What Every Jew (and Non-Jew) Should Know

Enjoyed the read. Wonderful link too.

Thanks.

Peacetroll.

it certainly seems plausible -

but we need more hard evidence in order to convince a world gone deafly immune to all theories related to so-called "Jewish conspiracies."

The theory that anyone, let alone "Jews," is trying to "rule the world" is, after all, so maniacal as to be hardly believable.

And given the constant fabricated media focus on "anti-semitism," the fact that they also happen to be "Jews" tends to fall right into their trap, making the theory even less credible.

---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.

"We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled governments in the civilised world - no longer a government of free opinion, no longer a government by... a vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.

Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organised, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it."

Woodrow Wilson

Can you please say who the author is at the *beginning* of the article, rather than at the end? I like reading Makow's essays, but I prefer to know that it is a Makow essay that I'm reading, rather than finding this out after I finish reading it.

As for the essay itself, I heard an interview with Bjerknes a few months ago, and he seems extremely intelligent. I just wish I could command him to condense his 200,000 word books into a few 3000 word essays. Then I'd *really* be impressed with his intelligence.

Zionist' run America.

zionist run Brittan.

Zionist run Israel.

Zionist run the better part of the western world.

No doubt.

See Israeli Lobby Influence on American Government.

its nothing new.

In fact.

We will soon witness the power of the Zionist Lobby on America.

They will pass the "Hate Law" soon, and it is completely against the "Freedom of Speech" dictate of the US constitution.

but is the Constitution of the United States more powerful then the Zionist lobby?

I think not. Only time will tell.

Hi there all,

There are several parts of this article and commentary that are factually incorrect, but are not worth raising, as the errata are trivia.

However, one issue is certainly not trivia, it is central to identifying who the true Mr. Big is behind the zionist movement.

This issue is as follows:

The Sabatean Movement, a.k.a. the Frankists, a.k.a the Donmeh (of whom Attaturk was a descendent and member) and all the other names that this same group have manifested under, throughout time since their inception under Zevi, can be simply referred to as the ZOHARITES.

This article is confused in that it begins to state that this movement is inspired by hateful speech against Gentiles found in the Torah and the Talmud.

Yet as is known by those researchers and scholars truly familiar with the sectarian divisions within world Jewry, the Zoharites never actually use the Talmud or Torah as part of the basis of their teachings, in terms of faith or practice.

Anyone who is well informed about this subject, from the perspective of EXPOSING the Zoharites, knows that it is a fundamental tenet of Zevi being the awaited Messiah to his followers, that he abrogated all the Laws of Moses, peace be upon him, and that he "set the Jews free from the curse of the Law".

If these guys are so well researched on this FUNDAMENTAL teaching of Zevi and the beliefs of the Zoharites, why are they muddying the waters, pointing at Talmud and Torah, when the Zoharites are "free from its curse".

Maurice, who suddenly turned up to challenge my articles (as an expert on the Judaic groups) seems to be blissfully ignorant of the fundamental central belief and teaching of the Sabatean/Zoharite movement. It is difficult to believe they (Maurice, Makow, Bjerkes and Co) have heavily researched this subject and then missed the NUMBER ONE belief of the group.

The Zoharites, free from the Laws of Moses, are free to behave however they wish, as the Mosaic Laws do not apply them. Wife swapping, incest, murder, theft etc etc are all permissible (just so long as you don't get caught) since such acts are considered righteous if one condition is fulfilled. That condition is - the Zoharite must make the intention that they are enacting an act of righteousness under the "Left Hand of God" before undertaking the act.

This is why the Zoharites are rejected by the Orthodox Jewish scholars. For this reason the Zoharites PRETEND to be Orthodox to the existing Jewish community. They write commentaries on the Talmud and the Torah but for them it might as well be on Lord of the Rings - it is purely academic. Most of the Jewish community do not understand that they are venerating and granting deference to people who consider acts of evil to be righteous. And that's how the Zoharists like it, and how they like to keep it, very much.

Respectfully,
Muhammad.

I take everything from Bjerknes with a grain of salt.

