You are here

No hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11

Osama bin Ladin’s role in the events of September 11, 2001 is not mentioned on the FBI’s “Ten Most Wanted” notice.

Five years later Rex Tomb, chief of investigative publicity for the FBI explains, “The reason 9/11 is not mentioned on Osama bin Laden's Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11… He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.”

Among many questions, author Ed Haas starts with, “If the U.S. government does not have enough hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11, how is it possible that it had enough evidence to invade Afghanistan?”

Project Censored: News

Special thanks for Zanjabil, the writer of Zanjabil web blog for drawing my attention to this news item.
Ahmed Ismail


to attack anyone for dictatorship was never in need of evidence to commit crimes against humanity. If you are offended by term dictatorship used for so called democratic country "You are either with us or with the terrorists!" could make you ponder why you are offended! Which international court will prosecute US/NATO and other criminals for hundreds of thousands life lost since 911?! Everybody knows today that both wars were based on blatant lies and deception in breach of US and UN laws but if West is democracy as it claims why nobody is calling for the prosecution of war criminals?! Well answer is simple. Democracy is idea used by devil worshipers to dupe masses into believing that they have some say in law making and executing. An they constantly bark on Muslims accusing them of being inimical to their way of life. In fact Muslims have aversion toward immoral deception and injustice that is being promulgated by the so called democracy. And rightly so.

"Let there be Light!"

"Let there be Light!"

I totally agree with you but you said,
"Everybody knows today that both wars were based on blatant lies and deception in breach of US and UN laws"
Well, I stand corrected. Many of my blog viewers still believe that the war on Iraq and Afghanistan is really war on terror and they still strongly oppose anyone who says otherwise. I don`t know how those guys really think. But I believe that they are just typical Zionists.
My blog is:

Ahmed Ismail

This is the first time I've ever heard it phrased that way.

We often hear the pre-war intelligence on Iraq criticized, but hardly anyone ever questions the war in Afghanistan. Yet there is no hard evidence linking Bin Laden to 911.

It just goes to show how powerful a motivator fear is. Actions based in fear are, by their nature, irrational and of lacking thorough reason. Yet once we make these decisions we seldom re-examine them.

I remember doubting 911 very early on, and yet I did not question the Afghanistan invasion. I remember the week after 911, walking around in a daze; everyone seemed weird and shaken. There was an overwhelming sense of nationalism. My own internal reaction to this outwardly expressed nationalism progressed from an initial sympathy; to boredom; and eventually became sickness, anger and frustration.

I knew that the FBI had never put Bin Laden on a list of suspects wanted in connection with 911, and yet I never put that together with the Afghanistan invasion.

"Stop judging by appearances, but judge justly."


"Stop judging by appearances, but judge justly."

No evidence, No WMD, No Osama, no nothing.

These people have so much innocent blood on their hands, it's not even funny.

They'll be spending the rest of their eternity roasting in the flames of hellfire.

"Money" has no value - people do.


"Money" has no value - people do.

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer