Daryl Bradford Smith Indicted!

I should correct myself; Joe Molero is more than likely a Christian, according to my information, but is not necessarily a Zionist - although he's listed in the credits of this site, which is openly Zionist, and which he links to via his NOLAJBS site.

You're not wrong, Quasimodo, Glenn did pick it up. Thanks for the tip. I was kinda hoping Rivero would link to the Frank Lowy one though, despite it being a work in progress. The AIPAC thing is old news. But I do love to bash them.

Fester, which country are you from / do you reside in, if you don't mind me asking?

http://crimesofzion.blogspot.com/

Posiedon, this is OUTSTANDING work. Massive support your charges against the "3 Key Guys." AND it meets all of your renowned standards of Relevancy and Logic!

Terrific start old chum. Off you go now. There's a bicky for you at the end of the trail. Forward. Courage.

Fester concedes that "Inspector Clouseau" correctly deduced that he was Lotus. It's interesting that it has taken him ten weeks to own up, or more than a month since Masher1 pointed it out on page 2 of this thread "Or you can continue this RETARDED fester/lotus/PJZ shit you seem to revel in doing" in his comment "Poseidon is coming to it." And only then, when the case had been proven and Fester had no other choice.

And on April 14 on page 2 of this thread, Fester replied to me: "Poseidon, you're sharing what appears to be quite the motherload of info exposing DBS. Looks like VERY important material. Wish you deigned to share it earlier. I don't think my request for substantiation was that badly worded. Instead we had to go through a long, tedious, time wasting exchange." This related to information that I had only just come across, not something I had been sitting on for weeks on end!

On April 15, just after Masher1's comment, Fester deliberately refused to admit to being Lotus when he replied: MASHER has dropped a bomb on my world outing me as the efarious "RETARD" Daryl B. Smith/Lotus/PJZ." Poor, sad, desperate MASHER.

It is true that Fester stopped posting temporarily after March 3, Lotus registered and started posting on March 4, the last Lotus comment was March 14, and Fester resumed posting on March 16. But Fester wouldn't have been so silly as to run other handles simultaneously would he?

On March 5, in the thread Another Zionist myth bites the dust, there is an exchange between Lotus and ProudJewishZionist which seems to have been orchestrated to boost Lotus' reputation by showing him as a capable mediator in arguments with Zionists.

Then, in this thread, honestabe registered, supposedly specifically so he could accuse me of being a shill. Over 26 days, the only other comment by honestabe is an unsupported claim that he had donated money to Mike Gravel's campaign. This is consistent with honestabe being another manufactured Smithsonian brought along by Smith's group to 'support' their 'arguments', and a thinly veiled attempt to boost his reputation.

Given Fester's deception in taking so long to own up to being Lotus, his claim about cleaned cookies does not look very credible. If the cookies had been cleaned out, how would he have been able to copy the password in order to paste it? But if one does copy and paste a password, it works of course, provided the password is correct. I just tried it. His argument requires that he operates an unusual system of having a file of passwords ready to copy and paste, and had got them mixed up. Another of those bizarre Zionist coincidences?

It seems more reasonable to conclude that his plan was always to post this thread "DBS indicted!", and multiple personae were employed so he could run with whichever had established the most 'credibility'.

If you can just Email me any shows of there's one at a time. I am good to the end of Feb 06' i need Very early ones and all from March 06' on to now. I don't want them direct Down load and i want a mirror of them in my Gmail account for easy access wherever i am at. If you can help get me up to speed Great just pick a show i need at random or in order if you have many and mail it off Lets do Daryl a special do it yourself blog post you all can help fit it out by mailing those shows and Comments of course to me.

I mean if he in a fit posts my Email address for all to see they should have something to do with it should they not?

First you take D.C. Then you take New York.

Fester: COZ, I will own up to the Lotus handle. I cleaned out the cookies and wasn't able to sign in as Fester, so I opened a new account. I finally figured out that I had to RETYPE the password not just copy and paste. Please introduce me to Brendan sometime sounds like a brilliant fellow.

The rest of the textual analysis has been covered before when Fishwife & Son were low on hairballs and chum. This confession will undoubtedly provide them with months of "evidence" that their charges against DBS have been "proven." Should be fun to watch.

Ultimately, I'm not too concerned about who you are, Fester. But there's no doubt that your writing style is comparable to that of O'Connell, who posts under the handles "Quo Vadius", "Donnie Darko" and "True Believer". It's about the only thing PlanetQuo got right in his expose, besides his identification of Joe Molero as being a Christian Zionist.

Anyway, check this out. WhatReallyHappened.com linked to my AIPAC blog today here at WUFYS:

AIPAC's Power Base: America's Real Terrorists
Our entire government is controlled by Israel! Through a small, rich and powerful Jewish supported pro-Israeli tax-exempt lobby, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or simply AIPAC, virtually all American domestic and foreign policy is now being controlled by a foreign government entanglement. This is done by targeting American politicians: those who are pro-Israel receive campaign funding and favorable publicity through a myriad of Jewish organizations, magnified by the liberal and Democratic Party-leaning American press; those politicians not favoring policies benefiting Israel are targeted by Jews all over America who send money to help finance that politician’s opponent.
Posted May 18, 2007 10:24 AM PST
Category: ISRAELI SPYING

Thanks, Mike!

http://crimesofzion.blogspot.com/

I am going to sit through every show from the first to the last and after i am done with that my statement that the best way to look retarded is to admit going to I am the witness and the best way to confirm you are retarded is to post a URL to one of those very mp3 files.

Later Fester B Sutter or whoever the Frack you are.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York.

From the life and times of Daryl B. Smith and can fill me in on the year of shows i have missed Email me. See Daryl's little temper tantrum just above to get the mail addy. If you have all the shows let me know. I have about 260 meg of them from early to mar 06'

The Spook wants to play lets play.

Thanks

First you take D.C. Then YOU take New York Stupid.

Looking just like a rant from the pages of IATW. Sooner or later you will see that your entrance and attempts to drive suckers to your dreck by posting here in the hopes of coat tailing our readership is a folly of Gargantuan proportions. You forget it's my job to prevent your doing this with ANY fair public venue i see you posting URL's to those NOISY Mp3 files. I do this job at the cost of my own sleep and time nothing else other than the need to save a TON of folks a lot of wasted time slogging through the IATW site. A site that would be long gone if it was not for the deep pockets of your spook bosses.

Are you feeling a ton of pressure from them lately to come here and stir the pot Daryl?

Must be.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York.

MASHER, glad to see you've picked up the scent again. Should be a laugh riot.

Speaking of laughs, if Daryl is still attending this symphony of wind instruments, he is at least getting a few healthy laughs watching you and the Fishwife play Inspector Clouseau.

My fatal mistake was not realizing that DBS had patented terms like "pet project," "horseshit," and "dogshit." It was only a matter of time before Fishwife & Dim Son put all the pieces together and blew the whole operation sky high.

Job well done. Better get back to the siege of NYC. Where you at on that anyway?

Then read 6 pages of stuff at TFC and compare. You are blind if you cannot make the link. Daryl is nuts if he thinks he can hide behind his network spook kit and try to patch up his credibility by this FESTER crap. Trust is HARD earned Mr Smith And you BLEW it royaly. You see i am (As i have said to you many times) Here until you Quit this game. I see Right through your tasks and plays as most that have been through the CON you have going. I bet it just bugs you that you are not having much luck with the nice little public forum we have going here BUT you did bring your current troubles onto your own house. Now Why you followed me here is for you to know i don't care. You are doing nothing but telling those that followed me away that they were correct to quit visiting the NSA run "I am the witness" URL and do some old time Thinking for them selves. I know you still want to recover these numbers but there not your to recover Mr pants on fire. As i have said TRUST is hard earned and every single one of those that seen the mathaba bits with the treats and BS throughout from you were awoken that week and you lost a Whole bunch. I know i heard you moaning about it on one of your Mp3's of the month. Well keep it up and you are sure to lose even more. I will stay in my yard as it were and you don't suffer at the hands of the truffle sniffers we have around here. There is only one reason for this behavior i can fathom and this has been knowledge i have from March 05' and that is that someone was paying him to go around and do these things. After thinking on that and looking at the real evidence around Mr Sutter i soon saw that he was CIA or some FED type i go with CIA because of the Descriptives he cannot keep his knowledge from showing through his mask. Things he seems to have first hand info on things that under normal circumstances would not be common or even uncommon knowledge in the normal world. Looking at the shows around Smiths Visit by the Burly Marine type is a good area to read between the line a bunch.

Also the Money thing Where are these boys getting the scratch to serve all this content? Every single file i have received from that URL runs top speed on my line. (Anyone as fast a Microsoft update without a serious reason to be so fast is a government agency that simple.) I found out the real speed of there servers and was forever after suspicious about there little 9/11 truth operation. After looking through there audio with Soundforge for a week or two i noticed that the audio over time changed 0%. Eric is host for the Calls and the so called connections to France are never EVER different noise wise? Impossible for that many trans-atlantic calls to be trouble free and for them all to sound the same and with out delays please try to think sideways about this bunch. I learned most of this stuff just by setting off the Witness train and doing some serious thinking as to why i was so mad a being duped for over a year.

This post is long and i fear it will continue to grow because we are not dealing with a nut in France. The real enemy you al are set against is the Information operations road map.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York.

Here are just a few comments that I have recieved regarding this issue:
Some guy writes this comment at DBS's myspace profile page:

"What a coincidence that Quo's and Michael's attack came a few days before Bollyn's trial, right? "

I replied to him via myspace message:

What are you implying in your comment: " What a coincidence that Quo's and Michael's attack came a few days before Bollyn's trial, right?"
Spit it out AH, I have, with the evidence to back it up.
DBS is compromised. A Christian Zionist has more power over him than you or anyone else who supports him. Nothing to do with Chris, although his loyalty to DBS is suspect in light of his self-confessed Christian stance.
Haven't you worked it out yet?

The reply I got was:

"what christian zionist what are you talking about?"

Another reply I got read:

Whats DBS done now???

This was after I had sent them a link to the video and article available on this page.

Donnie Darko, under the name True Believer, at Club Conspiracy replies to a post made by Planetquo with full knowledge of the article and video posted there replies by saying:

"You are a liability to TFC.

I am amazed that enemies of TFC have not picked up on you. You are TOTALLY compromised and a mentally ill man to boot."

Like I say, with "Truth Seekers like this who needs a Zionist controlled media?

Does the above Fester post look like something Daryl would type?

I say Yes sir it is.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York.

Poseidon old chum, good to see you back manning the chum buckets. You are such a complete idiot that, however pointless, it is a delight to swim in your wake.

Just wanted to spit back this mini- hairball for the more coherent members to savor:

"Who would have such in-depth knowledge of the Smith-Kaminski rift that he would cite the new, revised 'explanation' (trouble with holocaust laws) as opposed to the reason given at the time (racist views)?"

Maybe someone more sympathetic to your special needs could explain the congruency between anti-Semitic "racist views" and "trouble with holocaust laws" even in the sippy-cup form in which you present them. Lord knows, I've tried, but you, poor sad, dear, just don't have the candlepower between your ears to light the bulb.

Super to see the reappearance of your "pet project" mini-hairball. It's a perennial and rates right up there.

COZ, I will own up to the Lotus handle. I cleaned out the cookies and wasn't able to sign in as Fester, so I opened a new account. I finally figured out that I had to RETYPE the password not just copy and paste. Please introduce me to Brendan sometime sounds like a brilliant fellow.

The rest of the textual analysis has been covered before when Fishwife & Son were low on hairballs and chum. This confession will undoubtedly provide them with months of "evidence" that their charges against DBS have been "proven." Should be fun to watch.

Well there is this

"Do you have ANY comments on the Freedman mp3 and it's curious arrival on the scene in 03'? Who did the mp3 encode? What format did you originally listen to this file? Was it as is in MP3 format? Have you ever seen or heard this recording on lp without edits?"

All questions that need answers. Without this and more answers about the origin's of this file. Until answers are forthcoming on this we will just assume this file is a propaganda production and will discount it completely as such.

And a tad more Doodoo talk for fun

I banned this mad man from my Myspace for causing problems over and over again with everyone. This is my payback. The question is why would MATHABA let him. He makes no comment about the interview. Just name calling. And real crazy statements with no proof at all none. Please mathaba take a look at this wack job. And end the "do do head" name calling. Please readers write to mathaba and let the know. One post from this guy after a file, OK; but 5 on one, and 9 on another; All because I banned him for the very same thing on my MYSPACE"

Good one Daryl he even managed to get wrong who was using the name calling and who was not.

see comments for more fun

First you take D.C. Then you take New York.

I will confirm that the "DoodoHead" "Piss" "Urine" and others are some of the clues to see Smith through his disguises and proxies. See this post of Daryl's to the old management of Mathaba.

Date: 21 Jul 2006 02:53 UTC [?]
Comment: DBS is not wanted around here
Your Name: daryl bradford smith (IP: Logged) [?]

mailto:Masher1@gmail.com
You forgot to tell everyone that I'm a dodo head too. Mathaba it's clear this nut just wants to pee on my leg, why let him do it over and over?
Web Link: Freach connection

Reply

So we can see that the Doodo Feces poop Dog Poop Urine talk is a matter of record. (Smith has a small black dog BTW judging by the photos he has posted. And also It's not his i bet but he is walking it the most hence the Venom for the normal bodily functions of perhaps dogs.) Anyway i use this motif combined with some logic like does the Persona post DBS URL's? That is another. Then i ask if the persona defends DBS,E.H. Bollyn Et Al? Does the persona seem to be saying things that sound like things Daryl has said on his mp3 files? does the persona fail to adequately defend himself/herself as they should in the face of unfriendly responses to there posts? Does the persona use HTML and composite images and photos? Does the persona maintain a almost fanatical hold on there cover even in the face of it being blown?

6 (Six) times here in the WUFYS archive i think Daryl has posted comments. I even called out a few Lotus,Fester,PJZ

The rest are easy to spot if you Use the DBS BS Persona test outlined above in basic because i really should be working on my wife's Elkey's reassembly
Thanks again Poseidon ;) i would have been all over this but i am a year behind on his BS and am at a total loss on Bollyn's part in all this. But i sure did like the gate keeping they did on saying what they did about smoke plumes from ground zero in the may 17 show. Trying to make the Nano particle info coming to N.Y. city will all be a result of Termite,Termate and nothing else eh boys?? Well Pah to that. Everyone around me knows exactly what i think about the Damprs in WTC 1&2 and the reasons that the Drawings and Blueprints are never going to be released. When the independent UO2/DU survey on the Manhattan area is done and the results shoot through the wires then i may have another stick to beat Daryl with at his trial.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York.

Aaah, so you've decided between yourselves to lie your way out of it. Makes sense; he was totally checkmated.

Just "text spammed onto the page", hmmm? Well I've got the originals in full too, Michael, so if his differ at all to mine, he's edited them.

So if my postings of these emails are just "text spammed onto the page", where's PlanetQuo to tell me so? Why isn't he here posting the "real email" material? And why will he make the "real" shit public "shortly", why not right here and right now? Better still, yesterday, when I first posted it all? He's been watching this thread the whole time, for fuck's sake. Or does he plan to move the whole debate over to his site, where he can deceive the unwary by means of using false context tactics and spin to put together some silly little "email expose" deception?

So ultimately Jim, this is your modus operandi: you've been totally checkmated and outed as a liar, and now it looks like you're opting to lie your way out of the lie, by lying. Well, this'll be interesting.

http://crimesofzion.blogspot.com/

Seen them, just text spammed onto the page. I've seen the original ones which Jim shall make public soon for all to see.

Poseidon, your observations have been noted and appreciated. Also may explain why DBS doesn't want to Skype with people who actually support him.

If Fester is Lotus and Daryl Bradford Smith, then Donnie Darko aka Quo Vadius is DBS; because I'm convinced that the Fester handle is Brendon O'Connell aka Quo Vadius aka Donnie Darko. Their writing styles are virtually identical.

http://crimesofzion.blogspot.com/

Michael, for fuck's sake. Stop playing dumb, man. I've posted my email exchange with Jim Kerr aka PlanetQuo for you twice now on this thread, and you've completely and deliberately avoided responding to it. I believed you the first time you said you'd missed it, but you've avoided it twice now when it's in plain view so I'm calling bullshit on you this time. Look, one more time.

From:planetquo@hotmail.co.uk

Sent: Wednesday, 25 April 2007 6:36:23 AM

To: jamie linton (jmzlinton@hotmail.com)

Hi Jamie,

I give you my word that any information that you give me regarding Nina aka 'A Possum Princess' will not be published on any of my websites or shared with Eric Hufschmid. Nina is under investigation. I am interested solely in her relationships with Daryl Bradford Smith and Joe Molero and Madthumbs.

See the quote from Jim in bold, Michael? Of course you do, and not for the first time, either. Why are you playing obfuscation games? It's not like I'm gonna forget about it, I'm not fucking stupid. And nor are the other readers of this thread.

The above statement was a promise made to me by Jim Kerr of PlanetQuo.com, which needless to say, was shamelessly broken, thereby rendering him an outright liar and a traitor to his friends, being that I was his friend and associate at the time. Do you refute my rationale here, Michael? Do you want to tell me that my logic is faulty or that I'm lying or that there's some sort of justification for being a lying cunt that I'm unaware of? Anything at all? Or will you just keep pretending you haven't seen it? For fuck's sake Michael, it's right there in black and white.

In case it's still not clear to you, here, once again, is what I wrote in the email before that, instructing him to use Nina's email, if I were to choose to forward it, strictly for the sake of his own interest:

"I have a fair bit of information from Nina that I'll pass on to you if you can assure me that it will be used for your interest only. No publishing on your site, no sharing with Hufschmid, no fucking around. I don't want her to be seen to be weighing in on it, especially via me."

Me: "No publishing on your site... no fucking around.."

Jim: "I give you my word that any information that you give me regarding Nina aka 'A Possum Princess' will not be published on any of my websites..."

No sharing with anyone, and no publishing on his websites. Well what the fuck do you call this, Michael? Look at the URL - planetquo.net. He shared the email with Suzette (breach #1), and then published it on his site (breach #2). He may as well have sent it to fucking CNN. The point is, he's a lying little cunt, and now he's a coward, too, because he won't front up here and either defend his nonexistent honour or be man enough to admit his mistake and apologise for his fuck-up.

The question, Quo, is not WHO are you (like the URL title of your little expose would suggest), it's WHERE are you. Stop fucking hiding. And Michael, I'm not posting this email info again. I've made myself clear three times now. Scroll up, you'll see it not once but twice on this page.

Now, Michael: do you still maintain that

"Jim is not a liar."

Do you still stand by your assertion that

"Everything Jim has ever claimed he is or has made reference to checks out 100%."

You wrote this in your last post:

"If I had even the slightest hunch that his integrity was suspect I would not be writing this."

I just showed you conclusive evidence in Jim's own words that he's a liar, more than enough to give you a "slight hunch" that something's amiss.

I trust you'll do me the service of responding pertinently to this matter, because this is getting ridiculous.

http://crimesofzion.blogspot.com/

For the benefit of new readers who have not seen the entire thread, or are quite new to WUFYS, one rather pertinent question concerns Fester's split personality. If Fester is not a spook, but merely a useful idiot who has been suckered into Smith's bizarre little cult, then why does he need to post on this forum under multiple handles?

Clicking on a username will reveal the comments and blog entries history for that particular name. The user "lotus", for example, may be tracked here:

http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/user/279

Click on "Track" to see which threads / blog entries a user has commented in. After a flurry of activity from lotus in the first half of March, the persona was quietly "retired".

In this thread:

http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/867

...about Zionists targetting WUFYS, we have the following comment by "lotus":

Q, sorry to hear the golem are moving against you. I shall bring 5 new people to the site this week & redouble my printing and leafletting. Peace

Fester also calls qrswave "Q", e.g. see his "Who's afraid of DBS?" post on the first page of this thread:

Q, I posted this "not very productive" line as I thought it was important for people to consider the "charges" which people smear Daryl Bradford Smith with.

And Fester also has a habit of ending his posts with "Peace": E.g., see that same comment and several others in this thread.

Then we have the fact that both lotus and Fester share the same cover story. They claim to print and distribute leaflets, as part of their effort to help the truth movement. E.g. see Fester's comment on the third page of this thread:

I never cared much for MASHER's contributions as they reeked with innuendo and were noticeably lacking in beef. Poseidon was a different story. I very much liked his 911 postings and was distributing one as a handout.

Incidentally, Fester chose to entitle that particular comment "The end of a fishy business." That was posted early April 24 (GMT time - or late April 23 US time). On Smith's April 22 show with Jim Condit, Smith commented (at 5:50) "It already smells like fish to me; the whole thing stinks." Fester will probably try to explain that one away by claiming he remembered Smith say it. Or his constant reference to fish is like a case of Jung's scarab "synchronicity".

In one of lotus's first comments:

The book which opened my eyes to some very important truths was Prof. Israel Shahak's Jewish History, Jewish Religion. I strongly encourage EVERYONE to read that. He also translated the Zionist plan for chaos in the Middle East which can be found at
www.freearabvoice.org/ZionistConspiracy_DivideTheArabWorld.htm

...see at the bottom here:

http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/785

...we find him promoting Prof. Israel Shahak. The clincher with lotus / Fester is the way they have / he has a history of shamelessly promoting iamthewitness and Bollyn. However, in an attempt to try and look more rounded, Israel Shahak was added to their wares. Take a look at this thread:

http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/975

...in which Fester brazenly plugs iamthewitness, and then goes on to the subject of Israel Shahak.

See this thread God Damn You, Dick Cheney!!!, where Fester comes in peddling Bollyn and iamthewitness, and then his alter ego lotus joins in to defend Smith. Note that much of the time, "lotus" remembers that he is not supposed to end his posts with a "Peace" as Fester does, instead posing as a possible Hindu with an Aum exclamation.

As previously noted, here are a few points to consider regarding Fester's comments in this thread and the possibility that he is DBS:

Who would be sufficiently motivated and well-informed to point out that the Apollo moon landings material is "Hufschmid's pet project"? Who was promoting the Money Masters video on Tuesday April 10 (Ans: iamthewitness) and who was promoting it in this thread on Thursday April 12? (Ans: Fester) Who would be jealous of Alex Jones getting CNN and Clear Channel time? Who would be sufficiently motivated to describe a Smith skeptic as a "true bottom dweller"? Who would be motivated to defend the lunatic conspiracy theory that the Iranians are "Crypto-Zionists"? Who would be asking for material with which he could obtain a propaganda advantage by promoting Eustace Mullins as a "Zionist agent"? Who would have a sufficiently inflated opinion of himself and his FBI/CIA entrapment techniques to claim that "any idiot would see that" Smith had not put words in Mullins' mouth when Mullins himself and several others reject this claim? Who would be sufficiently motivated to, every time new evidence is presented against Smith, repeatedly dismiss it as merely a "festering pile", "horse dung", etc? Who would have such in-depth knowledge of the Smith-Kaminski rift that he would cite the new, revised 'explanation' (trouble with holocaust laws) as opposed to the reason given at the time (racist views)? Who would claim to be sure that Mike Piper is a "plant"? Who has a fixation with filth ("dung", "horseshit", "cat piss", "fetid fecal fragrance") - a possible sex criminal who had been hiding out in France on a farm prior to being given immunity in return for his cooperation? (The timing of Fester's posts suggest he is now based in the US, not France.) Who likes the handle "Uncle Fester", having been known to use it to describe James Fetzer? Who would be likely to use a French expression such as "ménage à trois"?

It's ironic that Smith and Hufschmid criticise Karl Schwarz for posing as "Jon Carlson" and then praising and promoting Schwarz. They describe it as a "not-so-clever technique." A technique which Smith himself also evidently employs!

First off, before I even embarked on any lengthy interaction with Jim I checked him out first. Wasn't hard to do having friends and relatives in the UK, where I grew up myself. Everything Jim has ever claimed he is or has made reference to checks out 100%. He is who he is. The investigation was not Jim's alone and I can assure you that what is presented is as accurate as you can get. Jim's credentials are sound. I can assure you that I did my homework long before any investigation began. Jim is not a liar. If I had even the slightest hunch that his integrity was suspect I would not be writing this. Jim is not at the centre of this. Daryl Bradford Smith is. One doesn't need to be standing on any moral high ground to address Smith with these questions; anyone in the gutter would could do it and still retain the higher ground. If you have assumed that I have allowed Jim to pass through my checks and balances you're sadly misguided. His website speaks for itself, and contrary to what you claim receives more hits and downloads than most others of its kind. I can assure you that I have done my homework. The information presented speaks for itself and even Eric Hufschmid can confirm it as he helped gather much of the information. Fester, on the other hand has left such a trail of footprints in cybershite that all that remains are neck prints. Fester would be wise to leave now and save some face, even as ugly and docile it is. I'm asking DBS to explain himself to all who need to listen. That is reasonable. Case closed.

Fugazi, to Fester:

Daryl Bradford Smith is being indicted here. Your endless chatter is inconsequential. You've already established the fact that you have CIA connections. Take a hike spook, I'm addressing this to Daryl Bradford Smith.

Michael, the fact that Jim is a liar has everything to do with this. You're being a hypocrite, demanding answers without providing them yourself.

You're pretending that PlanetQuo has nothing to do with DBS' indictment. That simply isn't the case. Everything you've linked to comes from him. Your video plugs him. He's central to this in the most fundamental way.

I know he's been watching this thread, and so do you. So Jim: time to front up, man. I need to know how you can reconcile this urgent demand for answers from Daryl Bradford Smith with your own complete lack of credibility and sense of honour.

And I pose the same question to you, Michael. When your comrade is a liar, how do you justify your position with regard to your demands from Daryl Bradford Smith?

I don't think there's anything unfair or unreasonable or irrelevant about those questions. On the contrary, I think you need to address them immediately.

http://crimesofzion.blogspot.com/

Answer the Questions Daryl. What 9/11 truths has Daryl,Eric or Chris broken for the truth movement? What? IS There anything they revealed First. Is there anything they are even remotely responsible for that helps even one American see the truth? Come on i will make it easy for you just answer on your self Daryl. That should not be too hard for you. Also Mr Smith you sill have not explained about the Ben Freedman MP3 files origins or source. Still waiting on this.

Daryl your creditability is shot to heck. Coming here and trying to do this damage control stuff is just doing more to expose your lame maneuvers and games.

I have told Daryl that i will always be here to keep an eye on the DBS agents. And if you insist on coming to WUFYS,Mathaba or anywhere else that is public and continue to do this GHOST POST crap WE will be here and every time you do you will only hurt your operation and it's numbers. As i have said before Daryl you cannot hide your voice behind keys and computers. Those of us doing the Good work can sniff out ANY attempts to trick or bullshit us AND WE WILL DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.

Coming here Daryl without good deeds on your mind is just going to hurt your witness operation. We judge by ACTIONS here at WUFYS. And we have Elephant like memory for the scum and dreck and a real need to see that something is done to trip them into there own crap and lies.

Judge one by there deeds not by there words.

What deeds shall we judge Daryl and others by? Would they even care about doing things that help to mend the HUGE mess America is facing? So far i have not seen this in DBS or Eric.

Just because Daryl is a great poacher of other folks works and informations does not mean you should suck it all back without question. Ask your self while you read/listen to TFC stuff "Where is the help Daryl"
Does Daryl even once tell his listeners even one thin they can do to fight Zion and the other forces at work to wreck our world. No they do not.

And Fester I am not even the slightest bit in doubt about you or your identity.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York.

Aaaaaw, Fuzzy, you ain't gonna start ignoring me are ya? How bout another bucket of pus for the Old Chum Trail? Be a good fellow.

Daryl Bradford Smith is being indicted here. Your endless chatter is inconsequential. You've already established the fact that you have CIA connections. Take a hike spook, I'm addressing this to Daryl Bradford Smith.

Fuzzy old chum, lots of gas, dude. You seem to think your posting at a 4-1 rate somehow constitutes the "the readership of this thread."

The operative instruction was BLOW ME. I ain't wading into your steaming pile on any account. All this chatroom handbags shit is way out of my depth. I defer to those familiar with the territory and prefer to snipe from the sidelines, or, perhaps I should say, stir the chum with the paddle of levity.

COZ seems familiar with the issues and has put a serious looking question on your plate, so quit pissing and moaning about non-essentials as this is a fuckin' indictment here. Your repeated failure to address COZ's concern starts to fester: would it be that an answer might take some of the steam out of your pile?.

Like I said, your a johnny-come-lately, but don't let that rile ya too much. I'll be here on the CHUM trail whether you stay or go. If you got ANOTHER bucket, lay on.

I remain your humble servant:

I'd assumed you'd seen this post, but evidently I was wrong. It's on page 4 of this thread.

By the way, if you don't trust that these excerpts are real, I'll be happy to forward them to you. Here's the post from page 4 reproduced in full:

* * *

Jim Kerr of planetquo.com, the great forum-stalking exposer-guy, is either an outright liar or straight up delusional. I was friends with Jimbo until just recently, when he accused me of spreading disinformation via my myspace profile, because he doesn't approve of some of the sites I link to. According to Jim, if you link to 9/11 sites that don't vociferously declare that Israel was behind the attacks, you're a disinfo agent. His penchant for unwarranted finger-pointing and gratuitous accusations is second only to that of Eric Hufschmid. I didn't really give a shit when the finger started pointing at me, but now that the stupid old cunt's started posting lies about my friend Nina on his rapidly-declining-in-relevance website and on this thread, the time's come to do some "exposing" of my own.

PlanetQuo: I was amused when I heard Daryl Bradford Smith say that he believes you to be Scott Makufka a.k.a. Victor Thorn. I reckon that you're Debus posting under another pseudonym, but I bet you'll deny it - just like Nina a.k.a. A Possum Princess from NOLAJBS denies that she knows Madthumbs. Nina, incidentally is the girl who likes to pose for the camera while wearing an IDF T-shirt.

I doubt though if she's told Daryl Bradford Smith of her support for the Israel Defence Forces during their telephone conversations. I'm sure he'll find out soon enough though. In fact, I know he will. Daryl has been keeping some bad company....tsk tsk. Shame be upon him.

You're keeping very bad company too Poseidon. A self-confessed Jewish shill and a participant in an IDF summer camp is not the kind of company such a fine researcher and writer as your good self should be mingling with. One does tend to be judged by the company that one keeps, you know.

Jim aka PlanetQuo would have you all believe that Nina, my 22yr old friend currently residing in New York, "attended an IDF summer camp". Here are some quotes from Jim's ridiculous too-much-time-on-his-hand doesn't-get-out-enough Nina expose:

"Why is Daryl Bradford Smith having regular telephone conversations with a 22-year old woman who states that she attended an IDF summer camp?"

"Daryl Bradford Smith urgently needs to explain his relationship with the young woman who likes to be photographed wearing IDF T-shirts and dining on pages of the Talmud. How did Smith become acquainted with a supporter of the Israel Defence Forces in the first place?"

What Jim's referring to is a photo that Nina herself posted on a thread in the NOLAJBS forum. The caption was

"Oh, so it IS okay for me to share my experience in IDF summer camp? I'm grateful that this forum provides such a hospitable warm environment to come clean. Thanks...."

It was in response to this post, from an idiot going by the name of Quo Vadius, aka Donnie Darko:

"My sister went to Israel. Worked on a Kibbutz. I should have killed her on her return.

My friend has barbecues with a former Israeli fighter pilot. I should assassinate him immediately.

I walked past a Jewish guy once. I should have vomited and washed myself with acid immediately.

Your amazing logic is noted.

See your psychiatrist."

Can anyone besides the delusional Jim Kerr not see that it was a joke? Or is Jim not delusional at all, but trying to deliberately mislead the readers of his painfully boring and inane "expose"? One thing's for sure; either Jimbo's incredibly fucking dumb, or he's a bullshit artist.

Oh, and Poseidon is Debus, too, according to Jim. Who else besides Jimbo believes that?

Anyway, all that aside, I happen to have proof that Jim aka PlanetQuo is a lowlife liar, even if he is stupid. A couple of weeks ago I offered Jim some information about Daryl Bradford Smith that I'd obtained through email correspondence with Nina, on the condition that he keep it to himself. After getting Nina's permission to pass on the info, I wrote to Jim thusly (excerpt from an email):

"I have a fair bit of information from Nina that I'll pass on to you if you can assure me that it will be used for your interest only. No publishing on your site, no sharing with Hufschmid, no fucking around. I don't want her to be seen to be weighing in on it, especially via me."

This is the first paragraph of his response, excerpted from his rather lengthy reply:

From: planetquo@hotmail.co.uk

Sent: Wednesday, 25 April 2007 6:36:23 AM
To: jamie linton (jmzlinton@hotmail.com)

Hi Jamie,
I give you my word that any information that you give me regarding Nina aka 'A Possum Princess' will not be published on any of my websites or shared with Eric Hufschmid. Nina is under investigation. I am interested solely in her relationships with Daryl Bradford Smith and Joe Molero and Madthumbs.

I trusted Jim, I had no reason not to. I considered him a good friend and a man of his word. So I forwarded an email I'd received from Nina to him, unedited and in full. What a mistake that was. In the next email he sent me, he asked my permission to show Daryl Bradford Smith the email:

"Smith needs to explain himself and answer the questions that I will be asking him. If he is clean, he has nothing to hide. In view of this, will you give me permission to reveal the information without naming my source. Smith does not need to know where my information came from. All he needs to know is what Nina has said. He will know whether or not she is telling the truth."

So he was already looking to break the deal, but at least it was looking like I had a choice in the matter. So I asked Nina in a myspace message:

----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: Infensus Mentis
Date: May 2, 2007 12:01 AM

Nina - Quo is asking for my permission to share some of the info (whatever it may be that he's interested in, I don't know) with Daryl, yay or nay?

And from her, I got this reply:

From: Nina
Date: 01 May 2007, 10:15 PM

oh? HAha im pretty sure some such discussions have already taken place.... ;) why he's asking permission now, i'm not sure. (btw, if you'd rather not serve as courier, you can let planetquo know that he is welcome to contact me directly. i'm certain you've got more important and interesting things to attend to.)

cheers, Nina"

So it seemed he'd already spilled his guts. Unimpressed, I emailed him with the above quote from from Nina, with "it looks like you've already spilled the beans" at the bottom. It was at that point that he became hostile, deleted me from myspace, and accused me of being disinfo on account of the links to "deceptive sites" on my myspace profile. Conspicuously absent was any sort of denial about his "spilling the beans" and breaking his word. An excerpt from my reply:

My last email to you was "looks like you've spilled the beans", and now I get this. Not a direct answer, but this. And don't you fucking pretend that our deal was for you not to share it VERBATIM; the deal was for you not to share it at all, you conniving bastard. I believe my words were "for your interest only". But you broke that word, didn't you. So that you could run over to Daryl and be the hero that saves him from Nina, the 22 year old girl that you're making an arch-nemesis out of in your silly fucking doesn't-get-out-enough imagination.

Shortly thereafter, Nina's information, the email I'd given to Jim on trust, was posted verbatim in a thread on the NOLAJBS forum by Jim's new partner in crime, Suzette the Whipette. So he'd passed it onto someone else, breaking his word in the process. But not only that; remember my conditions, outlined above?

"..I'll pass on to you if you can assure me that it will be used for your interest only. No publishing on your site, no sharing with Hufschmid..."

From his little Nina "expose" page on his website:

I invite you, dear reader, to examine the following extract from a conversation that Nina recently had with a mutual acquaintance, and to draw your conclusions regarding the truthfulness of what Nina is telling us...

So there you go. Jim Kerr aka Planet Quo is full of shit, and as such, can't be trusted at all, for anything, and should shut the fuck up. No more finger-pointing, no more Poseidon this and Debus that, no more "deceptive" this and "disinfo" that. That's right Jim, I'm talking to you. You've lied and deceived about Nina and her "IDF connections", and you outright lied to me, someone you've publicly declared as a "good friend" on NOLAJBS forum. And indeed I was until you fucked with me and tried smearing the good name of an innocent young girl half your fucking age, all based on contrived bullshit and out-of-context tidbits.

So it looks like you're in a "bit of a pickle"; if you deny the above quotes are your words, you're a liar (I've got the emails to prove it), and if you accept that they are, which of course they are, you're a liar by virtue of the broken promises therein.

I suggest you put the brakes on your rapid descent into irrelevance and get busy exposing the real Zionists for a change.

http://crimesofzion.blogspot.com/

http://crimesofzion.blogspot.com/

Crimes of Zion says "Why are you demanding answers from Daryl Bradford Smith but not Jim Kerr, aka PlanetQuo? Isn't that a bit hypocritical?"

Then start a new thread called "Planetquo indicted"

Crimes of Zion says "Do you doubt the authenticity of the email material I presented as evidence of his conniving, lowlife nature, or do you just not care?"

Where is the email evidence in question you speak of?

Crimes of Zion says "But most importantly, what gives him the right to claim the high moral ground over Smith, and demand that he answer these allegations when he won't answer ours?"

I'm the one calling for answers from Smith.

Crimes of Zion says "PlanetQuo needs to stop hiding away like a pussy and voyeuring on this thread and face me on this shit."
Tell that to Jim.

Crimes of Zion says "Until then (and forevermore, let's face it), he'll remain a fucking disgrace and a liability to your position on Smith and whatever else you stand for."
Nothing to do with my stand on Smith, everything to do with the evidence against him.

Crimes of Zion says "A liar is a liar."

You got that right. Anyone with half ounce of brain can work out who is and who isn't on this thread. The material presented is confirmed by Nina, Eric and Smith himself. Which brings me to the main point of this thread which is my challenge to DBS to answer the questions that this material asks of him. Some things in life are so simple that we often miss them. Better to be hated for what you are than praised for what you're not. The silence is deafening Daryl.

Fugazi, to Fester:

the entire readership of this thread know that your either a useful idiot or an agent of some ilk so why not save face and re-invent yourself elsewhere in your electronic playground. In the meantime will DBS answer the questions raised about him. Simple.

Smith's not the only one who needs to pipe up with some answers, bud. PlanetQuo owes us an explanation too. The questions you've raised about Smith on this thread are valid ones, but since they originate from Jim Kerr who is a proven liar, how can we trust his motives? Personally, I believe you're sincere about what you're saying and I have no reason to believe you're dishonest, but a) I know for a fact that you're wrong about Nina, and b) the other allegations and information you present about Smith is coming from PlanetQuo, who is, as I just mentioned, demonstrably full of shit.

Why are you demanding answers from Daryl Bradford Smith but not Jim Kerr, aka PlanetQuo? Isn't that a bit hypocritical? Do you doubt the authenticity of the email material I presented as evidence of his conniving, lowlife nature, or do you just not care? If he was willing to lie and fuck me over when we were good friends, do you really believe he won't eventually do the same to you? Or to anyone, for that matter. A liar is a liar.

But most importantly, what gives him the right to claim the high moral ground over Smith, and demand that he answer these allegations when he won't answer ours?

PlanetQuo needs to stop hiding away like a pussy and voyeuring on this thread and face me on this shit. Until then (and forevermore, let's face it), he'll remain a fucking disgrace and a liability to your position on Smith and whatever else you stand for.

http://crimesofzion.blogspot.com/

Grow up Fester and address the issue at hand. Its game over, case closed and DBS knows it. If DBS knows it then why can't you? Your behavior goes beyond that of a useful idiot. You're an embarrassment to the clown industry. For the benefit of newcomers to this thread here is what is presented regarding the indictment of Daryl Bradford Smith:

http://planetquo.net/WhoAreYou.htm

Wouldn't want it getting buried or Faheyd away now would we?

Treason and fraud for starters.

Fester, you may have the monumental privilege of being the instigator of this thread, a thread in which your role of defending DBS is totally irrelevant in the face of the facts presented. May I suggest you start another thread elsewhere in cyberspace. You could name it, "The delights of festering corruption". Your not even part of this debate anymore as any ground for coming to the aid of DBS is well and truly sunk in the mud. Face it Fester you’re outed, not by me or anyone else for that matter, but by the evidence presented. It's simply left up to DBS to come clean and explain himself. The entire readership of this thread know that your either a useful idiot or an agent of some ilk so why not save face and re-invent yourself elsewhere in your electronic playground. In the meantime will DBS answer the questions raised about him. Simple.

Fuzzy, try sounding out the big words. It's your steaming pile. Don't throw a tantrum if no one is interested in cleaning up after you.

Now, class can't continue unless you're able to follow the instructions. Go back and try again. Biting the tongue as one concentrates is sometimes helpful.

The "festering pile" has been heaped on DBS. You obviously enjoy taking responsibility for it being heaped onto yourself. Do you often volunteer to have "festering piles" of shit fall upon yourself when it is clearly aimed at someone else? Such behavior may lead free thinking minds to reasonably assume that you are DBS. Now where have I heard the word "festering" before........Answer the questions raised.

Fester, it surprises nobody here that you would personally know two CIA spooks. The "festering pile" has been heaped on you, not "us". You are alone in your inability to see sense. I would assume that personally knowing two spooks would qualify you to provide a more intelligent response, such as actually addressing the questions with evidence if you can refute what is presented within your thread

Fuzzy, yeah, it's "my own velocity." You could start by explaining WTF that statement was intended to mean or you could blow me instead.

You're a johnny-come-lately as far as this partikler thread goes, so spare me the preaching.

I have no intention of wading through the pile of shit you've blessed us with, but I do look forward to plenty more buckets over the side from you and yours.

Don't like the pictures? See the instructions above old chum.

Fester, are you DBS? The comment is for DBS. Are you unable to act on your own velocity? If you feel it absolutely necessary to come to the defense of this man then perhaps you can answer the questions that are being raised instead of further embarrassing yourself posting silly images and deflecting attention away from the issue at hand here. You can start by revealing your real identity plus photo of yourself, unless the photo of the croc is you. Only then will you have any credibility at all. Until then you are nothing more than an html code of insignificance. Now, address the questions raised, remember that it was you who insigated this thread.

Fuzzy, that's a deep festerin pile you dropped on us. I won't venture in too deep except to mention that the well-known Culinary Institute of America on the Hudson turns out dozens of "spooks" every year. I personally know two of them.

MASHER, one of your finest posts. My only suggestion is that you get yourself a reading tutor. Main idea, inferencing, word decoding, etc. all seem to be pretty low, but I expect your SIEGE of NEW YORK has taken most of your free time. Multitask, dude, multitask.

Was tempted to call you a paid shill, but the notion of anyone paying for your efforts isn't plausible.

I'll retire and you may resume blithering n now.

It's very simple. Information has been gathered together that raise serious questions regarding the credibility and motives of DBS. If the same information applied to Piper, Jones, Stadtmiller, Rivero etc, then this would have been all over the front page at TFC. DBS and Eric have sent more to their imaginary guillotine on far less evidence that what is presented against him. Again in his latest chatter he implies that his attackers are religious nut job. Nothing could be further from the reality of it. DBS has been compromised via Nina and Joe Molero. Why do you think he refuses to name Joe Molero on his broadcast? To limit the damage he has only stuttered that the reason that "NOLOJOBBS" is suspicious because they have a link to the 'New American' newspaper. He even got that wrong and were it not for the respectable Jim Condit Jr (a religious nut job by DBS's definition) correcting DBS by saying its not the 'New American' but the 'American Spectator' another piece of misinformation, however trivial, would have gone unchecked. The point is DBS fails to mention Joe Molero's connections with Christian Zionism and Prison Planet via Joseph Watson. If this alone does not raise a red flag then why are we bothering to expose deception at all? The fact is, DBS does nothing at TFC other than rant. He is the voice alone that helps carry Eric's political and social commentary along. DBS claims that he requires around $400-$500 a month to run his "operation". Anyone who has a website knows that this is not the case as the amount of sites on the internet would probably be reduced to at least a third of what is already out there. He claims Skype does not network for him (perhaps because Skype would reveal his real location?), so he insists on using a landline. Even with the use of a landline you can get deals in which you can call overseas etc for only a few dollars an hour so the idea that he requires this amount is ridiculous and is nothing more than a money grabbing exercise. If he requires the money then the question that arises is what for? It's no secret that DBS was an (the) executive chef at the Rainbow Room situated at the Rockefeller Plaza at one time, a place that would have also catered for his love for Jazz. This may seem innocent at first glance until you discover that two former executive chef's I can name are CIA trained. Why would the exe chefs at this gig be CIA trained? When you realize the kinds of people who frequent the Rainbow Room are the likes of David Rockefella and CFR members amongst others it's not hard to figure out why this would be the set up. For example the Queen's personal chef and staff, if they are not already handpicked from various 'trusted' Intel or military organizations and if they are not they are sure as hell briefed by them with strict codes of secrecy. I offer up this as an invite for anyone interested to do further investigation, after all, I'm in Australia and my resources, except for the internet, are limited. Here are a couple of links that may get you started:
http://www.starchefs.com/Summer/99/AWilkinson/bio.shtml
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_Room
It's not long before you begin to see what I refer to if you study the names and links etc. Even if this angle is not valid it is worthy of attention as it sure as hell fills in a lot of gaping hole in who he claims to be, for instance, he claims to be able to trace his ancestry back to the Mayflower. This may be true, but the amount of Americans I have heard say this would suggest that the Mayflower was akin to a fully laden QE2! Again, he plays the 'Patriot Game'. Then he claims he WAS a Professor? I always thought that once a Professor always a Professor. If he WAS a professor then what happened to make him a former one? and what was he a professor of?, politics?, religion?, science?. In a nutshell,???????????????? Eric tells us to investigate the investigators, no blind obedience, no exceptions, as long as it doesn't apply to DBS. The moment he gets wind that he is under investigation or even suspicion then he retaliates in the most vulgar and deviously manipulative fashion and that alone should give you a clue as to the mentality of DBS. An honest man would not have put himself into a situation to be under suspicion at the first place by being so evasive and vague about himself. For example listen again to the broadcast from 14 Fed 2006 in which he claims he was visited by a man of mid-east appearance bearing an aerial photograph of his farmhouse. DBS claims this man SPOKE with a "middle eastern accent" before telling us how he chased him down the road with a rifle. Whilst doing this he managed to get a partial glimpse of his car license plate and promptly reported this to the local police and even the French secret service. DBS claims that this visit coincided with unknown people allegedly digging into his dustbins. He tells us that a neighbor spotted this/these strangers and alerted him. First off, his neighbor must have great eyesight in order to spot an alleged intruder in the dark of night in his remote farmhouse! I live in a semi-remote area of Australia and can assure you that I CANNOT SEE A THING at night except the stars and the distant lights of other homes. But then again, in the conversation he had with Chris and Eric (3rd May 2007), he claims that the rain around his place has been so much that its spilt out onto the street. As I say I live in a fairly remote area and there's no streets here, just roads (if you could call them that). Going back to the conversation he had with this bulldog looking man of middle eastern appearance he says nothing about what was actually said. The fact is, DBS is using the old AJ technique of fear. Incidentally, he claims that the strange going-ons happened around the time that he first began talking about the Chabad-Lubavitch connection in all this. What's funny about this is that he is strongly implying, if not actually saying, that these old decrepit Rabbis are sending out people fitting the classic profile of an assassin out to warn off people from revealing their secret plans, YET has no hesitation to laugh off the idea that Jesuit priests, whom he describes as largely a bunch of old guys in their seventies hobbling around in walking frames, could wield any power to do likewise. I don't subscribe to this Jesuit view much either, but you get the point. That said, if there is a strong Jesuit connection, which DBS flatly rejects, then surely we would not be privy to much information about it would we given the magnitude of what would be involved if it was so as Phelps and others put forward. As I say I don't subscribe to putting to much focus on this angle myself simply on the grounds that the Vatican don't control the supply of money, which is at the heart of the control. To round this up I simply encourage others to examine the evidence put forward and not be misled into thinking that this is an attack on any person in particular, it just so happens that the people involved need to simply explain and give an account, instead all we are seeing is the same tactics employed by politicians and mainstream media and I thought we were a little more intelligent than that. In a nutshell, answer the questions raised at hand DBS. This manufactured thread is nothing more than an engineered attempt to placate those who would raise similar questions and concerns. It's all very well people maintaining support for DBS on the information alone, but as Greg Felton said in the interview DBS conducted on 23rd Oct 2006 "the information on your site contains nothing that isn't freely available anywhere else on the internet". Incidentally and more important this is the only, I stress, ONLY broadcast that mentions those words that no-one dare utter..CLEAN BREAK. And this was uttered from the lips of Felton, not DBS. In fact DBS was clueless about it(?). It was me who sent the link to Eric and DBS regarding Grant Smith's excellent breakdown of the CLEAN BREAK document, which appeared for a short time at iamthewitness. I then sent the video discussion of it to appear on DBS's myspace profile and alas, it never appeared. I sent it again and alas it never appeared...HELLO!! Start answering questions DBS or the guillotine awaits, I ain't fucking around here, because it strongly stinks of a classic operation to self-implode by design thus sinking the information, or the credibility of it, with it. In the real world DBS would be arrested and quizzed on the strength of the circumstantial evidence alone if was in relation to an investigation of a criminal nature (and by Eric's definition this is of a criminal nature). Has he not hung out to dry many people on less evidence? Lets not forget the self-confessed Christian Bollyn (who DBS rides on the back of), who cares not that Eric puts hardcore porn (violent exploitation of young woman/girls actually) on his CD Rom with the instruction to Copy and Distribute. Nor has his "Christian" conscience been pricked as to why he still maintains his connections with DBS who sends emails of a virulent ant-Christian nature to a woman who's only crime, besides supporting him loyally, suggests that he be investigated in light of his constant lengthy calls to a 22 year old woman, whilst having no time or desire to even email people who actually support, defend and contribute to the French Connection. COME ON!!!
Is it going to take a trip to France to out this guy personally, because I will have no hesitation in doing so for the sake of my own conscience. WHERE'S YOURS?????????????????

So fester You say above "Smith has an outstanding library of files detailing the history and current operations of the Zionists. Simply the best place for the clueless (not spineles clueless) to begin to get up to speed. (NB - Pidcock and others are historians NOT reporters and so they have presented the material they have. Their absence is not evidence of any sort except to the obtuse/zio-trolls.)"

No fester Daryl has a bunch of files without much of any work of Daryl's and a smattering of a WHOLE bunch of other people's work parroted on the MP3 files as HIS or OUR research when it is in most cases Smiths repackage of other more robust and documented sources. All with his own special BIAS of course. Then think that Daryl is not an investigator he is a commentator and a very poor one at that. Investigators usually do something to further there investigations. Just what is Daryl doing other than waisting everyones time and talking endlessly on and on about the surface of the issues and never gets to into the real details. I have to commend Posidon for taking so much time doing all that HTML Quotes posting to help swim the murk of Smith. So fester can you list any Smith scoops? Stuff Smith is documented to have revealed first? How about just 3 things (Three) that the Trio has broken and brought to light first. Three things documented to have broken into the truth movement one from each that should not be too hard eh?

You can do that Fester?
First you take D.C. Then you take New York.

UAZ: This thread has turned into a mishmash of personal diatribes, meaningless accusations and insinuations.

Meaningless accusations and insinuations is accurate. I agree that it's regrettable that this thread has degenerated into what it has. But, UAZ: I'm not about to sit by while PlanetQuo uses this thread as a forum to spread lies and bullshit about a friend of mine. Would you?

The impression an onlooker/newbie would get from these latest posts is that we're all mentally unstable jerks. Your personal quibbles and vulgarity make you look like bratty kids.

People aren't stupid, generally speaking. They'll judge this site by virtue of it's merit, not by the inane "personal quibbles" and nonsense in the comment section of Fester's blog. This is an excellent site. No amount of peripheral drivel will alter that reality.

Nevertheless, I apologise to qrswave and the rest of you that would rather bullshit like this didn't go down here. But for as long as PlanetQuo and his ilk continue to use this place to proliferate their lies and deception, I'll be here to set the record straight, as I see it.

In any case, whatever (or whoever) is causing all this childish in-fighting, it serves only to distract us from the real issues. We will never succeed in stopping the Zionists if we behave like paranoid nutcases, casting doubt upon anyone and everyone at the first "suspicion" that crosses our minds. Rushing to judgement based upon a few personal misgivings or some perceived suspicious activity is not only counter-productive, but self-destructive.

This has been my point all along. And as far as "whatever (or whoever)" the source of all this "childish in-fighting" goes, I would hope that it's pretty obvious it's not me.

http://crimesofzion.blogspot.com/

The Gospel Truth is on the Way - of the Truth and the Light !
Here it comes, right down the Pied Pipers' Purple Poopshoot !

It's rich, it's thick. It's full o' herring and hairballs and a buckets and buckets of pus, but darn it's our very own CHUM smorgasbord.

Best of the Breaking News:

Old St. Pipe is gonna let it ALL HANG OUT on his arch enemy one o' these days. He's even THINKIN' about getting ready to really cut loose wid dem beans.

Wait, I caught a little whiff...it's coming in clearer now...yes, Oh God, yes, yes.."Daryl B. Smith is a BOLD liar...and..and...and St. Pipe knows it for a FACT!"

Po, do tell Pipe not to strain himself. He been scooped already.

Meanwhile, we're right back where we started:

Smith has an outstanding library of files detailing the history and current operations of the Zionists. Simply the best place for the clueless (not spineles clueless) to begin to get up to speed. (NB - Pidcock and others are historians NOT reporters and so they have presented the material they have. Their absence is not evidence of any sort except to the obtuse/zio-trolls.)

ON the other hand, he cusses people out (email too!), argues with people who were his friends, and may be a little paranoid (fuck, there's nothing to be worried about), and he likes booze. A simply appalling record supported by a symphony of the purest flatus.

Gosh, it's all so confusing.

Fester said:

Poseidon, we're just about come back to where we began. Golly, any idea when Pip might be ready to "share"?

Piper said that "there's been something that's rattling around for some time that we really have got to address this year": the Final Solution to the Hufschmid Conundrum.

The gruesome threesome are living on borrowed time.

Millions of people have realized that 9/11 was a false flag operation, but how many of them have read a book on 9/11?

There are a lot of 9/11 books; there are even more 9/11 websites. But how many people were swayed by a website mostly dedicated to character assassinations on prominent figures in the movement, compared to genuine truth sites that aim to present the facts rather than stir up trouble?

Germar Rudolf's work is great, but it focuses exclusively on The Holocaust, doesn't it?

Not entirely. He wrote an article debunking the "Apollo landings were a hoax" theory, for instance. And the last edition of The Revisionist that he managed to send out before his arrest included a piece showing how the "holocaust" allows the ruling elite and the bankers to maintain their stranglehold of compound interest and debt slavery. The "holocaust" taboo deters objective research of Hitler's system of dealing with other countries through barter transactions, and provides the corrupt elite with an ideological "air superiority".

How does it then "vastly surpass the collective works of TFC/Bollyn"?

Rudolf's revisionist work vastly surpasses the collective works of TFC/Bollyn on revisionism. Specialists in other fields vastly surpass TFC and Bollyn.

Are you trying to say that Jim Hoffman is not a Zionist denier?

He's a Zionist denier, but not all Zionist deniers are Zionist agents.

The only problem with TFC is that for some reason they have gone way too far and have "identified" many innocent people.

The reason being that they themselves are agent provocateurs.

But what Alex Jones does is discourage anyone else from treating the broken leg [exposing Zionism]. Furthermore, he does everything he can to make everyone think there is no broken leg in the first place. Do you see the enormous difference?

Although the Zionists are greatly over-represented in serious crime and were the principal players in 9/11, some folk genuinely have a blind spot with Israel, Jews and Zionism. They fail to see the elephant in the room.

Theories such as "the Jesuits did it" are ridiculous, because it's the Zionists who control the press, who have the most money, who have land-based nukes and sub-launched nuclear warheads, control the premier international terrorist group "al Qaeda" aka the Mossad, and have established a reputation as dangerous psychopaths whose nuclear blackmail must be respected. If Israelis suddenly turned over a new leaf and stopped carrying out all manner of atrocities such as using unarmed children for target practice, that would deplete World Jewry's power. It is convenient for them that so many Israelis have the morals of an alley cat and the compassion of the Virginia Tech shooter.

So there are four types of people: (1) The sheeple. Those who believe what they read in the Zionist press and think that "Arab hijackers" did 9/11. (2) The Zionist deniers. They have ascended to the first rung on the ladder. They know something is wrong with MSM and govt accounts of major events, but have a blind spot with Zionism and end up suspecting the government / Jesuits / Saudis / Russians. (3) The disinfo agent misidentifiers. The second rung features many of those who have correctly fingered the Zionists as the culprits. However, this group has a problem distinguishing between the real McCoy and decoys devised to confuse and divert. Decoys can pose as "Zionist exposers" in the hope that some will take them at face value. Once they have their followers, they will feed some disinfo or present themselves as the only true truth tellers. (4) The disinfo agent identifiers. On the third rung, they should be able to see that Ernst Zundel and Mike Piper, for example, are the real McCoy - genuine anti-Zionists. And they should be able to see that an alcoholic teamed up with a jew and a dodgy ex-journalist, who, collectively, claim that dozens of genuine truth tellers are fake, are fakes themselves.

Alex Jones is not trying to cover up the fact that WTC7 was demolished. He is trying to cover up the fact that Zionists/Mossad demolished it. And you know this.

There is no denying that he's a Zionist denier and a possible agent. Eric Hufschmid, on the other hand, is a Zionist denier and is an agent.

I doubt anybody, not even Hufschmid himself, would believe there are millions of agents. A few thousands at most -- possibly as few as in the low hundreds, as I've mentioned before.

Here is what Eric says:

The Zionist movement may have hundreds of thousands -- possibly millions -- of members, so identifying a few dozen is actually identifying only a tiny percentage of them.

http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://www.iamthewitness.com/...

And here is what I said on this thread about 4 weeks ago:

"I wouldn't dispute your estimate of such paid agents numbering in the low hundreds. Jews who volunteer to defend Israel would extend well into the thousands."

I came here about a day before this thread was linked to on TFC. What would make you suspect I am an agent/shill? I think I have more reasons to believe you are a shill than you have to believe I am.

It was the timing of your entry into the thread, your blog entry which seemed to have been largely copied from mercury.com where it had appeared the previous day almost word for word, and your knowledge of the Piper vs. DBS issues. Your subsequent comments lead me to believe that you are in the group of innocent people who are on "rung two" of the ladder (q.v. above). If you are an "agent", you are much better than Fester / lotus and the rest!

I think I have more reasons to believe Smith / Hufschmid / Bollyn are shills than you have to believe I am. It would be a bizarre double standard to suppose that I was a Zionist agent for saying that the terrible trio are agent provocateurs - after they had already accused Rimland, Rivero, Zundel, Piper, Glenn, Duke, Rudolf et al of being Zionist agents!! - yet they can somehow attack all of these innocent people without it serving as evidence of their own deception.

Is your claim that TFC trio are Zionist agents, then, not contradicted by their exposing of Zionism in their radio/audio shows and website?

No. They deliberately choose not to expose Zionism to a large audience, e.g. Eric's book and video, or Chris Bollyn's reply of "I wish I knew" to CNN when asked who did 9/11. When they do 'expose' Zionism to a few internet listeners, this is just a few morsels tossed to keep up the illusion, info that others have already exposed.

we have TFC's allegations that Zundel, Rimland, Rudolf, Rivero, Piper, Glenn, Duke, Rodriguez, Steven Jones and all the rest are Zionist agents,

And this, I maintain, is the evidence upon which all other alleged evidence is based.

The other "alleged" evidence is not based or dependent upon their attacks on innocent anti-Zionists. All the individual items or data points serve to reinforce and corroborate each other, supporting the theory that the Eric Hufschmid operation is a Zionist-run operation.

their contradiction-riddled claims such as Bollyn being the biggest exposer of Zionism whilst at AFP which was "Zionist-controlled"

It may not necessarily be percieved as a contradiction by them.

If they are clever enough to identify all these Zionist agents and discern truth from lies, yet they cannot see the contradiction in a Zionist-controlled newspaper allowing one of its reporters to expose Zionist involvement in 9/11, that in itself would be another contradiction!

It may be that Zionists have less control over AFP than has been suggested, and got Willis Carto to fire Bollyn just after the police assault, using Hufschmid's convenient accusations as the perfect excuse.

It doesn't make sense that they would wait for a full 5 years, allowing Bollyn to carry on exposing them, and then have a frantic scramble to get Carto / Petherick to fire him late in 2006 after he had established a following and a name for himself.

I do find it strange that the Zionists would allow Bollyn to go that far in exposing their role in 9/11. But according to you, they've gone way further than that with TFC!

Of the trio, Bollyn was always the best exposer of Zionist involvement in 9/11. But it's the Smithsonians who say that TFC and Bollyn have exposed a great deal; I would say that they expose just enough to appear convincing. And then, if Bollyn hadn't got a story, it would have gone to someone else like Piper.

He didn't run from them; he walked away to get his brother, he says. There was no reason for the cops to force him down to the floor, and much less to taser him.

The cops thought he was going to get a weapon, so they disabled him. The brother didn't even give him a lift home, but did Bollyn really imagine that the cops would agree to have his brother as mediator or something?

Also, Hufschmid says a lot about The Holocaust on his website.

Not as much as Germar Rudolf or Ernst Zundel. And Hufschmid doesn't get parcel bombs sent to his home.

The Zionists use pedophiles, which are easy to control.

But it's not feasible that Piper, Carto, Zundel, Rudolf, Duke, Rivero, Glenn, Rodriguez, Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan, President Ahmadinejad, etc, are mostly all pedophiles.

leading on of guests to come up with any dirt they can on a third party,

That's certainly not how it sounds like,

That's how it sounds to me in general, although the Mullins saga is bizarre.

So an old man posing for a photograph that was going to be taken anyway, is a connection to him? It's not like it's a secret that David Rockefeller attends the Bilderberg meeting every year.

Rockefeller not only let Bollyn photograph him, but stopped to chat in the park. And Bollyn was representing an anti-Zionist or even "anti-Semitic" newspaper that was totally against the NWO!

Only according to Piper and a supposed PI that AFP hired to investigate Bollyn. Hey, I thought Bollyn was working for the CIA! Why money from overseas, then?

He does appear to have a lot of intriguing connections.

To me it looks like just that: paranoia.

He has been trying to warn people about infiltrators and agents for years, and his attempts have been very much in vein.

Yet when he had the chance, he deliberately chose to avoid any mention of Zionism in his book and video.

I agree. However, that doesn't make them agents. Here you're being deceptive: You say "and all the rest", yet you only name the ones that are less likely to be agents. You didn't name Alex Jones or Jeff Rense.

It's TFC's naming of the unlikely ones that demonstrate that they are agents or idiots. Naming Alex Jones or Rense as agents reveals little.

Unlike what Piper has claimed, they have referred to Scientology a few times, calling it a cult. And why would they be Scientologists, anyway? I must've missed that part.

The Scientology theory is Piper's idea, based on the premise that the Church is Zionist-owned and Mossad-controlled. It could help to explain how a fake "anti-Zionist" outfit can attract a cult following.

Piper's May 17 show has a bit about what Piper calls Bollyn's "intellectual dishonesty". Bollyn published a letter from Ellen Mariani purporting to show that she supported him. But he asked her to represent him and she refused until he "got his act together", e.g. broke away from TFC. Hufschmid says Mariani is a "Zionist". Piper also mentions that Suzette the Whippette has withdrawn her long-time support for the "gruesome threesome".

This thread has turned into a mishmash of personal diatribes, meaningless accusations and insinuations. The impression an onlooker/newbie would get from these latest posts is that we're all mentally unstable jerks. Your personal quibbles and vulgarity make you look like bratty kids.

The meat of PlanetQuo's article is reprinted below. The rest of it is largely redundant in relation to the topic at hand ("DBS indicted").

I wonder why Daryl Bradford Smith has given so much of his time and attention to Nina, but has only contemptuous verbal abuse and more verbal abuse still for someone [Suzette] who used to work very hard to promote Smith and his partner, Eric Hufschmid. I wonder why Daryl Bradford Smith has never mentioned the owner of NOLAJBS - Joe Molero - by name on any of his broadcasts or drawn attention to the fact that Molero has PROVEN Christian Zionist connections and a PROVEN connection with the Prison Planet forum. I wonder why Daryl Bradford Smith introduced NOLAJBS and Opposing Digits to his listeners, and I sure as hell wonder why Eric Hufschmid will not confirm or deny with a simple yes or a straightforward no whether or not he is Jewish, runs Judicial Inc, is The Skunk, and whether or not he made the following statement....

I wonder all these things also, especially after reading the article. However, I don't believe these questions warrant a dismissal or condemnation of DBS. Let him respond to them first, at least, if he would be so "kind". They like to pretend there are no valid criticisms of them:

Some websites are insulting us, but that should be a warning to you. We have serious information about Zionist involvement, and all they have are childish insults. If they had evidence that we are making mistakes or deliberately lying, don't you think they would use it? When a person insults us, that means they have nothing serious to say about us!

There have been several insults aimed at TFC, for sure, but many serious questions have been raised by various people, that I believe merit a serious response.

Defending anybody, including DBS, on the grounds of the information they present is a trap that so many have fell into; I believe Eric calls them Goy pens of which 'The French Connection' is one of the most sophisticated.

It may well be so, but you fail to provide any explanation as to why it would be so. If you shouldn't defend anybody on the grounds of the information they present, then for what should you defend anybody? The radio/audio files they did in 2006 are groundbreaking, as are Bollyn's articles and Eric's early 9/11 work, and they should be defended for that. But for some reason they have slowly come to accuse virtually everybody except themselves of being part of the criminal network, and hence have completely isolated themselves. I wonder if they'll ever have any returning guest on their show.

This behavior is difficult to explain, but I have a harder time believing that the Zionists would expose themselves full force in an operation that is limited to trying to create small breaches within the "truth movement" -- a movement which was ineffective anyway, because everyone blamed Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld back when TFC and DBS first appeared. I'm beginning to consider, however, the possibility that they might have been "gotten to", as Scott Makufka (aka Victor Thorn, or "Mufkaka" as DBS calls him) suggested back in August or September 2006.

Poseidon's evidence and musings have been rather weak and are presented from a clear anti-TFC agenda, but some of his points merit consideration. He pointed out a pattern that TFC seems to have followed. They started out criticizing the obvious agents, such as Tom Flocco. Then they started with the Zionist deniers, emphasizing (and rightly so) on Alex Jones. Then it was the "White Nationalists", while slowly starting to cross the line over to the Zionist exposers: Kaminski, Irving, then AFP, WingTV, Piper, Rivero, the jailed "Holocaust deniers", etc. Now they seem to have crossed the last line, by bashing organized religion and their religious ex-associates/friends. This apparent pattern would suggest they were not "gotten to".

In any case, whatever (or whoever) is causing all this childish in-fighting, it serves only to distract us from the real issues. We will never succeed in stopping the Zionists if we behave like paranoid nutcases, casting doubt upon anyone and everyone at the first "suspicion" that crosses our minds. Rushing to judgement based upon a few personal misgivings or some perceived suspicious activity is not only counter-productive, but self-destructive.

We should focus on exposing the Zionist criminals, the obvious agents (the ones that leave no room for doubt, such as those mentioned in my previous post in this thread), the less obvious shills like the Zionist deniers (many of them, such as Alex Jones, have no valid excuse; a few of them may have a possible valid reason not to point the finger at Israel), and avoid accusing Zionist exposers unless there is concrete evidence to support it. We should limit ourselves to point out their shortcomings, such as David Duke's "the Arabs did 9/11 and the Israelis didn't warn us" (which is suspicious, but arguably not enough to condemn him), or Mark Glenn's "the Israelis were spying on us but did not carry out 9/11".

There's clearly something wrong with Joe Molero (NOLAJBS.net). His connections to Christian Zionist organizations and Watson/Jones leave little room for doubt. I'm wondering why the posters at NOLAJBS don't seem to care about his highly suspicious connections. Great job on exposing that, PlanetQuo.

However, one of your newest "exposes" is baseless -- a big deviation from your previous pieces. You imply that, because both Fester and someone else once said "I'm here to help", they are the same person. You need more than that, PlanetQuo. Something like a unique misspelling like "absoloutly". Capitalizing "EXACTLY" is not uncommon, either. Fester also emphasizes many other words by capitalizing them, and AFAIK, does not always capitalize "exactly" like QuoVadius does. I don't discount the possibility that Fester and this QuoVadius person are one and the same, but there is no real evidence, and their writing styles seem too dissimilar.

Perhaps my perception was influenced by Poseidon's accusation that Fester was DBS, but earlier in this thread, Fester was sounding strangely similar to DBS, and for a little while I suspected that he was indeed DBS. However, I did not rush to judgement and start to publicize this idea. I am now pretty sure that he is not DBS.

I pick todays fresh steamy one May 17 and fire it into the player. Can this guy stutter and halt speak some more?. Do these guys actualy drill there scripts? Same noise signatures. As i thought the Bollyn thing was to add a new feel to an old tired dog. I notice that Daryl Et Al are starting to gate keep the Micron Particle issue. The Micron particle filled smoke plumes were FULL of them all right Uranium Dioxide particles he sure did not let that slip. They sure went close to that point though. I bet after the U-238 Dampers in WTC 1&2 issue gets first light they will point to the May 17 th show and say see what did we say. Only they are poaching Masher1's theory on the reasons for the 2 month 8+ week fires that caused all this molten steel to be under all (3) three implosions.

So gatekeeping Check
The weird studio setup. Check
The coached dialog (I would say Drilled talking points) Check
The Bollyn thing is sort of new but as i have said "New face Old dog".

Who is trusting these folks? Where is the Eric,Daryl and bollyn show going?

Oh and you I am the Wittless bobble heads are NOT doing RADIO so quit saying you are already. Sheeesh.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York.