You are here

Home

UK's ministry of truth takes Press TV off air

published by Tom Sullivan on Fri, 2012-01-20 20:57

In a questionable move and without offering a valid response to the Press TV CEO's letters, the British Office of Communications (Ofcom) has revoked Press TV's broadcasting license and finally removed the channel from the Sky platform.

Ofcom has revoked Press TV's license for what it calls breaching of the broadcasting code.

Earlier, Ofcom also hit Press TV with a fine of 100 thousand pounds. The British media regulator stepped up pressure on Press TV after the news channel covered British police crackdowns on anti-austerity protesters in London and other British cities.

Ofcom is said to have close ties to Britain's royal family. And the cables released by the whistleblower website WikiLeaks show that Press TV's programs on the royal wedding, which many in the country described as extravagant, angered the royal family.

Many observers have also noted that the British government's hostile campaign against Press TV has its roots in the channel's extensive and transparent coverage of the role that the British government played in the killing of tens of thousands of innocent people in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Press TV has extensively given coverage to Britain's support for autocratic Persian Gulf monarchies and even given legitimacy to the dictatorial regimes in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia.

In January, Press TV's CEO Mohammad Sarafraz sent a letter to Ofcom questioning the independence of the British regulatory body given that the British Secretary of State has the power to appoint or remove from office Ofcom's chairman and its members, and even to dissolve the entire organization.

Sarafraz also pointed out that Ofcom is funded by loans and Grant-in-Aid from the British Government.

He further pointed to Ofcom's “glaring contradiction” in its dealings with Press TV. “Ofcom wants to revoke the broadcast license because it has determined that Press TV Ltd. does not have control over the broadcast. Yet at the same time, Ofcom sentences Press TV Ltd. to pay a financial penalty for the broadcast of something Ofcom says it has no control over! How can you possibly explain your paradoxical performance?”

Sarafraz stressed that Ofcom's bid to revoke Press TV's license will not prevent the channel from broadcasting the truth about the British Royal regime.

“It is futile to attempt to conceal the truth from the people of Britain, and those that want to hear our alternative voice will find a way despite your efforts,” he said.

Source: Ofcom revokes Press TV's UK license, Press TV, 20 January 2012

Tags: 
UNITED KINGDOM
CENSORSHIP

Comments

Submitted by Heydrich on Sat, 2012-01-21 22:06.

Ofcom has been threatening to do this for awhile now. It's all about ratings and audience share. The growing popularity of Press TV angered the entrenched lie factories (e.g. the BBC), and they wanted the competition removed. Russia Today (RT) is next on the target list. All the bullshit about royal families, coverage of the riots, and so forth is just that...bullshit.

Submitted by Tom Sullivan on Sun, 2012-01-22 00:26.

I agree with the bulk of Heydrich's comment. Ofcom are a tool of the UK establishment and are about as independent as, say, the FDA is from Congress.  I disagree that this is all about ratings. Given how entrenched Zionism is in the UK's corridors of power, I would hazard a guess that this act of censorship was as much about maintaining a particular worldview (the Zionist one) to the exclusion of others.  Yes, Russia Today is probably next.  I wonder what excuse the pencil-pushers in Southwark Bridge Road will find to take that off the air.

Ofcom's decision has had implications for viewers outside the Septic Isle.  For instance, viewers in the Republic of Ireland have been denied the ability to view this station despite the fact that Ofcom have no jurisdiction there. I wonder if this could be a potential subject for legal action.

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer