JB, very nice work! I have a question about the first quote though. Have you read The Vexing "Jewish Question"? It's by Goldwin Smith and details the bogus claims of the Jews about "pogroms" in Russia.
Here's an excerpt, "The outrages on women, by which public indignation in England had been most fiercely aroused, and of which, according to the Jewish accounts, there had been a frightful number, no less than 30 in one place and 25 in another, appeared, after careful inquiries by the consuls, to have been very rare. This is the more remarkable because the riots commonly began with the sacking of the gin shops, which were kept by the Jews, so that the passions of the mob must have been inflamed by drink. The horrible charge brought in the Jewish manifesto against the Russian women, of having incited men to outrage Jewesses and held the Jewesses down, is found to be utterly baseless. The charge of roasting children alive also falls to the ground. So does the charge of violating a Jew's wife and then setting fire to his house. The Jewish manifesto states that a Jewish innkeeper was cooped in one of his own barrels and cast into the Dnieper. This turns out to be a fable, the village which was the alleged scene of it being ten miles from the Dnieper and near no other river of consequence."
I had a blog querying the use of the quote as a possible way to bury what Smith actually wrote.
I have heard of the book and read passages, but to be honest, I know that reading it would piss me off so much that I would go push the first Ashkenazi that I would see into a canal.
JB & Infinite, I'm puzzled by the question of who Goldwin Smith was. The quote, which should be pulled from the otherwise great video, is wrongly dated 1981 (he was long dead) and makes a truthteller appear to be a Jewish radical.
JB, very nice work! I have a question about the first quote though. Have you read The Vexing "Jewish Question"? It's by Goldwin Smith and details the bogus claims of the Jews about "pogroms" in Russia.
Here's an excerpt, "The outrages on women, by which public indignation in England had been most fiercely aroused, and of which, according to the Jewish accounts, there had been a frightful number, no less than 30 in one place and 25 in another, appeared, after careful inquiries by the consuls, to have been very rare. This is the more remarkable because the riots commonly began with the sacking of the gin shops, which were kept by the Jews, so that the passions of the mob must have been inflamed by drink. The horrible charge brought in the Jewish manifesto against the Russian women, of having incited men to outrage Jewesses and held the Jewesses down, is found to be utterly baseless. The charge of roasting children alive also falls to the ground. So does the charge of violating a Jew's wife and then setting fire to his house. The Jewish manifesto states that a Jewish innkeeper was cooped in one of his own barrels and cast into the Dnieper. This turns out to be a fable, the village which was the alleged scene of it being ten miles from the Dnieper and near no other river of consequence."
I had a blog querying the use of the quote as a possible way to bury what Smith actually wrote.
I have heard of the book and read passages, but to be honest, I know that reading it would piss me off so much that I would go push the first Ashkenazi that I would see into a canal.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldwin_Smith
JB & Infinite, I'm puzzled by the question of who Goldwin Smith was. The quote, which should be pulled from the otherwise great video, is wrongly dated 1981 (he was long dead) and makes a truthteller appear to be a Jewish radical.
Two Goldwin Smiths?
A smear of an important scholar?