Obama's Swearing In Screw Up

Anyone else besides me finds Obama's swearing in ceremony a bit strange? He had to repeat easy phrases, which he couldn't do. I think that his swearing in ceremony was screwed up intentionally. The only think that crosses my mind is that he's probably not Christian because his second attempt was missing the Bible while during the inaguration day the Bible was present.

From Washington Post:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/22/AR2009012203769.html

President Obama's awkward swearing-in ceremony and subsequent do-over of the oath of office drew a great deal of attention, but the double-dip does not make him unique in American history. Nor is he the first president to take the oath without a Bible, as occurred during his second swearing-in ceremony Wednesday night.

According to records compiled by the Architect of the Capitol and maintained by the Library of Congress, Theodore Roosevelt did not use a Bible at his 1901 swearing-in. (Maybe that's because he was a Rosenfeld??? LOL)

We kept hearing a lot of debates about Obama's background and his religious affiliation, so this will sure make those people continue discussing  which religion Obama belongs to and whether or not the 'screw up' had any hidden purpose. I remember Colin Powell say that there was going to be an event on January 21 & 22, so would this be it because i can't seem to recall anything else happening that would catch one's eye.

I would not be surprised if he was a Jew on his mother's side (obviously!) because during his AIPAC speech he stated that his name comes from the Hebrew name "Barush-Baruch". Seeing his mother's photo I immediately thought about whether or not she's a Jewess since she looks like one. I find it strange that he has such a hard core Hebrew name...if it was David or Joseph, I wouldn't be surprised as they are common names for the non Jews, but Baruch?????

Coming down to the last sentence...I must say that now I doubt his affiliation to Islam because if that was the case then why would he be given a Hebrew name in the first place? Unless the name Baruch has the same roots as some other Muslim name, which I don't know about. If such a name (or similar) exists among the Muslims, I'll be interested to know about it and how it is written also. Now I also think that maybe...just maybe he is a Jew on his mother's side even if his father was a Muslim  (assuming), and that's one of the reasons why he has been pampered by the Zionists for many years now for his presidential post, and if he was 100% Muslim, perhaps the Zionists wouldn't have chosen him for the job. They like to put their people in the presidential seat, and even if Obama doesn't look the same physically, his religious affiliation is the same as theirs.

Here's the swearing in moment:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrmaYHSfRfY

Submitted by Fem on Fri, 2009-01-23 08:05

I noticed it

There is no requirement that a Bible be used, but Obama is said to have loaded the "Bible for Blackberry" on his and held it in his left hand.

Claymoremind | Fri, 2009-01-23 08:33

That was no mistake

On December 5, 2008, we said: "Questions have been raised as to whether Chief Justice John Roberts could administer the oath of office to a man who he believes may not be entitled. Chief Justice John G. Roberts will have to KNOW that Barack Hussein Obama II is eligible to 'enter on the execution of his office,' before he administers the Inaugural Oath of Office.'"

The Chief Justice of the United States did not make a mistake when he flubbed the oath of office.

He did not want to issue the oath to Obama because of his doubts. By failing to issue the oath in exactly the manner prescribed by the Constitution, Roberts deliberately created a constitutional issue that Obama was not duly sworn in as President of the United States.

The Obama team knew what he was doing and insisted that he come to the White House and administer the oath again. (Did he do so under duress?)

"When he failed to properly administer the oath of office in accordance with the Constitution, Chief Justice Roberts sent a message to history that he knew something was wrong," said Glenn Spencer of the American Patrol Report. "Roberts was attempting to save his historic face in the event future legal decisions find that Obama is not qualified," he added.

Claymoremind | Fri, 2009-01-23 08:37

Thanks for the article...very interesting and definitely makes sense although I had a different twist on it as you can see but everything is a possibility and it is clear now that the inaguration was a farce, hence Powell's 'event'

Fem | Fri, 2009-01-23 08:47

Fem,

Having a Muslim father doesn’t get any sympathy from me.  Have you listened to the speech he gave at the AIPAC? Or the way he foams in his mouth (may be in his pants too) whenever he talks about Israhell & how he is going to defend its honor & such?   Ognir has a post about this. 

 Obimbo  is a bought & sold slave to the Zionist  Juu masters.  He will be always their slave, no matter what.

There are plenty of Muslim traitors out there who have traded their souls to serve the Zionist controllers. So having  Muslim parents shouldn't give anyone a free ride.

Oh.. Have you noticed the way Zionist Juu bastards like to   divide & create conflicts among the Christians & the Muslims?  They have created treamendous hate & fear within the gullible, God fearing, Israel loving Christians by calling Obimbo a ”secret Muslim".

Muslims are bad ya know, they lark around  street corner &  they will get you,  so watch out!!

On the other hand, all the dumbass (yes, there are plenty of them too) Muslims out there, they think...oh! Obama is a "secret Muslim"! He will solve our problems ... so we must sign up for him blind folded. I have seen that mentality by checking out  Muslim Matters site.(whatta joke!) There are plenty of idiots over at the site think that way.

But they NEVER talk about the possibility of having commie past of his or his mother, Do they?? I personally don't care about his religion, race or color. All I know and I have seen it too that He loves to lick AIPAC's & specially Israhell's balls shamelessly whenever possible! That should be a good reason to put NASTY  taste in anyone's mouth.

Obimbo hardly resembles his father.  Claymoremind has a FANTASTIC post on Obama’s history, you should check it out too. Obimbo rather looks like his commie mentor & sadly I can't remember his name right now.  Anyway, that's just me saying all that. 

Finally Abigail writes:

Topic: Barack = great Jewish name! (Judges ch. 4-5) 

Abigail wroteon October 10, 2008 at 9:51am 

Barack Obama is not a scary name if you emphasis the "Barack" part. In the Bible, Judges ch. 4-5, Barak is the general who leads the Israelites against the Canaanites and totally kicks Canaanite butt all over the Promised Land. It's spelled a little different, but c'mon, it's the same name. Bara(c)k leads Jews to victory!

I  puke every time I read that! lol

musique | Fri, 2009-01-23 10:14

Most won't believe this but I had a strong feeling beforehand that something was going to be wrong with the oath.  Needless to say, I noticed it immediately as it happened and said to myself, "I knew it". The articles the next day didn't even report the mistake correctly. Most of them said that Roberts only flubbed one word of one line. He flubbed more than that. He said ' execute the president of the United States'  instead of "faithfully execute the office of the president..." . And he also didn't say anything about  "enemies, foreign and domestic..."

I find it hard to believe this was an accident considering Justice Stevens had just given Biden the oath perfectly just 2 or 3 minute before.

http//www.nogw.com

shylock | Fri, 2009-01-23 11:02

and they know they are letting America down, but they are bought and paid for. We thought that perhaps it was Obama's demon that was making it awkward for Obama. :)

Jenny Miner | Fri, 2009-01-23 11:42
I'll bet he swore a Corporate or Admiralty Law version of an oath as Chief Executive of United States of America Inc.

Constitutionally, he's not eligible, but under Corporate or Maritime Law, he's just fine.

Claymoremind | Fri, 2009-01-23 11:46
and i think there are reasons for it.
Grim Reaper | Fri, 2009-01-23 14:05

Tag Cloud

Popular content