I remember him saying that the Protestant Reformation was a psy op. As if the corruption in the Church and the bad doctrine was non existent. I guess Martin Luther just made up the 95 Theses and fooled a whole lot of people to abandon the Catholic Church. And this coming from a supposedly serious researcher? BTW, Luther didn’t want to leave the Catholic Church, he was excommunicated.

As for the Zionist movement being religious in nature. What do you think binds these people together? Money is how you get all the suckers to participate. But Jew “religion”(Synagogue of Satan) is what keeps the highest people of one mind together and the love of money is a part of this "religion" as well. I don't know if it matters what sect they come from.

Sometime, most of the time, we are too concerned about what "they " are doing and should be thinking about what we can do.

"Mr. Big of the Zionist Movement."

I think his name is Satan. Mr. Big here on earth is inconsequential, because he can always be replaced.

It is my understanding that Tsvi (one of about fifty spellings for the name) required his followers to free themselves from the Law by practicing anti-commandments - doing the exact opposite of what the law commanded.

It that that is followed to the letter, they must hate God and they must hate their neighbor as they hate themselves.

Evil personified.

I have read right through both of his long online books. They are extraordinarily repetitive, since he recycles the old material into new combinations with the new material, ad infinitum.

The salience of the sabbatians in alternative modern jewish history is basically due to the efforts of various catholic reactionaries in the nineteenth christian century who wanted to show that modern judaism (and protestantism, and for that matter everything else except catholicism itself) is satanic in origin. This theory was more recently taken up by some jewish writers, because being so vague it can be used in any of a number of opposing directions - these jewish writers use it to attack secular zionism, since they want to submit the zionist state to religious dictatorship. Barry Chamish was a follower of this school, via the bizarre rascal guru, Dr Marvin 'Moshe' Antelman.

As I have pointed out elsewhere, defining your opponents as being in league with satan may make you feel important for a while, but it will not add to your offensive capability.

You make some interesting points. But let me ask you this:

Isn't it even in the Talmud [believe or not] that the children of Israel were not suppose to take possession of the Holy Land after sinning against God so many times, [except to live in obeyance of the laws of the natives of that land?] Doesn't the Talmud even say, that until God says so, through some Messiah of their own, that to create israel is a major sin and they will be cursed again?

I'm sure the Neturei Karta have brought this up several times. I can't remember the name of the passage in the Talmud, but I've seen it on their website. Too lazy right now to look it up.

I find it very perplexing how the this Talmud will state this as a huge rule, and yet says such ugly things.

Could it be that some of what God said did indeed come into the Talmud and stayed, regardless of the pharisee hatred that is all over this book?

Very odd.

Could you somehow expand, Maurice?

"Mr. Big of the Zionist Movement."

I think his name is Satan. Mr. Big here on earth is inconsequential, because he can always be replaced.

====================

That is an excellent point.

People who commit evil acts for their own selfish gain can and are always replaced with someone else willing to do it.

The world would be a much better place if people would spend less time worrying about WHO brings forth evil and more time trying to pinpoint WHAT evil conduct is and enjoin it.

A prime example is charging interest on money loaned - I couldn't care less who's doing it. The act itself is pure evil - plain and simple exploitation - and it should never be allowed in civilized society.

---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.

Hi there Maurice,

You say:

"If the Bible is the cornerstone of Judaism, then the Talmud is the central pillar, soaring up from the foundations and supporting the entire spiritual and intellectual edifice. In many ways, the Talmud is the most important book in Jewish culture, the backbone of creativity and of national life. No other work has had a comparable influence on the theory and practice of Jewish life, shaping spiritual content and serving as a guide to conduct." (Chabad Lubavitch member, Adin Steinsaltz, "What is the Talmud")

http://chabadstanford.org/pages/wisdom_center/Article/114.html

How does this fit into your strange theory, dear Muhammad?

***

Read what I said Maurice. The Lubavitcher write and publish commentaries on this mainstream Judaic literature but they do not accept it for their own teachings. Why are you continually ignoring this point? How many times do I have to state it? Yes they read it, so do I, but I don't practise it. I have written and given lectures on many different beliefs systems, their respective sources and community practices. Yet I do not accept any of it as the basis for my own beliefs and teachings. How much clearer can this point be? Why do you keep ignoring this point? Why do I have to keep repeating this point to you? If you disagree with the point they say so, but stop ignoring it and pretending that I haven't made it.

Also, they use this stuff (commentaries etc) to try and appeal to the other members of the Jewish community to get those other Jews to accept them and accept their Messiah. This is well known in the Judaic community. You know this too.

For all you other readers out there, if you would like proof of what I have just said, here it is. In 1992 the Lubavitcher community went into overdrive because they thought that Schneerson was the living Messiah. The Lubavitcher tried to get all the other groups of world Jewry to accept him as such. This performance was a CARBON COPY of the attempt by Zevi to gain recognition from the Orthodox Jewry of his day.

I have attached a second post below, containing excerpts from an article published by Newsweek in 1992, about the Lubavitch trying to get the Jews (and Gentiles) of the world to accept Schneerson as Messiah.

Respectfully,
Muhammad.

As you will see from this article, in the final paragraph quoted, the Lubavitcher quote from Maimonides, who they do not accept, but they know that most of the rest of the Judaic community do accept, in order to try and convince the rest of the Jewish community to welcome their movement and grant allegiance to their Messiah. They have been trying this on for more than 250 years.

Quotations begin:

Newsweek April 27, 1992

“…members of the Lubavitcher Hasidim pray daily for the Messiah to come. But they do so with a difference. According to their 250 year old tradition, there is in each generation at least one righteous Jew who is worthy of being the Messiah. In this generation, the Lubavitchers believe, that man is readily identifiable; he is their own rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Mendal Schneerson, leader of the international Chabad movement, the best-known known, most influential and aggressive Hasidic sect.”

“Last week, as Lubavitcher’s around the world celebrated Schneerson’s 90th birthday, pressure grew among his estimated 250,000 followers to do for the rebbe what he has so far refrained from doing himself: reveal his Messianic identity. In some 70 cities from Canada to Israel, rabbinical judges (most of them Lubavitchers) issued a joint declaration calling on all Jews to recognise Schneerson as the ‘Rabbi of all Israel’ and to beseech to God ‘that this generation should merit that he be revealed as the Moschiach [Hebrew for Messiah].’ But in the Crown Heights section of Brooklyn, where the rebbe is recuperating from a stroke, many of the Lubavitchers saw no need to wait for further confirmation. ‘I believe the rebbe is the Moschiach,’ says Shifra Hendrie, who initiated a dinner for 3,000 Lubavitch women last January to help promote that belief among Jews and Gentiles alike”

“Most Jews do not share that conviction or welcome the Lubavitchers’ provocative ‘Messiah is on the way’ publicity campaign, although millions respect the rebbe himself.”

“’Of course he is not the Messiah,’ says Avraham Ravitz, leader of the ultraorthodox Degel HaTorah Party in Israel. ‘They push the Messiah like they’re promoting a product. That’s not the way it’s supposed to be.’ But David Hartman, an Orthodox rabbi and head of the Shalom Hartman Institute for Advanced Jewish Studies, in Jerusalem is more tolerant. ‘While the idea of the rebbe as the Messiah has enormous significance for the Lubavitcher community,’ he says, ‘it has not changed anyones plans for the summer.’”

“’He symbolizes God to his generation,’ says Rabbi Simon Jacobsen, head of Chabad’s massive publications program. ‘He has the capacity to heal the world and unite Jew and gentile. Maimonides, the medieval scholar whom all Jews accept, says that when we see a man who has these qualifications, we must follow him as the Messiah’”

Do you have any links to English Tranlated Zohars which contain these words?

And if they have to be bought, the cheapest?

Hi there Maurice,

I am glad to see that you have finally acknowledged what I have been saying about the Zoharites pretending to be Orthodox. And you have disagreed with me, fine.

You ask:

Why do you apply double standards? What virtue is there in a group that upholds the Jesus bashing, racist, usury promoting Talmud as God-inspired "Torah"? Why do you keep ignoring this point? Are you suffering from such anti-Zionist tunnel vision that you would recruit the devil as an "ally"?

My answer:

You are confusing objective study with personal tenets of faith. A student or analyst can examine which source texts that people use for their belief system, the methodologies that they use to derive legal opinion and the way in which they then implement their derived rulings. In so doing this IN NO WAY implies that the said student or analyst agrees with anything that they have read or studied in this regard.

Look at SOAS, the London School of Oriental and African Studies. This university is full of scholars who are experts in ancient languages and belief systems. For example the sanscrit language, texts and the ancient sanscrit speaking peoples' beliefs. Do these scholars themselves uphold these ancient beliefs? No, of course not. So why does anyone studying Judaism and Judaic beliefs have to be an adherent or supporter of those beliefs.

Why then do you persist in muddying the waters of objective study?

I am not going to ask you what your faith and beliefs are as they are not relevant to the objective study of the different faiths. However, since you have asked me questions about my faith, including my possibly seeking alignment with Iblees, may the curse of Allaah be upon him, himself, please be aware of the following:

People are free to choose what they want to believe. The Holy Qur'aan teaches that "there is no compulsion in faith" and that "truth stands out from error".

If the Neturei Karta and other Judaic groups wish to hold beliefs and opinions that are entirely rejected and abhorred by Islaam, so be it. It is a tremendous shame that they cannot open themselves up to the Gospel of Jesus, peace be upon him and his mother and forsake the claims made about him in the Talmud; claims that Islaam teaches are entirely false.

As I have stated previously and openly in another blog, we Muslims believe that Jews are 1 Prophet short of becoming Christians and that Christians in turn are 1 Prophet short of becoming Muslims.

Naturally, as a Muslim I would like all of mankind to come to the guidance of Islaam and the Islaamic way of life. If I truly have faith in Islaam, how could I not wish that to be the case.

In the past I have also given support to the community known as Jews for Jesus, who, as the name suggests are Jews who have come to faith in Jesus as the awaited Messiah, but still feel attached to their Judaic teachings. So they seek a way in between. Technically they are Christians and this group of Jews are often belittled by the rest of the Jewish community.

What people end up believing is between them and Almighty God, glory and praise be to Him. He is the guide and His is the guidance.

Please do not be offended by what I say here, but it would be better for your research if you were not to mix your presentations with your own personal belief or opinion on the subject you are critiquing. Much of the information you present is good and worthy of note. Becoming emotional because people don't accept the divine nature of the mission of Jesus does credit to your love of Jesus, but does not add to your analysis and presentation.

Respectfully,
Muhammad.

Hi there Christopher,

You appear to be a little emotional.

There was only one quotation from your work placed on the blog at this site. I stated that I disagreed with some of your findings but that most of my disagreements were on small technicalities. I did take issue with one matter that I considered to be serious in the quotation given. I put forward that it is misleading to the reader in that the quotation does not clarify the TRUE variant source texts for Zoharite and non-Zoharite members of the Jewish community.

That's it.

So why on earth did you find it necessary to come to this blog and even bother to take issue with such a small detail? More importantly, who told you that I had taken issue with such a small detail? Do you usually make the same claim; that anyone who disagrees with you on a few points has "entirely misrepresented your entire corpus of work". We were only examining and debating this one small quotation provided.

And in your response, why didn't you simply state something like "Hi Muhammad, although the point you raised is absent from that particular quotation, I have made this point many times elsewhere in my research, examples being here and here" and give some examples. Since you claim that you have covered this issue many times in your work, could you please furnish me with some examples and quotations, so that I can verify that you have actually dealt with the point I raised. After all, you have now claimed that you have dealt with this matter, the onus is on you to demonstrate it.

Also, the point I raised has got nothing to do with the idea of redemption from sin as you seem to think. Re-read my analysis and you should understand exactly what element of your quotation I am referring to and why the Lurian development was a major departure from what had been 'Orthodox' Qabbalism up until that time. (Clue: This is not a reference to the doctrine of the development of the universe and the "Breaking of the Vessels", but the doctrine of the Abyss and the Mantle).

Please feel free to take issue with my comments and provide your evidences if you feel any what I have said is inaccurate. It is always pleasing to find new information and opinions.

As for placing a large number of questions at the end of your posting, some of which are about people's personal life and beliefs; what on earth does that have to do with your quotation?

Respectfully,
Muhammad.

Muhammad said:
"In the past I have also given support to the community known as Jews for Jesus, who, as the name suggests are Jews who have come to faith in Jesus as the awaited Messiah, but still feel attached to their Judaic teachings. So they seek a way in between. Technically they are Christians and this group of Jews are often belittled by the rest of the Jewish community."

I've been very suspect of this organization. Years ago I heard Moishe Rosen, the founder, being interviewed on a Christian radio station. A caller told him that he thought many jews acted arrogant and better than everyone. Moishe exploded and started calling him an anti-Semite. I thought that this was strange behavior from a "born again Christian." He sounded no different than your your garden variety ADL spokesmen. Actually much worse, because usually they are kind of polished. I don't know if this means anything, but it made me like and trust him and his organization a lot less. I'm sure they have some true believers there, but they are Zionist Christians.

Here's what executive director of jews for jesus says:

GOD IS A ZIONIST!
http://jewsforjesus.blogspot.com/2007/02/god-is-zionist.html

So why would you support a Zionist organization Muhammad?

Maybe Maurice is right. Maybe NK can't be trusted either.

Douglas Reed asserts that the addressing of the Balfour Declaration to Lord Rothschild was diversionary. A smoke screen. Apparently, World Jewry was not completely sold on Zionism and the Rothschilds were no different. Maybe Mr.Bjerknes could comment on the quote below?

Quote:
______________________

"In this way one of the most fateful actions ever taken by any British Government was prepared. The draft incorporated in a letter addressed by Mr. Balfour to Lord Rothschild, became "the Balfour Declaration". The Rothschild family, like many leading Jewish families, was sharply divided about Zionism. The name of a sympathetic Rothschild, as the recipient of the letter, was evidently used to impress Western Jewry in general, and to divert attention from the Eastern Jewish origins of Zionism. The true addressee was Dr. Weizmann. He appears to have become an habitué of the War Cabinet's antechamber and the document was delivered to him, Sir Mark Sykes informing him, "Dr. Weizmann, it's a boy!" (today the shape of the man may be seen)."

p.269 Douglas Reed "Controversy of Zion"

[rafeek] "Much of the information you present is good and worthy of note. Becoming emotional because people don't accept the divine nature of the mission of Jesus does credit to your love of Jesus, but does not add to your analysis and presentation."

I really don't agree with this at all. I don't see Chris and Maurice being emotional. For me, their analysis and research on this topic are quite intensive and an eye-opener.

Thanks for answering my question, Maurice.

But I have more.

Are you [Chris or Maurice or both can answer please] saying that from the Talmud and EXACTLY the Talmud springs forth the likes of the Illuminati? The zionist founders who created the disaster in the Middle East - the world for that matter? Does the Torah play a part in all of this sickness as well? Or is it possible at all that the Talmud or the Torah are just bystanders and are looked at very fleetingly by such zionists - as they usually don't believe in God.

I wonder if Benjamin H. Freedman agreed and supported the Neturei Karta.

Let's say the Neturei Karta got their way and ended zionism in Palestine. Would they become like the zionists anyway and create trouble for the world as the zionists did?

Thanks for listening. I know I asked a lot of questions.

[duped] "He sounded no different than your your garden variety ADL spokesmen. Actually much worse, because usually they are kind of polished. I don't know if this means anything, but it made me like and trust him and his organization a lot less. I'm sure they have some true believers there, but they are Zionist Christians.

Here's what executive director of jews for jesus says:

GOD IS A ZIONIST!"

I have met a few jews for Jesus. I think they are quite silly. Judaism and Christianity are so very far apart in their beliefs. And yeah, the jews for Jesus are just as much for this israel scheme as the hardened anti-God zionists - so really, what is the difference? None at all. I think it's a game to play to enamor themselve with the Christians, for many obvious reasons that come to my mind.

That infamous liar and deceiver, who is allegedly a resident of "Central France", claims that Christopher Jon Bjerknes is a "Zionist agent":

Smith's assumption was that he just had a strange personality.

Bjerknes is a Jew who opposes Zionism and loves Goyim, but the incredible promotion Bjerknes has been getting recently by Jeff Rense, RBN radio, and other suspicious people is making it clear that he is a Zionist agent.
Source

Here are some excerpts from Smith's audio broadcast of July 26, 2007:

[10:45]: But anyway, Mr Bjerknes has been going out there saying that Eric is a Mossad agent.

I'd say Eric Hufschmid's clearly working for the Zionists; after all, he has every incentive to. As for Mossad, perhaps a sayan. He's hardly katsa material is he :-)

Now let's take a look at that rationally. In what possible benefit would there be for Eric to be Mossad and then go out and trash the tar out of Zionism, in every way?

A controlled 'opposition'. It's the oldest trick in the book.

11. In the third rank we shall set up our own, to all appearance, opposition, which, in at least one of its organs, will present what looks like the very antipodes to us. Our real opponents at heart will accept this simulated opposition as their own and will show us their cards.
Protocol No 12

The benefit to the Zionists is that they control the areas upon which people are focusing, they can make sure the evidence under scrutiny is circumstantial rather than "smoking gun", they can prepare their defenses in advance, and can waste the time and energy of thousands of potential critics through duplication of efforts, putting them all on the equivalent of an identical spinning hamster's wheel.

Work diligently at putting out Bollyn's work and my work and files and articles about these people?

Yes, Bollyn's 'work', like Danner's "Global Hawk", and the exploding thermite batteries in the computer room. And Smith's 'work'? Give us a break!

Bjerknes is trying to push people away from us, desperately, and makes up lies about us...

It seems to me that they're making up lies about Bjerknes. And another name on their current hit list is the Palestinian Dr Hesham Tillawi:

http://currentissues.tv/

Bjerknes and others are also telling people that Hufschmid is a Mossad agent or a Zionist, and some even claim that Hufschmid is a Jew! The behavior of these people is making it rather obvious that:

1) They are Zionist agents.
2) They are desperate to stop people from listening to us.
Source

No, it makes it rather obvious that those people are genuine truth seekers and anti-Zionists who are not duped by TFC's deceptions and propaganda.

[16:52]: Go back and read the stuff (Bjerknes vs Rafeeq) on Wake Up From Your Slumber...

Funny, it was only last week that Smith was telling all legitimate truth seekers to stay away from WUFYS, because it was a "corrupt site", a "lying site", a "website of absolute liars, shills, and nonsense spreaders", a "lying collection of imbeciles", an "infested nest of nonsense", etc, etc. A week is a long time in Smith-inanity!

...which, by the way, pops up Bjerknes, Shelton, and the rest of them, and this supposed Jay Bollyn, all at the same time, all of them pop up and start posting over there. (Chuckles.) You couldn't write this stuff if you were a fiction writer [...] [19:26]:Piper, identified. American Free Press, finished. There's not an ounce of credibility left to these crooks. And Bjerknes, right along with 'em. It's their whole team, ladies and gentlemen, you just follow them back to the rats' nest. And here we are being, saying that we're, by this woman Shelton, that I, that we're money-grubbers that are trying to profit from this. I can't pay my phone bill this month, 'cos of the donations have not been very good...

When he wants to make a one to one call, why not use Skype? Does Muhammad Rafeeq not have it? The quality's not so good with, say, four people, but still useable. And if Smith missed some detail in a conference, he could always call people individually afterwards, for free.

And again, this guy Bjerknes is a, is a, is a, a COINTELPRO completely. He's saying that Eric is Mossad? [...] What would the goal be? No goal. No reason. It makes zero sense.

False. See above. And if Smith has considered Bjerknes to be a Zionist agent since he stopped doing any interviews with him a year ago, why does he still have Bjerknes' audio files on TFC site?

Jon Bjerknes, liar! And now with your associations going on to Alex Jones and to Rense, and they're shopping you around at all the old shill watering holes. [23:20] And you live in Chicago, and Bollyn is missing in Chicago, hello?

An amusing comment by Smith. Either he is ignorant of Chris Bollyn's whereabouts, or he has to feign ignorance in order to peddle this conspiracy theory of Bjerknes being linked to Bollyn's "abduction".