Following US news media coverage of the Burgas, Bulgaria bombing, one would conclude that the Hezbollah provenance of the attack can be determined from recent alleged Hezbollah terrorist plotting against Israelis in Cyprus and elsewhere. The New York Times quotes anonymous US officials as saying the Burgas attack bears "all the hallmarks" of "the Hezbollah plots, including the arrest in Cyprus earlier this month of a suspected operative on the suspicion of scheming to kill Israeli tourists."
So an arrest of a "suspected" Hezbollah operative who is "suspected" of a plan to kill Israeli tourists is the equivalent of an actual terrorist attack that has killed Israeli tourists? Bibi Netanyahu talked about the case on Fox News Sunday as though the Lebanese man arrested in Cyprus had done everything that was done in Burgas except actually detonate the bomb. So has the Israeli press.
But as I reported earlier this week, the Cyprus case is far murkier than Netanyahu and those US officials have been suggesting. A senior Cypriot official told Reuters, "It is not clear what, or whether, there was a target in Cyprus." Furthermore, the Cypriot investigators believe the Lebanese they suspected of planning to harm Israeli tourists was acting alone, which doesn't make it sound like a Hezbollah operation at all. And perhaps most significant of all, there has no sign of a bomb or even of materials with which to make a bomb in conjunction with the Lebanese detainee. The Cypriot government has not yet decided whether there is enough evidence to prosecute the man on any violation of Cypriot laws.
The need for skepticism surrounding the Cyprus arrest applies even more strongly to the arrest in Bangkok in mid-January of another Lebanese with a Swedish passport who was suspected of being a Hezbollah operative. The arrest came after what was described by the Thai Deputy Prime Minister as "weeks of coordination with Israel." The Israelis convinced the Thai police chief of their speculative allegation that the man was planning a massive terrorist attack along the lines of the 2008 Mumbai massacre that would include the Israeli Embassy, synagogues, tour companies and kosher restaurants.
The Lebanese who was arrested was charged with possession of ammonium nitrate and urea fertilizer, which are potential bomb-making materials, but none of the other necessary components for bomb-making, such as fuses and timing devices were ever found. And the former police chief, who is now the Secretary General of the Thai National Security Council expressed doubt that the man was actually a terrorist.
Given the fact that the Israelis were then planning the assassination of an Iranian scientist Mostafa Ahmadi-Roshan in early to mid-January, the Israeli tale of a massive terrorist threat coming in mid-January, which first passed on to Thai authorities on December 22, was extremely convenient in terms of distracting attention from the inevitable negative press accompanying the Israeli terrorist action.
While the Obama administration has pointed to these murky allegations in Cyprus and Bangkok as relevant to Burgas, it has exhibited no apparent interest in the historical record of actual suicide bombings against Israeli tourists.
The reason, apparently, is that, all of the terrorist attacks that fit that description have been claimed by al-Qaeda or an affiliate.
The first suicide bombing against Israeli tourists was an al-Qaeda attack in Mombasa, Kenya in November 2002. That operation involved an effort to shoot down an Israeli passenger jet as it took off from Mombasa's airport, using shoulder-launched anti-aircraft missiles, and then the triple suicide car bombing of an Israeli-owned hotel in Mombasa. The missile missed the aircraft, but the suicide bombing killed killing three Israeli tourists and 10 Kenyans.
The small number of Israeli deaths did accurately reflect al-Qaeda's intentions. In claiming responsibility for the Mombasa attacks, al-Qaeda proclaimed that it was targeting "The Christian-Jewish alliance" and promised future and more lethal attacks on Jews around the world.
In October 2004 three suicide bombers detonated a truck bomb and car bombs at the Hilton Hotel in Taba and two other Red Sea resorts which were favorites of Israeli tourists in Egypt, and most of 34 dead were Israeli tourists. The Abdullah Azzam Brigades, an affiliate of al-Qaeda, took responsibility for the attack. The organization said the attacks were intended to "purify the land of Taba from the dirt and corruption of the grandchildren of monkeys and pigs."
In July 2005, three more terrorist attacks by suicide bombs killed at least 88 people at a shopping area and hotel packed with tourists, including Israelis, in the Egyptian Red Sea resort city of Sharm el Sheik. The Abdullah Azzam Brigades again claimed responsibility for what it called an attack "on the Crusaders, Zionists and the renegade Egyptian regime."
The Abdullah Azzam Brigades organization was designated by the State Department as a Foreign Terrorist Organization on May 24. Strangely, the designation ignored the history of the organization in suicide attacks on Israeli tourists in Egypt and said it was established only in 2009. But it did point out that the organization has bases in Lebanon which have launched rocket attacks on population centers in northern Israel.
Even if the US. national security state does not wish to acknowledge that the Burgas bombing fits the profile of an al-Qaeda terrorist operation rather than Hezbollah, there is no excuse for the US. news media failure to report that inconvenient truth.
Source: Gareth Porter, Antiwar.com, 28 July 2012
Comments
Re: Which ‘Terror Plots’ are Relevant to Burgas?
Gareth, do you really believe that Al Qaeda exists as anything other than a tool of U.S. intelligence services? I suppose you still believe in the tooth fairy too?
