My view of the Georgia-Russia conflict instigated by U.S. & Israel in an attempt to fracture SCO

I'll try to make this short and to the point, but I'm afraid that will defeat the purpose as I delve into explanation of geopolitical SNAFU.

For those unfamiliar, SCO stands for Shanghai Cooperation Organization. More on that later.

I trust the people who are wise to pursue alternative route to Internet news to find out the truth of what the hell is going on in South Ossetia. CNN, Fox News, MSNBC and broadcast news channels, as usual, fail to provide the fair and balanced analysis -- all they do is fumble and defer to "respected talking head" morons pretending to be experts explaining away the situation when they really know shit.

Here, I offer my view of what's really going on over there and how this is the fault of U.S. and Israel.

The fact is, the Western media obfuscates the truth with noisy propaganda blaming Russia as the sole aggressor in a bizarrely staged incident using Georgia as the "underdog of democracy" to provoke Russia to respond in anger like a bear's hibernation is disrupted.

The people at the White House and Zionised-to-the-core Department of State "eagerly jumped to the conclusion" to pin the blame on Russia's retaliationary attack as "disportionate and dangerous". What the hell are they smoking, haven't they wrecked enough havoc in Iraq and Afghanistan?

I wrote the article on this similar, albeit absurd, scenario earlier this year in March called "Red Alert: U.S.-Israel plan to attack Syria to provoke Iran to retaliate as excuse for new war".

For the recent conflict, it is alternatively called "Red Alert: U.S.-Israel plan to attack Ossetia through a proxy Georgia to provoke Russia to retaliate as excuse for new war". Replace Syria with Ossetia & Iran with Russia and you get the picture.

The Georgia-Russia war is nothing more than a proxy war for U.S. and Israel (one of the sources of the report, DEBRAfile, is likely Mossad-affilitated propaganda as Jerusalem-based media outlet specializing in intelligence and military news, so take it with a grain of salt) that had already trained and armed Georgia military with substantial foreign backing.

Cui bono -- who benefits? Oil-gas pipeline dispute under the inferno of geopolitical strife to detract Russia from "keeping its eyes" on Iran-West dispute over nuclear programme, so to speak.

Compounding the confusion are two videos below, one after the conflict begun and another one before that.

It's possible Israel needs the pipelines routed to its homeland through the balkanized Iraq land (Syria poses the problem for U.S.-Israel in providing the shortcut access, so Syria would have to be conquered to make that feasible).

To clarify the confusion arising from the real reasons for Georgia-Russia war, this is probably over coveting oil-gas resources to satisfy not only the shitty little country's insatiable greed for fuel in profiteering but alleviate that nation's energy crisis, just like Afghanistan was destroyed post 9-11 after Caspian oil deal failed to materialize under Taliban regime.

To provide more perspective on the relationship between Israel and oil and why there is the conception of "proxy war," here are three detailed posts written by leading WUFYS editor Qrswave for starters:

Yes, the War is for Oil - and the Oil is for israel

Hindsight is 20/20 - how israel duped US into fighting their wars

Did you know that by law the US guarantees israel's oil supply - no matter what?

All they need is a big event to light the fireworks and begin conquering the designated countries under false pretexts to plunder lucrative resources left and right and tootle the horn as the "hero". Sun Tzu was right, "All wars is based on deception."

Divide and conquer is an old strategy, and it will fail to materialize this time unless Neocon-Zionist cabal of Tel Aviv, London and Washington/New York have the tricks up their sleeve to escalate the situation that could precipitate WWIII.

Russia knows precisely what's going on because its hand was forced to intervene when Georgian troops invaded Ossestia to commit probable acts of genocide against the indigenous population and murder of a dozen or so Russian peacekeepers. Thus the natural response to commit to defense by counterattack with a considerably aggressive force.

Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili attends a ceremony during which he received an honorary Doctorate of Philosophy from Haifa University in northern Israel, during a conference about global energy and political trends, 31 October 2006. AFP PHOTO/GALI TIBBON (Photo credit should read GALI TIBBON/AFP/Getty Images)

Georgian president Mikhail Saakashvili, a proven Zionist puppet, counted on the militarily superior U.S. to intervene. What tiny backwater shithole country have the confidence to count on Western intervention to neutralize Big Bear?

Not only is it an incredibly stupid calculation but it may cost Georgia dear sovereignty as it gets pummeled mercilessly by Russian forces to repel Georgian invasion in its failed ambition to become the member of the "exclusive VIP club" NATO as an antagonist of Shanghai Cooperation Organization fighting over the regional oil-gas pipeline routing and access.

God damn USA and Israel for using Georgia as a puppet that ended up being annihilated by Russia's destructive bear swipe. It is obvious USA-UK-Israel waited for an opportunity to douse on the fire started by its misbehaving puppet.

Mother Russia will not tolerate such a provocation that led to yet another grievance in the senseless loss of life (thousands of innocent people dead in the carnage) at the hands of the aggressor backed by U.S. and Israel who could give a f*ck about Georgian/Russian/Ossetian lives as expendient to expand to the bigger war they desire so badly in order to forcibly divide the triumvirate of Russia-China-Iran by proxy wars engineered by USA and Israel.

It is astoundingly apparent U.S. chose to ignore the warnings of American Founding Fathers and early Presidents against the needless geopolitical interventioning, particularly Martin Van Buren, who stated in the First Inaugural Address in 1837:

"Our course of foreign policy has been so uniform and intelligible as to constitute a rule of Executive conduct which leaves little to my discretion, unless, indeed, I were willing to run counter to the lights of experience and the known opinions of my constituents. We sedulously cultivate the friendship of all nations as the conditions most compatible with our welfare and the principles of our Government. We decline alliances as adverse to our peace. We desire commercial relations on equal terms, being ever willing to give a fair equivalent for advantages received. We endeavor to conduct our intercourse with openness and sincerity, promptly avowing our objects and seeking to establish that mutual frankness which is as beneficial in the dealings of nations as of men. We have no disposition and we disclaim all right to meddle in disputes, whether internal or foreign, that may molest other countries, regarding them in their actual state as social communities, and preserving a strict neutrality in all their controversies. Well knowing the tried valor of our people and our exhaustless resources, we neither anticipate nor fear any designed aggression; and in the consciousness of our own just conduct we feel a security that we shall never be called upon to exert our determination never to permit an invasion of our rights without punishment or redress."

Counterproductive American geopolitical affairs meddling is the motivating factor for rising global anti-Americanism, which is a perfectly natural reaction in the beleaguered Middle East (except Israel, of course) and Russia (despite its intervention with ex-Soviet republic Chechnya to eliminate separatist factions).

No wonder the Bush Administration is arrogantly stubborn & incompentent on its insistence to provide support to the "underdog" and attack the Bear with the assistance of Corporate Media propaganda that refuse to clarify the situation but rather serve as the cheerleader of infantile "Us versus Them" mindset.

The way it is now, USA has once again prove to be the asshole of the world.

Submitted by Nepos Libertas on Mon, 2008-08-11 01:18

Look how the ziostaniacs are running from responsibility for training, arming, and provoking the Georgian attack: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1010224.html http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1010226.html http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1009946.html Just as they backed out of the Lebanon without getting their trespassing soldiers back or stealing the water of the Litani, ziostan is now back peddling from their support and provocation of their fellow khazars in the homeland of Joseph David Djugasvili (jew-son) - otherwise known as Joseph Stalin. There will be retaliation on ziostan for their intervention - maybe all the Georgian zionists can immigrate to ziostan to get their numbers up to the 6 million target. 8/8/8 will be remembered as the start of a great war.

Claymoremind | Mon, 2008-08-11 02:27

And who do you propose conquers Syria?  The US that can’t even conquer the city of Baghdad or the green zone… or Israel that couldn’t even enter  5 kilometers into Lebanon and can no longer get into Gaza except from the air?  To conquer land you need ground troops… so who do you propose will try to conquer Syria?  You only have 2 choices:  the US or Israel?  Would Israel walk into Syria and become vulnerable on all fronts including Iran?  I personally can’t imagine that.  By the way, some of the Israeli generals that were kicked out of the IDF after Israel’s defeat in front of Hezbollah in 2006, were sent to Georgia to train troops.

Georgian president Sakashvili is primarily a US puppet, not a Zionist puppet.  Indeed Washington is now occupied by Israel, but this has been the choice US politicians have made for their country.. and continue to make.  As far as I see it, what is happening in Georgia is part of the bigger imperial ‘re-arrangement’ of the world maybe.

Here is a comment I just placed moments ago in another post on Georgia:

It’s not about Zionists… and it’s not even about Georgians.  It’s about US imperialism.  The Georian president is a US clone.  Didn’t anyone hear his speech about the NWO 2 days ago when he first launched his attack on Ossetia?  Yes Israelis train the Georgians and sell them weapons, but the main financier of Georgia is the US.  I don’t think that the Russians are as interested in teaching the Georgians a lesson as they are interested in teaching Western Europe a lesson for its blind obedience to the US.  Western Europeans countries have basically all lined up behind Bush in terms of his ridiculous Iran policy and have shown total inability to put their foot down on the Iran war issue which is becoming very serious.  A major pipe line to Europe passes through Georgia to Western Europe… and without it, Europeans literally freeze in Winter.  A few years ago Russia gave Western Europe a taste of  what it would be like if it chose to ‘close the tap’… and the Europeans all started to behave properly… but they seem to have forgot that lesson.  Russia is also giving the US a taste of what could happen if the US allows an attack on Iran to take place.  Maybe Russia has chosen not to be a by-stander this time and is now positioning itself in response to US deployment in Eastern Europe, the Caspian area and the Persian Gulf.   Already 1 or 2 days ago,  as a result to the Russian response to the Georgian attack on Ossetia, the Georgians pulled away 1000 of their troops from Iraq.  On the first day of Georgia’s attack, the Georgian president was very haughty  and declared that Georgia was in full control and needed nothing from the world.  Today, the US puppet is begging for a cease-fire and for help.

In just a few days,  the situation for the US is different.  Is the US going to open the Iran front with a new front in Georgia open… not forgetting Iraq and Afghanistan on the military level… and the whole Middle East on the political level?  Will the US allow Israel to attack Iran now and possibly drag the US into a wider-than-anticipated conflict?  When the pipelines providing Western Europe with energy are at risk, the US and Israel will also lose the backing they have of their European allies.  For the US, it matters most in Afghanistan where the US is literally begging the Europeans for troops.

I frankly think that what is happening in Georgia is just part of a much larger conflict which Washington has created…and which is now starting to unfold.

Latest news I heard:

Russia bombed Radar station near Tiblisi and sunk a Georgian navy boat carrying missiles.

Cherifa Sirry | Mon, 2008-08-11 02:34

Obviously nuking Syria to make way for Caspian/Iraqi oil pipeline to Israel is out of the question.

The Zionists know they have worn out their playing cards in the game after Georgia fiasco. So, what is the new idea?

The only way to "re-conquer" the Middle East is using U.S. military forces armed with superior tactical strategies and advanced technologies.

How to do this? Easy: stage a false flag event to enrage Americans into chanting for war on a designated enemy, and reinstitute the draft in the Congress or on order of the White House.

Trick worked in the first two world wars and Vietnam. But with the mandatory draft dissolved thanks to the heroic efforts like Alaska senator Mike Gravel, the U.S. military is stretched thin by the prolonged wars on two fronts. The next war with Iran and/or Russia will prove to be the breaking point that will call for the reinstatement of the draft.

Israel has a limited number of the military force and it prefers to defend its homeland as a Zionist base while American soldiers are sent to the no man's land to perish.

Israel and Neocon traitors wants Americans and Brits ready to die for the cause -- if it means conquering Syria and Iran using conventional warfare. I'm sure with Iran having acquired Russian missile technology USA will be defeated and Israel (that is, Zionist headquarters and military bases) finally destroyed.

Otherwise, the easiest tactic is to just nuke the hostile nations, like General Douglas MacArthur proposed wiping out North Korea and even China during Korean War, for which he was unceremoniously fired by President Truman disturbed by MacArthur's jingoistically amoral, damn-it-all-and-get-it-over-with attitude.

I hope that after Georgia-Russia episode, USA and Israel re-think their priorities and not underestimate Russia again. Not even Western media propaganda can overcome to provide plausible excuses. If Zionists tried to play the game again, they will end up being exposed as the real enemies for which the joint forces of Russians and Iranians will serve the singular purpose to destroy the warmongers to restore peace to the region.

Nepos Libertas | Mon, 2008-08-11 03:21

Somebody translate please.

US Citizen in S. Ossetia says USA and Georgia responsible for starting violence

Nepos Libertas | Mon, 2008-08-11 06:21

If Georgia had succeeded in its aggression, Kristol would be comparing Saakashvili to George Washington.

Will Russia Get Away With It?

By WILLIAM KRISTOL
Published: August 10, 2008

In August 1924, the small nation of Georgia, occupied by Soviet Russia since 1921, rose up against Soviet rule. On Sept. 16, 1924, The Times of London reported on an appeal by the president of the Georgian Republic to the League of Nations. While “sympathetic reference to his country’s efforts was made” in the Assembly, the Times said, “it is realized that the League is incapable of rendering material aid, and that the moral influence which may be a powerful force with civilized countries is unlikely to make any impression upon Soviet Russia.”

“Unlikely” was an understatement. Georgians did not enjoy freedom again until 1991.

Today, the Vladimir Putins and Hu Jintaos and Mahmoud Ahmadinejads of the world — to say nothing of their junior counterparts in places like Sudan, Zimbabwe, Burma and North Korea — are no more likely than were Soviet leaders in 1924 to be swayed by “moral influence.” Dictators aren’t moved by the claims of justice unarmed; aggressors aren’t intimidated by diplomacy absent the credible threat of force; fanatics aren’t deterred by the disapproval of men of moderation or refinement.

The good news is that today we don’t face threats of the magnitude of Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union. Each of those regimes combined ruthless internal control, a willingness to engage in external aggression, and fervent adherence to an extreme ideology. Today these elements don’t coexist in one place. Russia is aggressive, China despotic and Iran messianic — but none is as dangerous as the 20th-century totalitarian states.

The further good news is that 2008 has been, in one respect, an auspicious year for freedom and democracy. In Iraq, we and our Iraqi allies are on the verge of a strategic victory over the jihadists in what they have called the central front of their struggle. This joint victory has the potential to weaken the jihadist impulse throughout the Middle East.

On the other hand, the ability of Syria, Hezbollah and Hamas to get away with murder (literally), and above all the ability of Iran to pursue its nuclear ambitions effectively unchecked, are setbacks for hopes of peace and progress.

And there is no evidence that China’s hosting of the Olympics has led to moderation of its authoritarianism. Meanwhile, Russia has sent troops and tanks across an international border, and now seems to be widening its war against Georgia more than its original — and in any case illegitimate — casus belli would justify.

Will the United States put real pressure on Russia to stop? In a news analysis on Sunday, the New York Times reporter Helene Cooper accurately captured what I gather is the prevailing view in our State Department: “While America considers Georgia its strongest ally in the bloc of former Soviet countries, Washington needs Russia too much on big issues like Iran to risk it all to defend Georgia.”

But Georgia, a nation of about 4.6 million, has had the third-largest military presence — about 2,000 troops — fighting along with U.S. soldiers and marines in Iraq. For this reason alone, we owe Georgia a serious effort to defend its sovereignty. Surely we cannot simply stand by as an autocratic aggressor gobbles up part of — and perhaps destabilizes all of — a friendly democratic nation that we were sponsoring for NATO membership a few months ago.

For that matter, consider the implications of our turning away from Georgia for other aspiring pro-Western governments in the neighborhood, like Ukraine’s. Shouldn’t we therefore now insist that normal relations with Russia are impossible as long as the aggression continues, strongly reiterate our commitment to the territorial integrity of Georgia and Ukraine, and offer emergency military aid to Georgia?

Incidentally, has Russia really been helping much on Iran? It has gone along with — while delaying — three United Nations Security Council resolutions that have imposed mild sanctions on Iran. But it has also supplied material for Iran’s nuclear program, and is now selling Iran antiaircraft systems to protect military and nuclear installations.

It’s striking that dictatorial and aggressive and fanatical regimes — whatever their differences — seem happy to work together to weaken the influence of the United States and its democratic allies. So Russia helps Iran. Iran and North Korea help Syria. Russia and China block Security Council sanctions against Zimbabwe. China props up the regimes in Burma and North Korea.

The United States, of course, is not without resources and allies to deal with these problems and threats. But at times we seem oddly timid and uncertain.

When the “civilized world” expostulated with Russia about Georgia in 1924, the Soviet regime was still weak. In Germany, Hitler was in jail. Only 16 years later, Britain stood virtually alone against a Nazi-Soviet axis. Is it not true today, as it was in the 1920s and ’30s, that delay and irresolution on the part of the democracies simply invite future threats and graver dangers?

Greg Bacon | Mon, 2008-08-11 10:38

Georgian Zionist Jews and various Z.O.G.s pretending to aid of Iranian Sunni Muslims (South Ossetian Oblast) against Russian Lubavicth Zionists over control of an Oil Distribution hub. Meanwhile this will trigger an Oil Shock! The magnitude remains to be seen. A manufactured energy crises with highly energy dependent nations suffering the most. Throw in economic callaspe and you have your nightmare scenario.

Chess! Zionist and Patriot Georgians (dupes) backed by US Military Zionist controlled attacking Iranian Sunni Muslims (South Ossetian Oblast) patriotic tribal dupes against Russian Lubavicth Zionists over control of an Oil Distribution hub. All being managed to create a trigger event (see Barnets Lecture) creating an oil shock scenario. Oil Shock or Peak Oil (new name for con game) is the greatest weapon! Direct attack against all humans by cutting off the lifeline of energy. If the ruling group allows this cover story to develop it is the perfect quiet weapon for quite wars. Massive depopulation. Leaving the weatlh of the world in tact! No one will ever put all the pieces together and see it as a global psyc-ops. The one government has just begun to actively bring about their control to the forefront.

LatinAmericanview | Mon, 2008-08-11 15:16

How long before the MOSSAD computer geeks come up with a video that shows Bin Laden or some other aL-CIA-duh flunky, speaking out about S. Ossetia?

Naturally, it will be one of the Jewish Media Groups, SITE or IntelCenter, that first "discovers" this message.

Greg Bacon | Mon, 2008-08-11 16:35

Tag Cloud

Popular content