Wonder why the Z's don't like Bollyn? Look what he was doing back in 2005:
4 March 2005
Controlled press hides Chertoff's Israeli roots:
http://www.iamthewitness.com/Bollyn-Chertoff_roots.html
Also, there is an audio interview with Smith and Bollyn:
Saturday, 4 November 2006
Christopher Bollyn, exposes the Chertoff family as hard-core Zionists:
http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Bollyn-4Nov2006.html
Submitted by Daryl on Tue, 2007-08-07 15:31
- Daryl's blog
- 1228 reads
-
Why does Smith have a site anyhow?
You Should have a fourm on YOUR OWN SITE!
First you take D.C. Then you take New York (:
are you seriously claiming that were it not for C Bollyn (whom anyway you are just using as a wedge, without any consideration for his wishes, and without any permission to cite him) we wouldn't know who Chertoff is?
Your arrogance is extraordinary, for people with no real background in this line of study whatsoever - it's hilarious, too, when you attack people like M Hoffman III, incidentally - he is as genuine as the day is long, and has been sticking his head into the mouths of lions for literally decades.
David Duke was posting articles on his site exposing Michael Chertoff's Zionist sympathies in January 2005.
1/12/2005 Israel-firster, Michael Chertoff appointed Director of Homeland Security
Posted under: General— @ 2:55 pm
(left) Former head of ‘Joint Terrorism Task Force’ in the Justice Department is a jewish supremacist who let go a hundred Israeli Spies apprehended by the FBI
by M. P. Shiel
President George W. Bush nominated former JTTF boss and current federal judge Michael Chertoff (pictured, with Bush this morning), a thuggish and fanatical Jewish supremacist, to replace Tom Ridge as the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security.
Bush stated, speaking of Chertoff as of a close and revered friend: “When Mike is confirmed by the Senate, the Department of Homeland Security will be led by a practical organizer, a skilled manager and a brilliant thinker.” Bush referred to Chertoff as a “good leader in the war against terror.”
Possibly implying that Chertoff gave short shrift to the law and constitutional rights when attacking the enemies of Zionism and multiracialism, Bush said that Chertoff “had an impressive record of cutting through red tape as an assistant attorney general.”
Stating that “Our nation is still at war,” Bush equated “cyberterrorism” (by which he may mean nothing more than investigative online journalism which exposes Jewish supremacist crimes) with “Weapons of Mass Destruction”:
“The Department of Homeland Security will also continue working to reduce the nation’s vulnerabilities to weapons of mass destruction and cyberterrorism,” Bush said.
Bush was also quick to point out Chertoff’s multiraciailist credentials: “He stood against racial profiling. He’s worked with the NAACP Legal Defense Fund to represent poor inmates on death row.”
Investigator and author Mark Farrell stated that Chertoff was reportedly “instrumental to the entrapment and fraud” which resulted in the imprisonment of Matt Hale, adding that Chertoff and his accomplices ought to be put on trial themselves, saying that “they should be fairly dealt with in the courts for their crimes, and not have statements manufactured against them, unlike in Hale’s case.”
Pro-White activist Chester Doles had false gun charges laid against him under Chertoff’s watch, though Doles possessed firearms no different from those of his neighbors and had done nothing more than speak out for White interests and against a real terror threat that Chertoff and his gang pointedly ignored — illegal immigration.
Pro-White writer and thinker David Duke was forced into prison on outrageously falsified charges under direct orders from Chertoff immediately after he began an international speaking tour exposing Zionist espionage and manipulation of the U.S. givernment into war against Iraq. Duke stated in an American Dissident Voices interview with Kevin Alfred Strom: “Within thirty days, I was prosecuted by the Justice Department in this case, and the pressure from that came out of Washington and Michael Chertoff’s office.”
Steven Swan, a writer who exposed the Israeli/9-11 connection, also states that he was railroaded into prison under selective prosecution initiated by Chertoff’s office.
Jewish supremacists were quick to praise Chertoff’s latest appointment. “Judge Michael Chertoff is a wise choice to lead the Department of Homeland Security during these dangerous times,” according to Jay Sekulow, chief counsel of the “American Center for Law and Justice” a neoconservative front group. (Sekulow, by the way, was an employee of Chertoff at the Justice Department.)
The BBC notes that “Mr Chertoff has been described as the driving force behind some of the most controversial initiatives in the war on terrorism…. Civil liberties groups have accused him of curtailing free speech and the rights of the criminal defendant.”
Principled civil libertarians on both the left and right note Chertoff’s willingness to skirt the law and justify imprisonment without trial or counsel.
According to author Steve Brill in his book After, Chertoff stated that his department’s “detainees” should be held for long periods of questioning without a hearing and that even if some got a hearing, “the hearings could not only be done in secret, but also could be delayed, and that even after the hearings were held and they were ordered deported [usually for only minor immigration violations], there was nothing in the law that said they absolutely had to be deported immediately. They could be held still longer.”
Chertoff, according to Brill, knew that the prisoners “were entitled to call a lawyer from jail, but the lists the INS provided of available lawyers invariably had phone numbers that were not in service…. according to one person who says he was there, someone in the room remarked that the government should not try too hard to make sure these people could contact lawyers. ‘Let’s not make it so they can get Johnnie Cochran on the phone,’ another lawyer added.”
Brill, according to columnist Nat Hentoff, states that “there was indeed a deliberate, pervasive blocking of detainees’ right to phone lawyers. And those orders, as Brill’s book reveals, came from the top. At the very top, next to Ashcroft, was Michael Chertoff.”
The conservative watchdog group Accuracy in Media claims that Chertoff was involved in the TWA Flight 800 coverup, while Independent Judiciary investigators say that Chertoff is responsible for “dangerous curtailments to free speech and the rights of criminal defendants.”
Chertoff’s Zionist sympathies are well known. It was under Chertoff’s direct orders that the largest foreign spy ring ever to operate in the United States — the Mossad’s over 200 “Israeli Art Students” — were released and sent back to Israel without having to face a single charge. This occurred not long before the revelation that the Mossad was assembling literal murder gangs — death squads — to kill enemies of Israel and Zionism worldwide, specifically including the United States. The Israeli hit squad announcements were not even mentioned, much less criticized, by “tough” “anti-terrorist” Chertoff and Bush.
In 2002, Chertoff turned down an offer by Bush to name him to head the Securities and Exchange Commission, evidently believing that his then-position at the Justice Department would give him greater opportunities for advancing Jewish interests. As is usual, the Jewish agenda is supported by bought politicians on both sides of the aisle — “liberal” Democrat Ted Kennedy supported Chertoff when he was appointed to the U.S. Appeals Court and observers predict he and other Democrats will support him now. Another Democrat (and fellow extreme Jewish supremacist), Charles Schumer, has come out strongly in support of Chertoff: “[he has an] understanding of New York’s and America’s neglected homeland security needs… at the outset, he appears to be a strong choice.” (In 2003, Chertoff was confirmed 88 to 1, the one being Hilary Clinton who has a non-political personal grudge against Chertoff because of the Whitewater investigation.)
Standing with Bush at his appointment announcement this morning, Chertoff said he would be working with “the thousands of men and women” who are “protecting our security and promoting our freedom.”
Chertoff’s appointment is an ominous symptom of the Jewish tyranny that has come to America, wrapped in the bloodied and tattered false flag of conservatism.
Not only were Chertoff's loyalties an open secret, but some of Bollyn's claims about Chertoff have been debunked. In this Bollyn article, he asserts that Benjamin Chertoff of Popular Mechanics is related to Michael Chertoff. In fact, he isn't, and it was sloppy journalism on Bollyn's part. No wonder AFP fired him for submitting inaccurate articles. It would have been sheer folly to hire someone to verify his work, when there are professional journalists available who can be trusted to submit reliable articles.
discussed here
Welcome Daryl,
Having you here adds to the fun. I do hope you continue to post blogs and make comments.
You said in this blog.
http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/2859
"As for what I look like I've been on TV out of London where 2,000,000 tuned in to watch."
-----------------------------------------
Daryl,
Were you actually filmed or videotaped for this television show, or did just your voice "appear"? Do you remember the name of the TV show or the date and channel on which it was aired? I know that a lot of people would like to get their hands on this TV show.
Why don't you have a photo taken of yourself and post it on the Internet? I'm sure someone could help you do this.
And Daryl, my dear, where is your promised forthcoming list of shills? I and others are awaiting with bated breath (no pun intended).
Oh, pretty please, tell me that I made the grade for a top spot on this coveted list!
Suzette the WhipMaster
I'm not going to bother feeding the trolls like Pedros any more. Their attempt to gather information on their opponents came to grief, their 'arguments' have been beaten, and their spamming at WUFYS did them more harm than good. But it'll be fun to hear Daryl's report on today's operation, in his next rant. Eric's prospects of a sizeable share of Rupert's $9 billion fortune must be in serious jeopardy!
'pedros' seems to have a mental age of about five, but this is probably because 'pedros' is just daryl jerking off.
"we need a few good men... "
http://naqniq.wordpress.com/2007/08/08/a-call-for-hebrew-speaking-satani...
the point is, daryl, you are trying to use a supposed neglect of bollyn by everyone except yourself and eric to make yourselves out to be white knights, but in reality bollyn has walked away from you, which is something you just don't seem able to grasp or admit.
In this comment “I always use my real name” Berkeley says “I always use my real name, and look what happens!”
Then refers the reader to this link:
http://www.philipweiss.org/mondoweiss/2007/01/david_gregory_p.html
The page links to a post with the first comment made by (allegedly, according to Berkeley) Rowan Berkeley on January 27, 2007 3:02 am. Within the comment we read:
“I don't think it is correct to talk about a disinformational campaign in the formal sense, like a concrete conspiracy hatched in a physical smoke-filled room, in many cases. Outside of the core conspirators, there is merely a climate of conformity. It's like under Stalin : you didn't need to send goons to every journalist's doorstep to make the situation clear.”
A little further down we read Berkeley’s disclaimer posted August 01, 2007 at 11:35 am (7 months after) which reads:
“This is really most bizarre. I have been receiving snapshots of this page from people such as my hebrew teacher, who profess to find in it proof that I am indeed the loathsome spotted reptile of fable. However, none of the above were actually posted by me, so the case is not proved.”
The only people who claim to vouch for Berkeley’s claim of being impersonated are these: Observer and Another Observer. I take it that these mysterious observers know Berkeley well enough to come to his defense.
Question: is Berkeley suggesting that his hebrew teacher, who I presume would know Berkeley’s style and presentation in writing, not to mention the fact that he would have spoken with him whilst being in his company during lessons, is lying regarding the source of the comment that Berkeley denies writing?
In this comment “on balance I'm glad I use my real name” (Tue, 2007-08-07 14:19) Berkeley writes:
“I think I decided never to use screen names because I didn't want to end up saying things that would make me look two faced when my various pseudonyms came out.”
What I find peculiar about this statement is that Berkeley is suggesting that by using his real name, and real name only, he will somehow be absolved from being viewed as “two faced” should it ever be revealed that things he has said are contradictory when his “various pseudonyms came out”. Think about what he says.
Another interesting comment he makes is this one,” p.s. - Quo's animation” (Tue, 2007-08-07 13:15) where he claims that the images that I, Michael, created and posted at photobucket (not PlanetQuo.com or .net) were “Quo’s animation”.
Then we have this comment: “Hebrew speaking satanists” (Wed, 2007-08-08 11:50), in which Berkeley links to one of the images I created which he uploaded to this site:
http://naqniq.wordpress.com/2007/08/08/134/
In this one he states that his “anonymous detractors strike again”. Is this the mind of a delusional at work or does he suppose that I, Michael, are his “detractors” and that I have struck again since initially posting the image?
Berkeley says "I have been online for five or six years".
Thats an awful lot of footprints in the cyber snow.
Incidentally, I notice that Masher1 gets reprimanded on account of his 'masturbate' comment yet Berkeley is free to post his 'jerjing off' comment without even a whisper.
"So Just Who is Admin around here then. Quasi is one Qrs is two
Who else is?" says Masher1
I'll give you three guesses; it's a Mad, Mad, Mad world, ask Quasi.
Anyway, back to the snow.
but I like you all, really.
Michael, are you saying MT is an admin. here at WUFYS?
It's interesting that Bollyn didn't write that "August 8" article on his site. But he admits as much, on Rumor Mill News:
The following article from the blogspot of Smokingmirrors is a very well written appeal to Americans to take action and hold their leaders accountable and take responsibility "for what happens in your name or you soon won't even have a name, you'll have a number."
Smokingmirrors writes that "the worst part of all the evils" is "what is happening to The Laws of the Land." I couldn't agree more......
See here for the original article dated August 3. There is also an August 6 post on "Doc Zakheim and the missing trillions", that was subsequently posted here at WUFYS.
“I believe there's plenty of internal evidence which will make it easy to satisfactorily disprove it!” exclaims Nobodaddy with regards to his excellent analysis of the alleged Bollyn article………well?
“I do rather tend to confuse you spooks, its true but I like you all, really.” twitters wannabe Jew Berkeley without the slightest idea of where his cyber footprints lead.
Why he would post at this insignificant
site is obvious to most here including those who are progressively getting an education.
To answer your question, The Dead Bishop, regarding MT. Who else fits the bill?
he is in an Israeli dungeon!
P wrote:"It's interesting that Bollyn didn't write that "August 8" article on his site. But he admits as much, on Rumor Mill News"
Let me guess...someone is commenting on "how it doesnt look like Bollyns writing style"?
sigh
no comment. its just too...
nevermind.
ATTN DBS: Im with CoZ and others who plead..Daryl..Please..just tell us who the Zionists AREN'T.
We are the masses, remember,.. you really need to make it easy. 7 names versus 90.. much better odds of us dumbasses remembering who is who.
And afterwards.. are you going to be so kind as to explain why u feel the need to create farce?
A friend of mine says Huff is just jealous and weird..and doing shit behind your back.. rather like a spiteful female whose man never seems to know what a bitch she really is. .....I however fall on the 'group of zionist contractors' side of things.
(Though I do consider the possibility that you are , in reality, the useful idiot you describe on many of your broadcasts)
Uraniumtiger attempts to deceive with the assertion that Chris Bollyn is a "better Zionist exposer" (e.g. in the case of Michael Chertoff) than prominent anti-Zionists such as David Duke. Uraniumtiger downplays the information on Chertoff provided by Duke and others in January 2005 or earlier, yet exaggerates the significance of Chris Bollyn's own 'work' that was published months or years later.
The problem with Bollyn is that he has a long history of making unsubstantiated claims. Indeed, this was the reason for his being fired by American Free Press. It's no good misquoting someone on a matter such as Benjamin Chertoff's relationship to Michael Chertoff and pretending that they said they were cousins. The Zionists will deny it, and with nothing but an unsubstantiated allegation, the prosecution will get absolutely nowhere.
See how Bollyn's claim about the Benjamin - Michael relationship was debunked:
The story...
The senior researcher on Popular Mechanics March 2005 "911: Debunking the Myths" story, Ben Chertoff, is a cousin of Department of Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff. Chris Bollyn wrote:
This means that Hearst paid Benjamin Chertoff to write an article supporting the seriously flawed explanation that is based on a practically non-existent investigation of the terror event that directly led to the creation of the massive national security department his "cousin" now heads. This is exactly the kind of "journalism" one would expect to find in a dictatorship like that of Saddam Hussein's Iraq.
Because the manager of public relations for Popular Mechanics didn't respond to repeated calls from American Free Press, I called Benjamin Chertoff, the magazine's "senior researcher," directly.
Chertoff said he was the "senior researcher" of the piece. When asked if he was related to Michael Chertoff, he said, "I don't know." Clearly uncomfortable about discussing the matter further, he told me that all questions about the article should be put to the publicist ? the one who never answers the phone.
Benjamin's mother in Pelham, New York, however, was more willing to talk. Asked if Benjamin was related to the new Secretary of Homeland Security, Judy said, "Yes, of course, he is a cousin."
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2005/070305chertoffscousin.htm
Our take...
We never actually thought to doubt this claim, simply believing it irrelevant. The piece needs to be judged on its contents, not the surname of one of those involved. But then we heard a suggestion that Benjamin Chertoff denied the story altogether, so decided to email him to hear what he had to say. Was he really related to Michael Chertoff? And if he wasn't, then how could he explain the quote from his mother?
This is what he had to say.
Here's the story, as best as I know: I'm not related to Michael Chertoff, at least in any way I can figure out. We might be distant relatives, 15 times removed, but then again, so might you and I. Bottom line is I've never met him, never communicated with him, and nobody I know in my family has ever met or communicated with him.
As for what my mom said: When Chertoff was nominated to be head of homeland security it was the first I'd heard of him, and the same for my family (and, FYI, we'd already sent the 9/11 issue to the press by then!). My dad and I thought there might be some distant relation. When Chris Bollyn called and asked my mom if there was a relation (introducing himself as only "Chris"), she said "they might be distant cousins." Like much in the conspiracy world, this was taken WAY out of context. (Another case in point: Bollyn called me earlier and asked "Were you the senior researcher on the story?" I said, "I guess so," -- that's not a title I have ever used, nor is it at all common in magazine journalism, but I was the research editor at the time, so it kinda made sense.) Nonetheless, I was one of 9 reporters on the story, not counting editors, photo researchers, photo editors, copy editors, layout designers, production managers, fact-checkers, etc., etc., etc. who worked on this story.
Chertoff paints a very different picture from the original story. Some will say he’s lying, of course, but in that case it shouldn’t be too difficult to prove: go to it. And in the meantime, this acts as a useful reminder to everyone, including us: don’t take any 9/11-related claims for granted, whether they come from someone on your “side” of the argument or not.
Source:
Bollyn had made many other unsubstantiated allegations, such as a death threat" in 2000, his misquoting of Mark Loizeaux regarding where the molten steel was found, his misquoting of Arthur Lerner-Lam as to alleged "seismic spikes", the Sam Danner "Global Hawk" report (which Russell Pickering identified as highly suspect right from day one), the "thermite disguised as batteries" red herring which any demolitionist worth their salt would recognise as nonsense, a satirical article from The Onion submitted as Bollyn's "original work", a suspect article that Bollyn tried to get into the Barnes Review, the "Flight 93 was not shot down but landed at Cleveland" theory, etc.
Here's what Mark Loiseaux had to say regarding Bollyn's misquoting of him regarding where the molten steel was found:
Here is what he wrote to me today at 10:38 PST:
Mr. Bryan:
I didn't personally see molten steel at the World Trade Center site. It was reported to me by contractors we had been working with. Molten steel was encountered primarily during excavation of debris around the South Tower when large hydraulic excavators were digging trenches 2 to 4 meters deep into the compacted/burning debris pile. There are both video tape and still photos of the molten steel being "dipped" out by the buckets of excavators. I'm not sure where you can get a copy. Sorry I cannot provide personal confirmation.
Regards,
==========================
Mark Loizeaux, President
CONTROLLED DEMOLITION, INC.
2737 Merryman's Mill Road
Phoenix, Maryland USA 21131
Tel: 1-410-667-6610
Fax: 1-410-667-6624
www.controlled-demolition.com
Source
AFP had found Bollyn's articles to be unreliable. See this excerpt from Chris Petherick's email of October 2006:
...We and our loyal subscribers believe that when Jim Tucker or Mike Blair or any other reporter writes something and we print it that the facts presented are true. When we get a story from one of our trusted reporters we do not need to check every quote or fact. Our reporters would not dream of submitting a false story. The same cannot be said for you, however. By accusing AFP of being under the control of some other agency, you lie. There is an ancient Roman legal maxim; “falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus,” meaning that if a witness lies about one thing his testimony may be disregarded for all he says. Thus, we can no longer print anything you submit without checking it, and this we will not do.
For the reasons above, please do not bother to submit anything else to this newspaper. In addition, we will no longer be able to pay your salary.
This is effective immediately.
Christopher J. Petherick
Managing Editor/AFP
Source:
Bollyn could have made any number of allegations about Michael Chertoff, such as he was "related to the Rothschilds", he was a "shape-shifting lizard", he was a serial pedophile, etc. Time and again, we find that Bollyn merely regurgitates work that others have already done, albeit in diluted form, then he spices it up with unsubstantiated allegations.
Who are you nobodaddy?
All I've seen from you is accusations that others are trying to hide "the truth" from readers.
Cut it out already.
People can decide for themselves who to trust and who not to trust.
Thanks but no thanks, we don't need your help.
Stick to the facts.
You're welcome to post links to old posts at other sites that you feel need some more attention.
But, please stop making unsubstantiated assertions and accusations.
---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.
case closed.
---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.