The Melted Vehicles of 9/11

3.083335
Your rating: None Average: 3.1 (6 votes)

I've been investigating everything I can find on 911 from day one, but this is new to me. These vehicles, many of them half mile of urban canyon away show some very unusual damage. The controlled demolition of the three towers is established fact , but this shows evidence of something extraordinary.

I know we all look at pretty much the same sets of websites, give or take, but do any of you New Yorkers have ideas or further info on this matter?


Cars along FDR drive were randomly toasted. These cars are at least 1/2 mile away from the WTC. Note the waviness of the tire tracks. What happened?

Your rating: None Average: 3.1 (6 votes)

Submitted by Claymoremind on Sat, 2007-03-24 05:56

Masher1 | Wed, 2010-08-04 23:16

Were you there during 9-11?  Did you actually see it happen?  Are you sure those planes weren't blue screened?  How do you know there was a fire burning for 60 days?  How do you know there were melted cars?  Maybe they were just photoshopped in.  Maybe the "witnesses" were plants.  And on and on and on.............................................

The above is about what you sound like.

No, none of us were there and all we have is others reportage to go on.  Acting as if scores of reports on the presence of gold aren't valid is making you look certifiable.  Why don't you look it up yourself.

andie531 | Wed, 2010-08-04 02:35

And All ANY of them saw was a bunch of armored cars. Did you inventory any of them? Did any of the reporters climb into any of them and confirm the STORY they were told???? NO.

Masher1 | Wed, 2010-08-04 00:14

"Belief"?  There are several hundred news articles documenting this.    Your argument isn't even rational. 

andie531 | Tue, 2010-08-03 00:20

I guess you do beleve.

Does not make it true.

And to quote a Guliani comment is just funny.

I suppose you think Fort Knox is loaded with the yellow metal too eh?

Better pull your head out of the sand.

Masher1 | Tue, 2010-08-03 00:09
andie531 | Mon, 2010-08-02 22:05

???Please - any idiot could check on this in less than one minute - one of many stories is below.

But you're going to ask us to "prove it" - how adolescent is that?

So tell us how the gold remained intact and not in a puddle.

 

AP Online
11-01-2001
Buried Gold, Silver Removed From WTC

NEW YORK (AP) -- When terrorists flew two hijacked planes into the World Trade Center, they destroyed much of the twin towers -- and buried $200 million worth of gold and silver under the rubble.

On Wednesday, Mayor Rudolph Giuliani announced that most of the precious metals -- held in vaults by Canada's Bank of Nova Scotia -- had been safely recovered.

``I think we have most of it. I'm not sure we have all of it yet,'' Giuliani told reporters. He confirmed that armored cars heading to and from the site were carrying the gold and silver.

The precious metals, stored in a Bank of Nova Scotia …

andie531 | Mon, 2010-08-02 06:22

@ Sully- Fresh kills is an American place. New York is an American state. So no i have not invaded your land to do work AMERICANS should be doing for themselves.

As to the density thing, Uranium was chosen not for the sole purpose of mass. DU was chosen for the DUAL purpose of reducing the TMD size and more importantly to have on site the fuel to destroy as much proof as possible before any nosy investigators saw it.

I Challenge ANY person to come up with an explanation for the duration of the fires on the site. So far NOT one explanation is even close to a rational explanation for a 60 to 80 day long fire in a concrete bathtub covered with tons and tons of powdered concrete and twisted steel with the exception of mine.

Calling me a chest pounding egotist with a Me complex is just more smoke and little else. I have put forth an explanation of the fires that could be true,Has technical merit,And fits the events. Not one other explanation is even remotely close to mine.

I am very confidant that when the event gets it's time in the light of a REAL investigation my explanation is going to be confirmed. You Poo flingers just add to the feelings of unease regarding this fire.

I am certain at some point the blueprints for these towers are going to become public,The TMD system and it's placement will be seen and the whole event WILL undergo many MANY computer simulations.

I have ZERO doubt of the truth of the demolitions will come out. P.S. Do you still think that there was tons and tons of gold still under the two towers on September 11 2001?

Masher1 | Mon, 2010-08-02 05:32

Melting point of gold = 1948 F

Melting point of steel = 2777 F

The gold should have been in a puddle. 

andie531 | Sun, 2010-08-01 19:14

Besides, just because lead is less dense than uranium (11.4 g/cm3 vs 19.0 g/cm3) why would an architect need to conserve space in a building that has nearly 100 acres of floor space?  If the TMD was a suspended 'slab', the lead TMD would be 60% thicker than the DU slab (Ex. 5 ft thick vs 8 ft thick).

Exactly. DU's utility as a counterweight really only comes into play where space is at a premium, such as its former use for trim weights on aircraft.

Sullivan | Sun, 2010-08-01 13:16

your speculation adds nothing but egotistical chest pounding.  Me, me, me, me......

That about sums it up. Masher in a nutshell.

What better way to turn people's attention away from WHO did the crime than to have them obsessing about HOW it was done.

Sullivan | Sun, 2010-08-01 13:13

Plenty of time to go out to Fresh Kills landfill and gather up some samples to test in a mass spectrometer.

Hey Masher, did you go to Fresh Kills landfill to gather samples? Have you tested them?

Sullivan | Sun, 2010-08-01 13:10

Explain why the gold was undisturbed and unmelted.

Workers at Ground Zero discover large amounts of gold and other precious metals stored below the ruins of the WTC. As debris is removed they are able to access parts of the 16-acre WTC basement, which drops 70 feet below ground level. Precious metals are stored in numerous vaults within this area.

andie531 | Sun, 2010-08-01 04:19

It's up to you to prove your theory...then what?  I am quite convinced that the event was a planned demolition by a whole host of known perpetrators and accomplices; your speculation adds nothing but egotistical chest pounding.  Me, me, me, me......

honestabe | Sun, 2010-08-01 01:18

And you know who will be laughing the hardest once this is proven.... ME that's who. Laughing my ASS off. You have had since March 2007 to look into the mess that is this fire. Plenty of time to get your OWN head around the facts. Plenty of time to ask Why so much foot dragging on any rebuilding of the site. Plenty of time to go out to Fresh Kills landfill and gather up some samples to test in a mass spectrometer. Plenty of time for a whole plethora of proofs to be uncovered.... But shit is still seeking the "Nuclear demolition" tit after all this time. You have been warned. Keep in mind the DU TMD issue is not just limited to the WTC site. If you wanted to do large scale contamination you might just have been building other very tall buildings in the very same danger filled way. Look around folks do you see big biz contaminating OUR world with reckless abandon?? I do. So Prove me wrong about the DU tuned mass dampers i dare you. No rational logical stream has even come within a thousand miles of MY explanation for the duration of the fires or melted steel found on the site. Not one. I have looked. Thoroughly.

Masher1 | Sat, 2010-07-31 22:19

Sixty PLUS days of fire on the ground zero site MUST be fueled by some source. Many millions of gallons of water must have been evaporated in some way. Thermate is SERIOUSLY short on mass to say it is the fuel. Just what OTHER fuel could have sustained a 2 MONTH long fire? What could have produced the molten pools of steel? Burning Uranium 238 is one of a few possible fuels to fit the events AND the evidence. All this nuke demo shit is just that shit. Fresh Kills land fill holds every thing one needs to CONFIRM the U-238 fuel/DU tuned mass damper thing. Not one source has even come close to ANY realistic explanation for the fires and their duration save one.... Mine.

Masher1 | Sat, 2010-07-31 21:58

With all due respect, depleted uranium does not convert to tons of strontium or barium or any other nuclear decay product unless its involved in a fission reaction, but since it is already depleted one would need to expose the TMD with neutrons first.  Also, assuming there was a TMD system, lead is much cheaper, easy to fabricate and readily available.  25mm depleted rods are more readily fabricated into projectiles or locked away in storage. Besides, just because lead is less dense than uranium (11.4 g/cm3 vs 19.0 g/cm3) why would an architect need to conserve space in a building that has nearly 100 acres of floor space?  If the TMD was a suspended 'slab', the lead TMD would be 60% thicker than the DU slab (Ex. 5 ft thick vs 8 ft thick).

This entire argument of mine hinges, of course, on the veracity of the dust samples and the assumption that a TMD was fabricated from DU.  Frankly, there are too many unanswered questions and suppositions to arrive at any conclusion.

honestabe | Fri, 2010-04-09 13:18

This thread is huge, but go back and look at Masher's posts on the possibility of DU, because of it's weight, being used as the tuned mass damper system for the WTCs.  They surely had a TMD system.

Titus Sviatoslav | Fri, 2010-04-09 05:02

I watched the videos and they don't answer the question of the large amounts (percentage in dust samples) of Strontium, Barium, Zinc, etc.  The PDF goes into much detail as to the secondary and tertiary radioactive decay elements and estimates that a thousand tons of U235 would be neccesary to explain the amounts found, not enough in one two or several nuclear devices to account for.  Although it is pure speculation regarding 'reactors' it does explain the quantities of collected material.

Mr. Khalezov's presentation certainly explains all the mechanics and the observable effects of nuclear devices (150 Kilotons ea.) much better.  His presentation is simple and convincing.  Perhaps we'll never know exactly but I am much further educated today than yesterday.

honestabe | Fri, 2010-04-09 01:32

They weren't reactors.  They were  Nuclear Demolition munitions used under patent held by CDI that were declared to the Soviets under the terms of the Peaceful use of nuclear devices treaty, according o Dimitri Khalezov. 

The demolition system was a condition to building the WTC.  Rockefeller built them to be destroyed after he assumed the Presidency under the 25th Amendment.  The Towers were built to be destroyed!

 

Watch 7-13 for all the details.

All the Demetri Khazelov tapes 1-26

http://nodisinfo.blogspot.com/

 

I'm still researching.

Titus Sviatoslav | Thu, 2010-04-08 23:08

Oh, my!

I just finished reading the PDF found at your link:

http://www.nucleardemolition.com/files/Download/GZero_Report.pdf

Regrettabley I have not taken the time before today to read this excellent analytical report.  Makes me feel bad for those who lived in NYC during 911 and the long term radiation exposure effects to come.

Among my thoughts are what were these reactors generating electrical power for?  Emergency power for the Manhattan, secret underground city, secret DOD facility, or a power source for the PTB?

Reminds me of stumbling upon the hydroelectric plant in remote Quebec Cananda while surfing the net.  Seems that a Rothschilds owned operation built a self contained hydroelectric plant into the side of a granite cliff; they carved it out of granite and bragged that the generator rotors were made from the largest castings of stainless steel ever made.  Though I digress, it seems apparent that if one has enormous quantities of money no cost is an obstacle.  If you wanted your own fast breeder reactor (or two) then build it,...secretly.

Many mysteries and answers to gnawing questions were explained to me today and I am gratelful. This knowledge does not change anything regarding  the perpetrators but it does open up new possibilities to test for direct evidence of intentional demolition.  It also paints an even more sinister picture of the perpetrators in that millions of people will be long term victims of 911, in addition to those already killed in NYC and killed in Iraq/ Afghanistan.

Should anyone find the time to read it you won't be disappointed but will be even more outraged.  These fucksticks are beyond evil.

honestabe | Thu, 2010-04-08 20:16
Titus Sviatoslav | Thu, 2010-04-08 07:15

I've got at least four problems with this theory:

1. If the entire buildings were supposed to have turned to dust up to a certain height, leaving the tops solid, and each tower collapse initiated from the point where the plane hit (footage of WTC2 collapse here, WTC1 collapse here), the nukes would've had to have been buried at different distances beneath each tower to ensure that they only disintegrated up to a certain height (height of plane strike), which would've been very difficult. Much easier to do with thermate.

2. If the twins were turned to dust by nukes, how do you explain the solid projectile steel columns that ended up embedded in surrounding buildings, and these intact ground-level core columns (which were closest to the blast radius)? You can't have some of the steel disintegrating and some of it remaining completely solid, with no middle ground.

3. Khalezov tells us at 7:30 into part 14 that the nukes had to be planted under the twins by a railway system on the day, and that's why they had to demolish WTC2 before WTC1 (even though WTC1 was hit first), because if WTC2 collapsed before WTC1 it would've destroyed the railway delivery tunnel leading to WTC2. But if he's saying the tunnels were still open on the day rather than sealed up by a shitload of set cement or concrete days or weeks prior to the event, it means that there's another path of least resistance from each blast site. The open tunnels factor fucks up his initial diagramatic explanation of how the blasts would be focused upwards into the underground sections of each tower and then up into the buildings to a certain height, turning them to dust. The tunnels would need to be sealed before the blast, but he says they weren't, and that's why WTC1 was taken down first.

4. How do you explain the presence of nanothermite in four different samples of the WTC dust?

Crimes of Zion | Sun, 2010-04-04 04:43

Watch the whole series, but watch these 5 first to answer the questions that were asked in this thread!

 

Masher, you were correct

Titus Sviatoslav | Sun, 2010-04-04 01:51

How many by a show of hand buy the bullshit of the many yammering heads about highly explosive nano thermate????

 

Seems to me plenty of folks have fallen for the lies.

 

Funny as shit.

 

Oh well it is a good way to see the bullshitters at work.

Have to laugh!

 

Masher1 | Fri, 2010-01-08 05:34

for a particular reason?

Sullivan | Thu, 2009-12-10 19:02
Masher1 | Thu, 2009-12-10 18:34
Asking about 911 responder mortality rate? Do some '911 responder mortality rate' Yahoo or google searches of main medical terms in the first few stories you get... not too good. Serious related and covered up effects swirl all about the men describing the events of 9/11 in any MSM capacity. Not that i have seen any real MSM coverage after the evil reports were thrown at our feet to feast upon.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

 

Masher1 | Mon, 2008-12-29 18:35

Seventy Five percent of US see Your works.

We will force you into the light.

Nothing will stop US!

And that includes the Diaper Eating Mossad.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

 

Masher1 | Fri, 2008-11-21 16:27

I KNOW. You should Know Mr Retired Fire Department.

We will just ASSUME you are not willing to speak up about this PAM1/R hazard detection system for the FD.

Talk to you Later Greg.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

 

Masher1 | Tue, 2008-10-07 16:05

You on the PAYROLL too?

That you GB? Mr Frank Pilla?

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

 

Masher1 | Mon, 2008-10-06 21:21

What do you have to say about the PAM1/R topic? You are the retired Fire guy are you not? So What Up Do the FD of modern cities use the Personal Area Monitor system? I KNOW you should know.

Spill it.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

 

Masher1 | Mon, 2008-10-06 21:03

Was planned and thought up some time BEFORE those towers were even drawn up.

THEY had the plan to kill. They built the whole place with a bomb on EVERY floor pan from the very first floor to the top BUILT INTO the corrugated steel floor pan units.

Three layers,One Steel,One C4 and another steel all pressed together and edge sealed to keep the active C4 fresh.

Then at the needed environmental remediation process the WHOLE system is set up. The needed DEMO gear is introduced and inserted into the ceiling spaces and a whole bunch of holes are drilled to insert blasting caps and wire into those floor plate blasting sheets.

Day one.

And EVERYONE involved is still running the show with a huge cart full of bull shit.

Oh and on the ground i would expect to not find too much rad... Most of the tonnage of those TMD units was added to the WHOLE atmosphere of this planet.

Or everyone gets a dose just as they have planed.

At 1400 tons of U-238 burned to hide crimes and kill...

You should at least check it out.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

 

Masher1 | Wed, 2008-09-17 17:13

Who has found the plans of these TMD systems from the WTC towers?

You?

How about You?

The total lack of info about this VERY important system AND the refusal to allow the WTC plans to be published can only be interpreted a few ways.

And the US government is scared shit-less about every one of those interpretations of this secrecy.

An Ex-Homeless street urchin to five horse farmer Brought you this info. All of it is as far as i can tell is true EVEN with with my limited mathematical knowledge of the precice properties of the various states and reactions of this element U-238.

You really only need to think about the cause of a sixty (60) day long fire in an oxygen starved debris filled WATER DROWNED crucible filled with a SERIOUS amount of STEEL BEAMS poked into it then further hindered by tons and tons of powered concrete.

Sixty days.

Forget the ASBESTOS.

Bugger the other contaminants... if you carry a lung of this ceramic shit you are going to need help.

Ask the dude that had to care for the dozens of fire dogs.

Ask him if the pile was responsible for giving a large amount of those dogs RAD sickness??

Almost every dog seen in the videos of the effort on the ground zero pile is DEAD.

Do you her anything about the FIREMEN with RAD sickness?

Live in the area?

FUCK THEM. They are going to have to ANSWER all my Questions soon.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

 

Masher1 | Wed, 2008-09-17 16:51

There is a Hole seen in a photo marked "PUNCH OUT" i have seen this as a pre demo mark spray painted to outline the holes workers need to remove to allow the skid steer bucket loaders access for the clean out process PRE demolition well before any WORK takes place. Why claim an EXIT HOLE? when it is clearly a hole made by a hydraulic machine for access to the site AFTER the 11th of September.

Why do you and others not pounce on this photo and say these things of such an obvious nature mister Rivero?

Why use them to further a lie?

Is living on an island COOL? Why is it i have zero luck even listening to one of your shows?

In short you are NASA elite and i have seen too many of your deceptions not to have a rather harsh filter on your content.

P.S. if you look up the TIN MAN photo i posted you can see the WRH link of mine sporting its warning tag "LIES" in that picture.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

 

Masher1 | Fri, 2008-09-12 20:07

Query: Just how (If a plane hit the pentagon) Is it that there was NOT a huge trail of fire from where the so called jet was cut up by colliding FIRST with the light poles well BEFORE flying over the lawn and alleged hitting to have hit pentagon?

No fire no Plane.

WRH seems to think a plane hitting a light pole a well over the planes VNE will not damage it. Fuck the fact it hit FIVE poles with No fire on the lawn?

And we live in a pod?

I think Mike is in a pod.

see:http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/ppfinal.html

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

 

Masher1 | Thu, 2008-09-11 20:25

NSA tricks are for Kiddies.

Your demise is going to be some party starter ;)

See ya!

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

 

Masher1 | Thu, 2008-09-04 22:00

Wubbles to you,No trouble.D to fetch others Whenever. Sorry.

My work is tough.

No faults.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

 

Masher1 | Wed, 2008-07-30 17:54

An area close to the WTC site with plenty of firemen and other response to the pre-collapse situation and you can't see shit on the ground whilst this effect is reacting to dense but microscopic particles in the dust cloud (Perhaps the Americium from the smoke detectors??) and being recorded as an Afterglow just post collapse on THREE occasions But there are Plenty of post collapse fires in the area with nothing but WEIRD circumstances all around them hence the first insightful post by Claymore Mind here.

Lightning strikes the same event once... but Three times... a plan is afoot..

A VERY careful plan.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

 

Masher1 | Tue, 2008-05-27 07:00

The effect that caused the 'Spire' i think was tuned to a wavelengths to heat very dense material Very Quickly (The 'Afterglow' lasts for a very short time) A target like a human would be affected but would not have the density to be seriously adsorbing much of the energy.

A target like a U-238 granule would on the other hand heat very quickly in the same effect zone on plain density alone.

Human tissue is mostly water.. A sheild if you will.. and Uranium is a resilient and dense target for MOST of the same energy to be adsorbed into the granule. The target temperature of 190+ degrees is all they needed over the WHOLE area to ensure no eagle eyed investigator find even one U-238 granule.

If you find or have the Blue Prints you can prove this with a slide rule and a pencil in a few hours math because they cannot hide the 1.7 times the weight of lead factor if you have the TMD system dimensions of even a basic layout diagram.

So i search for this bunch of drawings.

You should too. You would not believe the importance of them.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

 

Masher1 | Tue, 2008-05-27 06:43
Ehud Olmerts Wo... | Sun, 2008-05-25 01:38

My first question:

What happen to the people around those cars?

LatinAmericanview | Sat, 2008-05-24 19:08

The moment it was posted and all i will say is this.... Watch MY birdy!

Pure BS damage control.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

 

Masher1 | Sat, 2008-05-24 18:53

 

911 WTC Nuclear
Toroid-Shaped Gas Pattern
More Evidence To Support The Nuclear
Melting Of Cars At The WTC

By Ted Twietmeyer
c. 2008 Ted Twietmeyer
5-11-8
 

To support the nuclear toroid theory, we need to look at atomic blasts on the surface of the Earth. We will also look at photos of Tunguska, Hiroshima and the WTC for evidence of such blasts. This paper is only the beginning.
 
 
 
Fig.1 ­ Basic shape of a toroid
 
A toroid has two characteristics ­ First, the shape inherently has an endless loop around its periphery. Second, there is a rotation of energy perpendicular to the ring shape as illustrated below. In Fig. 2 this is labeled "toroidal circulation of hot gases":
 
 
 
Fig. 2 ­ Toroid shape in a nuclear blast according to Virginia Tech [1]
 
 
 
 
Fig. 3 ­ Bikini Atoll nuclear test shows the toroid gas shape. Since this detonation took place on a tiny island, must of what we see here is probably steam from ocean water. Objects visible near the bottom of the image are old, scrapped ships used for testing damage patterns from the blast.
 
TUNGUSKA EXPLOSION
 
In 1908 a massive explosion took place at Tunguska in Russia. This part of Russia is a very hostile place even in summer, where netting is used to provide protection from swarms of mosquitoes. No one lives near the site of the blast, although it did create on- going effects in the area. Sound from the blast was heard up to 1,000 miles away. Below is an aerial photo of the area after the blast:
 
 
 
 
Fig. 4 ­ The 25 mile wide Tunguska crater shows a toroid shape (aerial photo)
Researchers are almost evenly divided among those who think it was of extraterrestrial origin such as an exploding UFO, and those who believe it was a comet or asteroid.
 
 
 
Fig. 4a ­Melted spheres were found formed from intense heat at Tunguska
 
Russian scientists were astounded when they finally visited Tunguska several years later. They found a stand of trees still standing in the very center of the swamp. This was also determined to be the epicenter of the blast and radiation levels were elevated in the area. Genetic damage to both people and wildlife from radiation has also been observed.
 
In the mid-1980s the US Navy announced to the American media Tesla's weapon was tested on the same day of the Tunguska explosion. This author clearly recalls hearing it announced in mainstream newspapers and fellow engineers at work were talking about it that day. However, I have not been able to find it on the web as of this writing.
 
HIROSHIMA
 
Hiroshima is synonymous with nuclear devastation. What many people may or may not know is that directly below the location of the overhead nuclear detonation in Hiroshima, is a building which did not vaporize. That building is still standing to this day as a memorial to what happened:
 
 
 
 
Fig. 5 ­ Hiroshima government building
 
The fact this building survived an overhead atomic bomb detonation provides more empirical evidence that the toroid blast pattern theory is correct. At the center of the blast force vectors would cancel out while radiating outwards from the center. Tremendous heat from the atomic bomb didn't vaporize the concrete structure, because the building was at the center of the toroid. This is something like being in the eye of a hurricane where all is calm.
 
WTC NUCLEAR EVIDENCE
 
Much has been previously written about a nuclear event on Sept. 2001. Elevated tritium levels have been measured in run-off from fire-hose water at about 27 times the normal level in the environment. Tritium is formed during nuclear reactions. According to Dr. Ed Ward, "Two billion pounds seemed like an extremely large amount of particulate matter from buildings whose total weight has been quoted at around 3 billion pounds. Debris removal has been quoted at 1.2 billion pounds. Based on these rough numbers two- thirds of the building was indeed turned to dust or vaporized." [2]
 
 
 
Fig. 6 ­ Rolling toroid pattern of debris was visible in 2001 during the
Building's entire descent
 
 
 
 
 
Fig. 6a ­ Another image taken with a different camera showing toroid hot gas circulating and attempting to pull material inward toward the building as it falls. When the plane first hit the building this effect was not observed. The toroid shape did not appear until the building began to fall some time later. This would appear after a nuclear detonation took place.
 
In an atomic blast according to Virginia Tech, superheated gases roll in a circular pattern as illustrated in Fig. 2. A rolling- doughnut effect is the result of superheated gasses. Figure 2 is shown below along with a rough outline of the building for reader convenience:
 
 
 
 
 
Fig.7 ­ WTC dust and dirt with the toroid effect [1]
 
Building debris such as steel and chunks of concrete are too heavy for hot gasses to lift upward. That material will simply fall back to Earth. Logically, the lightest material (such as 30 years of accumulated dust) and pulverized building material will be lifted upward and may not immediately return to Earth (see top Fig. 6.) Other material not visible will be vaporized during detonation and the initial fireball. Dr. Ed Ward also was among the first to point out that considerable mass was missing in the building rubble and was never accounted for.
 
 
 
Fig. 8 ­ Wreckage from the 47 box beam core bent into a hair-pin shape, as though it was attempting to roughly follow the shape of the toroid. This beam is kept in a restricted area. Why would ANY scrap metal be kept in a restricted area? Is it still radioactive? (Image is from a frame of a news broadcast.)
 
 
 
 
 
Fig. 9 ­ Text from Port Authority Jan 2006 PDF document (page 17) prohibiting unauthorized photography [3]. Why?
 
 
 
 
 
Fig. 10 ­ Is this more evidence of an electromagnetic pulse? Vehicles were ignited, but not paper lying on the ground or in trees.
 
In conclusion, the toroid shape of the falling building dust pattern provides evidence that a nuclear event happened that day, timed to occur in concert with the plane impact. This also fits observations in my earlier work "What May have Melted WTC Vehicles?" at http://www.rense.com/general75/melt2.htm
 
If a specially developed secret nuclear weapon were used, radioactive half-life of fallout may have been dramatically shortened to days or weeks. One method to do this was demonstrated on an ABC morning show on June 10th, 1997. The Patterson power cell reduced radioactivity (Patent #4,533,66) in a mix of Thorium and Uranium decreased by a measurable amount in only an hour on live television. In the intervening 4 years between 1997 and 2001, considerable progress may have been made into implementing that concept into a "clean" nuclear weapon. Tritium appears to be at least one radioisotope created during the event that can still be measured.
 
Ted Twietmeyer
tedtw@frontiernet.net
www.data4science.net
 
 
REFERENCES and SOURCES
[1] www.cddc.vt.edu/host/atomic/images/enw77b2s.gif
 
[2] http://www.serendipity.li/wot/ed_ward/use_of_abombs.htm
 
[3] http://www.panynj.gov/drp/pdfdocs/wtcsite/wtcsiteaccess.pdf
 

http://www.rense.com/general81/d3hr.htm

Claymoremind | Sun, 2008-05-11 20:10

you need chelation therapy.

Grim Reaper | Mon, 2008-04-07 01:15

Hey Great NEWS... We have Charlton Heston with a nice COLD DEAD HAND...

Someone shoot over there and PRY THAT GUN loose.

I sniff a GREAT Ebay fight for that particular item.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

 

Masher1 | Sun, 2008-04-06 22:37

To hide the fact that the 9/11 event was not only a false flag but ALSO a masive self induced population control event running 20 or so years long Much like Cherynobl? Three Mile Island?  Iraq? Diamona?

All targeted at the most popuous part of the Americas??

I DO.

You should find out why a farmer is this certain. You live there.

 

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

 

Masher1 | Thu, 2008-03-27 20:19

I am not playing around here.

www.nytimes.com/2008/03/25/science/25bats.html

All life is going through serious changes on one account alone..               Uranium.

Mark my words Uranium 238 use is killing FAR more than you will ever know. Uranium mining,reprocessing,enrichment and consumption ALL increase the rad load of the whole planet... Nothing can hide.

Right now. Tomorrow. Next week,Year,Decade.....

Find a fix or we all perish.

.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

 

Masher1 | Wed, 2008-03-26 18:20
Masher1 | Sun, 2008-03-09 22:48

The NASA boys have the turnaround down to 3 weeks.

A new huge manipulator delivery to the ISS this week.

America is almost Dead economically speaking and then there is NASA and there orgy of consumption before there 'TRUCK' the shuttle turns up lame and YOU have to BUY a Replacement FLEET. Trillions gone to what Exactly??? A robot??

'With 11-foot arms, a shoulder span of nearly 8 feet and a height of 12 feet, the Canadian Space Agency's "Dextre" — short for dexterous and pronounced like Dexter — is more than a little intimidating, at least for astronaut Garrett Reisman.'

Oh yeah they are doing something up there all right.

Good luck with that.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:

Masher1 | Sun, 2008-03-09 18:59