those who stand in their way will suffer the same fate as the Canaanites did under the sword of Joshua, the very motif voiced by David Ben Gurion, Menachem Begin, Yitzhak Shamir and Ariel Sharon in the late 1940s when they fomented terror and assassination in Palestine to drive out its inhabitants.2 Reed’s 585 pages tell us how it is being done, and the bulk of the book takes us from the 1800s to the late 1950s which, though somewhat dated by our entrance into the third millennium, shows distinct patterns of behavior that are still prevalent today, if not more so.
The Watershed Year for Zionism: 1789
Reed writes: “What is clear is that each stage in the ruination of the West, during these 170 years, has been accompanied by successive stages of ‘the return’ to the promised land…To the ‘heathen’ masses of Christendom the process which began with the emergence of the world-revolution in 1789 has been merely one of sound and fury, signifying nothing; but the student perceives that in majestic rhythm it fulfills The Law and The Prophets of Judah…The French revolution was the world-revolution in action,
not a revolution in France…Before then people might indulge notions about suffering peasants, stung to sudden uprising by arrogant aristocrats and the like, but diligent study of the background of the French revolution dispels such illusions. It was the result of a plan and the work of a secret organization revealed before it occurred; it was not merely a French outburst produced by French causes…The French revolution of 1789 is the one that provides the key to the mystery. It forms the link between the English
one of 1640 and the Russian one of 1917 and reveals the whole process as a planned and continuing one…That climax, foreseeably, will take the shape of an attempt to consummate and complete the worldrevolution by setting up a world-government under the control of the organization which has guided the revolutionary process from its start”(134-5). Consistently verifying Reed’s take on things, the Jesuit journal sponsored by Pius IX, La Civiltà Cattolica,3 saw the same: “That series of assertions which in 1789 was said to be the synthesis of the rights of man, in fact represented nothing but the rights of Jews…These rights were, so to speak, the bulwark of power by means of which Judaism, in our century, laid siege to Christian society, assaulted it, upset it and, to a great extent, overtook it. This is seen in the universal stupor in which Europe finds itself as it perceives that gold, the dissemination of ideas, and the politicalirreligious tendency of its states are nearly entirely in Hebrew hands.”
And again: “From May 1, 1789, the day when the rights of man were glorified purely on behalf of the Jews, until September 20, 1870, when Rome was conquered with shells and the Papacy made a prisoner, the conspiracies, the uproars, the rebellions, the assassinations, the massacres, the wars, the so-called revolutionary deeds, everywhere and always had the same success of increasing the Hebrews’ wealth and of humiliating and oppressing the Christian civilization.”5 Jewish convert to Catholicism, P. Ratisbonne, put it more elaborately: “Through their dexterity and ingenuity, as well as through their lust of power, the Jews have step by step occupied every way leading to wealth, dignity and power. Their spirit, so to speak, imbues modern society. They regulate the stock exchange, the press, theater, literature, the great trade channels by land, as well as by sea, and by possessing the capitals as well as through their shrewdness, at present they hold captive, like in a net, all of Christian society,” with La Civilta giving a most apt comparison for the Catholic to ponder:
“As in the time of Arianism, the hour in which the Christian world, without realizing it, found itself Arian, thus today, Europe find itself mired, and to a great extent no longer Christian, but Jewish or Judaizing.”6 Perhaps it is no coincidence that Arius was a Jew (Alexandrian) whose principle heresy was denying the deity of Christ just as the Jews in the 1800s were making it the major heresy of Europe and abroad. In essence, the cries for “democracy” in 1789 were little more than disguised Jewish assaults on the reigning Catholic monarchies, which is the same cry we hear today in order to eliminate “the Catholic problem” and promote Zionist hegemony in its place.
The assaults come in many and varied forms. The recent false flag operation conducted by the Israeli Mossad in Oslo Norway that killed dozens of people, and which was characteristically blamed on the “Muslims” and “al qaida” but which was Israel’s attempt to scare Norway into supporting Israel (see Culture Wars, Sept. 2011, “False Flag in Oslo”) is a pattern of Jewish behavior that Reed uncovers in glaring detail. Already in the “middle of the last century” Reed says the Jews were in “control of modern
media of mass-propaganda and mass-suggestion” by which “it is possible to impress on the mind of the multitude these false images of what is happening elsewhere, and under the spell of such false notions to incite them into war itself.”(176) Reed believed it was high time the majority of decent Jews stood up to the minority of revolutionaries so that the former could assimilate with the world and allow everyone to live in peace. With the precision of surgeon, Reed tells us the story of how the minority would not be dissuaded from their messianic goal and where that group is headed.
One of Reed’s main concerns is identifying precisely what drives the Zionists. His answer begins in the
Old Testament and especially its “Talmudic chauvinistic” commentary. For example, today’s typical
Zionist believes that the cherims of the Old Testament (the instances when God commanded the total
destruction of heathen peoples in Deut. 2:34; 3:6; 7:2) are still applicable in modern times and are to be used as a tool for Zionism’s advancement. As Reed puts it: “…it daily threatened the seven neighboring Semitic peoples with the destruction and enslavement prescribed for them in Deuteronomy.
It did this in the open belief that its power in the Western capitals was sufficient to deter the governments there from ever gainsaying its will, and to command their support in any circumstances. It behaved as if America, in particular, was its colony.” “Within its borders its laws against conversion and intermarriage were those of the much-cited Hitler; beyond its borders lay a destitute horde of Arabs, driven into the wilderness by it….These were by repeated raid and massacre reminded that the fate of Deir Yasin yet hung over them too: ‘utterly destroy man, woman and child…leave nothing alive that
breatheth.’ The Western countries, its creators, murmured reproof while they sent it money and the wherewithal of the war which they claimed to fear; thus, like Frankenstein, they created the destructive agency which they could not control.”(510)7 Reed would simply have said “I told you so” if he lived
long enough to hear the conversation that took place on October 3, 2001 between Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and Foreign Minister Shimon Peres when Peres was worried that Israel’s policies of continued violence might “turn the U.S. against us,” upon which Sharon retorted: “Every time we do something you tell me Americans will do this and will do that. I want to tell you something very clear: don’t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.” Thus we can understand why in May 2011 prime minister Netanyahu received 29 standing ovations from the US Congress.
Analogously, faced with a juvenile delinquent that threatens to blow up the family house unless he is
given money and licentious freedom, Reed opines that “the new state [of Israel] was only made possible by this huge inflow of Western, chiefly American money. Assured of this unstinting monetary backing, and of a political support in Washington which could not change the new state set out on its grandiose ambition: to restore to full force, in the 20th century of our era, the ‘New Law’ promulgated by the Levites in Deuteronomy in 621 BC. All that was to come was to be ‘fulfillment’ of it; the Mongolian Chazars were to see that Jehovah kept his compact, as the Levites had published it. And what ensued was in fact an installment on account of this ‘fulfillment’: the vision of ‘the heathen’ bringing the treasures of the earth to Jerusalem began to become reality in the form of American money, German tribute and the like.(514) The Arabs saw from the start what was in store for them, for they knew the Torah. Dr. Weizmann had told the Peace Conference [of 1919], ‘The Bible is our mandate,’ and they knew about ‘the God of the Jews’ and his promises of pogrom and reward…Deuteronomy 7:1-3. In 1945 King Ibn Saoud [of Saudi Arabia] told President Roosevelt, ‘You have fought two world wars to discover what we have known for two thousand years.’”(292)
The “Greater Israel”
Prophetic as he was, Reed saw the beginnings of the quest for “Greater Israel” almost immediately after 1948. Israel’s second president, Ben Zvi, stated in his 1952 inauguration: “The ingathering of the exiles still remains our central task and we will not retreat….Our historic task will not be accomplished without the assistance of the entire nation in the West and East.” Reed then remarks: “The world would have raised a pandemonium of protest if a Kaiser or a Hitler had said such things. The ambition expressed by such words as ‘the full and undiminished program of Zionism’ is in fact boundless, for it is the political program contained, in the guise of a compact with Jehovah: world dominion over ‘the heathen,’ wielded from empire stretching from the Nile to the Euphrates. The support of Western governments gave reality to what otherwise would be the most absurd pretension in all history.”(515) “Boundless” was precisely the strategy employed by the first Zionist organizers to retake Palestine. As it
still stands today, Palestine was to be “partitioned” but Israel was not to have any borders. The obvious reason: once you make borders you will be expected to keep them, but the advocates of “Greater Israel” believed they were eventually going to attain all the land “from Dan to Beersheba,” as British parliamentarian Lloyd George once told Rabbi Stephen Wise. The undisputed leader of Zionism, Chaim Weizmann, used a similar but more clever logic when speaking to the 1937 Peel Commission: “The Arabs are afraid that we shall absorb the whole of Palestine…A Jewish state with definite boundaries… would be something final; the transgressing of these boundaries would be an act of war which the Jews would not commit, not merely because of its moral implications, but because it would arouse the whole world against them,” and he sold this logic by an appeal to mutual benefit, which, by the ring of “establishing democracy,” still holds today: “the Jewish National Home would play a very considerable role in that part of the world as the one reliable ally of the democracies,” from which Reed surmises: “By this he meant that the Zionist demand for arms for the forcible seizure of Palestine…would be presented…through the politicians and the press, to the public masses of the West. In 1938 he then proposed…that the Zionists should be allowed to form a force of something like 40,000 men,” which forces Reed to point out the hypocrisy of Weizmann who years earlier had said of the Hitler regime: “If a government is allowed to destroy a whole community which has committed no crime…it means the beginning of anarchy and the destruction of the basis of civilization. The powers which stand looking on without taking any measures to prevent the crime will one day be visited by severe punishment.”(328)
True to form, when Count Bernadotte sought to mediate the UN partitions for Israel (which required Israel to abide by the Nov. 1947 ‘recommendation’ of the UN so that the boundaries were to be ‘respected and maintained’; that the Arabs were to have the Negev; that Jerusalem would be internationalized; and that Arab fugitives should have safe passage back to their homes), on a trip to Jerusalem on Sept. 16, 1948, Bernadotte “and his party, unarmed and defenseless were halted by a Zionist jeep…three men jumped from the jeep…killed him and his Chief Observer.”
When the Zionists then officially rejected the UN proposals, “the world-newspapers brought out the editorial which they seemed to keep in standing type for such occasions (e.g., ‘Incalculable harm has been done to the Zionist cause’) and then resumed their daily denunciations of any who pleaded the Arab case as ‘anti-semites.’ The Times of London even blamed Count Bernadotte for his own murder,” suggesting that he “‘undoubtedly incited certain Jews to kill.’” In the aftermath, “two Stern Group leaders named Yellin and Shmuelevitz were sentenced to eight and five years imprisonment” for the murder of Bernadotte but “within a few hours of their sentencing they were released, then being escorted in triumph to a popular reception.”(462-3)
“Pull down and destroy; rule over all nations”
The theme of Reed’s book is repeated many times. It begins on page 123: “From the downfall of Babylon to the revolution in France  the ruling Talmudic Jews always acted as a destructive force among the peoples ‘whither I have driven thee.’ This was inevitable, given the creed to which they adhered and the fact that this religion was also The Law governing every act of their daily lives. Under the Judaic Law they could not act differently, and were indeed condemned to remain ‘the destroyers forever’: ‘See, I have this day set thee over the nations and over the kingdom, to root out, and to pull down and to destroy.’”
Although Reed is correct in seeing Israel as God’s “destroyer,” here we must, however, pause and fault him for an anachronistic reading of Jeremiah 1:10. The “destroyer” image would fit much better in Israel’s early history under Moses and Joshua, since at this writing of Jeremiah’s it is Judah herself who is in the crosshairs of God’s judgment. In fact, the next chapter of Jeremiah begins God’s long tirade against the Jews for their apostasy. They are the ones who will be “destroyed” by God, and he will use the nations, in this case, Babylon, to do His handiwork. What Reed means to say is, despite God punishing Judah for her sins, the Jews themselves would take these passages out of context and make themselves the “destroyers” of the nations rather than admitting that God had used the nations to destroy them. The delusion that the Jews were to become the “destroyers” even after they themselves had been destroyed was the core impetus for their attempt at resurrecting themselves in the latter half of the second millennium as “the Chosen People.”
In chapter 19, titled “The World Revolution,” Reed continues to point out the theme. Quoting from Johann von Herder the German historian in 1791, he writes: “The ruder nations of Europe are willing slaves of Jewish usury….The Jewish people is and remains in Europe and Asiatic people alien to our part of the world, bound to that old law which it received in a distant climate, and which according to its own confession it cannot do away with…It is indissolubly bound to an alien law that is hostile to all alien people.”(133) Similarly, La Civiltà Cattlolica quotes the Jewish author Don Sebastiano Nicotra revealing “the key to Jewish power”: ‘My sons, Jehovah is with us, and in his mercy he has reserved to us a powerful weapon…that is to raise us in the midst of the nations of Christ and to subject them to our domination. This force is named in the holy book, and it is called usury.’”9
The theme continues with Reed’s discussion of Benjamin Disraeli, who became Lord Beaconsfield and head of the British government, and a Jew who was a strong critic of the Zionists. Reed notes, “he was of the breed of the Israelite prophet who denounced Judah.” The Jews, says Disraeli in a speech given to the English House of Commons in 1852, were seeking to foment revolution “because they wished to destroy Christianity” and that “the influence of the Jews may be traced in the last outbreak of the destructive principle in Europe. An insurrection takes place against tradition and aristocracy, against religion and property….The natural equality of men and the abrogation of property are proclaimed by the secret societies who form provisional governments and men of Jewish race are found at the head of every one of them”;(166) with Reed adding, “(exactly the same thing recurred in Russia in 1917, that is, seventy years after the 1848 outbreaks).” Disraeli concluded, ‘the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes,’ and which Reed interprets, citing Zionist historian Josef Kastein, as the “Jewish international…a league of powerful and wealthy men at the top, under whose authority kings and princes, first, and republican presidents and politicians, next, equally found themselves.”(181) In his 1869 publication Polénique contre les Juifs, Disraeli spoke of Jews in international finance and intrigue who form “secret societies…and do not want constitutional government…they want to change the tenure of land, to drive out the present owners of the soil, and to put an end to ecclesiastical establishments.” At this same time, La Civiltà Cattlolica warned Catholics against Jewish predatory practices: “The legitimacy of robbing Christians is impudently taught by the rabbinical schools…Such is the teaching of Rabbi Pfefferkorn. ‘It is permissible to cheat a Christian as much as possible. Usury imposed on a Christian is not only permissible but even a good work….a
Christian is so much to be plundered that he remains ruined,’” adding this: “And that the sinister codex of the Talmud…commands hatred of all men who don’t have Jewish blood, and especially Christians, and makes it licit to spoliate and ill-treat them like noxious beasts.”10 Almost as if La Civiltà had taken a page from today’s Washington Times, it reported that the Viennese parliament complained that “our schools are in the hands of the Hebrews, that our Christian teachers are suddenly put on trial as soon as the slightest accusation against them has been made by the Hebrews; that our officials are unable to make themselves known as Christians if they want to evade persecution; that our Christian newspapers are continually confiscated,” adding, “it has control of education also, in such a way that the majority of the texts being imposed on the elementary schools have been compiled by Hebrews,” and “the Hebrews make themselves champions of the neutral public school, out of hatred of the Catholics, who wish to have free Catholic schools for their children.” It further reports that in London “the Jews buy the press, for half of the newspapers are in their powers, and they use it on behalf of their ideas” and in Rome “where is barely to be found a liberally behaving daily newspaper that doesn’t depend on Israel….but what is worse, entirely Jewish is the pornographic and irreligious press which sullies the country and has no equal in any civilized place.”11
Reed notes that when Disraeli died in 1881 “the thing he had striven to avoid had come about: the ‘secret societies’ had been welded into one world-revolutionary movement under Jewish control, and this was preparing to blow up the foundations of the 20th century.”(172-3) The motto was: “‘Pull down and destroy…rule over all nations’; the one destroyed in the East and the other secretly ruled in the West.”(272) The 1848 Jewish revolution is described by Reed through “Rabbi Drach, who like Disraeli foresaw what was coming, and published his indictment of the Talmud as the source of this disruptive process.” Agreeing with Reed, La Civiltà quotes Drach revealing the essence of the Talmud: “The Messiah has to be a great conqueror who puts the nations under the yoke of the Jews. They will anew take possession of the Holy Land, victorious and loaded with the riches taken from the infidels….Then all the peoples will be subject to the Jews….But one of these blessings is the greatly desired moment of the slaughter of the Christians and of the complete extermination of the Nazarene’s sect.”12 La Civiltà also pointed out “the work of Achille Laurent, which the Hebrews have taken nearly out of circulation because it masterfully reveals the secrets of Talmudism regarding the extermination of Christian civilization.”13
Drach was severely persecuted by his fellow Jews but his warning was also voiced by Jewish writer Morel who concluded, “what can the wisest measures of the authorities of all countries do against the vast and permanent conspiracy of a people which, like a network as vast as it is strong, stretched over the whole globe, brings its force to bear wherever an event occurs that interests the name of Israelite.”(173)
Things haven’t changed much. French citizen Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the Jewish former chief of the International Monetary Fund, recently said: “I wake up every morning and think about how I can help Israel.”14 Similarly, on October 11, 2011, Bill Handel, popular LA Jewish talkshow host said in reference to the Wall Street protestors: “I’m not angry at Wall Street because this is my tribe who control Wall Street. Why would I be upset?”
Reed sums up the Zionist racist history as follows: “In 1776 Adam Weishaupt founded his Illuminati. By 1846 Disraeli was writing that ‘the revolution is developing entirely under Jewish auspices.’ In 1869 Michel Bakunin, the disciple of Weishaupt, attacked the Jews in the revolutionary movement. In 1872 Bakunin was expelled and the united Communist movement plainly emerged, under Karl Marx (in 1917 it produced an almost exclusively Jewish Bolshevist government.”(173) [NB: Weishaupt was a crypto-Jew
who was outwardly Roman Catholic. He was funded by Mayer Amschel Rothschild who once said: “Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws” and “if a high placed person enters into a relationship with a Jew, he belongs to the Jew”]. Reed notes: “In 1920 official Bolshevik statements showed that 545 members of the chief ruling bodies included 447 Jews. In 1933 the American Jewish journal Opinion stated that Jews occupied almost all important ambassadorial posts and that in White Russia 61 percent of all officials were Jews; it also stated that the Jewish percentage of the population (then given as 158,400,000) as ‘less than 2 percent.’ If this was true it meant that Russia at that time contained less than 3,000,000 Jews. In 1933 the Jewish Chronicle stated that one-third of the Jews in Russia had become officials. If this was the case, they plainly formed the new governing class.”(417) In 1937, A. Stolypine wrote, “the key-positions of real control, through terror, all remained in Jewish hands.
These were the concentration and slave-labor camps (controlled by a Jewish triumvirate; they contained perhaps seven million Russians); the prisons (all Soviet prisoners were governed by a Jewish commissar); the entire news-publication and distribution machinery, including the censorship; and the essentially Talmudic system of ‘political commissars,’ through which the armed forces were kept under terrorist discipline.”(419) Reed adds Arthur Bliss Lane the US ambassador to Poland; and Major Tufton Beamish of the British Parliament who stated, “‘Many of the most powerful Communists in Eastern Europe are Jews…the large proportion of Jews to be found in the ranks of the Secret Police forces.’”(420) Balfour was once given a report from M. Oudendyke from the British Government’s White Paper of 1919 titled “Russia, No. 1, a Collection of Reports on Bolshevism,” which stated: “Bolshevism is organized and worked by Jews, who have no nationality and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the
existing order of things.” For the record, Oudendyke’s words were expunged from later editions of the official British publication. The US ambassador, David Francis, added: “The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to state a worldwide social revolution.”(273)
The Ploy of “Anti-Semitism”
At many junctures in the book Reed reminds us, “It was not a conspiracy of all Jews…the organizing force and the leadership were drawn from the Talmudic-controlled Jewish areas of Russia, and in that sense Communism was demonstrably Eastern Jewish.”(272) Reed then expresses the theme that runs throughout his whole treatise: “Such was the result, foretold by Disraeli, of the removal of Jewish disabilities and of a few decades of Jewish emancipation. The lowering of the barriers had not had the effect of amalgamating the Jews in the comity of peoples; its consequences had been to give ‘the most formidable sect’ freedom to work for the ruination of these people by revolution.”(173) In other words, the main problem is that these particular Jews did not want to assimilate and live peaceably with their Gentile neighbors, but instead they wore their plight on their sleeves in order to win sympathies so that they could make inroads, so that they can eventually rule – a theme that repeated itself over and over again. As La Civiltà Cattlolica noted in 1890, “…the cardinal point of Talmudism is the oppression and spoliation of the very peoples who extend hospitality to its disciples. Because of which St. Paul… characterized the Jews as displeasing God and hostile to all men [1Th 2:14-16].”15 To camouflage this process, Reed says, “During the 19th century the term ‘antisemitism’ was born. As ‘persecution’ could no longer be said to exist, some new word had to be found, capable of intimidating Gentiles and terrifying Jews….Presumably the authors of this term desired to keep such words as Jew, Jewish and anti-Jewish out of the public controversy and counted on intimidating the mass-mind by the introduction of an obscurantist word….The word ‘antisemitism’ was coined at the time when ‘men of Jewish race,’ as Disraeli and Bakunin pointed out, took over the direction of the world-revolution, and the main object of its invention was by intimidation to deter public discussion of that remarkable development.”
As proof, Reed offers the words of Jewish author Bernard Lazare: “This is what must separate the impartial historian from anti-Semitism. The anti-Semite says: ‘The Jew is the preparer, the machinator, the chief engineer of revolutions’; [but] the impartial historian confines himself to studying the part which the Jew, considering his spirit, his character, the nature of his philosophy, and his religion, may have taken in revolutionary processes and movements.” In other words, it would be anti-Semitic to say that the Jew incites revolution, but kosher to say that he just jumps on the bandwagon when he sees revolution occurring. Either way, Reed sees in Lazare the admission that revolution is the Talmudic Jew’s calling card. The Revolution has one purpose: to supersede Christianity as the politico-religious framework for the rest of the world.
Reed is careful to point out, “when the Jewish direction of the world-revolution became discernible by the middle of the [nineteenth] century it was a direction by the Ashkenazic Jews” while the “Sephardic Jews were in the mass strongly opposed to it” such that “the Eastern Jews at that moment emerged as a distinct body, mobilized by the rabbinical government for action against the emancipated Sephardic Jews of the West and against the West itself.” As Reed sees it, it is the Ashkenazic Jews who are the real deceivers – depicting themselves as “being the victims of a cruel ‘antisemitic’ persecution which wantonly denied them emancipation” yet, citing Chaim Weizmann, the “Ashkenazim were inspired to obstruct emancipation by every possible device (including assassination in the last resort) while the story of their persecution was hammered, as an intimidatory warning, into the consciousness of the Western Jews and, as a rightful claim of succor, into that of the Christian West.”
Almost as if Reed had torn a page out of 2012’s headlines, he writes that during the late 1800s and early 1900s, “Gentile politicians of the West presented these fictions [i.e., persecuted Jews seeking to be emancipated] to their peoples as truth, for they found that powerful Jews, in all countries, were able to assist parties favored by them with money, press support and votes; the return they required was support for the cause of the ‘persecuted’ Jews in Russia and for the return to Palestine.”(176-77) By this process Reed concludes that the Ashkenazim dominated the Sephardics such that “nearly all Jews have now been declared to be Ashkenazim” wherein “the regime of rabbis in the East was nearly absolute and the ghettoized communities obeyed their commands, as God-empowered lawgivers and magistrates, in every act of daily life.”
Reed says there developed a “threefold purpose of the grand design…First, through revolution the process of emancipation (and therewith of Jewish assimilation in the West) might be reversed and the supremacy of the ruling sect in Jewry maintained. Second, through revolution vengeance might be taken on Christendom for the expulsion from Spain, or perhaps for the existence of Christendom (for that is the affront to which the Talmud is in effect the answer). Third, revolution would promote the fulfillment of The Law, which ordained the ruination of the heathen and the triumph of the Chosen People.” As Reed concludes: “…the Gentile rulers were forced by the threat of revolution from below to yield even more authority, until they fell; in their dealings with foreign countries, and in the wars to which these led, they were constrained by the power of the purse to support the plan of the symbolic ‘return’ to Palestine…Zionism was the force that was set in movement to achieve ‘the return’ and lay the foundations of the supreme Nation-State in Palestine. This, the force of domination, at every stage in the process of the last hundred years kept step with the force of revolution, and neither could have achieved what it did achieve without the other….The Gentile often asks why men of wealth should promote revolution. Disraeli put the same question, in order to give the answer: they wish to destroy Christianity.
He knew precisely what he meant: to the Gentile the answer may be made more comprehensible by saying that they obey the Talmudic Law, which requires the destruction of heathen nation-states as the prelude to the triumphant ‘return.’”(180-1)
The Theological Dimensions
Although Reed is a journalist not a theologian, he has an uncanny grasp of how religion is at the root of the twists and turns in history. On the one hand, he says that it was in the “second half of the last century [the 19th century] when Communism and Zionism began their simultaneous assault on the West.” Reed says that Chaim Weizmann’s book is the best single fount of information about the twin roots of Communism and Zionism and their convergent purpose.”(193) But with this insight into the double helix of Jewish revolution, Reed also saw the apocalyptic ramifications better than any Catholic cleric or TV evangelist today. Thus he says, “The eighteen Christian centuries which, despite ups and downs showed a total sum of human betterment greater than that of any earlier time known to man, were coming either to an end or an interregnum.” He then speaks of “one eminent man of that period…foresaw what was to come in our century and thought it would be the end, not a transient Dark Age. This was Henry Edward Manning, the English clergyman who was converted to Rome, became Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster” who, with “Disraeli, Bakunin and others…warned against the Jewish usurpation…and the coming of Zionism.” Like Disraeli, Manning spoke of the “secret societies…the existence of which men laugh at and deny.” Manning expected “the full success of Weishaupt’s original plan and thought the time in which he lived was ‘the prelude of the anti-Christian period of the final dethronement of Christendom and of the restoration of society without God in the world.’”
Reed adds his own observations that “today the anti-Christian revolution holds temporal power in half of Europe, the Christian cross has been expunged from the flags of all great European nations…and a ‘society without God’ has been set up as a potential world-government.” So, while the previous 18 centuries under the Christian banner “appeared to be slowly moving towards an improving future” it was the “Talmudic areas of Russia” in which “Zionism joined Communism as the second of the two forces which were to intercept that process.” As Reed sees it, “Communism was designed to subvert the masses…Zionism set out to subvert rulers at the top.” It was successful because “neither force could have moved forward without the other, for rulers of unimpaired authority would have checked the revolution as it had been checked in 1848” (192-3).
Today in 2012, what Reed saw has turned much worse. Over 75% of Europe is non-Christian, causing Pope Benedict XVI to coin the phrase “silent apostasy” to describe it. Filling the vacuum is a massive Muslim population in Europe among the middle and lower classes, and a Jewish/Zionist dominance in the governments and upper classes, noted especially in the fact that it is now a crime to question the “holocaust” in fourteen countries of Europe.16 In fact, just as Christianity had the Inquisition to quell
dissent, Reed says the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) “has imposed the law of heresy on the public debate in America,” and in some countries imprisons anyone who dares to question the doctrines of Zionism. Whereas Catholic bishops in the US prior to Vatican II wielded great power in boycotting the smut produced by Jewish-run Hollywood, the ADL would answer, in turn, by putting pressure on producers to ban “the film Oliver Twist” as well as “The Merchant of Venice,” and in fact “Dickens, Chaucer, Belloc and Chesterton were blacklisted and called ‘literary Jew-baiters.’” The reversal of fortunes is uncanny, and the Vatican is not only capitulating but pandering to it. Cardinal Schoenborn now says that anti-Zionism is anti-semitism (which is a sin for Catholics) and that “We sinners of the past are called to become the allies of the future and stand faithfully by our Jewish friends.”17 Archbishop Timothy Dolan recently met with the ADL at their annual meeting.18 Pope Benedict, when performing the Stations of the Cross, makes mention of Jews killed by Hitler.19 When 60 years ago we heard David ben Gurion saying in 1952: “Jerusalem is the capital of the world no less than the capital of Israel,”(341-3) as well as his astounding 1962 interview with Look magazine in which he said: “All continents will become unified in a world alliance, at whose disposal will be an international police force. All armies will be abolished, and there will be no more war. In Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will build a shrine of the prophets to serve the federated union of all continents. This will be the seat of the Supreme Court of mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah,”20 we now read of the Vatican calling for a “world political authority” and “central world bank,”21 wording taken from Pope Benedict XVI’s encyclical Caritas in Veritate of July 2009. John Paul II had similar notions about a one world government, and shared them with Mikhail Gorbachev.22 Although in some respects Benedict XVI is trying to help the poor and downtrodden, in other respects he is playing right into the hands of the power-brokers. It is almost a surety that any centralized financial and political authority would be organized around the reigning Zionist institutions, such as the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and the Federal Reserve System. If anyone has the naïve notion that the Jewish banking cartel begun by the Rothschilds, Warburgs, Kahns & Schiffs, and is now perpetuated by Goldman Sachs (run by Jewish Zionists, Lloyd Blankfein and Gary Cohn)23 and the Jewish-run Federal Reserve (headed by Jewish financiers Benjamin Shalom Bernanke, Alan Greenspan as chairmen, and Donald Kohn and Janet Yellen, as vice-chairmen) and the Jewish-run Securities and Exchange Commission (run by Jewess Mary L. Shapiro), are going to suddenly relinquish all that they have striven to achieve in the past 150 years when they are on the brink of realizing their Deuteronimic quest for global domination, they are not living in reality. This group won’t even allow themselves to be audited by the US Congress, much less give up their monetary power.
To get a sense of the chutzpah these Jewish Zionists have, when Jim Leherer of PBS interviewed Alan Greenspan and asked: “What should be the proper relationship between a chairman of the Fed and the president of the United States?” Greenspan replied: “Well, first of all, the Federal Reserve is an independent agency, and that means basically that there is no other agency of government which can overrule actions that we take.” Notice that Greenspan didn’t say something cordial like, “Oh, it should
be a good mutual relationship in which we work together for the betterment of the nation.” Greenspan took the opportunity to lay down the gauntlet and declare that he could do whatever he pleased. This chutzpah is precisely why the Federal Reserve, without any debate in Congress, recently made off- balance-sheet disbursements of trillions of dollars of American taxpayer money to bail out the mostly Jewish bankers (who used our money which they acquired by fractional-reserve banking) to play financial roulette with ‘credit default swaps’ and ‘collateralized debt obligations’ prior to the 2008 economic meltdown.24
Meanwhile, both the Vatican and Israel have committed inordinate sins in the last 50 years that cry out to high heaven for God’s justice, sins He will answer, according to Cardinal Manning, by His giving of “strong delusion so that they believe what is false” (2Th 2:11) and which He allows to be carried out by the Antichrist who will also “make war with the saints and to overcome them; and authority over every tribe and people and tongue and nation was given to him” (Ap 13:7). As such, Manning was quite candid about the role the Zionists play in this usurpation of Christianity. Reed quotes him saying, “‘Those who have lost faith in the Incarnation, such as humanitarians, rationalists and pantheists, may well be deceived by any person of great political power and success, who should restore the Jews to their own land…”
Hand in hand with this restoration of Israel, Reed says Manning “expected the personal coming of Antichrist in the form of a Jew…and he related Saint Paul’s message to the Thessalonians 2:1-11, to the coming time, saying ‘It is a law of Holy Scripture that when persons are prophesied of, persons appear.’” Although Cardinal Manning attributed the Communist/Zionist threat to the releasing of the Antichrist, we should note also that St. Paul specified “the apostasy comes first.” Putting the two together, we can
conclude that the “apostasy” is the very reason the last seven popes have not performed the consecration of Russia. In 1917, reminiscent of Joseph’s dream to flee to Egypt to escape Herod, heaven intruded to warn the Church of the very place this atheistic entanglement had given birth – Russia. The Church was given the means to stop this juggernaut by consecrating Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
Unfortunately, each pope failed to perform this simple task, and thus the warning from heaven played itself out in the remainder of the 20th century: “If My requests are not granted…the good will be martyred…nations will be annihilated…Russia will spread its errors throughout the world, fomenting wars and persecutions against the Church.” The consecration of Russia was the only cure heaven offered to stop the Communist/Zionist threat in its tracks, but the Catholic Church refused to listen to heaven.
During that time, the Russia/Zionist threat has metastasized into a Global/Zionist juggernaut that is even beyond the fears of Douglas Reed, which is why Our Lady also said that “the Holy Father would eventually perform the consecration, but it would be too late.” The Communists and Zionists started their assault in the late 1800s and early 1900s and continued thereafter. By the time we reach Joseph Stalin’s death in 1953, a man who Reed says “probably caused the death and enslavement of more human beings than any other in history, had to some seemed endless, like the uncoiling of the serpent,” we are getting a full taste of exactly what heaven meant when it warned of Russia’s “errors.” As an aside, Reed offers a good reason why he believes Stalin was assassinated by Jewish conspirators. “A few days before he died Stalin prompted the Red Star to state that the struggle against Zionism ‘had nothing to do with anti-semitism; Zionism is the enemy of the working people all over the world, of Jews no less than Gentiles.’”(497) Reed mentions “a notable American correspondent in Moscow, Mr. Harrison Salisbury, who wrote that after it Russia was ruled by a group or junta ‘more dangerous than Stalin,’ consisting of Messrs. Malenkov, Molotov, Bulganin and Kaganovich.”(495) La Civiltà Cattlolica reported that “the Jewish Bolsheviks like Kaganovich had liquidated the 10 million Christian families in the Ukraine.”25
Reed reiterates that while a good portion of western Jews had been reasonably assimilated into Gentile culture, “Zionism was essentially the rejoinder of the Talmudic centre in Russia to the emancipation of the Jews in the West” to the point that Zionism decided that “they must not involve themselves in mankind but must remain apart.” Things have not changed much today. A majority of Jews today of both the east and west deplore the tribalism and superiority inherent in Zionism, while the Zionists seek to entice them to join their crusade by appeals to Jews being the “Chosen People” destined to rule the world.
Reed adds that “never since Babylon had the ruling sect ventured to play this card. It can never be played again, if the present attempt ultimately ends in a fiasco. For that reason the Talmudists ever refrained from playing it, and only did this when emancipation confronted them with a vital emergency – the loss of their power over Jewry.” Of course, Israel’s alternative if this final plan doesn’t work is the Samson Option. Once their treachery is exposed and there is no escape, Israel will opt to bring down with her as many as she can (and some in Israel have already made it known that their ICBMs can reach to the borders of Europe). As Reed puts it, “the ‘policy’ has been ‘settled’ and cannot be altered.”(361) As the world entered the 20th century, Reed says, “A book by a Jew on being a human being among other human beings was by the mid-century rare. The accumulation of literature of incitement and hatred…and the virtual suppression of objection to it as ‘anti-semitism,’ gives the 20th century its distinctive character; it is the age of Talmudic chauvinism and Talmudic imperialism. Our present situation was told to us nearly a hundred years ago by a German, Wilhelm Marr” who at one time had helped in the 1848 Jewish revolution but later “became aware of the true nature” of the movement and predicted the Jewish Bolshevik revolution of 1917 four decades before it occurred. Marr wrote in 1879: “The advent of Jewish imperialism, I am firmly convinced, is only a question of time…. The empire of the world belongs to the Jews…Woe to the conquered!...I am quite certain that before four generations have passed there will not be a single function in the State, the highest included, which will not be in the hands of the Jews….Judaism will find the fulcrum of Archimedes which will enable it to drag the whole of Western Europe off its hinges once for all. The Jewish spirit of intrigue will bring about a revolution in Russia such as the world has never yet seen.”(485)
Balfour, Churchill and the Zionist Cabal
Reed goes into great depth about the mechanics of how all this was accomplished. “In 1903 the British government had offered Uganda to Zionism,” which Reed says Theodore Herzl was ready to accept, but “in 1906 Arthur Balfour, Prime Minister of England, met Dr. Weizmann in a hotel room and was captivated by the notion of presenting Palestine, which was not his to give, to ‘the Jews’….but at no time, as far as the annals disclose, did he give thought to the native inhabitants of Palestine, whose
expulsion into the wilderness he was to cause.”(226-7) Balfour suffered from the same hermeneutical disease that most evangelical and fundamentalist Protestants, as well as many Neo-Con Catholics, suffer today. Oliver Lampson, a member of Parliament, stated the party line: “Winston [Churchill], Lloyd George, Balfour and I were brought up vigorous Protestants who believe in the coming of a new Savior when Palestine returns to Jews.”(245) Lloyd George, as recorded by Rabbi Wise, liked to tell the
Jews, “‘You shall have Palestine from Dan to Beersheba’ and thus to present himself as an instrument of divine will.” Otherwise known as “Millennialism,” this is the belief among most evangelical Protestants, courtesy of John Darby and the 1909 Scofield Reference Bible which took a decidedly anti-Augustinian view of Scripture and proclaimed that Israel was the crux of God’s plans for the world and that the Church was a mere “parenthesis,” going so far as to state in its commentary of Genesis 12:3 of the 1967 edition that not being favorable to the Jews was the sin of “anti-semitism” and punishable by God’s judgment. As Reed notes, “The menace was always implicitly the same:
‘Persecute men if you will, but you will be destroyed if you oppose the Jews.’”(499) The irony of evangelical enthusiasm for Israel is that the favor is not often returned by the Zionists. The most prominent Jewish leader of that day, Chaim Weizmann, said it best when “he wrote to Lady Crewe, ‘We hate equally anti-semites and philo-semites,’”(286) or as Reed later puts it: “the philo-semites in high places whom Dr. Weizmann hated while he used them.”(291) The Commissar for Public Instruction in
Russia, Lunatscharsky, stated: “‘We hate Christianity and Christians; even the best of them must be looked upon as our worst neighbors. They preach the love of our neighbors and mercy, which is contrary to our principles. Down with the love of our neighbor; what we want is hatred. We must learn how to hate and it is only then that we shall conquer the world.’” Reed adds, “This is but one specimen of an entire literature of that period.”(417) This sentiment, according to Taradal and Raggi in La Segregazione amichevole, is echoed by La Civiltà Cattlolica when it described Judaism as the “demonic antitype to Christianity” such that “if the foundation of Christianity is love of neighbor, the foundation of Judaism can only be hatred elevated to a supreme religious precept.”26 In the end, to purebred Zionists, Gentile enthusiasts for the favor of Israel are merely spiritual parasites that can, and will be, escorted off the reservation no later than anti-semites if and when the Zionists come to full power, including such lapdogs as John Hagee, the evangelical Zionist who is calling for a preemptive strike against Iran.27 La Civiltà saw this scenario as far back as the 1868 Romanian manifesto: “Concerning gratitude towards the peoples who shelter them, the Israelites regard themselves as absolved, since they believe them to be usurpers. Just to the contrary, they use every sort of means in order to gain supremacy over them, of which they believe to have been assured by the Old Testament. The time they pass within the bosom of other people is for them, so to speak, a time of penance, punishment and exile; and the inhabitants of the countries harboring them pass for enemies which, as soon as the promised hour of universal Jewish dominion over the world will have come, are to be subjugated.”28
As it went, Balfour wrote a letter to Lord Rothschild on November 2, 1917, telling him of England’s plan to move the Jews to Palestine, hoping that the Rothschild name would “impress Western Jewry in general, and divert attention from the Eastern Jewish origins of Zionism,” and the letter, after it was enhanced by Weizmann, Brandeis and Rabbi Wise, became known as “the Balfour Declaration.”(269, 299)
The letter stated: “I have much pleasure in conveying to you…the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet…the establishment of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of the existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine…” But Balfour’s true intentions were made clearer in a memorandum he wrote on August 11, 1919 stating: “For in Palestine we do not propose to go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants….The four great powers are committed to Zionism, and Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is rooted in age-long tradition, in present needs, in future hopes, of far profounder import than the desires and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land.”29 Balfour and the Zionists received some opposition from Louis Brandies who, upon a visit to Israel, was dissuaded against immigrating Jews to Israel and concluded that “the World Zionist Organization should be greatly reduced, if not abolished…but Zionists from Russia overthrew Mr. Brandeis as easily as Dr. [Theodore] Herzl in 1903-4.” Lord Northcliffe, editor of The London Times, also voiced concern saying, “‘We, without sufficient thought, guaranteed Palestine as a home for the Jews despite the fact that 700,000 Arab Moslems live there and own it’ and sought to write an article critical of Balfour’s attitude towards Zionism” having already published a critical “article about the Protocols in The Times.”(296)
Immediately thereafter a campaign of character assassination was waged against Northcliffe, including the fact that he was “going mad,” and “Northcliffe was convinced that his life was in danger and several times said this: specifically, he said he had been poisoned.” Likewise, Churchill wasn’t so sure what he got himself into, and his reservations were of a more sinister note. On February 8, 1920 he wrote an article for the Illustrated Sunday Herald which revealed one of the most astounding perspectives on the Jewish question ever uttered: “It would almost seem as if the gospel of Christ and the gospel of anti-Christ were designed to originate among the same people; and that this mystic and mysterious race had been chosen for the supreme manifestations, both of the divine and the diabolical….From the days of ‘Spartacus Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (German) and Emma Goldman (United States), this worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence and impossible equality, has been steadily growing….It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the nineteenth century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire. There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others.”
What is probably even more amazing considering the degree of Zionist onslaught on modern society is Reed’s ending note on Churchill’s letter: “This is the last candid statement (discoverable by me) from a leading public man on this question. After it the ban on public discussion came down and the great silence ensued, which continues to this day.” Proof of this came when Churchill “refused permission (requisite under English law) for a photostat to be made of this article, without saying why.”(272-3) As Reed notes: “Mr. Churchill’s political fortunes took a sudden turn for the better and his attitude toward Zionism appears to have had much to do with this” so much so “that a Zionist speaker said any Jew who voted against him was a traitor.” When Weizmann said “after the war we should want to build up a state of three or four million Jews in Palestine,” Churchill replied “Yes, indeed, I quite agree with that,” but twelve months earlier Churchill had called for “solemn assurance” to the Arabs that Zionist immigration would be regulated and restricted.” When Weizmann increased the Zionist army to 50,000 men “‘for the…greatest possible number of Jews in Palestine for the fighting services,’ Mr. Churchill “consented to the program.”(330-4) Churchill said much the same about the Germans in a July 26, 1944 letter to Weizmann: “‘I like the idea of the Jews trying to get at the murderers of their fellow-countrymen in Central Europe and I think it would give a great deal of satisfaction in the United States. I believe it is the wish of the Jews themselves to fight the Germans everywhere.’”(424)
Typical of how the Zionists operated with their Gentile counterparts is seen in Churchill’s next reversal of fortune, as Reed notes: “Mr. Churchill had gone far in ‘arming the Jews’ and in privately committing himself to Zionism, but not far enough for Dr. Weizmann.” With “control of the press virtually complete… Zionist propaganda at the election turned solidly against Mr. Churchill” for it had been advocating “‘hostile action’ against the Arabs (‘the Arabs should be encouraged to move out as the Jews move in’”) after which “Dr. Weizmann says that the Socialist victory (and Mr. Churchill’s ‘dismissal’) ‘delighted all liberal elements.’ This was the requital for Mr. Churchill’s forty years of support for Zionism,” that is, “he had not actually ordered British troops to clear Palestine of Arabs.”(430) When Ernest Bevin (whom Reed considers “the greatest man produced in British political life”) told Weizmann that he “would not be coerced or coaxed” into using force against the Arabs, Weizmann went to work “to destroy Mr. Bevin, on whose head, for the next two years, a worldwide campaign was turned. It was concentric, synchronized and of tremendous force,” with the ADL inventing a new term for antisemitism, “Bevinism,” subsequently using “Mr. Truman to undo Mr. Bevin’s efforts” and thereby showing that “an American president publicly supported ‘hostile action’ against the Arabs,” such that “the 1946 Zionist Congress (composed chiefly of Jews from Palestine) joyfully recorded this new ‘pledge.’”(432-3) The same happened in 1949 to James Forrestal, US Secretary of Defense. When Forrestal told Secretary of State George Marshall that “a large body of Jews ‘hold the view that the present zeal of the Zionists can have most dangerous consequences,’” the Zionist smear campaign went to work and convinced the public that he was “insane, a coward who had left his wife to be attacked by a burglar, a tax defaulter, and all manner of other things” and “President Truman…on March 21 sent for Mr. Forrestal and demanded his immediate resignation, without explanation, to be effective May 1.” By this time Forrestal “had been so reduced by this persecution that…a few weeks later he threw himself from a high window…on May 21.”(447)
Woodrow Wilson and the Zionist Cabal
The Zionist use and abuse of Churchill mirrored that of the US Presidents. According to Reed’s accounting, Woodrow Wilson was little more than a puppet of the Zionist machine. Wilson allowed the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913, which was basically a Jewish banking cartel devised, at the behest of Lord Rothschild, at Jekyll Island off the Carolinas by seven of the world’s richest men.
Wilson also introduced the Federal income tax to pay back, with usury, the money created out of thin air by the Federal Reserve,30 two deeds that it is said Wilson later regretted with the words “I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country,” and later “We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated, governments in the civilized world—no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men….Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”31
By 1947 when Israel received its charter from the UN, everyone recognized, as noted by the Egyptian Prime Minister, ‘the extent of Jewish economic power, since it controlled the economic systems of many countries, including the United States, England, France, Egypt itself and perhaps even Sweden.’”(460-1) The only future attempt to deal with Wilson’s sell out was John F. Kennedy’s signing of Executive Order 11110 on June 4, 1963 so that the US government could “issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury,” without need of the Federal Reserve, but this was too little too late and was never implemented. In the most recent instance of someone trying to replace US fiat money, his country was raided and he was killed with an army that was paid for by the fiat money. His name was Moammar Gadhafi.32
The power behind Wilson was Edward Mandell House, popularly known as Colonel House, with his middle name given by his father in honor of a Jewish merchant in Houston. As Reed sees it, “Mr. House did not guide American State policy, but deflected it towards Zionism, the support of the world-revolution and the promotion of the world-government.”(232) House worked with the leading American Zionist, Rabbi Stephen Wise, “and the strength of this secret group is shown by the fact that in 1910, when Mr. House had privately decided that Mr. Wilson should be the next president, Rabbi Wise publicly proclaimed that he would be that, and for two terms,” with Wise adding, “House not only made our cause the object of his very special concern but served as liaison officer between the Wilson administration and the Zionist movement.” “House chose the president’s cabinet officers so that one of them had to introduce himself to Mr. Wilson thus: ‘My name is Land, Mr. President, I believe I am the Secretary of the Interior.’ The president…was frequently seen to visit a small apartment in East 35st New York, where Mr. House lived…Mr. House was often in Washington, where he conducted the president’s interviews and correspondence, and, stopping cabinet officers outside the cabinet room, instructed them what to say inside it.”(261) House was so powerful that “the Democratic party was in fact to owe its victories in 1912 and 1916, as well as President Roosevelt’s and President Truman’s victories in 1932, 1936, 1940, 1944, and 1948 to the application of Mr. House’s plan.” In fact, House published his “plan” in 1912, writing a novel titled Philip Dru: Administrator, an “allusion in the Protocols to ‘The Administrators whom we shall choose,’” with Reed concluding, “The chapter entitled ‘The Making of a President,’ which is obviously not fiction, makes this almost unreadable novel a historical document of the first importance.”(235) The hero, Philip Dru, a young West Pointer under the influence of Karl Marx, assembles an army and marches on Washington and proclaims himself “Administrator of the Republic” with his first major act being the creation of “a graduated income tax exempting no income whatsoever,” reminiscent of the “Communist Manifesto’s heavy progressive or graduated income tax” as well as “the Protocols progressive tax on property.”(238) La Civiltà Cattolica notes a Jewish rabbi in the 1890s who had already figured this out. Speaking to his fellow Jews the rabbi said: “Under pretext of aiding the masses of workers, we must excessively tax the estates of the big landowners and as soon as their property [through usury] will have been transferred to us, the Christian proletarians’ labor will totally fall to our advantage.”33
Reed concludes that Wilson “was promoted [by House and Wise] to make public obeisance to Zionism” upon which “Mr. Wilson, under coaching for the campaign, made a speech on ‘The rights of the Jews, in which he said ‘I am not here to express our sympathy with our Jewish fellowcitizens but to make evident our sense of identity with them. This is not their cause; it is America’s.”(240) House was coordinating the Zionist machine with the Jewish “presidential advisor” Bernard Baruch; the Jewish jurist Louis Brandeis “who had decided to ‘give his life’ for Zionism”; and Rabbi Stephen Wise, all of which were directing Wilson’s actions to the point in which Wilson “promised not to act independently” of them(241), but, to his credit, Wilson complained that “the government of the Republic should have got so far out of the hands of the people; should have been captured by interests which are special and not general.”(283) Reed adds: “From this moment the powergroups in America and England worked in perfect synchronization…coordinated their actions at the prompting of the inter-communicating Zionists on both sides of the ocean.”(264)
Reed also goes into some detail about the League of Nations under Wilson. The impetus for the League began “in 1917 when the two kindred forces from Russia, revolutionary-Communism and revolutionary Zionism” wanted a “‘federation of the world’ to take over ‘the management of human affairs’ and to rule by force.” House gave a “sales-talk” to Wilson and thereby camouflaged the League as merely “some plan by which the peace of the world may be maintained.” Then “by 1916 Mr. House had instructed Mr. Wilson as to his duty and in May the president publicly announced support for ‘the plan’ at a meeting of a new body candidly called ‘The League to Enforce Peace,’” but according to House’s private papers Wilson didn’t know its true nature. Since some Americans balked at the use of “force,” the name was changed to “The League of Nations,” but it sought to “transfer control of national armies to some supernational committee.” By April 1917, Wilson referred to the plan as “a new international order.” By 1919 “the authority of this ‘League of Nations’ was used to cover the use of British troops as a bodyguard for the Zionists intending to seize Palestine.”(290)
The history of the Woodrow Wilson presidency allows us to see how strong, how early and how pervasive the Zionist influence was on American politics. Seeing these ‘behind the scenes’ manipulations of early American presidents will allow us to get a feel for how the same manipulation happens in our day. John F. Kennedy was the last president that was rather unmoved by Zionist ambition, having told David ben Gurion that the United States would not be party to giving nuclear bombs to Israel. Lyndon Johnson reversed every one of Kennedy’s restrictions on US/Israeli relations, and was the man at the top who gave the orders to abandon the USS Liberty when it was maliciously attacked by Israel in 1967.34
By the time we get to the Clinton and Bush years, the Israeli influence in the US government makes Wilson’s capitulation seem mild by comparison, and we see Reed’s predictions come true. Whereas three out of four Wilson advisors were Jewish (House being the fourth), five out of seven for Clinton were Jewish, 35 and almost his entire cabinet was Jewish.36 George Bush (II) was also surrounded by Jewish advisors, especially in military-related issues,37 and Barrak Obama merely continues the trend,38 as did John McCain, and as will Mitt Romney, Rick Perry, Michele Bachmann and Herman Cain, if elected.39
Obama had the dubious distinction of having Rahm Emanuel, former Clinton advisor, as his White House Chief of Staff. Emanuel is a dual citizen of Israel who served in the Gulf War of 1991 on the side of Israel, and who is the son of a known Zionist terrorist, Benjamin Emanuel, a member of the Israeli assassin team in 1948 that murdered Sweden’s Count Bernadotte, the envoy of the United Nations who sought a solution to the UN Partition Plan. Upon hearing of his son’s advancement, Benjamin is quoted
by the Jerusalem Post: “Obviously he will influence the president to be pro-Israel. Why wouldn’t he be? What is he, an Arab? He’s not going to clean the floors of the White House.” The late Sherman Skolnick of Chicago called Rahm Emanuel the “Acting Deputy Chief for North America of the Mossad – Israeli Intelligence.”40 Regarding Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, after privately hearing French president Sarkozy call Netanyahu “a liar,” Obama himself added to Sarkozy that he had to “deal with him every day.”41
The stranglehold that Jews have on the American economy and foreign policy is unprecedented for an ethnic population that is only 3% of the nation.42 But even though the Zionists control the major media channels, they cannot stop the flow of information the Internet provides, and thus more and more Americans, and the world itself, are becoming wise to what Reed warned about 60 years ago in his book.
From Mearsheimer and Walt’s 2006 article on the power of the Israeli lobby to direct US foreign policy, to the candid thoughts of White House reporter Helen Thomas,44 to the brave LA school teacher, Patricia McAllister, who pinpointed “Zionist Jews who run the Federal Reserve that is not controlled by the US government” as one of the major causes for this country’s woes45 (all of whom were called “anti-semitic” by the ADL) people are beginning to wake up. Of course, some of the founders of the America, such as George Washington and Benjamin Franklin, warned of this problem two centuries ago,46 as did Jewish converts to Catholicism, such as the Lémann brothers who wrote: “O Israelites of Rome, we know the attitudes of our people. If you were given the property rights you wish, we wager that thirty, or at most fifty years hence, Rome would no longer belong to the Catholic Christians but be in your hands.”47
The ADL Cabal
No doubt, 1913 was a pivotal year for the Zionists, for they gained control of the US banking system and pushed through the 16th Amendment to ensure that the Jewish bankers would be paid usury on the money they would create from thin air, an act which Reed says, “Mr. House had caused President Wilson to write into the American Constitution the chief destructive measure proposed in Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto of 1848.”(314) To complete the trifecta, the ADL was instituted in 1913 – the Zionist socialpolice force employed to intimidate anyone who would balk at the banking cartel, ostracizing them as “anti-semitic,” a label that would be publicized by the Jewish Sulzberger family who owned The New York Times and who were the founding members in the late 1800s of B’nai B’rith (Hebrew for: “Children of the Covenant”), the parent of the ADL. As Reed puts it: “The little offshoot of 1913, the ‘Anti-Defamation League,’ had by 1947 become a secret police of formidable power in America. In Doublespeak, ‘anti-defamation’ means ‘defamation’ and this body lived by calumny, using such terms as anti-semite, fascist, rabble-rouser, Jew-baiter, Red-baiter, paranoiac, lunatic, madman, reactionary, diehard, bigot and more of the like….In 1933, Mr. Bernard J Brown wrote, ‘Through the intervention of the ADL we have succeeded in muzzling the non-Jewish press.’ In 1948 the Jewish Menorah Journal wrote, ‘Should but one phrase in a reprinted literary classic reflect unjustly upon Jews, the ADL will promptly belabor the innocent publisher until he bowdlerizes the offending passage. Let one innocent movie-producer incorporate a Jewish prototype, however inoffensive…the ADL will make him wish he’s never heard of Jews…No criticism of Zionism or the world-government plan is allowed to pass without virulent attack….America has today a few surviving writers who fight on for independent debate and comment. They will discuss any public matter, in the light of traditional American policy and interest, save Zionism, which hardly any of them will touch. I have discussed this with four of the leading ones, who all gave the same answer: it could not be done. The employed ones would lose their posts, if they made the attempt. The independent ones would find no publisher for their books…” In words reminiscent of today’s Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the Menorah Journal itself admitted in an article titled “Anti-Defamation Hysteria” that ‘fighting anti-semitism has been built up into a big business’ with the objective of ‘continuing to beat the anti-semitic drum’ and ‘to scare the pants off prospective contributors’ in order to raise funds,’ including ‘blackmail’ against fellow Jews, with the conclusion that American Jews were being ‘stampeded into a state of mass-hysteria by their self-styled defenders.’….As Dr. Weizmann said: ‘the technique of propaganda and the approach to the masses’ is an ancient, Asiatic art and was described on a famous occasion by St. Matthew: ‘the chief priests and elders persuaded the multitude…the chief priests moved the people.’”
The fervor of the ADL was supported by other publications, beginning with Max Nordau’s Degeneration in 1895 and Theodore Kaufmann’s Germany Must Perish in 1941 which perpetuated “Talmudic chauvinism,” and others such as William Zukerman’s article, “Raising the Hair of the Jewish People” in 1950 so as “to keep Jews constantly on edge with the scare of anti-semitism,”48 as well as Meyer Levine’s 1949 In Search asserting “Jewishness” as the motive for Zionistic superiority and the conquering of Gentiles.(480-7) Even Karl Stern’s 1951 conversion story to Catholicism, Pillar of Fire, contained remnants of Jewish racism. As Stern continued to speak of “the great Jewish catastrophe” that was suffered during WWII, Reed remarks that Stern “was offended by reading in a Catholic paper the statement that so many members of the crew of a sunken British submarine were ‘Catholics,’ saying, ‘I do not understand why anyone would care for such statistics.’”(488-9) Jewish converts today act much the same – there remains in their mind a pride about being Jewish, despite the fact that St. Paul shuns such spiritual racism. Some, like Roy Schoeman and David Moss, believe that God has centered the whole eschaton around the Jewish people and the nation of Israel, claiming that even the Fathers of the Catholic Church and two thousand years of Catholic tradition were in error in not seeing this truth.49 Sometimes there are exceptions, such as Jewish convert Ratisbonne’s admission, as reported by La Civiltà Cattlolica, that “the Jews’ evil is that they don’t understand to open their eyes to recognize the true causes of the persecution inflicted on them in all centuries and without peer in history.”50 In any case, Zukerman probably made one of the most astute realizations recorded in Reed’s entire book: “‘The generally accepted theory that the emergence of the state of Israel would serve to unify and cement the Jewish people has turned out to be wrong. On the contrary, the Zionist Congress in Jerusalem, 1951, has dramatically demonstrated that the creation of a Jewish political state after two thousand years has introduced a new and potent distinction which Jews as a group have not known in centuries and that Israel is likely to separate rather than unite Jews in the future.’”(512) But
Reed says something even more astute. Commenting on Churchill being viewed as “‘an old student of the Bible who knows very well that the Zionist aspirations remain unfulfilled until Israel is fully restored within the historic boundaries, the land of the Ten Tribes,’” Reed warns: “If the West, as these words implied, was secretly harnessed to the unqualified ‘fulfillment of Zionist aspirations,’ that could only mean a greater war than the West had yet endured, in which its armies would play the parts of pawns in a ruinous game, for the purpose of dividing the Christian peoples, crushing the Muslim ones, setting up the Zionist empire, and thereafter acting as its janissaries. In this great gamble, Jews everywhere in the world, on whatever side of the apparent fighting line, would be expected under the ‘law of the return’ to act in the overriding interest of Zion.”(516) As it stands today, after dismantling Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya, the US/Israel coalition is now considering a preemptive attack on Iran (claiming that Iran is using nuclear power to make bombs instead of energy, as if either are anyone’s business but Iran’s).
Meanwhile, Israel is the only nation in the Middle East “allowed” to have nuclear weapons (yet without ever being inspected by the International Atomic Energy Agency). According to General Wesley Clark there is a “policy coup” forced upon American policy by the Project for the New American Century (with Clark naming the Jewish hawks, such as Wolfowitz, Pearle and Kristol in cahoots with Cheney and Rumsfeld) that has an agenda of “destroying the governments of seven nations” in the Middle East; all “without telling the rest of us.”51
Reed notes that “The ADL and the American Jewish Committee” (the latter of which Rabbi David Rosen is the current president and who recently attended Assisi III put on by Pope Benedict), “‘set out to make the American people aware of anti-semitism.’ It informed Jews that ‘25 out of every 100 Americans are infected with anti-semitism,’ and that another 50 might develop the disease. By 1945 it was carrying out ‘a high-powered educational program geared to reach every man, woman and child’ in America through the press, radio, advertising, children’s comic books and school books, lectures, films, churches and trade unions. This program included ‘219 broadcasts a day,’ full-page advertisements in 397 newspapers, poster advertising in 130 cities, and ‘persuasions’ subtly incorporated in the printed matter on blotters, matchbox covers, and envelopes. The entire national press (‘1900 dailies with a 43,000,000 circulation’) and the provincial, Negro, foreign-language and labor newspapers were kept supplied with ‘and used’ its material in the form of ‘news, background material, cartoons and comic strips,’…and the name of the body [the ADL] which supplied this mass of suggestive material never reached the public.”(340-4) By the end of WWII, “one of the first acts of the Allied High Commission was to enact a law ‘against anti-semitism,’ thus they extended to the West the law which identified the nature of the first Bolshevist administration in Russia…introduced on July 27, 1918.” In 1955, “a western German law…made it an offence ‘to utter anti-semitic remarks or be unduly prejudiced against Jews.’”(403)
Again, very similar to the tactics of the SPLC today, Reed notes that “‘Mr. Martin Dies once described the ADL…as ‘a terrorist organization, using its resources, not to defend the good name of Jews, but to force and compel compliance with the objectives of their organization by terrorist methods; it is a league of defamation.’ The description was borne out….when about a hundred American Senators and Congressman then learned that they (and some of their wives) were shown as ‘Nazis’ on cards in the Civil Service files…which bore a note saying that the defamationist information on them was ‘copied from the subversive files’ of a private firm of Zionist lawyers. These files, the note continued, ‘were made up in co-operation with the American Jewish Committee and the Anti-Defamation League; the sources of this information must not be disclosed under any circumstances.’”(350)
Added to this propaganda was that of the treatment of Jewish people in Germany in order to keep alive the groundswell of sympathy towards the Jews. Reed uses one episode “from his own experience and reporting” to show how this was done: “Rabbi Stephen Wise, writing in 1949, gave the following version of events personally reported by me in 1933…. ‘The measures against the Jews continued to outstrip in systematic cruelty and planned destruction the terror against other groups. On January 29, 1933 Hitler was summoned to be chancellor…at once the reign of terror began with beatings and imprisonments of Jews…We planned a protest march in New York on May 10, the day of the ordered burning of Jewish books in Germany…the brunt of the attack was borne by Jews…concentration camps were established and filled with Jews.’” Reed retorts: “All these statements are false,” and he then gives the exact details of what actually occurred, and then concludes: “Twenty years later I observed that it was in fact impossible to draw public attention to the misreporting of the nature of the persecution of Germany and to explain that the Jews formed only a small fraction of the victims.”(310)
FDR and the Zionist Cabal
Reed also takes the mask off Franklin D. Roosevelt, since “he created precedent by having his cabinet sworn in the hand of a distinguished Jew, Mr. Justice Cardozo, who was a committed Zionist” and had received his Supreme Court judgeships from the efforts of “Rabbi Wise requesting them for him, first from Governor Al Smith of New York State and then from President Herbert Hoover. Thus the shadow of ‘dual allegiance’ fell on Mr. Roosevelt’s administration at its start.” He was pro-Zionist from the very
beginning of his political career and was honored and influenced by Jews, such as Henry Morgenthau, Jr., Samuel Rosenman, and Bernard Baruch (dubbed the “unofficial president of the United States” and of whom Eleanor said: “Mr. Baruch was a trusted adviser to my husband both in Albany and in Washington”).52 Reed notes: “These leading names…represent only the pinnacle of an edifice that was set around all American political life….The selection was discriminatory; anti-Zionist, anti-revolutionary and anti-world-government Jews were excluded from it…and Mr. Roosevelt ignored all protests.” It is no surprise, then, that “Mr. Roosevelt evidently was selected before he was elected…Mr. Howden [House’s biographer] says that Mr. House ‘picked Roosevelt as a natural candidate for the presidency long before any other responsible politician…through the years groomed him for the presidency, expecting to govern through him, as through President Wilson’” and “thus Mr. Roosevelt put ‘Philip Dru’s’ ideas into further
practice” so much so that Howden writes: ‘It is impossible to compare Dru’s suggested legislation with Mr. Roosevelt’s and not be impressed by their similarity.” It is now well known that Roosevelt himself was of Jewish origin, and though he knew so, he kept this fact from the public during his campaigning.
After a painstaking analysis of his deeds, Reed has no problem concluding that “Mr. Roosevelt’s achievement may now be seen to have been threefold and in each respect perilous to his country’s future: he helped to arm Zionism, he armed the revolution in its Moscow citadel, and he opened the doors of his American citadel to its agents.”(339)
When the Republicans caught on to Roosevelt’s Jewish leanings, they themselves tried to make friends with “the foreign group” but, reminiscent of the Bush administration’s calls against the “Axis of Evil” and “terrorism,” Roosevelt held sway “by invoking the need to beat ‘The Crisis’ and he produced The Permanent Emergency in which his country still lives.” When Huey Long decided to run against Roosevelt in the 1936 election, he took aim at Jewish special interest groups and especially Bernard Baruch. On Sept. 8 1935, in a tale reminiscent of Jack Ruby killing Lee Harvey Oswald, Long was shot [an assassination he predicted two months earlier] in the Louisiana State Capital by a young Jew, Dr. Carl Austin Weiss, but before Weiss could be questioned he was shot by Long’s bodyguard.”(311-7) Truman and Dewey would later do the same fawning since they both “held the Zionist vote to be indispensable to success.”(464) After Roosevelt’s four-term reign, “The Chicago Tribune in 1950 reported the view of a senior official of the State Department that the United States was ruled by ‘a secret government’ consisting of three members of the deceased Mr. Roosevelt’s circle: Mr. Henry Morgenthau junior, Justice Felix Franfurter and Senator Herbert Lehman. The word ‘Jew’ was not used….This article raised much commotion in the Zionist and Jewish press throughout the world…the Tribune Tower in Chicago was besieged by the ADL with preemptory demands for an apology. On this particular occasion none was made; the newspaper was at that time a lonely survivor from the days of independent reporting and comment.”(345) Bernard Baruch, “the unofficial president,” once testified before a Select Committee of Congress about US activities during the war and stated: “The final determination rested with me…I probably had more power than perhaps any other man did.” Baruch was followed by Jewish advisor Harry Hopkins, considered by biographer Robert Sherwood as “the second most important man in the United States.”(359) In fact, Roosevelt surrounded himself with 75 such Jewish “employees” in his administration.53 After you thought you heard everything, Reed notes a conversation between Joseph Stalin and Roosevelt at the end of WWII: “Then President Roosevelt, in the manner of a man who is a member of an exclusive club and is sure his host must also belong, ‘said he was a Zionist and asked if Marshal Stalin was one.’ Stalin replied that ‘he was one in principle but he recognized the difficulty.’” No accusations of hearsay can dismiss Roosevelt’s boast since Reed informs us it comes from “the official publication, ‘The Conferences at Malta and Yalta, 1945’ issued by the American State Department on March 16, 1955.” Although the Montreal Star broke the next morning with the headline: “World Capitals Dismayed, Shocked over Disclosures of Yalta Secrets,” but at this late stage of the game Reed resigns his commentary to saying “This was nonsense; by 1955 the masses were apathetic about such things, having been brought by control of the press to the condition of impotent confusion foretold in the Protocols of 1905.”(378)
Similar to the “secret government” Reed uncovered, today the American public is becoming increasingly aware, by means of the Internet, that the “government” has become much bigger; and the “secret” is out. The only problem is that the former is so big that it makes little difference if we know the latter. We see this in the fruitless displays of protest outside annual World Bank meetings or even the Occupy Wall Street movement. The only one permitted to suffer by the Zionist cartel is poster boy and sacrificial victim, Bernie Madoff. We see the futility no better than in the ten years following 911. The data is, to say the least, overwhelming against the official government story but the powers-that-be have thwarted every attempt at a reinvestigation.54 Reed tells us of similar incidents. “In 1941 the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor ‘on a day that will live in infamy’…but the later disclosures showed that the government in Washington had long been warned of the impending attack and had not alerted the Pearl Harbor defenders….Twelve days earlier Mr. Henry L. Stimson, the Secretary of War, after a cabinet meeting on November 25, 1941, had noted in his diary: ‘The question was how we should maneuver them’ (the Japanese) ‘into the position of firing the first shot without allowing too much danger to ourselves; it was a difficult proposition.’”(354-7) So it is not with too much surprise when we learn that the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), which is composed mainly of Zionist Jews such as Norman Podheretz, Midge Decter, Elliot Abrams, Paul Wolfowitz, Donald Kagan (formerly Kaganovich), Richard Pearle, William Kristol, et al., in a paper published just prior to the 2005 Iraq war titled, “Rebuilding America’s Defenses,” stated: “…the process of transformation, even if it bring revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.” The actual drafter of the document, Thomas Donnally, stated on national television: “The idea was that the US should seize the moment of the post Cold-war period to promote its principles and exercise its power vigorously.”55 The “Catholic” magazine First Things, which is actually a front for Zionism as is the “Catholic” magazine Crisis, received a hefty infusion of start-up cash from Podheretz and Decter. Catholicism in America has almost been completely taken over by Zionist influence, propping up Gentile figure-heads to disguise the inner operations.
