While the United States and European Union are vehemently competing with each other in the seemingly endless race of imposing sanctions on Iran, the ordinary Iranian citizens are experiencing the most breathtaking, agonizing impacts of the crippling embargoes.
On July 31, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) sent a letter to all members of the U.S. Congress, demanding a concerted action to approve The Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act which imposes a new set of sanctions on Iran's energy and transportation sector.
On August 1, the media reported that the Congress has ratified the bill and it's waiting to be signed by the president.
Iran is already under 6 rounds of sanctions endorsed by the United Nations Security Council. The sanctions are purportedly aimed at preventing Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons.
The UNSC sanctions stipulate a freezing of Iran's international assets, the closure of branches of Iranian banks in other countries, barring the export of nuclear and military facilities to Iran, a ban on investment in Iran's oil, gas and Petrochemistry sector, business dealings with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, banking and insurance transactions and traveling restrictions for high-ranking governmental and military officials.
The United States, Israel and EU countries have long accused Iran of trying to build nuclear bombs, a charge which Iran has persistently and categorically denied. Iran says that it needs civilian nuclear power to meet its growing energy needs, especially since Iran is a country mostly reliant on fossil fuels for its energy demands and oil revenues to keep its economy alive. The United States and its allies, in response, have penalized Iran with excruciating economic sanctions to derail the possible chances of Iran acquiring nuclear weapons capability.
On January 23, 2012, the European Union foreign ministers agreed upon imposing a multilateral oil embargo against Iran. The oil embargo which bans the European countries from buying crude from Iran went into effect on July 1.
What the Western officials say in public is that the sanctions are aimed at punishing the Iranian government and dissuading it from working toward acquiring nuclear weapons. What takes place in reality, however, is that the "smart" sanctions have directly come down like a ton of bricks on the Iranian people, making their life an arduous odyssey of struggling for survival in an ailing economy.
The sanctions have devastated the daily life of ordinary Iranian people by bringing the price of goods to a skyrocketing height, making the students abroad unable to get financial assistance from their parents in Iran, rendering it impossible for the private companies to do international transactions and making it extremely difficult for Iranians to get visa for traveling to foreign countries. The " smart sanctions" even include a ban on the importing of medicine and foodstuff from the other nations to Iran.
In the previous weeks, I have been arguing with my editors in some of the American political journals to convince them that certain sensitive medicines as well as agricultural goods could not make their way to Iran as a result of sanctions. They wouldn't accept, telling me that such transactions were smoothly taking place. But now, I think they have credible evidence available, confirming that the hard-hitting sanctions are destroying the daily life of the poor, defenseless Iranians who should pay the price for the West's and Israel's animosity with their government.
On May 6, Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty quoted Iran's reformist daily Shargh as writing that the exportation of a great deal of vital medicines to Iran has been banned as a result of the sanctions. These medicines which Iran is not capable of producing include drugs for the treatment of cancer, heart and breathing problems, thalassemia, and multiple sclerosis.
Hamid Reza Emadi, an Iran-based political commentator also confirms that the latest round of sanctions imposed on Iran just a few days ago directly affect the lives of average Iranians who have nothing to do with the country's nuclear program. "This latest move by the U.S. Congress shows the extent to which Washington has become frustrated and now it is going to step up their pressure on Iranian civilians by preventing the country from importing agricultural products… Iran is a grain importer and the U.S. knows that and by creating obstacles in the way of grain exports to Iran, the U.S. is clearly committing crimes against humanity because it only affects ordinary Iranians who have got nothing to do with the country’s nuclear energy program," Emadi said in an interview with Press TV.
"Do not forget that it is not just agricultural products; the U.S. is putting maximum pressure on international banks doing business with Iran, therefore Iranian medical companies cannot import some vital medicines," he added.
The board of directors of the Iranian Hemophilia Society has informed the World Federation of Hemophilia that the lives of tens of thousands of children are being endangered by the lack of proper drugs, a consequence of international economic sanctions imposed on the Islamic Republic.
Dr. Ron Paul, a Texas Congressman has called the recent sanctions an "act of war," saying that the bill had better be named "Obsession with Iran Act 2012."
“When you put on sanctions on a country, it’s an act of war and that’s what this is all about,” he said.
Some anti-war advocacy groups and organizations in the United States such as Veterans for Peace and Friends Committee on National Legislation have called on the U.S. government to put an end to its sanctions game with Iran which is seen by these groups a total declaration of war against Iran; however, it seems that these pro-peace groups will face a tough job to have their voice heard by the U.S. Congressmen and people in the White House who seem to be hell bent on delivering a lethal blow to Iran.
"Veterans for Peace" has just released a statement, saying that sanctions and threats of military strike are not viable and logical solutions to the nuclear crisis with Iran.
"The United States, European Union and Israel are using Iran's civilian nuclear program as an excuse to impose devastating economic sanctions against the people of Iran. According to various sources, the sanctions have already wreaked havoc on the Iranian economy, leading to inflation rates of 50 to 100 percent, youth unemployment rate of over 22 percent, drastic reduction of Iran's domestic production to 40 percent of its capacity, massive closure of economic enterprises and widespread layoffs, and 40 percent drop in the Iranian oil exports during 2012, resulting in a loss of $32 billion in oil income since last year alone," the statement reads.
