You are here

False flag alert

If NATO decides to start bombing Syria, a false flag attack on the tomb of Suleyman Shah will be ideal.

The Ottoman ruler Suleyman Shah (1178 -1236) supposedly drowned in the river Euphrates in Syria. An Ottoman-built tomb near Qal'at Ja'bar (Syria) has historically been associated with him. In accordance with Article 9 of the Treaty of Ankara (1921) signed between France and Turkey, the tomb is Turkish territory. Syria's government had abided by this agreement.

In 1974, Syria built the Tabqa Dam, which created Lake Assad, which flooded the area around the tomb. Therefore the tomb was moved to a new location north of Qal'at Ja'bar, Syria.

The significance is that the tomb, and the area around it, are Turkish sovereign territory. It is a Turkish enclave (and thus a NATO outpost) inside Syria, over 100 miles from the Turkish border.

At any given time, two Turkish soldiers stand ceremonial guard at the tomb's entrance . Fifteen Turkish soldiers are housed in a nearby barracks, although Turkey has recently increased that number. 

On 5 Aug 2012, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said during an interview, “The tomb of Süleyman Şah and the land surrounding it are our territory. We cannot ignore any unfavorable act against that monument, as it would be an attack on our territory, as well as an attack on NATO. Everyone knows his duty, and will continue to do what is necessary.”

Thus, Turkey could easly order its Syrian terrorists to fire a couple of mortars at the tomb, so that Turkey can say that Syria’s government has attacked NATO (even though the location is in Syria).

Incidentally, we know that the NATO-Israeli-GCC alliance is bent in destroying Syria, but people in northern Syria (especially Christians) focus on Turkey, who they think has “neo-Ottoman” aspirations.

Ottoman Turks ruled Syria from 1516 until World War I, during which time they relegated Christians to a second-class citizen status. The Ottomans also required Christians to pay special taxes, and restricted Christian interaction with Muslims.

Even harsher on Christians is Wahhabism, the psychotic form of "Islam" that is the official state religion of Qatar and Saudi Arabia. The Wahhabists want to purge Christians from the Middle East altogether. And since Israel has no problem with that, the Christians in the West don't either.

Many terrorist gangs in Syria name themselves after famed Wahhabist mass-murderers, such as Khalid ibn al-Walid, or the "third caliph" Umar ibn al-Khattab.

When the Alawites took power, they gave special protection to Christians, who since then have been treated much better in Syria than they have been in most Islamic countries.  The terrorists, and the NATO-Israeli-GCC alliance want to end that.

Syria’s Christians include Syrian Orthodox, Greek Orthodox, Armenian Orthodox, Greek Catholics, and Syrian Catholics. All have been targeted for expulsion or extermination. 

Also, Syria is the only Arab country where Palestinians have been given full rights. Palestinians are in every walk of life, including higher echelons of Syria’s government. The only right denied to Palestinians in Syria is the right of nationality, which is a political decision to keep Palestinian cause alive.

Since most Syrian Palestinians support the government, they are targets for the terrorists.  An example was the terrorist mortar attack that killed 21 Palestinians on 3 Aug 2012. And since most people in the West are morons, they think Assad is "anti-Palestinian." The morons said the same thing about Saddam Hussein, even though Hussein (like Assad) gave special protection to Palestinians, and always championed their cause. They also say Hezbollah is anti-Palestinian.

Amazing, isn't it? The West supports Israeli atrocities against Palestinians, and when the West wants to destroy Muslim governments, the West claims that the targets are "anti-Palestinian."

And the masses believe it.  

Comments

Heydrich,

You wrote: ''Many terrorist gangs in Syria name themselves after famed Wahhabist mass-murderers, such as Khalid ibn al-Walid, or the "third caliph" Umar ibn al-Khattab.''

Where did you learn history about islam and the companions of prophet Mohamed pbuh? Do you know who khalid Ibn Walid is? and do you know who Umar Ibn Khatab  is? or are you just guessing? what dont you post  sources of your claim? Wahabism  didnt start until so called Mohamed ibn wahab came to being which is only a centry ago. If you know nothing about something then better to avoid commenting on it. Thanks.

Mohamed ibn Wahhab was around in the 1700's which is more than a century ago.

"Do you know who Umar Ibn Walid is?  Do you know who Khalid Ibn Walid is?"

Yes. Groups of Wahhabist mass-murderers name themselves after people like them, according to the Wall Street Journal.

If you dispue that, then take it up with the Journal. By insulting me, you make yourself look like a moron.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390443537404577579473069060742.html

So Wall Street Journal is holy source? that's all what you could come up with? as I said wahabism only started a century ago and you know better. Heydrich, you are a disinformation agent.

Wow. Is that the best insult you can come up with?

Why don't you call me a "Zionist," a "CIA agent," and a "child molester" while you're at it?

Incidentally, Wahabists are worthless piles of feces. I personally know three of them. That is, I have spent considerable time around them. If you are one of them, then it would explain much.

The reason why anyone would name himself after Khalid ibn walid is because he was a warrior, all the wars he fought he won. I am only trying to make correction here. I careless who the wahabis are, but to associate umar ibn khatab and khalid ibn walid with so called wahabis is wrong.

There are many videos on youtube about khalid ibn walid. This is for readers to check.

Guys please keep it civil. 

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer