You are here

Who you going to believe, the NIST report or your lying eyes?

If you think the media or our government has given us the answers, think again. If you think this can’t happen again, think again. Seven years later most Americans haven’t even heard of Tower 7. Seven years later, most Americans don’t know thousands more of those rescue workers are sick, and many are dying from their exposures at Ground Zero. Seven years later, the FBI still hasn’t listed Osama Bin Laden as “wanted” for the 9/11 attacks. This is incredible–they are the lead investigators, and they don’t have enough evidence to put him on the “most wanted” list for those attacks? So, why do so many Americans believe he was behind it? Why are we at war over it? Do you know what evidence there is? The destruction of evidence, obstruction of justice, incomplete answers, and abysmal accountability is disgusting and unacceptable.

Remember those horrendous pictures of the jets slamming into WTC 1 & 2? Remember those huge fireballs? Remember all of that crashing down, thousands of tons of dusty debris hit the NY streets, yet the FBI was able to recover intact, a passport from one of the alleged hijackers, Satam Suqami, a passport that showed NO signs of fire or of damage. Amazing, that a fire that could melt steel and titanium couldn't affect a paper passport!

So, this passport had to survive the initial fireball without a singe, fly out of the building, and remain in a safe place because it was found after the debris from the buildings blanketed the area.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

How about the recent "investigation" by NIST, who insisted that there was no explosives like themite used in the towers. So, who you going to believe, NIST or your lying eyes?

NIST denies the existence of molten metal even though we have video and photographic evidence suggesting otherwise. We also have witness testimony from FDNY firemen themselves. Jet fuel and content fires do not produce the temperatures necessary to produce molten steel - that is why NIST has to deny the very presence of molten metal. This is not small stuff. This is a “smoking gun.” NFPA very clearly states melted steel or concrete is a sign of exotic accelerants. Therefore, the debris should have been thoroughly analyzed for exotic accelerants, specifically Thermite.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

No molten metal. NIST? No molten concrete, NIST?

Tell me, NIST how can a fire burn hotter than the on site contents and what residual jet fuel that might of survived the initial crash?

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

We are not implying the improbable is impossible. As professional firefighters, we have seen many things from fire, accident and crime scenes that don’t “make sense”. What we are suggesting is that there is more than sufficient evidence to doubt the “official” government story. There was no reason to destroy the very steel from all three towers that would have aided in the investigation. There is no reason to withold vast amounts of evidence that would very clearly support or disprove their version (ie: hard evidence proving the make/model/specific registration numbers from the aircraft, or the complete collection of the Pentagon vidoes, specifically any images of a commercial jet flying into the Pentagon). There is a large body of physical, photographic, audio, witness testimony and video evidence that directly contradicts the “official” story. We challenge you to really look at what the goverment has presented versus what many independent researchers have produced.

All of the above and more, from the recently created
Firefighters for 9/11 Truth

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer