It's all in the edit ~ BBC bias

 

Some of the BBC's reports about the recent strike action have a disturbing undertone: working-class people are racist

Why is the BBC obsessed with making working-class people seem racist?

Watching BBC news bulletins yesterday, it was very easy to believe claims that the current spate of wildcat strikes is inherently motivated by xenophobia. Constant emphasis was placed on objections to "foreign workers" per se, rather than fear of workers' wages being undercut, which would seem to be the real issue.

The 10 o'clock bulletin gave us a good example. A voiceover by the BBC's political editor, Nick Robinson, (about 12 mins in) told us: "Beneath the anger, ministers fear, lies straightforward xenophobia." Cut to woolly-hatted worker telling BBC reporter: "These Portugese and Eyeties – we can't work alongside of them." There we are: northern white bloke refusing to work with foreigners. Case closed.

Except, watch Paul Mason's report on Newsnight, featuring the same interview (about 4:30 in):


These Portugese and eyeties – we can't work alongside of them: we're segregated from them. They're coming in in full companies.

Even taking into account the dodginess of the use of "Eyetie" to refer to an Italian person, one has to admit that it would be very difficult to portray the second, full quote as racist or xenophobic. It's a statement addressing basic workplace issues – British workers literally cannot work alongside foreign workers, as they are separated. There really is no excuse for editing and presenting a quote in such a misrepresentative manner, unless one is setting out to prove something – namely, that working-class people are racists.

The BBC does have form on this, unfortunately: last year's White season was almost exclusively concerned with portraying white working-class people as paranoid and racist. This despite the fact – and this really needs to be repeated until it's firmly implanted in every bien pensant liberal's head – that white working-class people are the most likely to have friends of other races and religions, and are most likely to marry and have children with people of other races and religions. Not the behaviour of a resentful army of racists.

The apex of the White season's utter weirdness was a Newsnight interview with the BNP's Nick Griffin, author of Who Are The Mindbenders, a 1997 pamphlet detailing how "the Jews" control the BBC and other media. Griffin was interviewed on his own, and then we were taken in to a panel discussion featuring, among others, Bob Crow and Nick Ferrari (both of whom had obviously refused to share a platform with Griffin, hence the solo interview). Hardly natural bedfellows, Crow and Ferrari took turns lambasting the BBC for its portrayal of working-class people. It was an encouraging sight.

But even after this spectacular dressing down, the practice persists. Why? Is it because of a skewed identity politics at play in BBC newsrooms and commissioning meetings? Or is it because the BBC, like much of the media, is increasingly dominated by middle-class scions who don't actually know many working-class people, and thus breezily project any prejudice or other trait they wish on to them? Either way, it's a sordid state of affairs, and – as shown by the devious editing of last night's 10 o'clock news, a dangerous one, too.

Submitted by atheo on Wed, 2009-02-04 22:15

On its "news" website 4 February it has a spectacular story about the nazi camp doctor Aribert Heim who just died in 1992!

The article "informs" us that he was responsible for killing hundreds in concentration camps using horrific medical experiments.  The article is considerate enough not to go into details in respect of the nature of those experiments, just the same way as BBC did not bring us disturbing pictures of the wholesale slaughter of Palestinians in Gaza. 

We know for sure that the doctor was really bad, because a leading nazi hunter (how come they are still in business?) describes the "news" as "earth shattering" according to the Associated Press.  Again, we get no clue why the news of the death of a German doctor in 1992 is earth shattering, but we know enough to conclude that he was really bad, especially as he had moved to Egypt and converted to Islam!

That was possibly the real message they wanted to get across:  Muslims are bad! 

So sad that BBC which used to be universally respected, has become so utterly corrupted in its reporting.

Made Brani | Thu, 2009-02-05 00:26

The BBC was where George Orwell got his first hand experience of newspeak. The BBC were only respected back in the old days because people in general were deferential and "knew their place".

They have been a Jewish mouthpiece from day one.They are so brazen in their lies,that they even ignore their own previous output if it conflicts with today`s "narrative".

As to the anti-white propaganda,that`s a constant fixture across the whole broadcast spectrum.The maggots take great delight in making us feel down and apathetic.

The entire "establishment" in Britain is evil and rotten to the core.They deserve to have a swift trial,then a visit to the gallows.

Please Sir,can I have some more (soylent green)?

Chargeemquick | Thu, 2009-02-05 01:44

Tag Cloud

Popular content