Communist Control of Nazi Concentration Camps
Reed believed that one of the biggest reversals of truth was set in play by the Zionists regarding the German concentration camps. Having witnessed films of “piles of emaciated corpses stacked like firewood in these camps,” Reed says these portrayals gave him grave “misgivings.” He adds that “Wartime propaganda is the most insidious poison known to man, and I believe these picturegoers of 1945, deprived of truthful information for years, had lost all ability, perhaps all desire to judge what they saw. I think most of them thought the human remains they saw were those of Jews, for this was the suggestion hammered into their minds by the press day by day. They constantly read of ‘Nazi gas
chambers for Jews…Nazi crematoria for Jews.’” After his extensive investigation, Reed concludes that “the ‘Nazi’ concentration camps, at the time when the Anglo-American armies entered Germany, were predominately under Communist control, that Jews were among the tormentors, and that anti-Communism was a surer qualification for the death-chamber than anti-Hiterlism!” As he puts it: “The Communists, in their capture of the concentration camps, were aided by the policy of unconditional
support of the revolution which the Western leaders pursued (e.g., Churchill, Wilson, Roosevelt, and their Jewish administrations)…none of the money came from Russia; it was presented to the Communists by the Allies.” This “collaboration in the concentration camps between Hitler’s Gestapo and its prototype, Stalin’s MVD….justified themselves simply by claiming that they had never killed or injured a Communist: ‘I never endangered one of ours; I never did anything to a party comrade.’ They said they invariably chose for death anyone who could be classified as a Conservative, Liberal, Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox, Jew or Gipsy, provided that the victim was not a Communist.” Reed’s footnote adds: “In this matter the Western masses were hopelessly misled by years of propaganda, presenting ‘the Nazis’ and ‘our Soviet allies’ as opposites, whereas close affinity always existed.” In an account similar to how the US is now educated by Israelis on torture tactics against Muslim prisoners, Reed shows how the collaboration between the Gestapo and the Communists worked: “The Communist Juranitsch, the chief accused, said, ‘Yes, I killed hundreds and thousands of people, and took part in the ‘scientific experiments’; that was my task in Dachau,’ …and Puffer explained how these Communist trusties of the Gestapo hid their collaboration from other inmates….Odo Nansen, son of the famous Norwegian explorer, wrote of his experience in the Sachsenhausen camp, eighteen months before the war ended: “It’s extraordinary how the Communists have managed things here; they have all the power in camp next to the SS and they attract all the other Communists, from other countries, and place them in key positions.
Many of the Norwegian prisoners here have turned Communist….most likely they expect Russia to be the big noise after the war and it may be handy to have one’s color right.” Wing commander Yeo-Thomas, captured and sent to Buchenwald, was told by a British officer already there, ‘The internal administration of the camp is in the hands of Communists…Buchenwald is the worst camp in Germany; your chances of survival are practically nil’” Thomas adds: ‘The three chief internal administrators of the camp, called Lageraeltester, were Communists.’ Under the supervision of these men, ‘prisoners were inoculated with typhus and other germs and their reactions, almost always ending in death, under the various vaccines studied.”56
Reed concludes: “Communists ran these camps, tortured and murdered the victims. If there was any difference between them and the Gestapo jailers it was only that they were more villainous….As the Eastern Jews, in particular, play so large a part in Communism, Jews logically appear among the persons implicated in these deeds. That is not in itself surprising at all, for Jews, like all other men, are good and bad, cruel or humane; but it was kept hidden from the public masses, who received a picture of torturecamps inhabited almost entirely by Jews, tormented by depraved ‘Nazi’ captors. In fact, the Jews formed a small proportion of the entire camp-population; the tormentors in the last three years of the war were largely Communists, whose motives have been shown; and among these tormentors were Jews.”(406-410)
One obvious question that arises from this information is how the Jews were able to escape being accused and convicted of these crimes since Nuremberg was so penetrating. Reed answers by noting that his “files include a number of reports from Jewish newspapers of ‘trials’ of Jews denounced by former Jewish inmates of the Auschwitz, Vlanow, Mudldorf and other camps…These ‘trials’ with one exception, were held before rabbinical courts, in Western countries and before magistrates’ courts in Tel Aviv. They were treated as Jewish affairs, of no concern to other mankind” and the results were predictable with Reed giving many accounts of how these Jews were exonerated against the most glaring evidence and, “if they were punished, the world was not told. I know of only one case…where such Jews were included in a ‘war criminals trial.’ The Jewish Telegraph Agency (May 8, 1946) reported…3 Jews…Obler and Lewin have been sentenced to death and Shmandt to 15 years imprisonment.” The importance of Reed’s discovery is not the trial itself but what it confirms of his overall testimony that Communist Jews were involved in administering the tortures of the concentration camps. As Reed puts it, “the mass-mind, during the Second War, was given the false picture of a solely Jewish persecution conducted by non-Jews and that events in the world in this century are consistently so misrepresented, to the general misfortune.”
To complete the picture, Reed mentions the April 11, 1953 article in The Saturday Evening Post which stated, ‘With this shameful agreement (Yalta) as their authority Soviet MVD agents strode through the displaced-persons camps after the war and put the finger on thousands who had managed to escape the Soviet tyranny. These miserable victims were herded into boxcars and driven back to death, torture or the slow murder of the Siberian mines and forests.’”(411-3)
The upshot of all this investigation is what Reed has been trying to prove throughout the previous 400 pages: “Research into the events of the three decades 1917-1945 leads to the conclusion that by 1945 the revolution had for a hundred years been a Jewish-controlled revolution…a movement under the direction of the Talmudic rabbinate in the East, not a movement generally supported by Jews.” Even “the Bolshevist Government of Bavaria (which counted one Adolf Hitler among its soldiers) logically prove to be headed by Jews: Kurt Eisner, Ernst Toller and Eugene Levine. In Hungary the chief terrorist leaders were all Jews trained in Russia…the Communist International, Herr F. Borkenau, says, ‘Most of the Bolshevik and left Socialist leaders and a considerable percentage of their executive staff had been Jews…anti-semitism was therefore the natural form of reaction against Bolshevism.” Even the “Associated Press reported in 1953 that ‘90 percent of the high officials in the Hungarian Communist regime are Jews,’ and Time magazine remarked on ‘the strongly Jewish (90 percent in the top echelons) government of Communist Premier Matyas Rakosi, who is himself a Jew.’” Reed adds, “In Hungary, as in other communized countries, the specific attack on Christianity began at once with the imprisonment of high ecclesiastics” (e.g., Cardinal Mindszenty, imprisoned on charges of treason). The smoking gun is then revealed: “The source of this deed was indicated by a statement addressed to the Jews of the world in 1949 by ‘the Central Board of Jews in Hungary, the Hungarian Zionist Organization and the Hungarian Section of the World Jewish Congress’ which stated, ‘It is with great relief that the Hungarian Jews received the news of Cardinal Mindszenty’s arrest. With this action the Hungarian Government has sent the head of a pogrom-clique…to his well-deserved place.’” Prior to the 20th century, La Civiltà Cattlolica reports that the Jews had devastated Hungary with debt. The Rothschilds acquired a quarter of the land, and the Hungarian public debt, “which in 1873 was 221 million” rose to “more than 1600 million” in 1890. It also states that in “Galacia the Jews, in a little more than twenty years, have assumed ownership of 80 percent of its territory, and continue always to buy up those country seats and estates which are put up for auction because of unpaid taxes,” subsequently exhibiting an “arrogance of this race in the Hapsburg Empire with the boast ‘If the Christians are unable to tolerate this state of affairs, there is a quick remedy: let them leave the Empire, let them emigrate as they please.” The same was true in “Russia, where the land owned by the nobility is more than two-thirds mortgaged to German bankers, who are mostly Jews” or “our Italy, where for thirty years Judaism lords it and plunders, just as if Italians were its loot conquered from enemies….There is almost not a single lira spent without their approval.
Retail trade, industry, currency exchange, wholesale, rural and urban real estate depend on them.” The same was true in France in which the Jews “possess 80 billion” of “the total French capital estimated at 150 to 200 billion,” wherein “each Jew possesses a capital of 800,000 to 1,200,000 francs, whereas in proportion, each Frenchman possesses…6,000 francs,” and “the house of Rothschild…possesses a fortune of 3 billion francs,” such that “today one cannot negotiate a loan in Europe without the good will
of the Rothschilds, likewise, before long, no one will be able to do any business at all without the consent and the interest of the international Jewish league. Hebraism, with its adoration of the golden calf, which represents its power, must necessarily degrade itself below the civilized world.” La Civilta further reports that “Among the 600 bankers that Paris numbers, no less than 300 have been proven to be Jews; another 100 are probably so,” adding “They capture and monopolize the best, with an exhibition of usury no longer knowing any restraint.”57 Reed adds the London New Statesman reporting on the disproportionate number of Jews in government and police forces in Czechoslovakia and Central and South-Eastern Europe; and the New York Herald-Tribune saying the same covering Romania and Hungary.(421)
Reed’s evidence is very convincing and, if true, it is one of the most glaring indications of how the Zionist press has been able to hide from the masses one of the most important facts about the German concentration camps. Here Reed quotes G. K. Chesterton’s remark: ‘Journalism is a false picture of the world, thrown upon a lighted screen in a darkened room so that the real world is not seen.’ Reed’s picture portrays Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin’s Bolshevist Jews as the most ruthless terrorists and murderers the world has ever known. Catholics need not be surprised. Our Lady of Fatima pinpointed Russia in 1917 as the center of Satan’s kingdom and that which would be used against the rest of the world if the Church and the world did not obey the voice of heaven. Considering that Our Lady came to Sr. Lucia in Portugal in 1929 to ask for the consecration of Russia58 which, Pope Pius XI failing to do, prompted a vision to Sr. Lucia in 1931 and/or 1936 from Jesus warning the Church that the 1929 consecration was not accomplished and that if the pope continued to delay, he and the Church would suffer the wrath of God through the nation of Russia: “They [the pope and bishops] did not wish to heed my request. Like the King of France, they will repent and do it, but it will be late. Russia will have already spread her errors throughout the world, provoking wars and persecutions of the Church; the Holy Father will have much to suffer.”59 Almost like clockwork, Reed notes that “in Spain, the revolution made its bid in 1931. It was directed by emissaries from Moscow, many of them Jews, and this accounted for the disillusionment of many ardent republicans…many of the clergy and Catholic laity voted for the republic, then finding that the reforming impulse, once more, was perverted into an attack on the Christian faith. Churches, monasteries and any building carrying the Cross were destroyed, priests and nuns murdered; the specific mark of identification again appeared, seen in similar acts in Bavaria, Hungary, Russia, France and England.” After looting the Spanish gold reserve of 700 million dollars and transferring it to Moscow, “the anti-Christian tyranny was inflamed by the murder of the monarchist leader, Calva Sotelo, in 1936….Leading Zionist and anti-Zionist Jews in America alike attributed Jewish authorship to the revolution in Spain…Justice Brandeis told Rabbi Stephen Wise, ‘Let Germany share the fate of Spain’ and Bernard Brown wrote: ‘the Jews were as responsible for the establishment of a republic in Spain and the overthrow of the authority of the church in that country as in any other country were freedom reigns.’”60(416-7)
Reed began his book by posing the problem: “History records attempts to solve ‘the Jewish question’ by almost every imaginable method, from force and suppression to placation, compromise and capitulation. They all failed, leaving this question still a thorn in the side of the Gentiles.”(124) Each epoch experienced the same scenario, which is, as Reed puts it: “the oldest problem in recorded history, and had recurred in country after country whenever Jewish immigration reached flood levels.” When in 1906 Sir William Gordon of England “sought to solve it through an Alien’s Bill,” Chaim Weizmann concluded: “Whenever the quantity of Jews in any country reaches the saturation point, that country reacts against them,” and “forty years later Dr. Weizmann spoke similarly to Jews in America: “‘Certain countries can digest a certain number of Jews; once that number has been passed, something drastic must happen; the Jews must go’ to which Reed then comments: ‘Dr. Weizmann thus soberly presented the valid argument against unrestricted Jewish immigration only because he was speaking chiefly to Jews and was drumming into them the Talmudic argument that Jews cannot be assimilated; this argument is essential to Zionism, but it is not inherently true…He and his associates for half a century had been using all their power in America to gain unrestricted access for Jews, so that, according to his own words, they were deliberately leading the Jews there to disaster…’”(312-3). But even Weizmann wasn’t harsh enough for the purebred Zionists.
After attending the 1946 Zionist Congress, Weizmann remarked that the Congress spoke of “the conviction of the need for fighting against British authority in Palestine, or anywhere else, for that matter,” which, “in the context of his whole book and of the entire history of Zionism” means that Weizmann understood that the Congress “decided to resume the method of terror and assassination which had proved effective in Russia in the germinating stage of the two-headed conspiracy [Communism and Zionism].” So, as Weizmann had cast Herzl aside because Herzl was willing to settle for Uganda instead of Palestine, Weizmann was not re-elected president of the World Zionist Organization.”(434-5) This laid the groundwork in 1947 for Israeli soldiers such as Begin, Sharon, Peres and ben Gurion to lead “hundreds of thousands of Jews from Russia and Eastern Europe who were being smuggled across Western Europe to invade Palestine” to blow up the King David hotel in Jerusalem as an effort to eradicate the British. Faithful Zionists have no shame for such bloodshed since they believe the Jews have a “chosen people” mandate to resume Joshua’s sword. So we can understand why Neo-Cons like George Gilder in The Israel Test (2009) has the audacity to exonerate “the bombing of the British Army Headquarters at the King David Hotel [because it] was preceded by three phone calls warning the occupants to evacuate.” Gilder then brushes over the cold-blooded murder of these 91 people by quoting, in the very next paragraph, Shaul Olmert, the oldest son of former prime minister Ehud Olmert, stating that “In Israel you keep coming up with ways that will allow you to survive and allow you to grow. That is why Israelis are so innovative. We have to be entrepreneurs to survive.”61 These “entrepreneurs,” after they got wind that Palestinian uprisings were persuading the UN that partitioning the land was a bad idea and that “the idea of ‘the Jewish state’ seemed about to collapse,” decided “it was then or never, and the Zionists struck at once.” In what even Weizmann called ‘the terror in Palestine’ the ‘old evil in a new and horrible guise,’ the entrepreneurs attacked Deir Yasin on April 9, 1948 in the same way that Joshua attacked Jericho – “thou shalt utterly destroy them, men, women and children so that nothing that breathes is left.” Time magazine described it thus: “Jewish terrorists of the Stern Gang and Irgun Zvai Leumi stormed the village of Deir Yasin and butchered everyone in sight. The corpses of 250 Arabs, mostly women and small children, were later found tossed into wells.” To show other Palestinians that “Deir Yasin hung actually over them,” the Stern gang “on October 15, 1953 murdered every living soul found in Qibya and destroyed that village, sixty-six victims, most of them women and children, being found slaughtered.” On and on the Joshua-like slaughtering proceeded: “Gaza on Feb. 28 1955; Syria on Dec. 11, 1955; Gaza again on April 5, 1956; Jordan on June 24, 1956,” with David ben Gurion claiming that “Israel was ‘defenseless’ and justifying his murders with a maniacal Messiah complex: “‘The continued ingathering of exiles is the supreme goal of Israel and an essential precondition for realization of the messianic mission which has made us an eternal people.’”(520-3, 543) Many of the attacks were initiated by claiming the Arabs were going to attack Israel and thus Israel had to attack first, Reed offering “one of many examples from the London Weekly Review, September 1956, a few weeks before the Israeli attack on Egypt: ‘We can be absolutely certain that the Arabs, encouraged by Russia, will attack Israel. This is now beyond all doubt and should form the basis of our calculations.’”(552) The popular Voice of America radio programs continued to barrage the world with justification for these actions, tying them into “allusions of ‘the escape of the Jews from the Egyptian captivity,’” leading Reed to investigate its origins and discovering that VOA “is largely staffed by Eastern Jews.”(546) Reed notes: “The ‘Commander-in-Chief’ of Irgun, a Mr. Menachem Begin, some years later made ‘a triumphal tour’ of Western cities, being received in Montreal by ‘a guard of honor of the Montreal police headed by Rabbis bearing Scrolls of the Law.’”62 Speaking at Tel Aviv during an election campaign in 1950 Mr. Begin claimed credit for the foundation of the Zionist state, through the
deed at Deir Yasin, stating, ‘The other part of the Irgun’s contribution was Deir Yasin, which had caused the Arabs to leav e the country and make room for the newcomers.’”(463) “One of the most extreme Zionist chauvinists in America then was Mr. Ben Hecht” who, after the massacre at Deir Yasin “inserted a full-page advertisement in many of the leading newspapers throughout America. It was addressed ‘To the Terrorists of Palestine,’ stating, “The Jews of America are for you, You are their champions…Every
time you blow up a British arsenal, or wreck a British railroad train sky high, or rob a British bank, or let go with your guns and bombs at the British betrayers and invaders of your homeland, the Jews of American make a little holiday in their hearts.”“ This was the same man who said regarding Christ, “‘what I’d have done was had him shipped to Rome and fed to the lions. They never could have made a savior out of mincemeat.’”
Hecht received commendations from Bernard Baruch who stated to him “‘I am on your side…the only way the Jews will ever get anything is by fighting for it” and then adds what his modus operandi had been all along: ‘I’d like you to think of me as one of your Jewish fighters in the tall grass with a long gun. I’ve always done my best work that way, out of sight.’”(472) Reed adds: “At the Versailles Peace Conference in 1919 Dr. Weizmann had declared, ‘The Bible is our mandate,’ and the words sounded good to Western ears….The massacre at Deir Yasin was an act of ‘observance’ of the ancient ‘statues and commandments.’”(449) This ought to be a warning to those Catholic clerics today who are trying to reverse the Church’s teaching on supersessionism and who seek to give back the Old Covenant to the Jews by claiming that it has “never been revoked.” If it has not been revoked, then each Jew who lives by the Old Covenant has a mandate from God to “utterly destroy” any religion that denies the tenets of the Old Covenant (including those Catholic clerics who believe that Jesus Christ is the Messiah).
Lord Melchett, “a leading Zionist in England” once stated, “‘Do you really believe that we have been led back to Israel by nothing but a fluke?’ (Jewish Chronicle, Nov. 9, 1928).”(518) The simple answer is: it is no “fluke”; but the $64,000 question is: who has “led” the Jews to Israel, God or Satan? Reed’s book ends with a rhetorical answer of which I’m sure even he wasn’t prepared. Perhaps understanding much better Cardinal Manning’s perspective that the rise of Zionism coincides with the Antichrist of St. Paul’s
Thessalonian epistle, Reed concludes: “The feeling I had, in tracing the story of this ancient superstition and its reemergence as a political force in our century, was that of contact with a living, evil thing.”(570)
My conclusion is this: the major blame for the rise in Zionist power is the Catholic Church herself. It’s a very simple formula: when the faithfulness of the Catholic Church decreases, the power of the Zionists and other worldly powers increases; and vice-versa. As Isaiah says, the world’s powers are nothing in the eyes of God (Is 40:15). The key is how faithful and obedient the Church decides to be, and God will take care of the rest. The Catholic Church showed herself unfaithful when she refused to do the consecration of Russia, and continues to refuse 83 years running. The Church had the power of God at her fingertips but she remained unmoved. The Church’s power was further eroded when instead of preaching the Gospel to the Jews she decided to make a pact with them and speak of them as “elder brethren,” “the chosen people” and “possessors of the Old Covenant,” rather than the obstinate rejecters of Christ and Christianity they really are. As long as the Church stays on her path of disobedience (including all the scandals she has perpetrated) and refuses to do the consecration of Russia and instead invites pagans and non-Christians to pray for the world peace that Fatima was supposed to give,63 the Zionist power will continue to rise, eventually leading to the establishment of the Antichrist. There can be no other outcome since obedience to God can never be replaced by political and ecclesiastical maneuverings. God help the seven popes whose disobedience has created the devastation we have seen in the 20th century and which will culminate in the 21st.
Source .pdf (The Bellarmine Report)
1 It can be found at http://www.controversyofzion.info/index.htm.
3 As Jones notes: “The Jesuits who founded Civilta Cattolica were not acting on their own. The new magazine was created under the auspices of Pope Pius IX….Civilta was to be a bulwark against modernist thought….The pope’s support was both spiritual and financial….As a result of this approval, Civilta Cattolica soon became the most authoritative official organ of the papacy, a status which not even the founding of L’Osservatore Romano in 1861 could undermine….In 1869 Pius IX praised and blessed Gougenot des Mosseau’s book Le Juif, let Judaism des peoples chrétiens et le judaisation, which described the Talmud as ‘a savage code in which the precepts of hate and rapaciousness are mixed up with the magic doctrines of the caballah, a book which professes the greatest idolatry
imaginable’” (“Zombie Apocalypse on Wall Street,” Culture Wars, Nov. 2011, p. 18).
4 La Civiltà Cattlolica, Series XIV, Vol. VIII, Fascicule 970, Nov. 4, 1890, p. 11;
5 La Civiltà Cattlolica, Series XIV, Vol. VIII, Fascicule 970, Nov. 4, 1890, p. 21;
6 La Civiltà Cattlolica, Series XIV, Vol. VIII, Fascicule 970, Nov. 4, 1890, p. 11;
7 In the book The Israeli Holocaust Against the Palestinians, Jewish writer Moshe Lieberman tells the sordid history: On April 9, 1948, Begin, with the Irgun assassination gang, led a massacre of 250 Arab civilians at Deir Yassin. On Sept 17, 1948, 33 year old Yitzhak Shamir and his Stern gang assassinated Swedish peace mediator, Count Folke Bernadotte. On October 14, 1953, 25-year old Ariel Sharon ordered an attack on the Palestinian settlement, Qibya, destroying 42 homes and 60 civilians. On July 14, 1954, the Israeli Army intelligence squad known then by the name of Modin, under Prime Minister Moshe Sharett, firebombed a civilian post office in Egypt.
In 1956, the Israeli army under David Ben-Gurion attacked the settlement Kafr Qasim and committed coldblooded murders. In 1966, the same army under prime minister Levi Eshkol attacked the settlement village of Sammu and killed 18 people and wounded 100. In 1967, just prior to the six-day war, the Israeli air force under Levi Eshkol, made an unprovoked attack against the USS Liberty killing 34 soldiers and wounding 170, destroying the ship’s radio towers and lifeboats in hopes that there would be no survivors. In 1969, the same army bombed a civilian school building named Bahdr al Baker killing 75 and wounding 100 innocent children. In March 1970, under Golda Meir, the Israeli army invaded Lebanon killing scores of innocent civilians. On Sept. 8, 1972, the same army arbitrarily decided to bomb Syrian and Lebanese civilians killing hundreds of innocent people. In 1974, the same army under Yitzhak Rabin attacked civilian aircraft and desecrated Christian shrines including the Church of the Holy Sepulcher, and stole the diamond crown of the statue of the Blessed Virgin Mary. From 1975 to 1980, the Israeli secret service, the Mossad, conducted a bloody campaign of murder against Palestinian scientists, journalists and other important people. In October 1982, the Mossad bombed the houses, offices and cars of three legitimately elected mayors of the West Bank cities, Nablus, Ramallah and Al Beireh. In February 1989 Yitzhak Shamir bombed the Beka Valley killing 15 children and an unspecified number of their parents. On April 14, 1989, the Israeli police and armed Jewish settlers attacked a disarmed Palestinian village, Nahalin, killing 8 and wounding 50. Through
March 6-16, 2002, the Israeli army slaughtered over 200 Palestinians. On March 30, 2002, Sharon’s army arbitrarily executed five Palestinian bank guards. On April 8, 2002, Sharon’s army bombed the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem. The next day, April 9, the same army massacred Palestinian civilians living in Jenin, which, incidentally, is the date of the Israeli holiday, Holocaust Remembrance Day.
8 “Greater Israel” is the land to the east of the Jordan River and occupied by Arab countries (Syria, Jordan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia), whereas Israel now occupies most of the land to the west. In the book Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years (Pluto Press, 2002) Jewish author Israel Shahak recalls when David ben Gurion stated Israel’s ultimate plans very clearly in a Knesset meeting. At that time, Israel was at war with Egypt. On the third day of the war, ben Gurion announced that the major reason he started the war was “for the restoration of the kingdom of David and Solomon to its biblical borders.” The members of the Knesset rose to their feet, applauded, and began singing the Israeli national anthem. If ben Gurion’s dream is realized, the dimensions of Israel’s land grab would extend in the south to include all of the Sinai peninsula and of northern Egypt. In the east it
would include Jordan and Kuwait, then traveling up the Euphrates River into Iraq, Syria, Turkey, and Lebanon.
9 La Civiltà Cattlolica, Series XIV, Vol. VIII, Fascicule 970, Nov. 4, 1890, p. 11;
10 La Civiltà Cattlolica, Series XIV, Vol. VII, Fascicule 961, Oct. 23, 1890, p. 2;
http://www.romancatholicism.org/civilta-jews.pdf. It finishes with “That these flowers of Jewish morality – which contain still more turpitudes with which we don’t wish to dirty our pen – don’t fall on deaf ears, is known from experience by all the nations being afflicted with this race….forty years later, Talmudic ethics has made further progress, the worst of it being that, thanks to the civil equality Judaism now has in nearly all of Europe, most of the crimes committed by Jews go unpunished one way or another, and are sometimes even rewarded by knights’ ribbons and crosses or baronial titles”
11 La Civiltà Cattlolica, Series XIV, Vol. VIII, Fascicule 970, Oct. 23, 1890, pp. 15-17;
12 La Civiltà Cattlolica, Series XIV, Vol. VII, Fascicule 961, Oct. 23, 1890, p. 2;
13 Relation Historique Des Affaires de Syrie, Depuis 1840 Jusqu'en 1842; Statistique Gnrale Du Mont-Liban, Et Procdure Complte Dirige En 1840 Contre Des (French Edition), La Civiltà Cattlolica, “Defining Semitism,” Series XIV, Vol. VII, Fascicule 961, Oct. 23, 1890, p. 5; http://www.romancatholicism.org/civilta-jews.pdf. See
http://antimatrix.org/Convert/Books/Hellmut_Schramm/damascus.htm for a detailed exposé on the Jewish ritual murders taking place during this time. Schramm notes: “The works of the member of the Orient Society, Achille Laurent, which appeared a few years after the trial and dealt with the entire process against the Jews in Damascus by means of the court documents, likewise vanished down to one copy, which was still located in the National Library at Paris. It dealt with the two volumes of Achille Laurent: Relation historique des affaires de Syrie depuis 1840 jusqu'en 1842. The second volume contained the authentic court documents!”
14 Tribune Juive, No. 50; Haaretz, Oct. 14, 2011.
15 La Civiltà Cattlolica, Series XIV, Vol. VII, Fascicule 961, Oct. 23, 1890, p. 2;
16 Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Israel, Lichtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain and Switzerland. “Vincent Reynouard, 38-year-old French chemical engineer, shown above, was sentenced in a Paris courtroom to one year in prison and fined 10,000 euros ($14,600) for ‘denying the Holocaust’ in his 16-page pamphlet printed in 2005 entitled: Holocaust? The Hidden Facts. It is the heaviest sentence handed down to date for Holocaust denial in France” (The American Free Press, Washington DC, Dec. 24, 2007, p. 2.)
17 Washington Post, March 31, 2005.
18 Grand Hyatt Hotel, 109 East 42nd Street at Grand Central Terminal, New York City; Thursday, November 3 – Friday, November 4, 2011
19 The Telegraph, April 7, 2007: “The Pope shocked many Catholics last night with a dramatically revised version of the Stations of the Cross, one of the central rituals of the Easter ceremony. The ceremony, also known as the Via Crucis, recreates Jesus’ path on the day of his death from the Antonia fortress to Golgotha, where he was crucified… One of the boldest changes came on the third stop, where Jesus is given up to Pontius Pilate by the Sanhedrin, a council of Jews. The Pope recalled the sentence that was passed over the Jews by the Nazis, and their suffering in concentration camps. He quoted Etty Hilesum, a Dutch Jew, who was executed in Auschwitz in 1943, saying: “We must oppose every new horror and crime with a new piece of the truth and goodness.”
20 Look magazine, January 16, 1962. Ben Gurion’s words are very similar to those of the French-Jewish statesmen Adolphe Crémieux (who was born Isaac Moïse in Nîmes to a wealthy Jewish family), and whose words were quoted by La Civiltà Cattlolica: “Israel will never have an end. Its little family is the greatness of God. A messianism of the new age will be born and unfold. A Jerusalem of a new order, sacredly situated between the East and the West, will succeed the double-faced city of the Caesars and the Popes.” The Jesuit journal also notes “Stamm, a German Hebrew, has published a book, in order to announce to the world that ‘the reign of universal liberty on earth will be established by the Jews.” Series XIV, Vol. VII, Fascicule 961, Oct. 23, 1890, http://www.romancatholicism.org/civilta-jews.pdf
21 Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, Oct. 24, 2011.
22 On October 20, 2011 Gorbachev said at Lafayette College: “We are reaping the consequences of a strategy that is not conducive to cooperation and partnership, to living in a new global situation. The world needs goals that will bring people together. Some people in the United States were pushing the idea of creating a global American empire, and that was a mistake from the start. Other people in America are now giving thought to the future of their country. The big banks, the big corporations, are still paying the same big bonuses to their bosses. Was there ever a crisis for them? . . . I believe America needs its own perestroika. The entire world situation did not develop properly. We saw deterioration where there should have been positive movement. My friend the late Pope John Paul II said it best. He said, ‘We need a new world order, one that is more stable, more humane, and more just.’ Others, including myself, have spoken about a new world order, but we are still facing the problem of building such a world order…problems of the environment, of backwardness and poverty, food shortages…all because we do not have a system of global governance. We cannot leave things as they were before, when we are seeing that these protests are moving to even new countries, that almost all countries are now witnessing such protests, that the people want change. As we are addressing these challenges, these problems raised by these protest movements, we will gradually find our way towards a new world order.” http://www.lafayette.edu/about/news/2011/10/20/mikhail-gorbachevsays- uprisings-signal-an-emerging-new-world-order/
23 “Goldman played key role in mortgage meltdown, Senate investigators say. Citing company documents, investigators say the financial giant used its good reputation to sell toxic mortgage-related securities to investors and then bet against the overheated market it created. April 27, 2010 by Jim Puzzanghera, Los Angeles Times. http://articles.latimes.com/2010/apr/27/business/la-fi-goldman-senate-.... The other leading Jewish back was Lehman Brothers, headed by Zionist Richard Fuld. According to Ted Pike, Goldman and Sachs dominates the financial industry and shares huge responsibility for the meltdown, having been charged with fraud. Goldman and Sachs were its Jewish founders and almost all of its partners since have been Jewish; today it is run by Lloyd Blankfein, Jewish. Another firm charged with responsibility is Magnetar, which is run by Jews including its founder
Alec Litowitz. The current chairman of the Federal Reserve is Jewish Ben Bernanke, who took the helm from Jewish Alan Greenspan. Both Bernanke and Greenspan argued for unregulated financial derivatives, which greatly contributed to the US financial collapse. The Federal Reserve itself is quintessentially Jewish, being owned not by the federal government and American people but by a consortium of Jewish international bankers including the Rothschilds. Other super-powerful Wall Street Jews include Gary Cohn (COO Goldman Sachs), Barry Zubrow (Morgan Chase), Tom Nides (Morgan Stanley), Bob Greifeld (Nasdaq), Arthur Levitt and Harvey Goldschmid (SEC), Richard Neiman (State Banking Superintendent). These are just a few of the influential Jewish insiders shaping American finances. In a Forward article, Jill Jacobs laments that unethical Jews receive honor from other Jews as long as they donate some of their ill-gotten wealth back to the Jewish community. This is what the infamous Bernie Madoff did, bilking average Americans (as well as fellow Jews) out of billions. The Jewish Phenomenon tells us that Jews, who are 2 percent of total Americans, are 45 percent of the top 40 of the Forbes 400 richest Americans. They are one third of all American multi-millionaires. Clearly, Jews, ethical or not, bear an outsized responsibility for shaping the financial world in America today. “Hollywood,” Helen Thomas says, is controlled by Jews. To quickly confirm Jewish domination of the media, just visit the film department of your local major metropolitan library. You will find a number of books written by Jews (including Neal Gabler’s classic “An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood”) which document Jewish creation and control of the Hollywood film industry and the Big Three TV networks. Go to the prestigious Encyclopedia Judaica articles on “Motion Pictures” and “Television and Radio.” This Jewish reference source gives definitive testimony of how Jews created Hollywood and big media. In its article on “Publishing,” the encyclopedia also documents vast Jewish ownership of
the largest newspapers and publishing houses in America. Thomas: “It was former Israeli leader ‘Menachem Begin’ who created terrorism… they bragged, in his first book, about creating the modus operandi for terrorism.” In Begin’s book “The Revolt” he boasts how his Irgun terrorists in 1948, as a result of their Deir Yassin massacre of over 100 innocent Arab villagers, precipitated the panic that helped cause 800,000 Arabs to flee Palestine. Begin told prominent journalist Lord Howe that he was not just the father of terrorism in the Mideast, but “in the entire world.”
24 Bloomberg reports that, according to Jewish Neil Barofsky, Inspector General for the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program, “U.S. taxpayers may be on the hook for as much as 23.7 trillion to bolster the economy and bail out financial companies. The Treasury’s $700 billion bank investment program represents a fraction of all federal support to resuscitate the US financial system, including the 6.8 trillion offered by the Federal Reserve” (Dawn Kopecki and Catherine Dodge, July 20, 2009). Another report from Bloomberg says that 9 trillion dollars was dispersed “in the last eight months” and of which the Inspector General of the Federal Reserve had no authority to regulate (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKEObC_vfwo&feature=related). See also this report which says the
total figure is 20 trillion:
25 As cited by E. Michael Jones in “Zombie Apocalypse on Wall Street,” Culture Wars, Nov. 2011, p. 16.
26 Ibid., p. 19, citing La Segregazione, p. 21 in the original: “il fondamento dell’ebraismo non puo che essere l’odio elevato a supremo preccetto religioso.”
27 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hagee; Rick Perry channels megapastor John Hagee's call to strike Iran (http://trailblazersblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2011/11/rick-perry-cha...); “John Hagee Calls for Pre-Emptive Nuclear Strike Against Iran, his Christian Zionist Followers Agree,”
(http://www.youtube.com/user/WHTTdotORG). The US and Israel are planning war games in May of 2012, and Israel just tested an ICBM (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=MB032XTL8EM#!)
28 La Civiltà Cattlolica, Series XIV, Vol. VII, Fascicule 961, Oct. 23, 1890, p. 3;
29 Christopher Sykes, Crossroads to Israel 1917-1948, Bloomington, IL: Indiana University Press, 1965, 1973, p. 5.
30 See the book, The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Second Look at the Federal Reserve, by G. Edward Griffin, 1994.
31 There is some dispute as to the origin and authenticity of “I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country” (see http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Talk:Woodrow_Wilson), but there is no doubt of the second two quotes, taken from Woodrow Wilson’s The New Freedom: A Call for the Emancipation of the Generous Energies of a People (New York and Garden City: Doubleday, Page & Company, 1913). In 1913, Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr. stated: “This [Federal Reserve Act] establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When the President [Wilson} signs this bill, the invisible government of the monetary power will be legalized....the worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking and currency bill.”
33 La Civiltà Cattlolica, Series XIV, Vol. VII, Fascicule 961, Oct. 23, 1890, p. 12;
34 Paul Findley is one of many congressional representatives who lost their seat for daring to speak out about the injustices Israel gets away with because of a complicit Congress. On 8 June 2007 Findley was keynote luncheon spokesperson for the 27th annual American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee Conference: “I was here for the first convention 27 years ago and I still have a fire in my belly for the civil and human rights of Arabs. It is time to speak openly and honestly about Israel. But, in American politics, that is still forbidden. Pity that we cannot seem to shed our fear of Israel! We are afraid to speak out on Capitol Hill, for fear of losing the next election. They are more like trained poodles jumping through hoops than leaders! Why this fear? How did we get here? Forty years ago to this day, June 8, 1967 the change occurred, the floodgates opened and money poured into Israel as never before. When President Johnson heard about the U.S.S. Liberty being attacked by Israel he ordered the rescue fighter planes to return to the deck. The rescue mission was aborted and the survivors have said they heard LBJ’s voice tell Admiral Giess, ‘Get those planes back on deck. I don’t care if the ship sinks, I will not embarrass Israel.’ LBJ also threatened to court martial anyone who reported what had happened. Johnson accepted Israel’s false claim of “mistaken identity” and he knew it was a lie. That is when the change began and Israel learned they could get away with murdering U.S.A. soldiers.” http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/06/08/facebook-helen-thomas-lbj-and-...
35 From the Jewish Post, 19/9 1992: Robert Reich, professor of Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government; Ira Magaziner, president of SJS, Inc.; Robert J. Shapiro, vice president of the Progressive Policy Institute; Samuel R. Berger, former deputy director of the State Department policy planning staff; Michael Mandelbaum, professor and director of American foreign policy studies at the Nitze School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University.
36 Madeleine Albright, Secretary of State; Robert Rubin, Secretary of Treasury; William Cohen, Secretary of Defense; Dan Glickman, Secretary of Agriculture; George Tenet, CIA Chief; Samuel Berger, Head National Security Council; Evelyn Lieberman, Deputy Chief of Staff; Stuart Eizenstat, Under Secretary of State; Charlene Barshefsky, U.S. Trade Representative; Susan Thomases, Aide to First Lady; Joel Klein, Assistant Attorney General; Gene Sperling, National Economic Council; Ira Magaziner, National Health Care; Peter Tarnoff, Deputy Secretary of State; Alice Rivlin, Ecomomic Advisory; Janet Yellen, Chairwoman, National Economic Council; Rahm Emanuel, Policy Advisor; Doug Sosnik, Counsel to President; Jim Steinberg, Deputy to National Security Chief; Jay Footlik, Special Liason to the Jewish Community; Robert Nash,Personal Chief; Jane Sherburne, Clinton’s Lawyer; Mark Penn, Asia Expert to NEC; Sandy Kristoff, Health Care Chief; Robert Boorstin, Communications Aide; Keith Boykin, Communications Aide; Jeff Eller, Special Assistant to Clinton; Tom Epstein, Health Care Adviser; Judith Feder, National Security Council; Richard Feinberg, Assistant Secretary Veterans; Hershel Gober, Food and Drug Administration; Steve Kessler, White House Counsel; Ron Klein, Assistant Secretary Education;
Madeleine Kunin, Communications Aide; David Kusnet, Dept. AIDS Program; Margaret Hamburg, Dir. Press Conferences; Many Grunwald, Liason to Jewish Leaders; Karen Adler. Dir. State Dept. Policy; Samuel Lewis, National Security Council; Stanley Ross, National Security Council; Dan Schifter, Director Peace Corps; Eli Segal, Deputy Chief of Staff; Robert Weiner, Drug Policy Coordinator; Jack Lew, Deputy Director Management and Budget; James P. Rubin, Under Secretary of State; David Lipton, Under Secretary of The Treasury; Lanny P. Breuer, Special Counsel to The President; Richard Holbrooke, Special Representative to NATO; Kenneth Apfel, Chief of Social Security; Joel Klein, Deputy Whlte House Counsel; Sidney Blumenthal, Special Advisor to First Lady; David Kessler, Chief of Food & Drug Administration; Seth Waxman, Acting Solicitor General; Mark Penn, Presidential Pollster; Dennis Ross, Special Middle East Representative; Howard Shapiro, General Counsel for the FBI; Lanny Davis, White House Special Counsel; Sally Katzen, Secretary of Management and Budget; Kathleen Koch, FBI Equal Opportunity Office; John Podesta, Deputy Chief of Staff; Alan Blinder, Vice Chairman of Federal
Reserve; Janet Yellen, Council of Economic Advisors; Ron Klain, Chief of Staff for Al Gore; Various Jewish US. Ambassadors: Germany, John C. Kornblum; France, Felix Rohatyn; Poland, Daniel Frie; Denmark, Edward E. Elson; Hungary, Donald M. Blinken; Romania, Alfred H. Moses; Belgium, Alan J. Blinken; Belarus, Kenneth S. Yalowitz; South Africa, James A. Joseph; India, Frank G. Wisner; Turkey, Marc Grossman; New Zealand, Josiah H. Beeman; Egypt, Daniel C. Kurtzer; Sweden, Thomas L. Siebert; Morocco, Marc C. Ginsberg; Singapore, Timothy A. Chorba; Zambia, Arlene Render; Brazil, Melvyn Levitsky; Bolivia, Curt W. Kamman; Mexico, Jeffrey Davidow; Canada, Gordon Giffin; Cuba, US Interest Head, Michael G. Kozak; Norway, David B. Hermelin; Switzerland, Madeleine M. Kunin.
37 Michael Chertoff, Homeland Security Secretary; Samuel Wright Bodman, Energy Secretary; I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, former Chief of Staff to Vice President Cheney; Paul Dundes Wolfowitz, former Deputy Secretary of Defense; Douglas Jay Feith, former Under Secretary for Policy, Department of Defense; Dov S. Zakheim, Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), Pentagon; Ari Fleischer, White House press secretary; Kenneth Adelman - member of the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board; Robert Satloff, U.S. National Security Council Advisor; Elliott Abrams, Deputy National Security Council Advisor; Marc Grossman, Under Secretary for Political Affairs; Joshua Bolton, Director of Office of Management and Budget; Richard Perle, Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Policy; Ken Melman, White House political director; Jay Lefkowitz, Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of the Domestic Policy Council; David Frum, Speechwriter; Brad Blakeman, White House Director of Scheduling; Adam Goldman, White House Liaison to the Jewish Community; Chris Gersten, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Administration for Children and Families; Mark D. Weinberg, Assistant Secretary of
Housing and Urban Development for Public Affairs; Various Ambassadors: Daniel Kurtzer, Israel; Cliff Sobel, Netherlands; Stuart Bernstein, Denmark; Nancy Brinker, Hungary; Frank Lavin, Singapore; Ron Weiser, Slovakia; Mel Sembler, Italy; Martin Silverstein, Uruguay.
38 David Axelrod, Special Adviser to the President; Jared Bernstein, Chief Economist and Economic Policy Adviser to the Vice President; Rahm Emanuel, White House Chief of Staff; Lee Feinstein, Campaign Foreign Policy Advisor; Eric Lynn, Middle East Policy Advisor; Mara Rudman, Foreign Policy Advisor; Tim Geithner, Treasury Secretary; Gary Gensler, Chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission; Elena Kagan, Solicitor General; Sally Katzen, legal adviser to Obama-Biden; Ron Klain, Eric Lander & Harold E. Varmus, Co-Chairs of the President’s Council of Advisers on Science/Technology; Jacob Lew & James Steinberg, Deputy Secretaries of State; Ellen Moran, White House Director of Communications; Peter Orszag, Director of the Office of Management and Budget; Penny Pritzker, Obama’s National Finance Chair; Robert Reich, Economic adviser to Obama-Biden; Dennis Ross, Ambassador-At-Large in the (Entire) Middle East; Robert Rubin, Economic adviser to Obama-Biden; Daniel B. Shapiro, Head the Middle East Desk at the National Security Council; Mary Schapiro, Chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission; Chairman of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority since 2007; Phil Schiliro, Assistant to the President for Legislative Affairs; Lawrence (Larry) Summers, Director of the White House National Economic Council; Mona Sutphen, Deputy White House Chief of Staff; Susan Sher, First Lady’s Chief of Staff.
40 Christopher Bollyn states: “Emanuel is known for using gangster tactics to threaten people. He once mailed a rotting dead fish to a campaign pollster who had not produced results to Emanuel’s liking. Sending a dead fish to a person is a well-known Mafia message, which warns the recipient that he will “sleep with the fishes” unless he heeds the warning. Rolling Stone magazine revealed more of Emanuel’s gangster behavior in an article entitled “The Enforcer” on October 20, 2005: “The night after Clinton was elected, Emanuel was so angry at the president’s enemies that he stood up at a celebratory dinner with colleagues from the campaign, grabbed a steak knife and began rattling off a list of betrayers, shouting “Dead!...Dead!...Dead!” and plunging the knife into the table after every name. “When he was done, the table looked like a lunar landscape,” one campaign veteran recalls. “It was like something out of The Godfather. But that’s Rahm for you.” (http://centurean2.wordpress.com/2011/05/18/who-runsobamas-white-house/)
41 Ynetnews: Report: Sarkozy calls Netanyahu ‘liar’: Microphones accidently left on after G20 meeting pick up private conversation between US, French presidents. Sarkozy admits he ‘can’t stand’ Israeli premier. Obama: You’re fed up with him? I have to deal with him every day! http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4145266,00.html
42 As Ted Pike reports: Television Networks: CBS: Sumner Redstone - chairman of board and CEO of CBS and Viacom, “world’s biggest media giant” (Economist, 11-23-02). Viacom owns Viacom Cable, CBS, and MTV all over the world, Blockbuster Video Rentals, and Black Entertainment TV; Mel Karmazin - CBS corporation president and CEO; Leslie Moonves (great-nephew of Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion) - president of CBS Television; David Poltrack - executive vice-president, Research and Planning; Jeff Fager - executive director of “60 Minutes II”; NBC: Jeff Zucker - president of NBC Entertainment; Neil Shapiro - president of NBC News; Jeff Gaspin - executive vice-president, programming NBC; Max Mutchnik and David Kohan - co-exec. producers of NBC’s “Good Morning, Miami”; Lloyd Braun - chair of NBC Entertainment; ABC: Michael Eisner - major owner of Walt Disney, Capital Cities, and ABC; David Westin - president of ABC News; FOX: Rupert Murdoch - owner of FOX TV, New York Post, London Times, and News of the World; Sandy Grushow - chair, FOX Entertainment; Peter Chernin - second in command at Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp., owner of FOX TV; Gail Berman - president of FOX Entertainment; CNN: Wolf Blitzer - host of CNN’s Late Edition; Hollywood Movie Studios (The prestigious Encyclopedia Judaica, in its article “Motion Pictures,” pg. 449, says: “Thus all the large Hollywood companies, with the exception of United Artists...were founded and controlled by Jews”); Sony Corporation of America: Howard Stringer – chief; Columbia Pictures: Amy Pascal – chair; Warner Bros., Barry Meyer - chair; Jordan Levin - pres. of Warner Bros. Entertainment; Miramax Films: Harvey Weinstein – CEO; Paramount: Sherry Lansing - president of Paramount Communications and chair of Paramount Pictures’ Motion Picture Group; DreamWorks: Stephen Spielberg, David Geffen, Jeffrey Katzenberg (owners); MTV Entertainment: Brian Graden – president; Turner Entertainment: Brad Siegal – president; Radio: Clear Channel Communications: Robert Sillerman – founder; PBS: Ben Wattenberg - moderator, PBS ThinkTank; Publishers: The Encyclopedia Judaica, in its article “Publishing,” lists the following publishing houses, as of 1971, owned or controlled by Jews: Viking, Knopf, Random House, Modern Library, Simon and Schuster, Harcourt, Brace & Co., Greenberg Publishers, Ziff-Davis, Crown Publishers, Dial Press and Dryden Press. Publishing houses either founded by or with a Jew as editor-in-chief include: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux, Abelard-Schumann, Basic Books, Grosset & Dunlap, Federal Writers Project, Gaer Associates, Macmillan & Co., Harry N. Abrams, Inc., Citadel Press, Chanticleer Press, Arthur Frommer, Inc., Hart Publishing Co., Lantern Press, Oceanea Publications, Twayne Publishers, Arco Publishing Co., Grossman Publishers, and Stein & Day. Publishing houses involved in book clubs, reprints, or children’s literature either founded by or controlled by Jews include the Literary Guild, Book of the Month Club, Limited Editions Club, Heritage Club, Junior Heritage Club, Readers Club, Jewish Book Guild, Military Science Book Club, Natural History Book Club, Book Collector’s Society, Art Book Guild, Science Book Club, Beech Hurst Press, A. S. Barnes & Co., Sagamore Press, Thomas Yoseloff Inc., The Modern Library, World Publishing Co., Little Blue Books, Pocket Books Inc., Avon Publications, Popular Library, Schocken Books, Golden Books, and Golden Press. In its article on New York City, the Judaica adds to the list of publishing houses owned by Jews, Liveright & Boni, and Anchor Books. Today Random House, Doubleday, and Anchor Books, while Jewish owned and controlled, participate in the world’s largest publishing consortium, Bertelsmann A.G., benefiting from its staggering
distribution advantages; Bertelsmann’s American operations are headed by Joel Klein, chair and CEO. David Manaker is executive director for HarperCollins; Newspapers: Samuel Newhouse Jr. and Donald Newhouse own Newhouse Publications, which includes 26 newspapers in 22 cities. The Conde Nast Magazine Group includes the New Yorker, Parade, the Sunday newspaper supplements, American City Business Journal, business newspapers published in more than 30 major cities in America, and interests in cable television programming and cable systems serving one million homes; Wall Street Journal: Peter R. Kahn, CEO; New York Times, Boston Globe, and other publications: published by Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr.; New York Daily News: Mortimer Zuckerman, owner; Village Voice, New Times and network of alternative weeklies: Owned by David Schneiderman; Washington Post: Donald Graham, chair and CEO, son of Katharine Graham Meyer, former owner of Washington Post; San Francisco Chronicle: Ron Rosenthal, managing editor; Phil Bronstein, exec. Editor; AOL-Time Warner Book Group: Laurence Kirshbaum, editor; Magazines: US News & World Report: Mortimer Zuckerman, owner and chair of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish-American Organizations, one of the largest pro-Israel lobbying groups; New Republic: Marty Peretz, owner and publisher (NR openly identifies itself as pro-Israel.); Barron’s: Peter R. Kahn, CEO; National Review: Michael Ledeen, editor; Business Week: Bruce Nussbaum, editorial page editor; Newsweek: Donald Graham, chair and CEO, and Howard Fineman, chief political columnist; Weekly Standard: William Kristol, editor, also executive director, Project for a New American Century, (PNAC); The New Yorker: David Reznik, editor; Nicholas Lehman, writer; Henrick Hertzberg, “Talk of the Town” editor; Miscellaneous: Ivan Seidenberg - CEO of Verizon Communications, Comcast-ATT Cable TV, with Ralph and Brian Roberts as owners; Norman Ornstein, American Enterprise Institute - regular columnist for USA Today, news analyst for CBS and cochair with Leslie Moonves of the Advisory Committee on Public Interest Obligation of Digital TV Producers, appointed by Clinton; Dennis Lebowitz - head of Act II Partners, a media hedge fund; Barry Diller - chair of USA Interactive, former owner of USA Entertainment; Kenneth Roth - executive director of Human Rights Watch; Richard Leibner - head of N. S. Bienstock talent agency, which represents 600 news personalities such as Dan Rather, Dianne Sawyer, and Bill O’Reilly; Stephen Emerson - every media outlet’s first choice as an expert on
domestic terrorism; Terry Semel - CEO of Yahoo!, former chair, Warner Bros; Mark Golin - VP and creative director for AOL; Warren Lieberford - president of Warner Bros. Home Video Division of AOL-Time Warner. At the present time (1982), more than 47 major weekly magazines, with a circulation of over 79-million, are either directly owned or controlled by Jews. In the even more important field of daily news, 909 major newspapers, with a daily distribution of 49-million, are Jewish owned/or controlled as noted. In addition to the above, there are more than 17 daily newspapers with a circulation between 250,000 and 500,000 which are Jewish owned/and controlled, including such newspapers as the San Francisco Chronicle, the Miami Herald, the St. Louis Post Dispatch, the Atlanta Journal, the Indianapolis Star, the Boston Globe, the Kansas City Times, and the Omaha Herald. The Jewish mechanics in controlling small newspapers is to cut off it’s advertising and shut off it’s paper supplies. As a result,
very few independent newspapers will buck the Zionist line. There are several vicious Jewish commentators on TV, such as CBS Sixty Minutes, the 20/20 Show, and at one time the Phil Donahue Show. All these are distinctly liberal, pro-Zionist, and anti-Christian and are all run by Jews.
43 “For the past several decades, and especially since the Six-Day War in 1967, the centerpiece of US Middle Eastern policy has been its relationship with Israel. The combination of unwavering support for Israel and the related effort to spread ‘democracy’ throughout the region has inflamed Arab and Islamic opinion and jeopardized not only US security but that of much of the rest of the world.” (http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/john-mearsheimer/the-israellobby).
44 As reported by Ted Pike: There are four times more Jews in Congress than the 2 percent of Jews in the general population. A whopping 13 Jews inhabit the Senate (13%) with 29 Jewish House members. Even non-Jewish members of the House and Senate know where their interests lie. The Washington Post once estimated that Democratic presidential candidates ‘depend on Jewish supporters to supply as much as 60 percent of the money. Helen Thomas: “I can call a President of the United States anything in the book, but I can’t touch Israel. I cannot say anything [critical] about Israel in this country.” Thomas: Israel “has Jewish-only roads in the West Bank. No American would tolerate that – white-only roads.” Helen Thomas: “The Zionists have to understand that’s their country, too. Palestinians were there long before any European Zionists.” In an August 5, 2011 interview with Deanna Spingola on the Republic Broadcasting Network, Thomas spoke out again. Here are her remarks, arranged according to topic. Founding of Israel: “[The Israelis]…most of them, came from somewhere else and to take
people’s land is just absolutely wrong. [In 1948] they would call different homes out and tell the people if you don’t leave in 24 hours we’re going to wipe out this house and your family. Everybody was fleeing. And the Israelis said ‘nobody has to leave’ which is a joke, of course. How did all these strangers wind up in Israel, Jerusalem, and say this is my home, or wind up in Tel Aviv? Truman recognized the state of Israel at 3 o’clock in the morning when they knocked on his door on May 15th, 1948—this was totally, absolutely wrong. They drove the people from their homes—they’re still living in caves and tents—sixty years driven from their homes. Some Palestinians had keys to the door. The [Jewish] woman [would] open the door and say ‘this is my home! Who are you, go away!’ How can they [the Palestinians] tolerate that? [Grabbing Palestinian land] is always done since they were created. Anyone with any real soul and heart knows what they’ve been doing is mean—you just can’t take what doesn’t belong to
them.” Zionist Control of the White House: “I think every president has had to bow to the whole problem of [Zionism being created] . . . They [Zionists] used their money. They had the power: communication, propaganda, so it’s been going on more than a century. I think there’s a great purpose—to preserve Israel at all costs. [Zionism was] aided and abetted by almost every president because they put money in campaigns and presidents owed a debt.”
Zionist Control of Congress: Caller: “How do so many of the Israeli people have dual-citizenship when they come from every country of the world?” Thomas: “That’s right, they’ve got a real control of Congress and have been able to manipulate and get this kind of prestige [to allow dual-citizenship to Jews]. Also, every administration—every president has to cow-tow (she says Jimmy Carter’s administration may have been an exception.) “When you have that kind of power over the White House, [politicians] owe a debt. [Politicians] ‘can’t’ [respond to phone calls critical of Israel.] Caller: “How long have you known about Zionists in Congress?” Thomas: “When I first hit Washington in 1942 I began to realize that all was not all it seemed. I think I’ve learned more and more about Zionist pressure in our country and now I think it’s reached a high-point—there’s no question that they have power.”
Spingola: “They all serve the same masters over there in the Middle East.” Thomas: “That’s right, it’s true—and in the US. It’s unbelievable the kind of pressure that’s put on our administration when you have practically every member of Congress genuflecting when Netenyahu stands up there—I don’t know how many times they bowed and scraped before him.” Spingola: “That is just ridiculous. Who else comes into Congress and gets that response?”
Thomas: “No one.” Spingola: “And they’re just a dinky little country—stolen land in the Mideast and everyone dances around.” Speaking about Israel’s 2006 bombing of Southern Lebanon, Thomas says, “It was unbelievable what Sharon did and the U.S. [Congress and president] stood by.” Israel’s Nuclear Program: Thomas: “Is it possible for even a president who talks about change to tell the truth [about Israel’s nuclear weapons]?” Spingola: “How did he respond when you asked him about who had nuclear weapons in the Mideast?” Thomas: “He said that is what is speculated—I said you don’t have to speculate, that is the first thing you learn when you take office: who has the weapons, who is the enemy. Israel will do anything now to keep any other country from having nuclear weapons— including forcing us to bomb Iran.” Zionist Control of State Department: “The State Department bends to the
politics of the day and where the money is. The State Department has betrayed true diplomacy. Diplomats all over the world, they know exactly what is going on, yet when they write home…and wire the State Department, nothing happens. They have eliminated all the Arabists—any diplomat who has really studied in the Arab world or served there has been eliminated and even major universities—every major history department has been taken over.”
Zionist Media Control: Caller: “The problem with reporters not speaking up is that all the major media is controlled by the Zionists. They own it, so there’s no way they’re gonna speak up—they’ll lose their job.” Thomas: “You bet!”
Thomas says of burgeoning alternative media, “I think it is tremendous—a breakthrough.” She says of Spingola’s program, Spingola Speaks on Republic Broadcasting Network, “I’m amazed at the courage of this program – congratulations for your courage.” USS Liberty Attack: Thomas agrees with many statements by Spingola and guest host Eileen Fleming concerning injustices and deceptions by the U.S. government and Israel after Israel’s attack on the USS Liberty. Thomas: “We didn’t know all the facts when the Liberty was bombed in broad daylight.”
Persecution of Thomas: Thomas: “You don’t take any stand for Arabs and get away with it. I’m persona non grata in this country.” Spingola: “Someone accused you of being anti-Semitic.” Thomas: “I had a profane word that I don’t say on the air: ‘It’s a lot of BS.’ I mean, it’s created. There is no rights under their view. We have no rights.” Varied Comments. Thomas: “I think Jerusalem should be internationalized—the city for everyone. We should get out of Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen—every other place we’re in—get out and why keep on killing and dying.” Free Speech:
Despite the turbulence surrounding her over the past year, Thomas remains an optimist. “I think we can’t live without hope. I would never live without hope, I always believed the truth will come out.”
http://www.bollyn.com/index.php#article_13302. McAllister is quoted as saying: “What I have experienced less than a week ago, (Tuesday, October 18, 2011) has been unbelievable. Let me start from the beginning. As you might remember, I was posting, asking teachers to come to Occupy LA with our cause about the firing and mistreatment of teachers. That is what I did. I made a sign about teachers losing their jobs, and about money being stolen from teachers, and I took my lawn chair and sat on the grounds of city hall, like many other citizens...seniors, young, and old. I was approached by a reporter who said he wanted to ask me some questions. He had a camera crew guy with him to take the video. The interview was about 5 minutes long. After the interview I forgot about it. I think the
interview took place on Friday, October 14, 2011. On Monday morning, October 17, I started getting calls on my cell phone with such comments as “we support you”, and some not so nice comments. I did not know WHAT was going on. I then went on the web and I started looking around the web, and I found the Occupy LA video! I was shocked. I had an assignment to teach at a high school on subfinder. A school requested me for a future assignment.
I then decided to go to subfinder to check the assignment, and I got the message, “your status is inactive, contact your supervisor.” I then knew that something was brewing. I called the Subunit, and I was transferred to a supervisor. She asked me to call upstairs to Ira Berman, Director of Employee Relations. I called and we decided that I should come into the office to speak to Mr. Berman. When I got to headquarters on Beaudry, I was escorted into Mr. Berman’s office, along with his assistant. Mr. Berman gave me his business card, and he said that I no longer had a job with the district, that I was dismissed. I asked him why, and he said that he could not talk about it. I then asked him for the pink slip, and he said that he did not have one. I was in his office no more than 45 seconds.
This happened to be the same day that the Occupy LAUSD rally was held. I did not realize that until afterwards. I went to the supply store and I bought some sign boards and I stood in front of Beaudry. News reporters saw me and ran up to me saying that they heard I was fired, and they interviewed me...Fox news and KTLA. I have also had interviews with other news media. One might ask why this is such a hot topic. Well, anytime you mention the Zionist Jews and their ownership of the printing of our money, and their ownership of the Federal Reserve Bank, you will get a lot of static. Remember Helen Thomas and Rich Sanchez? All they did was mention Jews, and they were fired. The statement that I made was true. I will never apologize or back down from my statement. This matter concerning our Federal Reserve Bank being privately owned has been a concern of mine for years. Congress does
not even have the authority to audit the Federal Reserve Bank! I will have extensive history of the Federal Reserve Bank in the near future for the world to read. Experts have also said that if the printing of America’s money is turned over to the Treasury, through the Congress, that the U.S. could be out of debt within a year! Do you see, the mismanagement and the printing of America’s money by the Feds is the reason why we as Americans are suffering today! This is why what I said is causing such a stir. The Zionist Jewish bankers who started the Feds started the IRS within months of the Fed’s beginning. The Fed buys U.S. debt with money they printed from nothing (trees), then charges the U.S. taxpayers interest. The government had to create income tax to pay the interest expense to the Fed’s shareholders, but the income tax was never legally passed. The Fed is illegal per Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution. In addition, not one state legally ratified the 16th Amendment making income tax legal. I created the petition to have my job reinstated. Please go to the following website to sign the petition. Thank you in advance for all of your support.”
46 George Washington: “They (the Jews) work more effectively against us, than the enemy’s armies. They are a hundred times more dangerous to our liberties and the great cause we are engaged in... It is much to be lamented that each state, long ago, has not hunted them down as pest to society and the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of America” (Maxims of George Washington by A. A. Appleton & Co.); Benjamin Franklin: “I fully agree with General Washington, that we must protect this young nation from an insidious influence and impenetration. The menace, gentlemen, is the Jews. In whatever country Jews have settled in any great number, they have lowered its moral tone; depreciated its commercial integrity; have segregated themselves and have not been assimilated; have sneered at and tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which that nation is founded, by objecting to its restrictions; have built up a state within the state; and when opposed have tried to strangle that country to death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal. For over 1,700 years, the Jews have been bewailing their sad fate in that they have been exiled from their homeland, as they call Palestine. But gentlemen, did the world give it to them in fee simple, they would at once find some reason for not returning. Why? Because they are vampires, and vampires do not live on vampires. They cannot live only among themselves. They must subsist on Christians and other people not of their race. If you do not exclude them from these United States, in their Constitution, in less than 200 years they will have swarmed here in such great numbers that they will dominate and devour the land and change our form of government, for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives our substance and jeopardized our liberty. If you do not exclude them, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the fields to furnish them substance, while they will be in the counting houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your graves. Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they will nor how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never be otherwise. Their ideas do not conform to an American’s, and will not even thou they live among us ten generations. A leopard cannot change its spots. Jews are Asiatics, are a menace to this country if permitted entrance, and should be excluded by this Constitutional Convention.” From “Chit Chat Around the Table During Intermission,” at the Philadelphia Constitutional Convention of 1787, recorded in the dairy of Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, a delegate
from South Carolina.
47 La Civiltà Cattlolica, Series XIV, Vol. VII, Fascicule 961, Oct. 23, 1890, p. 8;
48 South African Jewish Times, May 19, 1950.
49 Schoeman claims that the Jews are “blessed by nature,” “…a blessing by nature promised to…the Jewish race, despite their lack of faith in Christ” (Salvation is from the Jews, p. 42). Schoeman claims that Jewish converts have been endowed with a special “Jewish charism” from God such that they are analogous to “yeast” that makes bread rise (ibid., p. 71). Schoeman claims that we can look “to the Talmud to examine some of what it has to say about the Messiah” (ibid., p. 111). Schoeman says the Fathers of the Church and Catholic tradition perpetuated an error “for two thousand years” by interpreting the prophecies of the Old Testament concerning the “restoration of Israel” as referring to the Catholic Church and not a future nation-state of Israel (ibid., pp. 303-312, 352-353). Schoeman
claims Old Testament prophecy predicts a “new Jewish state,” he says it “shall be extremely prosperous” and that the modern-day Israeli army is a God-favored entity such that God will see to it that “Israel will be miraculously militarily strong and able to defend itself” (ibid., pp. 309-310). Schoeman claims that the “fullness of the Gentiles” (Rm 11:25) occurred in 1967, and the sign of its fulfillment was what he deems as the God-blessed six-day surge of the Israeli army against its Arab neighbors in which “Jerusalem…was recaptured by the modern state of Israel in the 1967 war” (ibid., p. 306). Schoeman claims that those who try to “destroy the nascent State of Israel, well might be part of a diabolical attempt to prevent the Second Coming” (ibid., p. 316), thus promoting the idea that the existence and thriving of the nation state of Israel is absolutely necessary for Christ to return. Schoeman claims that the “one day” mentioned in Isaiah 66:8 is prophesying the establishment of the nation state of Israel on precisely one day, namely, May 14, 1948 (ibid.,, p. 307).
50 La Civiltà Cattlolica, Series XIV, Vol. VII, Fascicule 961, Oct. 23, 1890, p. 8;
51 The nations are: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Iran. Stated October 3, 2007 at the Commonwealth Club of California, San Francisco, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHiOK4b58-E&feature=share
52 Reed notes: “Apart from this distinct group of young men apparently trained during Roosevelt’s early years in office to take over the State Department, the president was accompanied by a group of Jewish advisers at the highest level. Mr. Henry Morgenthau junior (a leading Zionist, whose ‘Morgenthau Plan’ of 1944 was the original basis for the bisection of Europe in 1945) was his Secretary of the Treasury for eleven of the twelve years. Other intimate associates were Senator Herbert Lehman (another leading Zionist who took great part in promoting the ‘second exodus’ from Europe in 1945-1946, which led to the war in Palestine, Judge Samuel Rosenmann (a resident inmate of the White House, who helped write Mr. Roosevelt’s speeches, Mr. David Niles (of Russian born parentage, and for many years ‘adviser on Jewish affairs’ to Mr. Roosevelt and his successor), Mr. Benjamin Cohen (a drafter of the Balfour Declaration in 1917 and another important Zionist), and three Jews from Russia, Messrs. Sidney Hillman, Isador Lubin and Leo Pasvolsky” (317). The irony of Morgenthau is that his father was against Zionism.
Reed notes: “Mr. Henry Morgenthau senior was a notable Jew of America who became an ambassador…He said, ‘Zionism is the most stupendous fallacy in Jewish history. I assert that it is wrong in principle and sterile in its spiritual ideas. Zionism is a betrayal…an Eastern European proposal, fathered in this country by American Jews…which, if they were to succeed, would cost the Jews of America most of what they have gained of liberty, equality and fraternity. I refuse to allow myself to be called a Zionist. I am an American” (479).
53 According to the National Journal, http://globalfire.tv/nj/04en/history/fdrsneokons.htm
54 When the Jewish owner of the lease for the WTC buildings, Larry Silverstein, is caught on video tape saying “Pull it” to the NYFD in reference to his 47-story Building #7, and a few minutes later the whole edifice comes tumbling down demolition-style, it is just a matter of time before the thread will be pulled from the cloth to reveal a Zionist and American “secret” government backdrop. As the verified account goes, Mr. Silverstein was contacted by the NYFD in the late afternoon of September 11 and asked whether he wanted the FYPD to “pull” the building down.
Mr. Silverstein’s account of the incident is as follows: “I remember getting a call from the...er...fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, ‘We’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.’ And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.” The term “pull it” is common nomenclature for bringing a building down, derived from the days in which long ropes were attached to the top story of the building and men at the bottom would literally pull the building down after the internal structure had been sufficiently weakened. Soon after Mr. Silverstein gave the go-ahead, Building 7 came down demolition-style. It seems obvious that Building 7 had to be laced with demolition paraphernalia previous to September 11 and that Larry Silverstein and the NYFD knew it, and
thus both parties could agree on bringing the building down on cue. Interestingly enough, bomb-sniffing dogs were removed five days before 9-11. http://9-11research.wtc7.net/wtc/attack/preparation.html. I recently found out that the entire Odigo company was told to leave the Towers just prior to crash (http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/9-11_warnings_odigo.html). Another clip shows a deep cavity, complete with melted rock, at the base of the Twin Tower appearing to be caused by a mini-nuclear explosion (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jM3bHgTBxGo&feature=related). The evidence against the official government story is endless.
55 History Channel, August 2007.
56 See also Institute for Historical Review at http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v07/v07p405_Weber.html
57 La Civiltà Cattlolica, Series XIV, Vol. VIII, Fascicule 970, Nov. 4, 1890, p. 15;
58 “The moment has come in which God asks the Holy Father to make, and to order that in union with him and at the same time, all the bishops of the world make the consecration of Russia to My Immaculate Heart, promising to convert it because of this day of prayer and worldwide reparation.”
59 Fatima in Lucia’s Own Words: Sister Lucia’s Memoirs, editor: Fr. Louis Kondor; Imprimatur: May 13, 1976, Postulation Center, Fatima, Portugal, p. 199.
60 From Pharaoh to Hitler, 1933, although the page number is not cited in Reed’s book.
61 The Israel Test, pp. 229-230.
62 Reed notes this quote is from the South African Jewish Herald.
63 On October 27, 2011, at the Basilica of Holy Mary of the Angels (Santa Maria degli Angeli), voodoo warloc Wande Abimbola from Nigeria, in front of Benedict XVI, sang a hymn to the deity Olokun. Abimbola represented the Yoruba voodoo sect at the Fourth Assisi Inter-Faith Meeting, which commemorated the first of these events held by John Paul II in 1986 (http://gloria.tv/?media=209137). During his stay in Sydney for World Youth Day 2008, Benedict XVI received a “blessing” from one of the many Aborigine witch doctors he met.