During World War II, there was almost no "French resistance." Indeed, while Europe burned, French people spent the war in so much (comparative) comfort that writers like John Paul Sartre spent lazy days in coffee houses writing verbose philosophical tomes, such as 1943’s Being and Nothingness.  

Sartre’s wartime scribblings include an essay titled Réflexions sur la question juive (Reflections on the Jewish Question), which champions Jewish supremacy, and is used by zionist “intellectuals” to justify their atrocities. Indeed, zionists later changed the title to Anti-Semite and Jew: An Exploration of the Etiology of HATE.

I'll focus on Sarte's essay in a moment, but first, I mention it because it demonstrates the phenomenon we call zionist projection, in which zionists (i.e., Jewish supremacists) escape any blame for their crimes by angrily screeching that only non-Jews commit crimes. (Only non-Jews can be “terrorists.”)

This zionist projection is sustained by a fundamental emptiness that keeps the zionist inherently atheistic and parasitic. As such, he is eternally dependent on some host for material support and intellectual meaning. If the host does not support the zionist parasite, the parasite attaches itself to a different host -- which is why israelis have cultivated China as a backup host in case their Western host dies.

The zionist top tier is Ashkenazis, who deny their Khazar roots. Arthur Koestler, a Jew, wrote The Thirteenth Tribe as a service to Jews. Koestler wanted to give Jews a racial origin, plus a historic “homeland,” but Ashkenazis rejected this, knowing that if they identified themselves as a race, they might have trouble blending in with (and thus controlling) the hated Goyim. Moreover if zionists claimed Khazaria, they would lose their “God-given” claim to Palestine.

Top-ranking zionists know they are liars, but average zionists (i.e. most Jews) believe their own lies, such as the holo-hoax. The more they victimize others, the more they claim that others victimize them. And, being empty at their core, they can only maintain cohesion through their hatred of the Goyim. Hence their endless whining about “anti-semitism.”  

The zionist’s “Jewishness” exists only to the extent that he/she is considered Jewish by those around them. He denies his Khazar roots, yet he wants to be part of a racial “tribe.” This conflict makes him violently neurotic. He must hate the Goyim, and have supremacy over the Goyim, for without it, he is nothing. Where no “anti-Semitisim” exists, he must create it, or imagine it. He must forever maintain the delusion that he is “threatened.” Only thus can he maintain his “identity.” Only thus can he have a “tribe."

The Jewish denial of a racial status causes anxiety, yet it also yields many freedoms, such as the Jewish freedom to claim or deny tribal status according to expediency. When Jews want to claim innocence, they say they cannot be evil, for there is no clear entity that can be called a “Jew.” When Jews want to slaughter Palestinians, they claim that Jews are "The Chosen," and that God "gave them" Palestine.

The downside of all this is that the zionist is empty at his core, and is therefore utterly dependent upon Goy energy. Hence the zionist has no choice but to ascribe all his evils to the Goyim. The zionist does not merely blame others; he projects his evil onto others, denying all connections with his own evil.

The zionist may not understand all this consciously, but he certainly feels it, which is why he hates groups like the Natura Karta, which find cohesion in their religious rituals. Their cohesion points out the zionist’s emptiness.

Sartre’s essay twists all this into its opposite. It is a mirror image of reality, saying black is white, and white is black. It says zionists are not empty and neurotic; instead, everyone else is empty and neurotic.

Here are some key points…

---“Anti-Semitism” is arbitrary, irrational, prejudicial, self-serving, and divorced from reality. If the Jew did not exist, the anti-Semite would invent him. “Anti-Semitism” does not arise from facts or experience, but from itself. It allows the “anti-Semite” to simplify his world, and convince himself of beliefs he knows to be spurious at best.

---The “anti-Semite” has abandoned reason and embraced hate as a religious faith that yields meaning, purpose, and a reason to live. Hate allows him to blame everything on the Jews. It absolves the “anti-Semite” from having to think, or face doubt, or live with uncertainty, or take responsibility. It allows him to avoid himself. Hate also allows social cohesion with other haters. 

---The “anti-Semite” fears liberty, freedom, and change. He is a coward who does not want to admit his cowardice to himself. In short, “anti-Semitism” is fear of the human condition. The “anti-Semite” is a man who wishes to be anything except a man.

Submitted by Abdul Alhazred on Sun, 2008-06-08 20:35

• Abdul Alhazred's blog
• Login or register to post comments
• 216 reads
•