After reels of Hollywood films castigating Germans, generations of unqualified remorse, and decades of steady reparations, israelis figured they had a pretty solid grip on the German psyche, not to mention their bank accounts.
But, apparently, all good things come to an end - even for the Chosen Ones - as evidenced by the sincere questions raised by 25 German peace researchers in the wake of israel's recent conflict in Lebanon.
- Is it appropriate and meaningful – as the authors believe it is – to maintain these “friendly relations” and regard them as “special” in the sense indicated above?
- Is Germany really only obliged to Israel in the Near East?
- If these two questions are seriously raised, what does this mean for the inner German debate, and for relations between non-Jewish, Jewish and Muslim Germans?
It's worth reading in full to witness how Germans continue to struggle with their feelings towards israel after 60 years of psychological manipulation.
Indeed, israelis have so effectively burdened Germans with their collective guilt-trip, that (at least these) Germans are prepared to accept the blame for israel's holocaust against Arabs in order to justify extending a helping hand to Palestinians, who suffer so greatly under the Zionist yoke.
It appears to be a pre-emptive strategy designed to take the sting out of zionist accusations - sure to follow such aid - that Germans are repeating the sins of the past.
Until 1933 – 37 years after the publication of Theodor Herzl’s Der Judenstaat which grounded Zionism, and 16 years after the Balfour Declaration in which the mandatory power England promised the Zionists a “homeland” in Palestine – a maximum of 160,000 Jews had emigrated to Palestine. And many of them had taken this step believing that it would be possible to cultivate and develop the Holy Land together with the local Arabs. No one was to be expelled, as Martin Buber was still arguing in 1950.
And if you believe that, I have a bridge to sell you.
No wait - thanks to greedy bankers, that age old rhetoric has lost its original impact.
Only after the soon recognisable radical threat to the Jews in the sphere of influence of the National Socialists did mass immigration come about, and with it a threat to the demographic balance with the Arabs.
Not least under the shock of the Holocaust did the international community – against the wish of the Arab states – decide to accept the resolution of the United Nations on the foundation of the State of Israel, despite the initial strong reservations of the British and, for a long time, the US State Department.
In other words: It was the Holocaust that has permanently inflicted unbearable suffering on the (Muslim, Christian and Druse) Palestinians over the past six decades. That is not the same as if the Third Reich had committed genocide against the Palestinians. Yet in this case too, the result has been countless dead, the division of families, expulsion, or accommodation in emergency quarters to this very day.
Without the Holocaust against the Jews, Israel’s politicians would not feel justified or forced to so stubbornly ignore the human rights of the Palestinians and the inhabitants of Lebanon in order to secure the existence of Israel.
And without the Holocaust Israel would not receive the necessary material and political support from the USA in the form granted above all since the 1990s. (America’s financial aid to Israel is 3 thousand million [notice how the avoid the word BILLION] US dollars annually and thus corresponds to 20% of all the foreign financial aid given by the USA.)
The Near East Conflict, which has lasted for six decades and is becoming increasingly savage, undoubtedly has German and, to a degree, European origins; European to the extent that the German notion of a “final solution to the Jewish question” was spawned by European Anti-Semitism and Nationalism.
The Palestinian population had no part whatsoever in the “relocation” of part of Europe’s problems to the Near East.
No one - not even the brainwashed - can deny this fact.
So it is not only Israel that has a right to special attention, consideration and friendly criticism from Germany (and Europe). As Germans, Austrians and Europeans, we are not only co-responsible for the existence of Israel, which must be secured without reservations for the future now that history has taken this path, but also co-responsible for the living conditions of the Palestinian people and a self-determined future for them.
So, Germans dutifully carry the burden of the world on their shoulders thanks to a pack of deluded blood-thirsty Zionists, when what they should be doing is questioning the assumptions upon which this colossal crime is based.
A peeker, self-proclaimed Zionist Jew wrote above the last few comments:
Goyim were created by God to be our servants. You goyim are not human - although you are in human form, you do not have souls. You are less intelligent, because God created you with different brains.
Cooperate and live in peace as our slaves. Be stubborn, and we will make you suffer. We Jews are your masters.
The question is: was this just a provocation by some twit, or was it, is it, a serious encroachment? Zionist Jew, if you have guts (I do think the judaized Khazars have none) repeat and confirm the above - you will have proven to us we are totally on the right track here.
The next thing we'll do is to prove to you, you're just the greatest liers ever appeared in the whole history of mankind, and your 'greatness' ends there.
We Goyim will resist and be stubborn, and dissolve all of your steppen-born races into history just like your semitic co-religionists dissolved the Roman Empire 1700 years ago.
As for German suffering at the close of WW2 and up to 1950, here are the books to read:
1) James Bacque, 'Other Losses' and especially 'Crimes and Mercies';
2) Alfred-Maurice De Zayas, 'A Terrible Revenge';
3) John Sack, 'An Eye for an Eye'.
All available from on-line sellers.
In those books above, you will learn that some 9 millions (9.000.000) German civilians and POW were murdered by the combined efforts of the winners of WW2. Some retribution for what were, really, rightful complaints from the Germans after the shameful Versailles Treaty. Not only that, but (Bacque) you will learn that in order to force the Germans to accept the abominous Versailles Treaty the british (deliberate lower case 'b') enforced in 1919 (during peacetime, that is) a naval blockade of Germany that caused some 750.000 Germans to die of starvation.
How many here or out there know that? That was in 1919 and can you imagine the collective memory of that infamy, plus the disastrous terms of the Versailles Treaty, not entering in the equation that brought the world to WW2? Besides, britain and France caused that war, for not willing to accept the slightest of the revindications of Germany. Moreover, you all know how Poland was attacked jointly (at 1 month delay only) by Nazi Germany and then by Bolshevik USSR, yet britain and France declared war ONLY to Germany. What kind of loyalty towards the Poles is that? OK if Eastern Poland is swallowed by the Bolsheviks (with untold massacres, Katyn Forest and all that), but raise Hell if Germany swallows up a portion of Poland to recapture the vital Baltic Corridor. Here we have the typical double-standards of the opportunistic british race (deliberate lower case 'b') that was manifested already with the double promise of Palestine to the Arabs and to the Khazars, simultaneously.
Read the history of the kick off of WW2 from another prospect: the judaized Khazars lost their grip on Poland-Lithuania (the first New Khazaria they had, and held for a few centuries) in 1795 for good, with the Third Partition of Poland. Many of them fled to France, where they were in great numbers already and had fomented the French Revolution (a good thing after all), the First Partition of Poland (1772) being in fact prior to the taking of the Bastille (1789). Indeed Napoleon's Russian Campaign (1812) was nothing but the first attempt to regain Poland-Lithuania for the Khazars, their bankers instructing and financing Bonaparte. Indeed, Napoleon established the Dutchy of Warsaw during that ill-fated expedition, a polity that lasted only 6 months. That's why nobody notices and few understand the real motivations for Napoleon's disastrous Russian Campaign. OK, so the dream of recapturing Poland for themselves was finally achieved by the Khazars in 1915, when that state reappeared on the maps. But, damn it, the Polish aristocracy wanted now control of the land and, hell, why not ask the Khazar Bolsheviks to just stop that? Indeed it was done, few scholars know that in 1920 Lev Bronstein (Trotzky) set the Red Army against Poland and, due to the engagement in the horrendous Civil War in Russia erupted after the 1917 Bolshevik Restauration, the Poles very bravely halted the onslaught of the Reds. Without that brave resistence, Europe would have been all in the hands of the Khazars in the 1920s. So you now are at the conclusion of this re-reading of history: it was OK for the Bolsheviks to swallow up half of Poland in 1939, but oh no, not OK for the Nazi Germans to do that to the other half. So you have WW2, provoked by the british, the French and their Khazar bankers.
Some other time we shall elaborate on the Ukrainian Genocide (by the judaized Khazars) too, and on its implications during WW2.
Coming now to the current German guilt complex, it's just amazing what the Khazars have achieved in their 1945-1950 rape of Germany. Morgenthau wanted to transform Germany into an agricultural state in 1945, reducing the population to some 30 millions and razing all of its industry to the ground. Just read Bacque's Crimes and Mercies and see if that's not true. It did not happen, and I believe the Germans have the onset of the Cold War to thank for that. Germany now being the potential theatre of a nuclear confrontation between the West and the (re-russianised) Soviet Union, a purely agricultural Germany would have not served that purpose, so through the Mashall Plan Germany was allowed to rebuild its industry. At a cost: total submission to the winners, in particular the real winners of WW2 - the judaized Khazars. Their intellectuals are present in all spheres of modern Germany, they control everything important or attractive for modern society. Academia, politics, local government, finance, industry, the media, arts and crafts, ... you name it. It's all in their hands, so can you doubt that the subdued and indoctrinated Germans are totally brain-washed with their ridiculous, and historically false, sense of guilt towards 'den Juden'?
Finally, the Germans are amongst the people I know who less know about 'die Juden' being actually judaized Khazars. They firmly believe - including the present Chancellor who was/is married to a Jew (and may be 'jewish' herself, her maiden name is Kasner, Kas(t)ner) - that 'die Juden' are of Rhenanian origin and moved East from the Rhine Valley after the First Crusade's and the Black Death's persecutions. Nothing more ridiculous and historically false than that, but there you have it. There was one (excellent) book in German explaining that 'die Ostjuden' are actually Chasaren, Erwin Soratroi's 'Attilas Enkel aufs Davids Thron', a splendid title too, published by Grabert-Verlag in Tuebingen. Well, both Verlag and book were finally obliterated into a 'damnatio memoriae'. More to that, a recent counterinformative book on 'die Chasaren', by Matthias Roth (eh, eh, Roth) was published in 2006 to counter Soratroi's damage. However, Roth's book - to an expert - achieves just the opposite result, it gives further elements to prove the Khazar connection. Only, however, to an expert.