You are here

Israeli Pipedreams

When looking for the truth, it helps to have a map - or several of them . . .

israeli-American Pipedreams part 1

or two . . .

israeli-American Pipedreams map 2

or three . . .

israeli-American Pipedreams map 3

or more . . .

israeli-American Pipedreams map 4

. . .

isreali-American Pipedreams map 5

For details, click on the images and zoom in.

Examine them, critique them, but whatever you do -

PASS THEM ON

Many thanks to wadosy at LibertyForum.

See more information on israel's connection to oil.

Comments

In the fifth picture, it states that an American aircraft carrier was sunk, but it was actually an american intelligence ship.

The pipelines that are shown are EXTREMELY selective. In half a dozen places, Asian and Russian oil can be diverted to the persian gulf through Iran instead, and in various other places as well. They go all over to warm water ports in Europe and Asia, so the supposition that Israel is going to "control the oil supply" is bogus because all Iran and all its neighbors would have to do is destroy the piples leading to Israel.

As to Israel needing land because of global warming....I thought that Zionism began in the middle of the 19th century? Were they thinking about global warming back then too? And even if they were thinking about it now, they'd lose the first 25 kilometers of their coastline if the ocean rose TWO HUNDRED FEET! Here's a relief map if you don't believe:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fb/Israel_topo_en.jpg

So pretty much all of these maps don't prove or show anything valid at all, except possibly the Russia Chechnya connection, and whether you believe in false flag ops or not (I can believe in them, its just that EVERY single terrorist attack seems to be one....).

-Jebus

and a suspect zionist shill who cannot even READ carefully.

The map suggests that sinking an American carrier MIGHT happen in the FUTURE as a false flag effort to draw the US into a full scale conflict with Iran that could possibly allow using nukes against them.

Go away, man - you're a nuisance.

___________________________

"Money" has no value - people do.

haha, sorry, my bad. I didn't read carefully enough, but I don't have all the time in the world to read completely wild and fanciful what if stories. What if you had a shred of proof to prove this stuff? Gasp!

Address the other issues of land and oil please.

-Jebus

someone had said that the twin towers and an nearby building were going to come crashing down to the ground faster than the speed of gravity, after being hit by commercial airliners, I'm pretty sure you would have dismissed them as daft.

You're either blind, stupid, or a shill.

___________________________

"Money" has no value - people do.

Not really. I read a book by Tom Clancy that featured the Capitol building getting hit by a Japanese 747 pilot during the innauguration of the Vice President. All of congress, the senate, the president and his advisors, the Joint Chiefs, everybody was there. And they all died except the main character of the book, the guy who was supposed to become Vice President.

But I know what you're saying, but I can make a ton of what if suppositions and they don't mean anything. All it serves to do is promote your views. I could make "what if" suppositions about another Arab coalition deciding to attack Israel again, and cause fear mongering on CNN that we need to send more weapons to Israel. It would serve my purpose, but it may or may not happen. It works both ways, and is a propoganda tool for both sides so please stop using it.

-Jebus

You're an idiot and a misinformer.

___________________________

"Money" has no value - people do.

That doesn't address the fact that some of the statements made in your article don't make any sense, namely the land and oil issues. They may want land and oil, but the reasons for land and their ability to gather oil don't make any sense. If i'm a "misinformer", why don't you inform me as to the how those two statements can possibly make sense.

And don't tell me that I won't believe you if you actually show me some proof, or that i'm some Zionist this-or-that. I'll listen if it makes sense.

-Jebus

to losing land mass from global warming as being a motive for grabbing more land is highly if not entirely speculative.

But, the rest of the map and the conclusions and predictions drawn are very well grounded in over half a century of geopolitics.

Only the blind or someone with something to gain would deny it.

___________________________

"Money" has no value - people do.

why it is that so many assume this giant Zionist conspiracy, Israel controls America, etc., when a much simpler explanation to me would be that Israel was just created out of convenience and circumstance to represent the interests of the elite (mainly the US since WWII) and oppose those who were against US domination in a region that is so rich with energy resources?
It makes much more sense to me that Israel is simply a US outpost rather than claiming that Israel is controlling America. It seems to me that some of those who say that Israel and the Zionists control everything just have a racial ax to grind. I'm not equating Judaism with Zionism or Israel, but I'm often rubbed the wrong way by those who seem to.
Since it is completely bogus to say that being critical of Israeli policy is anti-semitic, it as also completly bogus to say that since Israel has become an outpost of western power in the middle east, there is some Jewish domination conspiracy. There are plenty of Jewish people who do not support Israel.

However, there are certain aspects of history as it unfolds and the actors that are undeniably responsible for it (not those we merely suspect) that leave a person hard pressed NOT to believe it.

It seems almost impossible to deny that Zionist agents who have israeli interests at heart diligently work to steer Western military and political instruments to their own political and economic detriment in order to advance israeli interests.

Just look at the US - every aspect of its economy - even its military is in rapid decline. Only israel and a handful of corporations (which are clearly Zionist aligned, if not zionist controlled) benefit from all these military conflicts.

___________________________

"Money" has no value - people do.

