Womanoids
By Alan Stang
10 -8 -7
http://www.rense.com/general78/womanoids.htm
We are searching for the reason so many of today's women are so crazy. While I have received encouragement (mostly anonymous) in this observation from men, I realize that some of my women readers, like my wife (the Love Priestess) especially my wife may disdainfully reject it because of my gender, so let's look at what a sane woman says.
In the last couple of years, I have noticed an electrifying development. The Internet is teeming with brilliant women. These ladies seem to be much smarter and I am embarrassed to add much braver than most men. They write devastating articles exposing the machinations of the conspiracy for world government. El presidente Jorge W. Boosh does not fool them.
Their pictures show them to be as beautiful as they are brilliant. And most inspiring they are Christian mothers. I believe their presence and influence could be a species of miracle. Reading them, it is possible to believe that our terminally degenerate country could be saved.
I am not going to name them. They are legion and the danger is great that I could accidentally leave someone out. You know who they are. So, the only one I shall name is the author of the book that occasions these remarks. She is Nancy Levant. Her book is The Cultural Devastation of American Women: The Strange and Frightening Decline of the American Female (And Her Dreadful Timing), a book you should read, not only because it is so provocative and interesting, but because it explains so much of what is going on.
Mrs. Levant offers an unusual inside perspective of today's version of the gender, not just because she is gloriously female, but because she operates a day care center where mothers leave their kiddos for the day, and from the mouths of these babes she learns what the mothers are doing. Her findings constitute the subject of her book.
When I first heard about her, and became the unofficial president of her fan club, I accused her of being an Amazon. She replied, "I write grants for a local hospital, I work in a bakery very, very early morning hours, I clean houses for extra money, I write books, I home school my last child at home, and I feed 25+ websites with weekly articles, and I sleep 5 hours per day. Not an Amazon, mind you, just tired and devoted to truth. I work all work/income hours around my child." I leave it to you to decide whether she is an Amazon or not.
I have spent considerable time demonstrating that the basic principle of modern feminism that the genders are the same is criminally wrong and that its purpose is to pull women out of their homes and to push them into military combat and other places they do not belong. Mrs. Levant says as follows of the issue:
"[W]hat men consider to be 'yapping and yapping' is actually the female brain in its purest form of delivery and expression. Women can hear 20 conversations at once and understand them. . . . This ability is impossible and totally lost on men. They hear 'yapping' because their brains can't take in floods of rapid thoughts in conversation. . . .
"Unfortunately, women mistake the uni-tasking male for stupid, disinterested, or bored, and men mistake the multi-tasking female for crazy, bitchy, and controlling. The truth, however, is that biology, nature, God, whatever your preference, developed our brains very differently. . . . We are not the same because our brains are not the same. . . ."
There it is again: the female brain. The same female brain Louann Brizendine, M.D., analyzed in her book of the same name. The male brain. Again, there is a dramatic difference. Remember that the reason I keep returning to this point is that the Organized Womanoids have made the alleged "sameness" the reason to overturn our civilization and country in a literal revolution.
Here is one of Mrs. Levant's versions of what is wrong: ". . . Magazines, television, the fashion industry, the sex-based youth culture, the make-up industry, and yes, schools, have retired American beauty at the age of about 20. I think this has sunk into women like lead and has made them crazy for decades . . . . Women compelled to compete with teenagers for desirability destroy their self-esteem in the very process. . . ."
And here is the result: "Many, many contemporary American women are emotional messes. They are pathologically vain, materialistic as clearly demonstrated by their overly decorated, sterile homes, and landscaped yards; are grossly self-involved, horrible and mean-spirited mothers and wives, and they are constantly, incessantly, angry and neurotic. American women are shallow. . . .
". . . Take a look at the condition of American children, marriages, and home lives, and then ask what role political feminism has played to make American women a global laughing stock while their children die spiritual and emotional deaths. . . . ." Did you know the situation is so bad that American women are a global laughing stock? I did not. I do know that no other country on earth is stupid and suicidal enough and degenerate enough to send its women into military combat.
Of course, the main victims of this horror are the children. At the day care center she has run for more than 13 years, Mrs. Levant routinely sees hundreds of children who have never eaten vegetables and hundreds of others who eat corporate junk food every night, who never eat anything else. At least 50 of them are babies less than one. Some of those babies cry all night in hunger.
"I've had a two-year-old child of a multi-millionaire come to day care every day with a satchel full of at least eight bags full of different candies, chips, and snacks, and I was instructed to let her eat them when she liked during the day. Of course, the child ate all eight bags of treats, and was lethargic at the end of the day. Her mother thought her lethargy was due to playing when, in fact, the child never, ever, moved off the couch because she was physiologically ill with sugar peaks and valleys."
Of course that child's health is being seriously damaged. Maybe she can recover because she is so young, but the damage may not show up for many years. It's a scenario that makes the Stepford Wives look like Little Women. Nancy Levant explains what women have lost:
"Okay, so women don't cook anymore. They really don't know how to cook, as my mother's generation was the last to prepare meals as a rule. Thank God, again, that I had an older mother who taught me to cook and that I enjoy the time in my kitchen preparing meats and vegetables, fruits and, yes, even baking. So many women don't realize what they are missing. They don't know about the womanly arts, how it feels to give good, nutritious food to children, as many women now rebel against the notion of mom as family cook. . . ."
Needless to say, all of this corrodes and destroys a marriage. Mrs. Levant reports that she hears in the comments of the kiddos left in her care "an inherent disrespect by children for fathers," that originates directly with the moms. "My dad is stupid." "My dad is a control freak." "Dad never does anything." "Dad never talks to Mom."
After children are born, men become unnecessary and irrelevant to American women, who find them shallow, boring and childish. ". . . It seems as if we are in the midst of an old role reversal here in contemporary America. And it seems that many American women are rather sullen toward husbands. . . ."
The result is a population teeming with crazy women. ". . . I think middle-class women are being eaten alive, from the inside out, with guilt pure and unadulterated guilt. I think they know they are guilty of poor mothering, being poor and mean-spirited wives, being bloodthirsty spendthrifts, and self-worshipping. I think they are shame-ridden by their shallowness and rejection of womanhood. . . ." Rejection of womanhood! A supremely important clue!
There is much more in the book. I strongly recommend you read it. It is available in book stores and from NewsWithViews.com. Certainly one of the most profound things she says is that "if there is no loyalty to family, no loyalties of any kind can exist." A corollary could say that if there is no family, no loyalty is possible, to country, to God, not even to oneself. Consider that we are looking at the dissolution of the family, under attack from every conceivable direction. Organized sodomy is one of those directions. In my new book, Not Holier Than Thou: How Queer is Bush? I take apart the sodomite assault.
So, we have proven to the normal mind that the differences between the genders are profound, so profound that no one normal could accidentally overlook them. And we have proven that today's women are not as crazy as they are by accident. Somebody is deliberately driving them crazy. Who and why? The womanoids you see screaming that the freest women who have ever lived on this planet American women are still "oppressed," are mere shills for the men who discreetly direct them. It is time to look at the reason for the horror Nancy Levant sets forth in her book.
© 2007 - Alan Stang - All Rights Reserved
Alan Stang was one of Mike Wallace's original writers at Channel 13 in New York, where he wrote some of the scripts that sent Mike to CBS. Stang has been a radio talk show host himself. In Los Angeles, he went head to head nightly with Larry King, and, according to Arbitron, had almost twice as many listeners. He has been a foreign correspondent. He has written hundreds of feature magazine articles in national magazines and some fifteen books, for which he has won many awards, including a citation from the Pennsylvania House of Representatives for journalistic excellence. One of Stang's exposés stopped a criminal attempt to seize control of New Mexico, where a gang seized a court house, held a judge hostage and killed a deputy. The scheme was close to success before Stang intervened. Another Stang exposé inspired major reforms in federal labor legislation.
His first book, It's Very Simple: The True Story of Civil Rights, was an instant best-seller. His first novel, The Highest Virtue, set in the Russian Revolution, won smashing reviews and five stars, top rating, from the West Coast Review of Books, which gave five stars in only one per cent of its reviews.
Stang has lectured in every American state and around the world and has guested on many top shows, including CNN's Cross Fire. Because he and his wife had the most kids in Santo Domingo, the Dominican Republic, where they lived at the time, the entire family was chosen to be actors in "Havana," directed by Sydney Pollack and starring Robert Redford, the most expensive movie ever made (at the time). Alan Stang is the man in the ridiculous Harry Truman shirt with the pasted-down hair. He says they made him do it.
AlanStang.com
stangfeedback@gmail.com
Submitted by Traveller on Tue, 2007-10-09 14:23
- Traveller's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 108 reads
-
Mr. Stang suggests that women of European heritage feel guilty.
Yeah? Well, I suggest that men of European heritage feel envious…of Muslim men.
I could be wrong about this, but it seems to me that militant feminism is not as rampant in Muslim cultures as it is in European-heritage cultures. (Yes I know there are Muslim feminists. I’m speaking statistically.) In the “West,” militant feminism contributes to family strife (but men are also to blame for this strife). If -- I say IF --there is less family strife in Muslim cultures, statistically speaking, then perhaps this is one reason why the world’s European-type population is in decline, while the world’s Muslim population is growing.
Abraham Makow thinks elitists helped launch the entire feminist project as a way to castrate male slaves while forcing women to pay income taxes and so on. I think there’s some truth to that. When the elitists want to attack a people and steal their resources, they claim that they want to “protect the women,” when in fact they want to enslave everyone. They did this to the USA and Europe. Now they do it with people abroad.
I also note that a lot of militant feminist women are zionist Jews, which suggests that feminism is one more means that zionists use to break up non-zionist culture. And by “feminism” I mean the negative kind that seeks to bring men down, not the positive kind that seeks to raise women up.
“Western” men believe all this elitist-zionist propaganda, since it helps them hide their impotence by posing as knights in shining armor. Then say all Muslim women are forced to wear hijab. They say we must kill Muslims to make Muslims “free.” They claim to be “real men,” when in fact they spend most of their leisure time sitting in front of a TV football game, beer in hand, whooping like monkeys. They’re so shriveled and castrated that they lash out in frustration, thereby serving the elitists.
I agree with Mr. Stang that western women are insane. I’m only saying that in my opinion, men are every bit as much to blame for this as women are.
I agree AZ women should "fight" and ask for their rights no matter where they are west or east. Marriage is partnership of two human beings and should never be a theater for mutual degradation and abuse in any way.
However Zionist imposed horrendous living conditions especially in the developed countries drains emotionally and physically both husband and wife to such a degree that they often lash out on each other as source of their misery while the real culprits behind their unhappiness get richer and greedier.
The extent of damage on family institution by this "modern day" living conditions are delicately construed to destroy mankind and turn it into wild beasts in ongoing struggle of survival. The basic human traits male and female have been utterly violated and corrupted thus ushering the age of hybrid generation of kidz educated by the enemies of mankind to mutually exterminate each other. We all witness outbreak of child disrespect and almost hatred toward their parents who have lost control over their children. Our governmental institutions are also corrupting them further ironically under the same "freedom" garbage propaganda to liberate the world from every decency and order.
Parents are more or less lost in family matters unable to impose any discipline on their kidz without social service interfering and discrediting their authority in front of their children. Then when kidz grow up and start criminal behavior governments vote in laws to punish parents for the crimes of their children. Parents are actually being punished through law and emotionally by seeing their children on self destructive crusade for "liberation".
Thanks to our revered "honorable" representatives who serve usury devils we are forced to employ both parents full time just to be able to pay the bills and have roof over our heads. I am not advocating that woman should be prevented from working if they wish so but I am advocating that at least one parent should be in serious full time care about home and children. It would go against tradition for men to stay home and cook but if this is what husband and wife decide between themselves so be it.
Ideally mother should take care of kidz and home because fathers in general don't do very well in this area of family life. Also motherly love and care is much more important for healthy development of the child than the fatherly love who in all sincerity can never give his child that what his mother can.
I am not underestimating father's role in the upbringing which in importance is next to the mother but lets not deceive ourselves if we could outdo woman in that area God would make us give birth to children. In some areas of human life women are far superior to men and this is one of them. How much beauty God created in woman is beyond comprehension of most men and religious reference of woman being created from man's rib is best indicator how men are weak toward women in many aspects.
Actually, me being a man, I think we men need women more than they need us. Its not just physical need that most men or women today will first think of. Its emotional need so deep inside man that makes him feel worthless if his honey is not happy or pleased with him no matter how rich or great career he has. I always believed that behind strong and stable man was or is strong and stable woman be it his mother who raised him or his wife who loves him. Male and female have their own advantages and disadvantages and only together they can produce perfection of human experience. From me as a man: Women I salute you for without you our life would be sheer misery.
I hope you understand what I meant with this bubbling.
”Actually, me being a man, I think we men need women more than they need us. Its not just physical need that most men or women today will first think of. Its emotional need so deep inside man that makes him feel worthless if his honey is not happy or pleased with him, no matter how rich or great career he has.”
Yes, but to base your self-worth on a woman’s approval is to be a cringing slave, which will make women reject you all the more. It’s better to be alone, although few men realize this until they have been beaten up many times. When you are alone, you feel lonely, but at least you retain your dignity. You don’t have someone around who’s always telling you you’re not handsome enough, not rich enough, not this enough, not that enough. This need for female approval is part of what keeps men enslaved. It is especially bad today, because males in the West are isolated and lonely. Women can always find companionship, but men cannot. Women can have sex any time they choose (although not necessarily with the man they want). Men cannot. Therefore men put extreme value on companionship. Women interpret this need as weakness.
So…play the game if you want to, but remember that as a male you are expendable. This is a law of nature. It applies to all animals that live in societies. One male can potentially impregnate thousands of females, but women can have only one pregnancy at a time. Thus, if thousands of males are killed, no one cares, but if a woman is killed, it makes the headlines. Again, this is a law of nature. Females (including humans) naturally form harems around dominant males. They gather around males who are especially handsome or rich. If you are one of these alpha males, then good for you. If not, then why compete with other males for a few seconds of female attention, before the females resume groveling at the feet of some alpha male? That's just my viewpoint, of course.
”From me as a man: Women I salute you for without you our life would be sheer misery.”
Misery? There could be no children if there were no women, but misery? I think that’s a matter of opinion, my brother.
Check back with me after you've had your heart stomped a few more times. Then we'll discuss this "misery" thing. :)
You got that right sista'! However, I'll take this lousy lot in life over what some women suffer. Having just read "The Bookseller of Kabul" I'll regard myself as being lucky with all my neuroses, frustration and anger. At least I can listen to mp3 files of DBS while doing housework :-)
hehehe...I see some at first sight very contrasting positions but in reality they are not so. I have stated why women have become the way they are today as well as why men have become the way they are. You have to understand that without faith and awareness of God its very hard to keep on leash carnal soul be it male or female.
Stomping of heart is very common in our time but bro believe me its happening both ways. There is lot of emotional and spiritual damage created in such cases and kidz suffer lasting damage from the trauma of their parents splitting. And that is why God has forbidden adultery and abuse of the honor of other individuals.
However in this age of ziogods and freedom loving world we criticize and rebuke God for forbidding such harmful behavior and now we all suffer like in some whirlpool of Hell, men blaming women and women blaming men.
Fidelity in marriage is almost nonexistent and even marriage is soon to become extinct because people are so much out of control that they know they will cheat on their partner so why feel guilty all the time. Go sleep whenever and with who you want and when you want. Why do you think that sex industry is progressing so well in developed countries.
Zionists created problem, blackmailed you into wanted reaction and now they deliver you self destruction. Don't fall for it. Men treat women with love and respect and make sure that you find out why particular woman wants to marry before you marry her. Women do not humiliate your protectors and use his love for you against him because it will backfire and cause you all inevitable misery. Celibacy is the second worse choice you can make first one being gay.
Its not marriage problem it is society problem for unjust and corrupt society creates unjust and corrupted families. Know thyself and know thy enemy or you will perish.
The first time feminism caught my attention was when a feminist-wannabe sincerely complained to me after years of trying this life style that 'there is some thing fundamentally wrong with this thing.' I never forget, she said some thing to the effect of 'women are not built for this lifestyle.' I didn't quite understand the importance of what she said. May be she didn't either. This was some 20 years ago.
I have randomly heard and read that the number of honest long time feminists has dramatically dropped. Those naively buying into the scam, cannot stay for too long. Now the majority of them are (young) newcomers and those who are part of the scam and know what they are doing.
A female movie director said something interesting. She said 'the world is run by mad people. Wise people control the situation.' Very much like engine and the wings of a plane. Engines thrust forward, and the wings sustain the position and change direction. There is no point in which is more important, just two half tasks of a function: flying.
If we decide this is what men (energy) and women (sustainability) are doing, then feminism is asking wings to play engine. This is exactly why after some years of trying, women feel exhausted while everything around them seem to be falling apart and making them angry, unhappy, and depressed. Because men can't/won't play wings, or worse there is no men around.
Feminism, like every other mind products of Judaics, is based on mind fraud. Under the banner of 'equality', feminism asks women to use male 'criteria' to look at the world: live like men, think like men, ask what men are asking, look for what men are looking for, behave like men, talk like men, drive like men, dress like men, joke like men, and to sum it up show them your middle finger if you don't like what they are doing... in one word 'toss your womanhood'. What a calamity.
Excellent points!
Thank you traveler for pointing out that there is misery in the world without women! You make other great points.
Kats - yes. Women are not honest with themselves. They think they can do it all. BIG mistake. Woman have stopped being women and have become females. And men have become males taking advantage of this despicable situation.
The 60s and 70s sex revolution - that stupid slogan:"make love not war"....
which was more like "have sex without commitment and to hell with the children".
I guess free sex aint so great after all - look what it did to America.
The orphanges, Children's aid societies, Child care services - they can't keep up.
Devastating!
FROM TRAVELER'S POST - She replied, "I write grants for a local hospital, I work in a bakery very, very early morning hours, I clean houses for extra money, I write books, I home school my last child at home, and I feed 25+ websites with weekly articles, and I sleep 5 hours per day. Not an Amazon, mind you, just tired and devoted to truth. I work all work/income hours around my child."
That's just plain crazy AND selfish. I know too many situations like this and the children suffer. How on earth does this woman home school a child with all those hours she puts into all those jobs? Why are people so selfish? If they don't have time for children - if they can't MAKE the time - then don't have them. Doesn't look like ongoing quality time with the child to me. And children aren't stupid.
They know when they are standing in line for attention.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21047654/site/newsweek/?GT1=10450 – WOMEN WORKING RUNNING THEMSELVES RAGGED
FROM THE LINK ABOVE: I'm lucky my husband embraces fatherhood with a zeal and devotion unheard of among previous generations, but I still have to wonder why, when men are far more involved in child rearing than ever before—and even talking about it to one another—women are still left carrying the bulk of the load?"
This makes me furious. Still left carrying the bulk of the load? Well then don't work so much or quit work altogether. Don't buy so many luxury items or don't live in such a big house. Why have two cars?
It doesn't have to be so complicated, and still I wonder....why have children when you can't be honest with yourself.
and I can't help it if this comment is too long........
traveler - "Ideally mother should take care of kidz and home because fathers in general don't do very well in this area of family life. Also motherly love and care is much more important for healthy development of the child than the fatherly love who in all sincerity can never give his child that what his mother can."
---------------
I only agree with half of what you say, and I will tell you why further below.
---------------
For now, let me tell you a story:
In college, during one of my classes - pyschology - the teacher had a list of items on a paper. Each student got a copy of this paper and at least one us had to start up a dialogue about one of the items on this list.
One item caught my eye like a big red neon sign:
"What would you do? You and your husband are working. One of your children starts to have serious mental problems at school and the behaviour is getting so out of hand that the child will need psychological help down the road and very soon. Which parent should quit their job to take the time to start dealing with this affliction?"
That was just one of 10 items, and really it was the only one I thought was worthy of talking about. I don't even remember the other items.
No one in the class spoke up and the teacher became very annoyed:
"if nobody pipes up, I will randomly pick someone and that person will be forced to start talking about a topic."
So I spoke up. Gee, guess which parent I picked! It's not hard to figure out. And with my answer came a derisive intake of breath and hostile mumbling.
I said the mother should quit her job.
The girls in the class were not happy.
So I further explained that the paragraph of this situation DOES NOT mention which parent makes more money. So I must assume that the father is making more money. Why should he quit his job? Sorry, but even in this day, men are still making more money than women, overall.
Still hostile muttering from the girls.
So I raised my voice and I said that I don't understand why women are having babies if they don't want to take care of them at home and nurture them. Really, I don't get that. And did you know that today, more women are suffering from cancer, diabetes, and heart disease at by far younger ages, and increasing numbers, than their mothers and grandmothers did. I wonder why.
So then a guy spoke up and he said that his father left the family for a better job. By moving away, his parents ended up divorcing and his mother suffered from that and he resented his father for many years.
I felt this guy was trying to alleviate the situation that I brought on. Very kind of him, really.
-----------------
At the same time traveler I don't agree that men are not good with home and child rearing. They just do it differently. Men bring their own qualities to the family unit. Indispensible! Fatherly love is equal to motherly love in importance..... only it offers of itself in different ways.
My father taught me wonderful, great things, especially when I was a teenager, and this learning and love I could never get from my mother. I can't imagine not having my father as I was growing up.
As for myself would never bring a kid into this world without a father - unless he DIED - and that can't be helped! Kids don't hate dead fathers, they hate distant, absent fathers, and their who mothers that created this mess.
- a tiny summary:
"The thing that struck me most is that Dinky's charity-mom is actually one of the most selfish people in the world." - http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/A3696DS4DX9HF9/ref=cm_pdp_pr...
Even as a kid, that book was a huge eye-opener!
1) Women complain that men automatically get paid more money for the same job. It’s accepted as “common sense,” like the “holocaust.” Where is the proof of this? I live in the USA, a downwardly mobile society in which corporate / bureaucratic structures contain a few males at the top (mostly white males and Jews) and women at the middle levels. At the bottom are the majority of today’s men. They are disposable drones. Women have been installed at the middle levels because they tend to be more compliant with bureaucracy. They form a buffer that keeps bottom-level men from rising up and potentially challenging the small number of men at the top. In government offices, most clerks are female, while most employees outside the office “in the trenches” are men, who are paid as little as possible. I don’t buy this line that men make more money. I think that statistically, it’s just the reverse, but I have no hard numbers to back that up. However, show me the hard numbers that prove men are automatically paid more for equal work. Or is that a taboo subject, like the “holocaust”?
2) Most women become angry when someone suggests that women would be better off at home caring for children or elderly parents. This female attitude is (in my opinion) ridiculous. The way I see it, women would naturally stay home if they had a choice. They would naturally choose to avoid rush hour traffic and bureaucratic rat races. They would naturally choose to watch over the “nest” or the “cave,” while men go out and hunt for game (food, clothing, etc). Yet women become angry when someone admits this openly. They continue to buy the propaganda that says they are “empowered” by having to show up for work at a set time every day. I maintain that (statistically) the workplace puts far crueler demands on women then men ever did when women still remained home. I also claim that men would stay home if they could. As you noted, women are having more and more stress-related diseases. Yet they insist on remaining in the workplace. Is this the fault of men?
3) Few relationships survive if a woman in a partnership makes more money than a man. A women who make more than a man naturally loses respect for the man. Women are biologically predisposed to look for a better deal; look for an alpha male. They are naturally inclined to want men to take care of them. Unfortunately in today’s downwardly mobile society, men find it harder and harder to do take care of women, since men make the same amount of money (or less) than women do on average. Women also have social networks that men do not. They get lower rates on auto insurance. They have free legal clinics if they live in large cities. They have all kinds of things. So if a woman in a relationship makes more money than a man, she has little use for a man. That’s just the way it is. In cases where average males make more money overall than women, has anyone stopped to think this is because the men must work several jobs at once if they are to survive? That is, has anyone ever considered that in the work world, men slave harder?
4) Because our society is downwardly mobile, and because men are expendable, most men are adrift. Rich people and corporations live off us all like parasitic cannibals. Bankers rule us all as slave masters. Yet men are blamed for “abandoning” the family. Most men have gone through the experience of coming home one day to discover their wife has filed divorce papers on them. And of course the courts always award primary custody of the children to the woman, unless the man can prove the woman is a drug addict or something. Yet, again, men are blamed for “abandoning” the family. Is there any part of today’s problems that are NOT blamed on men? Men can say nothing about this, for if they complain, they will be dismissed as “wimps.” They cannot admit they are depressed or confused or afraid, for they know they will be discarded if they complain. And so, all kinds of propaganda and injustices against men are allowed to continue.
And let me repeat this social structure as I see it. At the top are a handful of men. In the middle are women. At the bottom are most males. Thus, in divorce court, it is usually the man that gets burned. Among the rich, the situation is reversed -- it is usually women who get burned, for men have money to hire whatever they need (e.g., private detectives and psychological “experts”) to get a divorce settlement in the men’s favor. However, rich men are only a small percent of the population. Every average male will tell you that the divorce courts burned him. Despite all these factors, women still complain that men “have it made.” This bizarre twisting of reality is one reason why aberrations such as zionism continue to thrive.
5) American society assumes that women are better caregivers than men. Society does not allow men to stay home. What man can readily admit to other males (or to women for that matter) that he is a “Mister Mom”? He will be seen as a lazy wimp.
But let’s always remember…men “have it made.”
I didn't say that "men had it made."
I wasn't "complaining" when I stated that men make more money than women.
I said this: I must assume that the man is making more money. The situation doesn't give enough precise detail.
So why should he quit his job? One of the parents has to attend to the child full time - and like traveler said, yes, generally, women are nurturing, a word that is still associated with their mothering role. [I would hope].
Men do - generally speaking - make more money. Those girls in the classroom missed my point! I had to fill in the blanks for this scenario on the list..... so if the guy is making more money - I am assuming - then WHY SHOULD HE QUIT HIS JOB?
I am aware of women increasing their paychecks compared to the past. Sure there are women in power executive positions. That's just a certain percentage. More woman - generally speaking - still have average to low income. That's a reality for many different reasons.
That's really not the main issue, this "who makes more money" I brought this up to make a point. Not one girl in the class said "well what if the woman is making more money?"
Then I would have said the man must quit his job.
I brought up the income situation [from my perspective] because the scenario demanded it and I wanted to make a profound point. I don't apologize for that, no sir.
I said the words "sorry in these current times - OVERALL - men compared to women have bigger incomes" because the girls don't want to face reality.
What? The guy should quit his job even though he is making more money? Does that make sense?
As for proof that MOST or ALL women have bigger incomes than men - which city? which town? Who are they? What job? Education? Background? Connections? Nepotism? Why? I'm not going to delve into an essay of this.
I AM SAYING: I just don't understand why women have such a huge appetite for a power career or ANY job that takes up a good amount of hours of the day - and still want children AT THE SAME TIME.
A power career leaves no time to form bonds or instill your own moral values in the childrens' formative years.
I don't understand why women squander gobs of money on childcare services, nannies, or full time babysitters - these are the people really bonding with their kids - how sad - and talk about defeating the purpose of making more money - so all I can see is that women are on an ego trip. They want that kid AND that career.
Wow, some talent if you can get by without hurting the people around you and suffering in the long run. See Mary Tyler Moore - excellent example and just one of legion.
"nest" "cave" "hunt"
I just find those words very boring. Archaic and over-used. Just use the word 'home'. And just use the words 'going to work to put food on the table'. Good enough for me. I find that when guys talk this way, I can hear the contempt in their attitude and tone towards women. Bringing out the "Caveman" speech can only be spoken with great derision, as I have seen.
I despise the word 'empowerment' regardless of which gender uses it.
I find this word to be a more COMICAL kind of description of women in the workplace because down the road women tend to lose the greater picture - that bond with their children - that respect she would have for a husband who works hard. The stable family unit which would bring forth to this world children who grow into confident, well-adjusted adults.
I am not making an excuse for criminal kids from broken homes and severe, disruptive family episodes.
Even children from a home where the parents are still together can have serious problems - REMEMBER the book I mentioned - DINKY HOCKER SHOOTS SMACK - and still this book makes my point GREATLY.
I am not knocking men if they want to stay home with the kids - but I find it extremely sad how women are so dishonest with themselves that they would actually DARE to grow resentful of men that DO stay home with the kids - because for some bizarre reason women still feel desire that men should make more money. Believe it! It happens!
Mixed up, jumbled up world, isn't it?
NEVER, NOT ONCE, did I EVER say that it is the fault of men that women have stress-related diseases.
WHERE do you see that I said that? I don't even make an implication.
Perhaps you think I was singling you out.
Not at all.
I blame the bankers and corporatists for the mess, not you.
You both have made strong arguments for your positions on this subject and I (as observant) don't see anything wrong with what you are saying. Both of you arrived at same conclusion Messed up world -created by bankers and Zionists. This is the bottom line problem between men and women. Both men and women get hurt tremendously (emotionally) in the process of meat mincing Zionist machine. That hurt sometimes tends to lead us into "all are like that" whether its directed toward men or women. We are only human beings and its not the end of the world if that happens to any of us. However we always must strive to preserve and promote mutual love and respect between genders in general. There will always be black sheep in both genders that will stir up inter gender disunity and even enmity and of course this will be exploited by our common enemy which we all know about. Love you guys (I mean both of you :)).
"Let there be Light!"
Okay.....Zionist corporatists and bankers are pulling and prodding us like puppets resulting in the madness of women going to war, women acting like men, women losing sight of their place in the world - I AGREE 100%.
AZ - "Few relationships survive if a woman in a partnership makes more money than a man. And women who make more than a man naturally loses respect for the man. "
Yes. I agree 100%. TRUE. This is happening all the time.
====================
AZ - "Yes, but to base your self-worth on a woman’s approval is to be a cringing slave, which will make women reject you all the more. It’s better to be alone, although few men realize this until they have been beaten up many times. When you are alone, you feel lonely, but at least you retain your dignity. You don’t have someone around who’s always telling you you’re not handsome enough, not rich enough, not this enough, not that enough. This need for female approval is part of what keeps men enslaved. It is especially bad today, because males in the West are isolated and lonely. Women can always find companionship, but men cannot. Women can have sex any time they choose (although not necessarily with the man they want). Men cannot. Therefore men put extreme value on companionship. Women interpret this need as weakness."
=====================
I could turn EVERYTHING you said and make it that women are enslaved by men.
Men would have an uproar and I wouldn’t blame them.
Do you really think women WANT to be alone?
Do you really think women want to have sex just to have sex? I don't know any such women myself [ in close circles] - those who do sleep around for the fun of it - I do not associate with such types for friends. I also would never get involved with men who just wanna have fun. Know what I mean?
Water seeks its own level – people do the same, I suppose.
Sex and companionship are EQUAL to each other? NO.
Women can have sex any time they choose?
But not necessarily with the man that they want?
Again, why would any guy want to bother with such a female if his values are different – that is - on the higher level!?
How about rape, venereal diseases, total lack of self-respect, undoing their otherwise healthy personalities, EVEN GETTING MURDERED – that’s been known to happen ………this is what women get for having sex any time they choose with any guy they want.
Men cannot have sex anytime they choose?
There are a lot of STUPID slutty females out there! [thanks to the sick 60s - 70s sex revolution - see movie LOOKING FOR MR. GOODBAR] Take your pick. Enjoy. Just don't be so disdainful towards ALL women just because some of these filthy females trick guys into having a baby and then drags them into court for child support, for what? 18 years?
In my past relationships, I had my heart stomped on, also, AZ. Who do I blame?
Not men.
MYSELF - - for not seeing the writing on the wall.
The increasing wane of a man's attraction and interest is always there on the wall in plain view, unless the guy is a damn good con artist.
A woman or a man should take responsibility to end a situation that is hurting them.
It took some time for me to realize that.
So now you are sweeping everything I say aside by bringing up corporatists and bankers.....that you are not singling me out. But you are, I cannot help but see that - as I am one that belongs to the female population.
okay....how about this:
Remember a long time ago when you said that there may never be a solution to bring down zionism, the lobby, Federal Reserve and so on. Didn't you say that us "little people" the goyim masses, that the best thing we can ever do is love one another - to take care of each other?
When men start saying things like "women enslave men" and women say the same of men, then this solution falls by the wayside.