Via email from a friend
Please go to 14 minutes, 30 seconds into the audio file of part two of that program and listen to Mike Rivero "fudging" about Dr. Ron Paul's take on "9-11." It takes almost two minutes before it gets to the Dr. Paul part where you will hear Mike Rivero saying that Dr. Paul is "neutral" about "9-11."
I can be neutral about a lot of events but not about "9-11." If Dr. Paul maintains that 19 Arabs carried out the attack, he is not neutral. Instead he is full of it!
http://gcnlive.com/Archives2010/mar10/WhatReallyHappened/0304102.mp3
Tags:
Submitted by Ognir on Sat, 2010-03-06 07:35
- Ognir's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 195 reads
-
I think this neutral-on-9/11 business is just more of the same old hair-splitting on Mike Rivero, but I didn't like the way he rudely cut off the first caller (the one he disagreed with on the Debra Medina issue) while having a good, long old yarn with the second caller (whose remarks he agreed with). After cutting off the first caller he went into a long diatribe about his own position, leaving the muted caller with no opportunity to respond. That's not fair play, it's Jonesesque pussy shit.
already "weighed in" in 9-11 and said the Muslims did it. Rivero knows that. Or should.
Nice find, Ognir. Rivero is a very interesting case. Obviously a different act than Jones, but he keeps coming up shit. Jones left out the people responsible, Mikey mentions them very frequently, but always leaves out the critical info on the depth/age of the problem and he mixes in those nasty lumps of mainstream disinfo bullshit.
9/11 is THE litmus test. Ron Paul has repeatedly failed, yet Mikey's gonna keep fluffing him as he does for Dogshit Jones and Tarpley.
Readers interested in other Mikey antics should try the Nazi Boogieman Meter.
Mikey's changed his mind on this one. What was it, 24 hours? This does not build confidence in R.P. His thoughts on the subejct today are intelligent and accurate. I've put the Webhamster's Comments first.
7 March 2010
Webmaster's Commentary:
Another waffle-head who will sell himself (and you) to the official view of the world.
Drop this loser now.
Candidate denies link to 9/11 conspiracy theorists
Tags: * 911 * POLITICS/ELECTIONS/CORRUPTION
Although as of yesterday he was listed online as a member of a group that questions the validity of government and mainstream media accounts of the 9/11 attacks, state Rep. candidate Jonathan Loya says he is not a conspiracy theorist and joined the group because of his libertarian ideologies.
Guess some wafflers are more equal than others.
It's just become a weapon the media uses to try to discredit libertarian and populist candidates. They try to use these peoples', who actually speak the truth about important issues, own honesty against them and it works! If they say they do think 9/11 was a false flag the majority rejects them cause they're mainly a bunch of morons and possibly always will be. If they say that they don't think it was then their grassroot and informed supporters reject them, the strongest base who will actually go out and do campaigning. If they are wishy washy or flip-flip like Debra Medina has done then everyone hates them. You can say 'good, I'm glad Ron Paul lost!' but the jokes on all of us cause instead we got Obama who is obviously a lot worse.
I'd still support almost anyone who runs for office that says that 9/11 was a false flag w/Israeli involvement but I doubt that they'd win. If they did it'd be cool though, maybe someday.
but says he's not a truther sounds like a clown though, I'm w/Rivero on that one.