The following is an excerpt from "Blood Borders", published in the Armed Forces Journal (AFJ) that touts the latest geopolitical craze - redrawing Middle East borders. Left unsaid, throughout, is the underlying aim of it all - to get at the oil.
International borders are never completely just. But the degree of injustice they inflict upon those whom frontiers force together or separate makes an enormous difference — often the difference between freedom and oppression, tolerance and atrocity, the rule of law and terrorism, or even peace and war.
The most arbitrary and distorted borders in the world are in Africa and the Middle East. Drawn by self-interested Europeans (who have had sufficient trouble defining their own frontiers), Africa's borders continue to provoke the deaths of millions of local inhabitants. But the unjust borders in the Middle East — to borrow from Churchill — generate more trouble than can be consumed locally.
While the Middle East has far more problems than dysfunctional borders alone — from cultural stagnation through scandalous inequality to deadly religious extremism — the greatest taboo in striving to understand the region's comprehensive failure isn't Islam but the awful-but-sacrosanct international boundaries worshipped by our own diplomats.
Of course, no adjustment of borders, however draconian, could make every minority in the Middle East happy [nevermind that that's not the goal]. In some instances, ethnic and religious groups live intermingled and have intermarried. Elsewhere, reunions based on blood or belief might not prove quite as joyous as their current proponents expect. The boundaries projected in the maps accompanying this article redress the wrongs suffered by the most significant "cheated" population groups, such as the Kurds, Baluch and Arab Shia, but still fail to account adequately for Middle Eastern Christians, Bahais, Ismailis, Naqshbandis and many another numerically lesser minorities. And one haunting wrong can never be redressed with a reward of territory: the genocide perpetrated against the Armenians by the dying Ottoman Empire.
Yet, for all the injustices the borders re-imagined here leave unaddressed, without such major boundary revisions, we shall never see a more peaceful Middle East [because we shall not have gotten the oil].
Even those who abhor the topic of altering borders would be well-served to engage in an exercise that attempts to conceive a fairer, if still imperfect, amendment of national boundaries between the Bosporus and the Indus. Accepting that international statecraft has never developed effective tools — short of war — for readjusting faulty borders, a mental effort to grasp the Middle East's "organic" frontiers nonetheless helps us understand the extent of the difficulties we face and will continue to face. We are dealing with colossal, man-made deformities that will not stop generating hatred and violence until they are corrected [to ensure that all the oil is under our control].
As for those who refuse to "think the unthinkable," declaring that boundaries must not change and that's that, it pays to remember that boundaries have never stopped changing through the centuries. Borders have never been static, and many frontiers, from Congo through Kosovo to the Caucasus, are changing even now (as ambassadors and special representatives avert their eyes to study the shine on their wingtips).
Oh, and one other dirty little secret from 5,000 years of history: Ethnic cleansing works. In other words, who gives a shit about land without oil?
Zionists unite! - Power is Oil, and vice versa.
Imperialist Likudnik oil-hungry theory in a different dress - it's all for the good of the region.
No one will have to fight anymore, because everything worth fighting for will be divided once and for all.
And to the winner goes all the spoils.
Check out the link for the rest of the article, and a list of 'winners' and 'losers'.
Redrawing borders
divide and conquer
With "redrawing borders" the best option for the Muslims is to eliminate the borders.
It's sad however to see so many Muslims still divided by "nationalism". Their hearts connected to "nations" lead by traitors and borders defined mainly by their enemies or to their insignificant little tribes.
Imagine how unreal it would be if the enemies of China, Russia or the USA would divide them up in tiny weak pieces and then their future inhabitants would argue that the reason their countries are weak to get anything done and getting used against one another is because the borders are a bit of.