Western Savagery Ready to Unleash Nuclear War on the World Based on Lies

The history of endless US savagery reads like a horror story. Of course there was Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Just a little preview of things to come when a monster gets its hands on weapons of mass destruction.

When they first started feeling their oats after the Warsaw Pact was disbanded, there was the savage, murderous attack on Yugoslavia for a pack of lies. Damage done to Yugoslavia was estimated to be USD 30 billion. In the 78 days of the attacks, 540 buildings were destroyed, 58 bridges and 30,000 homes.

There were 146 air raid alarms which combined lasted for 774 hours, for an average of 9 hours and 55 minutes a day. The insatiable lunatics were flying over 650 sorties every night. Talk about savagery and overkill, lack of civilization and absolute terrorism, not to mention the war crime of collective punishment of Yugoslav civilians who were expected to rise up against their leadership because they had been sufficiently terrorized.

Is this the way a respectable nation behaves, a nation who expects everyone else on the face of the Earth to be a carbon copy of themselves?

At one point during the bombing, NATO spokesman Jamie Shea likewise said the following:

"If President Milošević really wants all of his population to have water and electricity all he has to do is accept NATO's five conditions and we will stop this campaign."

Right, just like that, roll over, bend the knee and allow NATO to do whatever it wants.

Then there was Iraq. A completely devastated infrastructure, over a million dead and people still dying and suffering...much of the environment plagued with nuclear contamination, NATO totally wrecked the place. Again, all because of lies.

Then Afghanistan, now being forced to reveal and surrender its great resources, not to mention the lucrative drug trade, the heroin and opium, now being mass produced thanks to NATO.

What Part of "Bans the use or threat of force" does the US and Israel not understand? This is part and parcel of the UN Charter.

Specifically, in UN Resolution 1887 of September 2009, the Security Council reaffirmed the call for all states to resolve nuclear issues peacefully in accordance with the Charter, which bans the use or threat of force.

Iran's military doctrine is strictly defensive ... designed to prevent any invasion force from occupying the country. Iran is also committed to diplomatic solutions to hostilities or disputes. Iran only has "limited ability" to project force beyond its borders. Studies done make clear that the Iranian "threat" is not military. Iranian military spending is low compared with others in the region, and less than 2% of that of the U.S.

US efforts to slander and lie about Iran's peaceful nuclear program range from the outright fabrication of documents recently discovered in at least two instances, to trying to silence the IAEA and Director General, Mohamed El Baradei, who just cannot be convinced to lie for them.

Anyone remember the fabricated document purporting to show an Iraqi effort to buy uranium in Niger, which was used by George Bush as part of his propaganda efforts in the buildup to the Iraq invasion of 2003? It's happening again and there is no excuse for people to be unmindful and especially silent that it's happening again.

Why is it constantly ignored in the western corporate media and by all the lying political buffoons that Ayatollah Ali Khamenei issued a fatwa forbidding the production, stockpiling and use of nuclear weapons on August 9, 2005. The full text of the fatwa was released in an official statement at the meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna. That ostensibly should settle the matter once and for all.

What part of "it is forbidden" do they not understand?

Now regarding the threats against Iran, what are Israeli warships doing, for the first time, in the Persian Gulf, the Strait of Hormuz and Iran’s maritime areas? They are accompanied by a US fleet whose declared mission is "to implement sanctions against Iran and oversee the ships arriving or departing Iran." British and Israeli media reported that Saudi Arabia is providing a corridor for the Israeli bombing of Iran (Saudi Arabia denies this, another lie).

Military equipment being prepared for the aggression against Iran includes 387 "bunker busters" [bunker buster bombs] used to attack fortified subterranean structures. Preparations for these "massive attacks" with bunker busters, the most powerful bombs in the small arsenal of nuclear weapons began in the Bush administration. Upon taking office, Obama immediately accelerated the plans in order to target Iran.

"They are in high gear for the destruction of Iran," said Dan Plesch, director of the Center for International Studies and Diplomacy at the University of London. "Bomber and long-range missiles are ready today to destroy 10,000 targets in Iran in a few hours," he said.

Again, Operation Overkill; Operation Terrorize the People; Operation Destroy a Country; Operation Contaminate the Land and Kill and Deform Generations to Come. They are planning nothing as they state, it's not going to be a mere "surgical strike." The US and Israel love to whine and play the terrorism victim card, but they themselves are the worst terrorists this world has ever seen.

Current activities of the Empire have led revolutionary leader, Fidel Castro, to gloomily predict that nuclear war will soon be upon the world. It is a resignation that cannot be taken lightly, knowing the courage that was required for all the many successes of this man's life.

Every country's leaders need to be called to account for their mindless lockstep with Washington on this planned attack, as well as the sanctions. Who do these leaders work for, their people or Washington/Tel Aviv?

At this point, we can only ask the creative power that brought the universe into being (whatever your particular faith or belief system uses for a name) and all that we know as good, pure and beautiful, to put a protective hand on the great people of Iran and spare them and us the planned horror, put every obstacle in the path of the dogs of war, the evil empire, the greedy gluttonous forces of hell that base themselves in the USA and Israel.

Lisa KARPOVA

Source: Pravda Wednesday July 21, 2010

Submitted by timewilltell on Wed, 2010-07-21 11:28

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Don't disagree with the summary of horrors, but have strong reservations about labeling what the US military does as "US" savagery.  Whoever controls the boobtube and other media has driven the public to support these actions to the degree that they have,

Wilson won reelection on the slogan "He Kept Us Out of War."  Ben Freedman has explained (1961) that it was Jewish blackmail of Wilson that forced him to renege.