The group has called for a nuclear free Middle East in an apparent allusion to Israel's nuclear arsenal. Along with India and Pakistan, Israel is the only country in the world which is not a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. By the late 1990s the U.S. Intelligence Community estimated that Israel possessed between 75-130 weapons, based on production estimates.
When all's said and done, Iran is currently experiencing difficult times, and its people are under mounting pressure in their daily affairs. Iran's economy is on the brink of bankruptcy as a result of the biting economic sanctions and the international community is calmly and silently witnessing the painful suffering of the Iranian people. The anti-Iranian sanctions clearly run counter to the principles of human rights, but it seems that those who advocate such values don't believe that Iranians are also "humans" who might perchance have some "rights" including the right of access to medicine, foodstuff, employment and above all, respect and human dignity.
Source: Kourosh Ziabari, 3 August 2012
Comments
Re: Ordinary Citizens: The Silent Victims Of Anti-Iran...
The Iran Strategy
In most nations the masses do not like their governments. Even in Venezuela and Nicaragua, the public approval rating is only 60 percent. (Rich elitists, of course, despise socialist governments.)
This is inevitable. It is the nature of society. No government can be perfect.
Therefore, when imperialist governments blockade a nation, the masses in the targeted nation tend to blame their own government for the hardships. The masses know they are being blockaded, but their hardships sharpen their routine complaints about bureaucracy, corruption, etc in their own government. The masses don’t care about international relations. They only know they are hurting, and they look for easy targets to blame, including their own government.
Imperialists are well aware of this. Hence imperialists strangle target nations in order to cause social unrest and political instability. When the masses become desperate, they become ripe for terrorism. This leads to civil war, which destroys the target nation. If necessary, the imperialists can assist the process via “humanitarian” carpet bombing.
Direct assaults rarely work well. Military sieges rarely break the people’s will to resist. The USA dropped millions of tons of bombs on the Vietnamese, and still did not break them. Israel bombarded all of Lebanon, and still was defeated by Hezbollah.
Therefore today’s strategy is to first starve the target, and then foment terrorism, in order to make the nation self-destruct, as we are seeing with Syria.
When the NATO-Israeli-GCC alliance has destroyed Syria, the alliance will sends its mercenaries to Iran, and foment terrorism there. This will be easy, since Iran is even now being starved. Alliance propaganda against Iran will switch from “global nuclear threat” to “responsibility to protect.”
Meanwhile inside the imperialist nations themselves, the One Percent use austerity to crush their own masses, in order to make the masses support imperialism.
For example, the One Percent in Europe and North America have imposed a severe Depression on the masses, who cope with their misery via fantasy and moralizing. Ordinary people are powerless against bankers and politicians, but they can righteously inveigh against “evil dictators” like Assad. We saw this in the 1930s when elitists starved the masses, and convinced ordinary people that Hitler was to blame.
The mechanism is essentially religious. When ordinary people are subjected to hardships, they individually and collectively escape into fantasies that are other-worldly, yet militaristic. (I am powerless now, but I will escape this misery when I die and go to heaven. I will win the lottery. In the meantime, Hitler is Satan. Assad is Satan. Ahmadinejad is Satan.)
In other words, when the masses are starving, they hunger for bogeymen, and are therefore easy to manipulate. For some people the bogeyman is “evil dictators.” For others it is immigrants, or people with brown skin. For still others it is Jews. (Jews merit condemnation, but many people becomes so obsessed with Jews that they excuse non-Jewish politicians, and non-Jewish members of the One Percent.)
Today’s “progressives” and “anti-war” people support war against Qaddafi, Assad, and so on. I attribute this “leftist” stupidity to the current Depression. In 2003 the One Percent had not yet subjected the masses to a Depression. Therefore the masses demonstrated against the invasion of Iraq. Today, because of the Depression, many "anti war" people demand that the USA make direct war on Syria. It is all part of the mass escape into righteous fantasies.
At the moment, the masses still do not favor war on Iran, since the masses associate the “global nuclear threat” propaganda with the obvious lies about “WMDs.” However the masses will change when Syria has been destroyed, and the NATO-Israeli-GCC alliance foments terrorism in Iran. The masses support any war that is “righteous” and “humanitarian” – especially when the masses are starving and unemployed.
Already the masses have slipped into the first stage of fantasy regarding Iran. The article above, for instance, mentions that "Veterans for Peace" has just released a statement, saying that sanctions and threats of military strike are not viable and logical solutions to the nuclear crisis with Iran.
This is denial. It is fantasy. The masses already know, at least subconsciously, that the nuclear issue is a smokescreen; a mere pretext to destroy Iran. Yet the masses cling to the nuclear issue, insisting that the campaign against Iran is simply “misguided.”
The masses also fantasize that the imperialist goal is “regime change,” when in fact the goal is total destruction, as we have seen in Libya, and now Syria.
Starving masses don’t want to face these realities, and therefore escape into righteous fantasy by agreeing that Qaddafi and Assad are “evil dictators” who are responsible for all atrocities committed by the NATO-Israeli-GCC alliance and their paid mercenaries.
Even if a foreign nation presents no threat, the masses agree that the nation’s “evil dictator” must be destroyed. Anything is acceptable in the process of destroying “evil dictators.”
If the blockade is causing the Iranian masses to suffer, then this is okay, since Iran’s government is “evil.”