If anything, the Burgas bombing (if indeed it was a bombing) fits the profile of a self-inflicted false flag operation. It wouldn't be the first time The Middle East's Only Democracy® sacrificed its own in order to further its political, territorial and military objectives.
Re: Which ‘Terror Plots’ are Relevant to Burgas?
“The Burgas bombing (if indeed it was a bombing) fits the profile of a self-inflicted false flag operation. It wouldn't be the first time The Middle East's Only Democracy® sacrificed its own in order to further its political, territorial and military objectives.”
~ Sullivan
Yes, Bulgaria is perfect for a Jewish false flag attack. The country is very popular with Israeli tourists, and Bulgaria’s government is radically pro-Israel. After the Burgas incident on 18 July 2012, Bulgarian Tourism Minister Stas Meseznikov blamed it on Hezbollah and Iran, claiming that both spread terrorism throughout the entire planet. Bulgarian President Rosen Plevneliev and Prime Minister Boyko Borisov announced that a Bulgarian ministerial delegation would visit Israel in September to strengthen Israeli-Bulgaran military cooperation.
Thus, Bulgaria has an incentive to falsely blame Hezbollah for the Burgas incident.
Regarding Gareth Porter’s article above, Cyprus is currently holding a Lebanese suspect that the Jews claim was planning an attack on Israeli tourists. There is no evidence for this, and Cyprus will probably let the man go.
The significance is that the Jews tried to use the Burgas incident to finally get the EU to put Hezbollah on its list of “terrorist organizations,” as the Jews have been trying to do since the mid-1990s. (Hezbollah is already on the US-Canadian list of “terrorist organizations.”)
Six days after the Burgas incident, during an annual EU-Israel meeting in Brussels, Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman said, “The time has come to put Hezbollah on the terrorist list of Europe.”
“No,” responded the woman sitting beside him, Ms. Erato Kozakou-Marcoullis, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Cyprus, which currently holds the EU’s rotating presidency. “Hezbollah is active in Lebanese politics, including the parliament and the government, and plays a specific role with regard to the status quo in Lebanon. There is no consensus among the EU member states for putting Hezbollah on the list of terrorist organizations. Such a move would require a unanimous vote of all 27 member states.”
As a result, the Israeli government is now furious with Cyprus, and the Israeli media is hysterically screaming, “How many Hezbollah terrorist attacks around the world does it take for the EU to list Hezbollah as a terrorist organization?”
Incidentally, Cyprus is 64 miles west of Syria, and is preparing to assist hoards of refugees that will flee Syria if the NATO-Israeli-GCC alliance kills Assad. Cyprus helped refugees from Lebanon during Israel’s 2006 attack. The Jews are still furious about their defeat by Hezbollah (their second defeat).
Gareth Porter's accusing of "Al Qaeda" for the Burgas incident may not be as silly as it sounds. When the NATO-Israeli-GCC alliance wants to stage terrorist acts as false flags, the alliance sometimes uses its own personnel to execute the attacks, and sometimes hires mercenaries to do it. The terrorist mercenaries are collectively known as "Al Qaeda." Many were in Somalia, and later, Libya. Many are now in Syria. If the Burgas incident was a false flag, then the Israelis may have hired Al Qaeda mercenaries to do it.
Before 9-11, the corporate media called these mercenaries the "PLO," or "Black September," or "Libyans." Mercenaries hired by Israel conducted incidents like the attack on Jewish athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics, the 1985 hijacking of the cruise ship Achille Lauro, the 12 Oct 2000 attack on the USS Cole destroyer, and so on. The 1990s bombings of Argentina and the Israeli embassy in London were examples of Israeli personnel directly executing false flag attacks.
Re: Which ‘Terror Plots’ are Relevant to Burgas?
When Israel conducts a false flag attack, the corporate media usually calls it a "suicide atack," in order to cover up all traces of the truth, and to portray Muslims as crazed wackos. Passports and other identification documents are manufactured, and the media claims that they were miraculously found at the attack site. So it was in Bulgaria.
The Bulgarian government claims to have sent “DNA samples” from the body of the “suicide bomber” to Interpol, plus the U.S. and Israeli governments. The Bulgarian investigative site Bivol.bg doubts that it was a “suicide bomber,” and thinks the bomber was used as an unwitting “mule” by the real organizers of the attack.
Against both claims, one Israeli tourist, Gilat Kulangiya, says she saw the bomber remove suitcases from the baggage compartment of the bus, in order to place his bag in the compartment. This seems the most likely explanation. A bomb was placed in the baggage compartment, and detonated via a timer, or via a remote triggering device (i.e. radio signal). The media calls this a “suicide bombing.”
The instant charge that Hezbollah did it has made the US, Israeli, and Bulgaran governments look silly. Bulgarian Interior Minister Tsvetan Tsvetanov, who is in charge of the investigation, has had to admit there is no proof that Hezbollah did it.
Mohammad Khazaee (Iran’s ambassador to the UN) says it was likely an Israeli false flag. In response, Israel's deputy U.N. ambassador Haim Waxman says Khazaee’s comment was "appalling but not surprising from the same government that says the 9/11 attack was a conspiracy theory and denies the Holocaust.”