There were many protests, large and small, prior to the Iraq War.  NPR even had to help out with the lying by saying the crowd in DC was ~10,000.  They apologized later.  IF the media were honest, it's unlikely they'd have had any support worth speaking of.

Our foreign policies are owned by Jewish interests as the arse licking rituals on display in Congress prove time and time again.

Revelation 2.9: I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.

"I've never seen a President — I don't care who he is — stand up to them. It just boggles the mind. They always get what they want. The Israelis know what is going on all the time. I got to the point where I wasn't writing anything down. If the American people understood what a grip these people have got on our government, they would RISE UP IN ARMS. Our citizens certainly don't have any idea what goes on." - Thomas H. Moorer, Admiral, US Navy & Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff during interview on 24 August 1983.

Fester | Wed, 2010-07-21 11:58

The US is a big country, and it is still perceived to be powerful.  Most people consider it to somehow remain the bulwark of freedom as we knew it (or perceived it) after the second world war and do not dare to go further than to conclude that the Jewish "lobby" has become too strong. 

However, if we dare to believe Ariel Sharon and his claim that Israel controls the US, we face an entirely different scenario in which you can make sense of facts which otherwise do not make sense at all. 

Just consider one example:  Why would the US use depleted uranium in Iraq (it was first used in Yugoslavia with devastating health effects hurting i.a. Italian soldiers)?  The US would know full well that not only the Iraqis and their children and childrens' children would suffer from the health effects but that its own soldiers would share their suffering?

In my mind the answer is very simple:   The decision makers were just as happy to kill Americans as Iraqis!  The decision makers were not true Americans but they were either people with Israeli citizrenship or people who had sold their souls to the evil one, to Israel compromising themselves with economic crimes, crimes against the American people (9/11) or possibly crimes against the smallest in society in the form of pedophilia.  That would tally well with the "values" of the Talmud.

Any notion of a US which is an independent nation will inevitably lead us to the wrong conclusion because you would assume that the US would persue American interests.  That is evidently not the case.  Not only does the US officially prioritize the welfare of Israel and its criminal acts higher than the welfare of its own population, including those who put their lives at risk to fight its wars, but it has entirely given up the idea of defending American lives when Israeli interests are involved, last time in connection with the deadly Israeli piracy in international waters in defense of an illegal siege of Gaza.  Its foreign policy has made the US the laughing stock of the world and in strict legal terms it is very doubtful whether the US lives up to the international law requirements pertaining to sovereign nations as it does not exert the powers of sovereignty.

Fester has quoted Revelations 2:9 which is appropriate, because it tells us what we are up against.  The US and other countries may face great trouble regaining their freedom in terms of public information, politics, and the economic life, but even if we one day find ourselves on the losing side of the battle it will have been good to fight for what is right. 

After all avenge belongs to God, and it would be helpful for the Jews to study the scripture and not only the Talmud.  They may start with Ezekiel 9:9-10:

"The sin of the house of Israel and Judah is exdeedingly great; the land is full of bloodshed and the city is full of injustice.  They say, "The Lord has forsaken the land; the Lord does not see.  So I will not look on them with pity or spare them, but I will bring down on their heads what they have done."

Thank God that revenge belongs to him and him alone.  If we entertain ourselves with the thoughts of revenge we might end up just as evil as they.

If you take time to study Ezekiel you might like to ponder 13:8-16:

"Therefore this is what the Sovereign Lord says:  Because of your false words and lying visions, I am against you, declares the Sovereigh Lord.  My hand will be against the prophets who see false visions and utter lying divinations.  They will not belong to the council of my people or be listed in the records of the house of Israel, nor will they engter the land of Israel.  Then you will know that I am the Sovereign Lord. 

Because they lead my people astray, saying, "Peace," when there is no peace, and because, when a flimsy wall is built, they cover it with whitewash, therefore tell those who cover it with whitewash that it is going to fall:  Rain will come in torrents, and I will send hailstones hurtling dow n, and violent winds will burst forth.  When the wall collapses, will people not ask you, "Where is the whitewash you covered it with?"

If you study biblical commentaries they tend to provide explanations which are linked to the situation prevailing at the time of writing the scripture.  That also goes for prophesies. 

Reading the above in the perspective of the current use of the term "peace" as expressed by the Israeli government as well as the government of its territories in North America (formerly known as USA) I personally get a very strong message.

The same is true for the wall (which is called the "fence", presumably not to confuse it with its low cost counterpart, which divided Berlin).  The way I read the text there are two dimensions of the wall:  The physical one and the political one.  Otherwise the last sententence does not make sense as you do not care about the paint on a physical wall which was destroyed by the wind.

We do not know how God is going to get rid of this monstrosity of a wall, but from the text I gather that the real problem is the whitewash, the lies on which it was built.   

Made Brani | Wed, 2010-07-21 21:27

Haven't been able to locate the passage in Shahak's Jewish History, Jewish Religion, but he definitely says that their is worship of Satan going on ("as they fear him more").

This idea is supported by Walter White's interview with Harold Rosenthal (The Hidden Tyranny).  White quotes Rosenthal as saying, "Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer."  Rosenthal got a bullet in the head in "a highjacking by terrorist" shortly afterwards. 

Fester | Thu, 2010-07-22 10:44

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Tag Cloud