Saudi Arabia Compared to israel

0
Your rating: None

There is no greater contrast from the point of view of costs-benefit in comparing  Saudi Arabia to Israel.

The latter is subsidized by the US, which has given over $120 billion dollars over the last 30 years while it competes, as the second largest arms exporter, with the US-military industrial complex thus costing American jobs and supplies absolutely no strategic materials to the US economy.

Indeed Israel has direct access to the most up-to-date US funded military technology, which it then sells to its clients. This is in stark contrast to Saudi Arabia’s servile relation with the US.

Israel has constantly demanded and received US support and financing for its wars, its illegal colonization of Palestinian land and has unwavering US support for its repudiation of international law and numerous violations of United Nations mandates.

While Saudi Arabia supports the US economy and is a strategic supplier of petroleum, Israel drains the US economy and secures its petroleum from it.

Beginning in early 2007, the entire Zionist power configuration (ZPC) mobilized to block the US arms and military technology sales to Saudi Arabia.  Zionist pressure was so intense and its control over Congress was so evident to the White House and Pentagon that Defense Secretary Gates did not even try to counter the ZPC’s campaign in the US Congress. Instead he went straight to the ZPC’s control center in Israel and not with empty hands.

He pleaded with Israel to call off its American attack dogs in exchange for a 'donation’ of over $30 billion dollars in US military handouts to Israel over the next ten years. Olmert accepted Gates offer: The US had paid the price but still the ZPC did not turn over their hostage Congress.

President Bush and Secretary Gates were convinced that Israel would muzzle the Presidents of the Major American Jewish Organizations to allow the Saudi sale to go through. This did not happen. Why should it?

President Bush could not withdraw the well-publicized pay-off to Israel; it was already in the legislative books. He could not retaliate – the ZPC-controlled Congress would oppose any and all counter measures.

So Bush and Gates went ahead and sent the bill to Congress authorizing the $20 billion sales to Saudi Arabia, a trillion dollar economy with a two-bit military wholly dependent on its US military protector.

Immediately the ZPC rounded up its automatic 190 members of the House of Representatives to sign a letter opposing the sale.

The ZPC formulated the position embodied in the letter and oversaw its draft with the collaboration of its co-religionists in Congress.

Zionist Congress members Shelley Berkeley and Anthony Weiner teamed up with Michael Ferguson. The Zion-Cons claimed justifiably that they could mobilize over three quarters of the Congress on any issue affecting Israel’s 'security’. Zionist lawmakers claimed, "the sale would undermine Israel’s superiority in the region".

Every major independent military think tank would dispute this argument since Israel is the only nuclear power in the region, has the biggest and most technologically sophisticated air force and missile system, while Saudi Arabia and all the Gulf States have trouble even controlling local ground level bomb throwers.

There are two likely outcomes both demonstrating categorically that it is the ZPC that dictates US policies in the Middle East:

The military sales will not fly.

The military sale will be approved on conditions that Israel is privy to all its details and can modify or omit any part of the agreement.

The ZPC was even able to strong arm the Congress-people who have made a lifelong career out of aggressively promoting the interests of Big Oil (BO) and the Military Industrial Complex (MIC) to switch sides and vote against the sale of weapons to Saudi Arabia – BO’s strategic partner and the MIC’s best overseas customer.

Congress members from BO states like Texas and states with large military industries like California endorsed the ZPC letter prejudicing their constituents and big campaign financers. The feeble 'lobbying’ by BO and the MIC in favor of the White House were crushed by the ZPC Congressional juggernaut.

The major trade unions of the AFL-CIO, like the steel workers, machinists, oil and chemical workers, electrical workers – whose members’ jobs were at stake, did not protest, let alone challenge the ZPC, demonstrating the high degree of Zionist influence over the trade union bosses. The obvious point is that the Congress and the ZFL-CIO are both Zionist colonized institutions.

The issue is not whether the US should or should not sell arms to Saudi Arabia (I oppose all arms sales and the MIC and BO around the world). The fundamental issue is whether we, the citizens, the elected representatives and the trade unionists in the United States, can be free of foreign colonization to decide the issue.

The issue is whether we are or can be a free and independent nation or a subject of a tiny powerful elite acting for a foreign power.

The narrative on the US proposed multi-billion dollar arms sales to a wealthy third rate military power demonstrates once again that Israeli interests have priority over US trade, jobs and geopolitical interests. Secondly the narrative confirms that the Israeli state dictates US political relations in the Middle East through its US conduit – the ZPC. Finally it refutes the Zionist geo-politicians and 'oil’ and 'military experts’ who cover up for the ZPC by falsely blaming Big Oil for policies they oppose because it prejudices their strategic partnership.

By blackmail and deceit, the Israelis got their additional $30 billion dollars over the next ten years and they double-crossed 'their’ president by unleashing their Fifth Column to block his military sales to the Saudis.

And if Bush dares a complaint, he will be added to the list of 'anti-Semites’the only honorable list in his entire 8 years in office.

No votes yet

Submitted by Rhiannon on Mon, 2008-07-28 00:20

I didn't see the duplicate text.

But I'll tell you this, Sullivan, I am getting the hang of both the rich text editor and plain text editor.  I have found a way to use them together and that has helped to put items together more quickly.  Took a while to figure out.  Thank you again.

Rhiannon | Tue, 2008-07-29 14:59

You're probably right, or you are right  about this Hal Turner.   The text above the colored points do seem wild and silly especially if they are spoken in such over-the-top dramatic fashion. 

But the points below in color I agree with.

Saudi Arabia is quite weak, military-wise.  They have nothing on israel or the USA.  Nothing.  The question is, will the usa go so far as to cause such instability in Saudi Arabia [another lopsided gang war for israel] to completely take Her oil. 

Indeed, the zionist policies are all about the desired monopoly of such resources, indeed, all along, that was the intention and the aim land and resources of the Middle East.

While USA and israel continue their business in public and/or private with Arabian royalty, they stab that country in the back over and over again with their media. 

While USA and israel continue their business in public and/or private with Arabia royalty, they stab that country in the back over and over again with their media.  Saudi Arabia is aware of the vicious exaggerations and lies.  It's quite a bizarre "partnership", but understandable when you look at the insidious and dangerous long term goals of the zionists and the short term, immediate, foolish lusts of the arabian kings and princes.

Rhiannon | Tue, 2008-07-29 14:50

His sensationalist 'exclusives' tend to be nothing more than products of his fertile imagination.

Sullivan | Tue, 2008-07-29 07:06

But it's really all the same, regardless of who we name.

Hal Turner Show's expose of Bush's plan to invade S.A.?

SAUDI ARABIA IN BUSH CROSS-HAIRS!

IF OIL PRICES DO NOT START COMING DOWN; PLAN IN THE WORKS TO TAKE SAUDI ARABIA FOR ITS OIL

STUNNING news out of the Pentagon. The Hal Turner Show has learned that the Bush Administration, worried over continuing economic trouble in the USA, is planning a complete and permanent takeover of Saudi Arabia to take its vast oil reserves.

Much of the financial trouble in the USA is being driven by increasing oil costs and the US President believes taking (by force) the worlds largest oil reserves, would solve US economic woes and send a message to other OPEC nations their price-fixing party is over.

Last week's $21 Billion financial collapse of The Carlyle Group means the Bush family no longer has financial ties with the House of Saud and, according to other sources, the Bush family is looking to kick some Saudi ass rather than kiss it as they've had to do for years!

UPDATE 1032 HRS EDT, Sat. 15 March 2008

_The Bush Administration will "sell"_

_the American people on the idea of_

_taking Saudi Arabia via force by_

_using the following talking points:_

A Majority of the 9-11 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia

Saudi Arabia is a hotbed of Islamic fundamentalism preaching violence

The Saudi royal family plays both sides, cozying-up to the US while turning a willful blind eye to its own terrorists.

Saudi Arabia has not cooperated with US Terrorism investigations, from Khobar Towers to 9-11

Saudi Arabia has participated in willful price-fixing to raise our cost of oil

US military assets already in the Middle East are more than adequate to topple the Saudi royal family and put the country in chaos within hours.

Nepos Libertas | Sat, 2008-03-15 19:56
Rhiannon | Tue, 2008-07-29 07:00

Saudi prisons to replace Guantanamo

Sat, 26 Jul 2008

Saudi Arabia is to build five modern prisons in the kingdom to replace US Guantanamo detention facility, a new report has revealed.

Jordanian Al-Majd daily quoted unnamed sources as saying that US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and Saudi officials are cooperating to construct the prisons which are to replace Guantanamo and US secret prisons in Europe.

Riyadh is to spent about two billion Saudi Rials for the project which can accommodate up to 18000 inmates, they added.

http://mparent7777-1.livejournal.com/1058306.html

Greg Bacon | Mon, 2008-07-28 15:13

The funny thing is that these silly shills post such off the wall nonsense that it actually encourages us to debunk them with facts. On the other hand, they cannot refute the arguments when I post information on Zionist crimes, so have to resort to ad hominems - e.g. "idiot", "moron", "retarded", or "you created this whole thing just because you are anti-Semitic", etc.

Although "the Arabs" aren't the principal force in global terror, it would be reasonable to show how Arabic leaders or media are often no more than a controlled 'opposition' to Zionism. E.g. the Emir of Qatar founded Al Jazeera with a $150 million grant, and is pals with George W Bush and Rudi Giuliani.

October 16, 2001

Emir of Qatar Completes First Official Visit to the United States

His Highness Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifah Al-Thani completed his first visit to Washington during the Bush Administration, Tuesday, October 2 through Friday, October 5. [...] The Emir first stopped in New York to visit "ground zero", at which time His Highness gave a total of three million dollars in gifts to Mayor Giuliani.

Interesting that R. Giuliani got the $3 million in "gifts" within four weeks of the 9/11 attacks - that would be one way to pay off accessories and launder dirty money. They claim the money was earmarked for worthy causes such as the police and firemen’s survivors’ fund, but Zionists have a tendency to "lose" other people's money, often amounting to vast sums.

During his three-day Washington visit, the Emir met with several Administration members, including Secretary of State Colin Powell (the meeting was? followed by a brief press conference at the State Department's "C" Street entrance), Acting Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz (Secretary Rumsfeld was traveling in the Middle East), and Secretary of Energy Spencer Abraham.

Links to a few more Zionists...

On October 4, Vice President Cheney hosted the Emir and key members of his delegation at a luncheon at the White House, which was followed shortly thereafter by an hour-long meeting with President George W. Bush.

That article has now gone from Google's cache, but see it while it's still at the MSN cache.

Poseidon | Mon, 2008-07-28 11:19

Rhiannon,

You really nailed it, including the "intruder."

Peter Chamberlin | Mon, 2008-07-28 09:15

**********

You are well organized, Grim! :-)

 Poseidon's comment with links belong here as well:

 Saudi Arabia, King of the Terrorists?

So Saudi Arabia "created and funded all the terrorism in the world"?

It wasn't Saudi Arabia whose intelligence agents were arrested in New York within hours of the 9/11 attacks. It wasn't Saudi Arabia whose former Prime Minister said of the 9/11 attacks that they would be "very good" for his country's relations with (and thereby influence over) the US, a former P.M. who was a former unit team leader in an elite special forces unit, who was a friend of the man who took over the World Trade Center lease and insured for billions of dollars against terror attacks a mere six weeks before terror attacks did in fact occur and who then employed (to press for the insurance claim) a 'structural engineer' who thinks that steel loses half its strength at "400 degrees", a former P.M. whose father was a senior aide, secretary and pallbearer to a man who in 1937 was commander of the Irgun Tzvai Leumi, a terrorist organization responsible for atrocities such as the King David Hotel bombing.

It wasn't Saudi Arabia that attacked the USS Liberty, was caught red-handed in a failed false-flag terror attack in Egypt, or indeed had established a reputation for having the capability to stage false-flag terror attacks prior to 9/11, or whose loyal servant was CEO of a company that made "Flight Termination Systems" that could electronically hijack in-flight aircraft by means of a "Command Transmitter System", or whose operatives would write about a "transforming event" rather like Pearl Harbor" and would call for a "new Pearl Harbor" and regime change in Iraq secured by a premeditated attack or who sent two hours' advance warning of the 9/11 attacks via an instant messaging service.

It isn't Saudi Arabia that has nuclear weapons including submarines equipped with cruise missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads with a 900-mile range, or that has a massive spy ring in the USA capable of tapping into much of the telecoms network and using information obtained to blackmail Americans, or that has a powerful political lobby capable of extorting vast sums. It's not Saudi Arabia that crushes peace protesters to death with bulldozers or shoots them, or shells a picnicking family on a beach when it wants to launch a war, or warns civilians to flee after blowing up bridges so it can target them like sitting ducks using phosphorus and cluster bombs, or shoots at Red Cross ambulances or UN observers after promising they would be safe. There never was a Protocols of the Learned Elders of Saud, the Arabs didn't fabricate a hoax about "six million" of their people being "killed", and it wasn't the Arabs who killed Christ.

 

Poseidon | Mon, 2008-07-28 06:40
Rhiannon | Mon, 2008-07-28 04:03
Grim Reaper | Mon, 2008-07-28 03:51

Where the devil is Poseidon's comment with all those links of israeli crimes???

I can't seem to find it!

Rhiannon | Mon, 2008-07-28 03:45

stephen schwartz - "Hamas in Israel represents pure Wahhabism."

Tell me....is Hamas a part of the zionist conspiracy? 

Clever of  you to post the  work of this schwartz fellow.  Real clever.  Notice how he said israel....not the Palestinian Territories. 

There's a lot in this interview that can be picked apart.  For a Sufi Muslim, he sure speaks  pure zionist style.   

Now RIDDLE me this:  If wahabbism and zionism are bedfellows...then why are the zionists attacking the wahhabists? 

 

Rhiannon | Mon, 2008-07-28 03:33

Huh this is all rubbish! who wants to know about this information? Everyone knows about Israel nuclear and arm export from THE US! this is not new!

I am telling you Wahhabism-saudi arabia is the creator of terrorism! the creator of islamic terrorism! there mission is to show islam is evil! they been setup to destroy islam! a living cancer on earth! you are misleading the members of this blog with nonsence!

So stop replying with your nonsence!

 

Intruder | Mon, 2008-07-28 02:57

For the Truth!

Grim Reaper | Mon, 2008-07-28 01:32