Mike, I know you are just wondering, but you state the following:

quote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

"It seems to me that some of those who say that Israel and the Zionists control everything just have a racial ax to grind. I'm not equating Judaism with Zionism or Israel, but I'm often rubbed the wrong way by those who seem to.
Since it is completely bogus to say that being critical of Israeli policy is anti-semitic..."

>>>>>>>>>>>>

How EXACTLY are "jews" are race?

THEY ARE COMPOSED OF A SUB-SET OF EUROPEAN ANCESTRY, MOSTLY EASTERN KHAZARS.

They are no more "semitic" than you typical Mongol or Chinese, or especially your typical AFRICAN since the original semites were of African-Arab Bloodline.

Now do you know who controls the CIA? The Federal Reserve? The MEDIA - especially US and European media? The US army?

....The likes of the Devil Henry Kissinger, the Balfour declaration, the ROTHSCHILDS, Perle, Wolfowitz, etc, etc, etc,

The WEALTHIEST, MOST POWERFUL AND RUTHLESS group has been in the last 400 years?

.......... answer that, and you have your answer!

Well, I imagine any state "lucky" enough to be the US protégé in a hostile region would quickly form somewhat of a symbiotic relationship. Obviously, due to the circumstances of the lives of the first inhabitants of Israel (the state), I'm sure that the new power and privilege that went along with being a US proxy went straight to their heads, as it probably would probably with any group of people who were coming out of a difficult time.
As we know, power quickly turns into arrogance and entitlement, both of which we now see. It makes sense that they are going to try and get as much out of 'daddy' as they can, like a child that's been spoiled since it's birth. It just so happens that this child is necessary for the US' interests in the region.

It seems almost impossible to deny that Zionist agents who have israeli interests at heart diligently work to steer Western military and political instruments to their own political and economic detriment in order to advance israeli interests.

I'm sure this is true, but for the large part, many of the goals of the Israili and US elite are probably congruent. And where they are not the same, it's perhaps not such a big deal for the most part. If Israel started doing something really absurd (in the US elites' eyes), I bet you would see US support evaporate in a flash. But I don't think you'd see that because Israel knows it can't exist without US aid. It would be the end of Israel as it's now known.

quote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

"This is an outstanding view of a combination of views held by Brzezinski and the Trilateral Group as identified in the "Grand Chessboard" and later books, the CFR and affiliated middle east think tanks that run straight out of Israel, PNAC and their execution of extracting both land and resources (US is so infiltrated the name should be changed to USIsrael), the SCO and their objective to keep their resources, and the concept that Zionists used in destructive creation in their game of chess, it is valid to sacrifice your own to win in the end which is a foundation of all military strategies. The US is a willing partner as the USS Liberty proved as well as other tragedies that were performed by Iraeli terrorists against US and Britain since the King David Hotel. Israel is not just a state but a world religious state homeland of which Zionists around the world consider their home first and above their country of residence.

Both Brzezinski and Wolfowitz are good friends and their objectives are the same. The contol of central asia and the movement of oil and gas through the mediteranean is exactly how their maps are drawn up. Since Turkey is no longer a friend, all lines would have to go through Eretz Yisrael so I would expect the destruction and takeover of Lebanon and Syria as well by US / Israeli forces. The SCO is the only group that will balance this situation out..."

Doesn't it make sense that in a culture where a certain ethnic group of society was banned from owning and farming land for so long or participating in common economic activity, that a couple hundred years after the fact, that same group would still be highly tied to the only way that the Christian majority had allowed them to make money, namely banking, the activity which derives the most power in our present-day society?

I'm not saying that this is necessarily the case, as I'm no expert on the subject, but it sure seems to have a more cause-and-effect logic to it than to assume a giant theory of takeover completely unrelated to any larger context.

You said:

Doesn't it make sense that in a culture where a certain ethnic group of society was banned from owning and farming land for so long or participating in common economic activity, that a couple hundred years after the fact, that same group would still be highly tied to the only way that the Christian majority had allowed them to make money, namely banking, the activity which derives the most power in our present-day society?

Please, rephrase or clarify your point.

___________________________

"Money" has no value - people do.

I am suggesting that if it is true (I don't know if it is or not) that there are a disproportionate amount of Jewish owners/managers in western culture, perhaps it could be possible to trace this back to the fact that in old Europe, many Jews had to rely on moneylending to make an income as they were barred by the Christian-church-run societies from practicing other methods of sustaining themselves financially.

It would then make some degree of sense that if generations in the past were involved in banking, this would still be a part of the culture to a degree and may explain such a disproportionality.

I'm just saying, as I was saying about Israel before, that in my opinion, many things are situational and probably make sense if one looks at all the inputs going into a situation. Rarely is anything black and white. Many things go into influencing every turn of history. Nothing has an easy explanation. Saying one race or ethnic group is good or bad is meaningless in my opinion. There are countless examples of many different groups carrying out the same dirty deeds given the right opportunity.

Have you ever thought that the reason Jews were banned from certain activities, in fact expelled from several countries, might have had something to do with their ruthless exploitation of non-Jews?

It isn't that Jews are or were racially any better or worse than anyone else. The problem was their Holy Book, the Talmud, taught them that the rest of us are not truly human beings, and that we were created by God so that there would be "animals in human form" to serve Jews.

People don't like being used and ruthlessly exploited, so some people decided that Jews were to be treated differently.

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer