You are here

How Hitler defied the bankers

Many people take joy in saying Wall Street and Jewish bankers "financed Hitler." There is plenty of documented evidence that Wall Street and Jewish bankers did indeed help finance Hitler at first, partly because it allowed the bankers to get rich (as I will describe below) and partly in order to control Stalin. However, when Germany broke free from the bankers, the bankers declared a world war against Germany.

When we look at all the facts, the charge that "Jews financed Hitler" becomes irrelevant. Los Angeles Attorney Ellen Brown discusses this topic in her book Web Of Debt

 

When Hitler came to power, Germany was hopelessly broke. The Treaty of Versailles had imposed crushing reparations on the German people, demanding that Germans repay every nation’s costs of the war. These costs totaled three times the value of all the property in Germany.

 

Private currency speculators caused the German mark to plummet, precipitating one of the worst runaway inflations in modern times. A wheelbarrow full of 100 billion-mark banknotes could not buy a loaf of bread. The national treasury was empty. Countless homes and farms were lost to speculators and to private (Jewish controlled) banks. Germans lived in hovels. They were starving.

 

Nothing like this had ever happened before - the total destruction of the national currency, plus the wiping out of people's savings and businesses.  On top of this came a global depression.  Germany had no choice but to succumb to debt slavery under international (mainly Jewish) bankers until 1933, when the National Socialists came to power. At that point the German government thwarted the international banking cartels by issuing its own money. World Jewry responded by declaring a global boycott against Germany.

 

Hitler began a national credit program by devising a plan of public works that included flood control, repair of public buildings and private residences, and construction of new roads, bridges, canals, and port facilities. All these were paid for with money that no longer came from the private international bankers.

 

The projected cost of these various programs was fixed at one billion units of the national currency. To pay for this, the German government (not the international bankers) issued bills of exchange, called Labor Treasury Certificates. In this way the National Socialists put millions of people to work, and paid them with Treasury Certificates.

 

Under the National Socialists, Germany’s money wasn't backed by gold (which was owned by the international bankers). It was essentially a receipt for labor and materials delivered to the government. Hitler said, "For every mark issued, we required the equivalent of a mark's worth of work done, or goods produced." The government paid workers in Certificates. Workers spent those Certificates on other goods and services, thus creating more jobs for more people. In this way the German people climbed out of the crushing debt imposed on them by the international bankers.

 

Within two years, the unemployment problem had been solved, and Germany was back on its feet. It had a solid, stable currency, with no debt, and no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the United States and other Western countries (controlled by international bankers) were still out of work.  Within five years, Germany went from the poorest nation in Europe to the richest.

 

Germany even managed to restore foreign trade, despite the international bankers’ denial of foreign credit to Germany, and despite the global boycott by Jewish-owned industries. Germany succeeded in this by exchanging equipment and commodities directly with other countries, using a barter system that cut the bankers out of the picture. Germany flourished, since barter eliminates national debt and trade deficits. (Venezuela does the same thing today when it trades oil for commodities, plus medical help, and so on. Hence the bankers are trying to squeeze Venezuela.)

 

Germany's economic freedom was short-lived; but it left several monuments, including the famous Autobahn, the world's first extensive superhighway.

 

Hjalmar Schacht, a Rothschild agent who was temporarily head of the German central bank,  summed it up thus… An American banker had commented, "Dr. Schacht, you should come to America. We've lots of money and that's real banking." Schacht replied, "You should come to Berlin. We don't have money. That's real banking."

 

(Schact, the Rothschild agent, actually supported the private international bankers against Germany, and was rewarded by having all charges against him dropped at the Nuremberg trials.)

 

This economic freedom made Hitler extremely popular with the German people.  Germany was rescued from English economic theory, which says that all currency must be borrowed against the gold owned by a private and secretive banking cartel -- such as the Federal Reserve, or the Central Bank of Europe -- rather than issued by the government for the benefit of the people.

 

Canadian researcher Dr. Henry Makow (who is Jewish himself) says the main reason why the bankers arranged for a world war against Germany was that Hitler sidestepped the bankers by creating his own money, thereby freeing the German people. Worse, this freedom and prosperity threatened to spread to other nations. Hitler had to be stopped!

 

Makow quotes from the 1938 interrogation of C. G. Rakovsky, one of the founders of Soviet Bolsevism and a Trotsky intimate. Rakovsky was tried in show trials in the USSR under Stalin. According to Rakovsky, Hitler was at first funded by the international bankers, through the bankers’ agent Hjalmar Schacht. The bankers financed Hitler in order to control Stalin, who had usurped power from their agent Trotsky. Then Hitler became an even bigger threat than Stalin when Hitler started printing his own money. 

(Stalin came to power in 1922, which was eleven years before Hitler came to power.)

 

Rakovsky said:

 

“Hitler took over the privilege of manufacturing money, and not only physical moneys, but also financial ones. He took over the machinery of falsification and put it to work for the benefit of the people. Can you possibly imagine what would have come if this had infected a number of other states?” (Henry Makow, "Hitler Did Not Want War," www.savethemales.com March 21, 2004).

 

Economist Henry C K Liu writes of Germany's remarkable transformation:

 

“The Nazis came to power in 1933 when the German economy was in total collapse, with ruinous war-reparation obligations and zero prospects for foreign investment or credit. Through an independent monetary policy of sovereign credit and a full-employment public-works program, the Third Reich was able to turn a bankrupt Germany, stripped of overseas colonies, into the strongest economy in Europe within four years, even before armament spending began.” (Henry C. K. Liu, "Nazism and the German Economic Miracle," Asia Times (May 24, 2005).

 

In Billions for the Bankers, Debts for the People (1984), Sheldon Emry commented:

 

“Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 on, which accounts for Germany’s startling rise from the depression to a world power in five years. The German government financed its entire operations from 1935 to 1945 without gold, and without debt. It took the entire Capitalist and Communist world to destroy the German revolution, and bring Europe back under the heel of the Bankers.” 
 

These facts do not appear in any textbooks today, since Jews own most publishing companies. What does appear is the disastrous runaway inflation suffered in 1923 by the Weimar Republic, which governed Germany from 1919 to 1933. Today’s textbooks use this inflation to twist truth into its opposite. They cite the radical devaluation of the German mark as an example of what goes wrong when governments print their own money, rather than borrow it from private cartels. 

 

In reality, the Weimar financial crisis began with the impossible reparations payments imposed at the Treaty of Versailles. Hjalmar Schacht – the Rothschild agent who was currency commissioner for the Republic -- opposed letting the German government print its own money…

 

“The Treaty of Versailles is a model of ingenious measures for the economic destruction of Germany.  Germany could not find any way of holding its head above the water, other than by the inflationary expedient of printing bank notes.”

 

Schact echoes the textbook lie  that Weimar inflation was caused when the German government printed its own money.  However, in his 1967 book The Magic of Money, Schact let the cat out of the bag by revealing that it was the PRIVATELY-OWNED Reichsbank, not the German government, that was pumping new currency into the economy. Thus, the PRIVATE BANK caused the Weimar hyper-inflation.

Like the U.S. Federal Reserve, the Reichsbank was overseen by appointed government officials, but was operated for private gain. What drove the wartime inflation into hyperinflation was speculation by foreign investors, who sold the mark short, betting on its decreasing value. In the manipulative device known as the short sale, speculators borrow something they don't own, sell it, and then "cover" by buying it back at the lower price.

Speculation in the German mark was made possible because the PRIVATELY OWNED Reichsbank (not yet under Nazi control) made massive amounts of currency available for borrowing. This currency, like U.S. currency today, was created with accounting entries on the bank's books. Then the funny-money was lent at compound interest. When the Reichsbank could not keep up with the voracious demand for marks, other private banks were allowed to create marks out of nothing, and to lend them at interest. The result was runaway debt and inflation.

 

Thus, according to Schacht himself, the German government did not cause the Weimar hyperinflation. On the contrary, the government (under the National Socialists) got hyperinflation under control. The National Socialists put the Reichsbank under strict government regulation, and took prompt corrective measures to eliminate foreign speculation. One of those measures was to eliminate easy access to funny-money loans from private banks. Then Hitler got Germany back on its feet by having the public government issue Treasury Certificates.

 

Schacht , the Rotchschild agent, disapproved of this government fiat money, and wound up getting fired as head of the Reichsbank when he refused to issue it. Nonetheless, he acknowledged in his later memoirs that allowing the government to issue the money it needed did not produce the price inflation predicted by classical economic theory, which says that currency must be borrowed from private cartels.

 

What causes hyper-inflation is uncontrolled speculation. When speculation is coupled with debt (owed to private banking cartels) the result is disaster. On the other hand, when a government issues currency in carefully measured ways, it causes supply and demand to increase together, leaving prices unaffected. Hence there is no inflation, no debt, no unemployment, and no need for income taxes.

 

Naturally this terrifies the bankers, since it eliminates their powers. It also terrifies Jews, since their control of banking allows them to buy the media, the government, and everything else.

 

Therefore, to those who delight in saying “Jews financed Hitler,” I ask that they please look at all the facts.

Comments

I, for one, would certainly be willing to defer to what I know and acknowledge to be your much more seasoned judgment and learning, but for the fact that I suspect his bankers and masters remained the same, right up until the end. In fact, it seems to me that WWII was basically conducted and manip[ulated altogether by two seperate brothers/ factions of the Rothschild clan, and had much to do with the control via railway, &c. of different segments of the warld (and to make money, oc, &c). Truth is, I believe your information (in this instance) is entirely besotted, spotty, and full of holes. (I could be wrong, although somehow I doubt it.)

Truth is, I've hardly spent sufficient time on the topic overall to give you much of an argument, or to be able to proffer solid proof, one way or t' other. P'haps someone (and, no, I don't mean Ehud Olmert's Wo) who differs from us both might care to fill us in.

I do know Warburg (Paulie's brother) lived right there in Germany right up until near the end of the war-- before things got too uncomfortable (what, with  the bombs and things(, &C.

regardless of the Hitler debate. Definately seems a lot better than the gold standard. It's what anti-Zionists should shoot for if we ever take the power back rather than Ron Paul's b.s.

Excellent post, Abdul. If you don;t mind, I will give it its own page on my web site. It's quite good. What Robodaddy101/Nonsense seems to be unable to grasp (probably because he works in Tel Aviv) is that it isn;t who lends you the money, but what you DO WITH THE MONEY that truly counts. The war, WWII, was started because of Hitler's fiscal policy. He started off as a player of the game and slowly pulled away until the German nation was relinquished. Wall Street and the American capitalists, being the greed-mongering swine they are, would stop at nothing to eek out their own little nest egg in the German economy; hence, companies like Ford, Coca-Cola, and IBM ended up in Germany. Hitler was fine with that: more money and jobs for Germans. Only a dimwit would reject such foreign investment.

One a related note, Robodaddy the split persona must think that Iran is currently run by Zionists too then. So, I fail to grasp why he should care whether or not that Zionist regime gets taken out by the American Zionist regime in order to replace the Iranian Zionist regime with yet another Zionist regime. The logic is ridiculous as you can see. Why remove a Zionist-friendly regime? It simply lacks credibility and sensibility. Had Adi and his rabble rousing buddies (by no means were any of them perfect) been pro-Zionist, why the war, regime change, and ensuing trial at Nuremberg where even the foreign minister was hanged? BTW, notice that the ONLY one to suffer before the Sanhedrin in ISRAEL was Adolf Eichmann? Well, that's because Adi II really was Jewish, but according to Hitler's laws, only half since his father was the Jewish one, not his mother. Eichmann, regreattably for us and the Arabs, was trying to help his idiotic people, as anyone with ethnic pride would. However, neither he nor the Nasos founded Israel: Napoleon started the process in 1799 according to the mideastweb.org. This was not due to his love for Jews; rather, he was trying to be a humanitarian. In other words, he believed their eternal victim bullsh*t that they have always thrown into the face of the Goyim. Why we keep falling for this bull is beyond me.

Infinite,

You seem to be a person after the truth, not bullsh*t. I very much try not to present bullsh*t, though, at times, I must admit I do tend to favor the Fuehrer because he's my #2 second only to Jesus Christ. So, forgive my bias and just know that it's there. But, if there wasn;t some meat behind this whole charade, then I would not be standing up for the man. Believe me, if he really had been some swarthy-a$$ Jew who sought to do deliberate harm to my German people, I would shut down my site tomorrow. There is simply nothing even remotely compelling to suggest as much.

"..  until the German nation was relinquished.".. That fragment says it all. Shut it down (or leave it up, I don't care).

Whose your # 3 man? Let me guess. Is it Barry Gibbs or Theodore Bundy? (J/k, lighten up.)

not Hitler, you silly little tittyballs. Lighten up.

Robo, are you trolling? Every time I log on, you're here. Have you no job, son?

A very good and sound item indeed (and I hope you have enough good will, good humor, patience and understanding to take my comments often with a grain of salt). Reminds me of Lincoln with his greenbacks, and (if I'm not mistaken), he too was a paradoxical character with as many (or more) strings, secrets and faults as he had free will, good intentions and virtues. The whole thing still seems too contrived, staged and deliberate to me to think it due to random fortune (poorly expressed);, and (before I throw my hands up in a kind of  appreciative aquiescence and abeyance-- for I perceive no faults in your essay whatsoever),  I will only refer again to the dueling Rothschilds, who surely pulled the strings, &c.. 

There's some well made points in AZ's post, but at some point, the 3rd Reich would have to seek some type of international financing, since Germany wasn't able to produce everything it needed.

A case in point is oil, which Germany had very little of and lack of oil was one of the reasons it was defeated in WW II.

To get access to commodities like oil, there would have to be some type of external financing mechanism to help barter trade between countries.

Enter the Rothschilds and their planet wide web of monetary agents.

They have been in business too long to not recognize a good investment, especially one that would lead to an even better investment, like war.

Pitting one side against the other, then financing both and making interest off the winning and losing sides is a Rothschild hallmark.

Greg Bacon

You are right that Germany had little oil, but you must remember that Stalin supplied Hitler's oil until the declaration of war was made in June 1941 (according to historian H.W. Koch, and ex-Soviet spy Viktor Suvorov, Stalin had mobilized some 183 divisions along the border of Poland, which ready to "attack" and not "defend," as the newest evidence has now revealed; thus, Hitler did indeed "preempt" Stalin, perhaps by only a couple of weeks or a month).

Hitler immeditaely got control of the Rumanian oil fields and used that, as well as wood chips (South Africa once used wood chip fuel too). Moreover, the Germans produced synthetic oil from coal. This was the very reason as to why the British RAF targeted Leuna, because of its MASSIVE synthetic oil plant. Friedrich Berg's Nazi Gassings website discusses the wood chip and synthetic coal fuel issues in depth.

Greg, you MUST read Campbell's essay on the oil situation. It will fill in numerous holes. I posted it here.

Here is an excerpt:

"

Oil is the most lucrative business after banking and cocaine trafficking but it depends on a reliable price structure.  That is, consumers have had to be persuaded that oil is rather scarce and hard to find to justify ever-rising oil prices.  Rothschild’s American banking and oil commissar, John D. Rockefeller, planted the idea that oil supplies were short and in danger of drying up at any time.  This myth was exploded on January 10, 1901 near Beaumont, Texas when the massive Spindletop well blew out.  That monster produced around four million barrels of oil and ended Rockefeller’s Standard Oil monopoly on oil prices, based on his Indiana and Ohio wells and his criminal railroad transportation practices.  Spindletop ended the belief he’d sold the people that oil was scarce.  Prices plummeted, although there wasn’t much demand for oil at the time.  There wouldn’t be for a few more years until the advent of the automobile.  A better method for control of raw materials - mainly oil - would have to be developed.
 
It was at this time that the Rothschild/Rockefeller Group devised the best method of all to keep unwanted oil in the ground, where it would not threaten the price structure.  Only oil owned by the Group would be exploited, and at very controlled amounts.  The Group began in 1917 to place its agents in control of governments of countries whose oil supplies, if exploited, would hurt profits by lowering the price.  Their first agents were two Communist Jews named Bronstein and Ulyanov, better known as Trotsky and Lenin.  These ruthless characters murdered the entire potential Russian middle class and thereby prevented the emergence of Russian oilmen.  Anyone with the idea of being a businessman was killed.  The oil stayed in the ground.
 
European oil production was mainly in Rumania.  Who can forget the wanton destruction of the Ploesti oil fields and massive storage facilities by the American and British air forces in the early 1940s?  Our wonderful boys flew months of air raids against Ploesti.  The German war machine switched to synthetic gasoline, produced by the gasification of coal!  This was in fact a Standard Oil process, but we are not told about it today.
 
China, of course, also represented a threat to the price structure if Chinese oil were produced.  So the Group installed two more extremely ruthless agents in China’s government:  Mao Tse-tung and Chou En-lai.   These two Rothschild boys slaughtered sixty-four million potential middle class enemies by 1964, according to the congressional records.  There were no Chinese oilmen to come up with a Chinese Spindletop.  They were all dead.  We can just imagine how China would have blossomed under the leadership of Chiang Kai-shek, based on the performance of tiny Taiwan, which rose to number four GNP in the world in just twenty years.
 
The same thing happened in Vietnam, where the US installed the Communist Ho Chi Minh, who made sure that a Vietnamese Spindletop would never be produced.  (Ho was a US intelligence agent during World War II.  He sent his reports to the OSS from the Texaco office in Hanoi.)
 
In fact, every Communist dictatorship in the world since 1917 was installed by the US State Department either overtly, as in the Russian, Chinese and Vietnamese examples, or covertly, as with the Cuban example.  Mainly, though, it’s been overt and usually based on the “corruption” of an American puppet installed some years before.  And the State Department is staffed in all important positions by members of the Rothschild/Rockefeller private ministry of war called the Council on Foreign Relations."

I neglected to mention that Hitler struggled to attain power for 10 years. So, to act as though he was 'conjured up' by Jewish 'power-brokers' overnight is to ignore the truth. It is more likely that the Jews, with their 'sixth sense,' saw where things were headed and attempted to "buy" the NSDAP. Needless to say it did not work; hence, the war. Besides, let's call a spade a spade. It makes no sense that the two pro-Zionist regimes of America and Britain would take out a third Zionist regime (in Germany). Yes, I have heard about the so-called 'fight' between the two brothers Rothschild, but that is pure conspiracy which cannot be substantiated. Show me the evidence of such a fight. I mean, even Josef Stalin threw the Rothschilds out of Russia. Perhaps this is why Stalin was poisoned by Jewry (many now suspect he was poisoned). Lenin may also have been poisoned. His last words while "crawling on the floor like a beast" were, "God save Russia and kill all the Jews!"

http://www.hitlerresearch.org/index46_files/Page775.html

In the book, "Rule by Secrecy", by Jim Marrs, there's some info on how the Bank for International Settlements, created after WW I to handle Germany's war reparations, went further and helped finance HItler's war machine.

The Rockefellers and the Bank of London were behind that scheme, with the BIS.

As for synthetic fuel, Albert Speer said Germany could not have fought WW II without getting the syn fuel formula from General Motors.

Greg Bacon

Ouch. Without reviewing what you (or I) have written, I wish to qualify my ill-considered and poorly-phrased responses that I entirely disagree with your premises, even if the points you've used to educe 'em happen to be facts (maybe most are, but I have cause to doubt). In fine, I'm certain Hitler was a bolschevic jew through and through, and a tool of the zionazi bankers.. who wrought the ruination of Germany faster than they could bring about in any other way, bleh, bleh, bleh. 

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer