Obama is our worst nightmare. At least McAIPAC would be easier to oppose. The establishment wins either way. You don't think they would allow a possibility of loss, do you?

or foreign money, or stolen money, or somehow otherwise suspicious...

Colin Powell endorsed Obama a bit ago, serious coup for Obama...

The jihadist vote (extracts)
Frank Gaffney, Wash Times, Oct 14 2008
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/oct/14/the-jihadist-vote/

Last week, Barack Obama's campaign was burned yet again for its dalliance with Islamists - those who embrace Islam's repressive theo-political-legal code known as Shariah and who are working for its triumph in the West in general and the US in particular. The episode is but the latest indication that the Democratic candidate hopes to win the White House by relying, in part, on the Jihadist vote. NBC reported Thursday that the Obama campaign's latest radical "Muslim outreach coordinator," Mouha Husaini, met last month in one of Washington's Northern Virginia suburbs -- the heart of what has been dubbed the "Wahhabi Corridor" -- with her predecessor, Mazen Asbahi, who had to resign this summer due to his own associations with Shariah. Even more problematic was the presence at the Springfield event of two prominent Muslim Brotherhood operatives: Mahdi Bray of the Muslim American Society (MAS) and Nihad Awad of the Council of American Islamic Relations (CAIR). As I pointed out, in a debate on Tuesday with a man associated with both organizations, and arguably the Bush administration's senior Muslim official, Suhail Khan, the Brotherhood is an instrument the Islamists have been using to foster a Fifth Column in America. Its stated purpose in this country is to "destroy Western civilization from within." According to NBC, even other attendees expressed concern that the Obama campaign was reaching out to such "politically radioactive" individuals as Messrs. Bray and Awad.

Unfortunately, this is hardly the only association of this type. A Federal Election Commission (FEC) employee has reportedly been warning for months about evidence that the Obama campaign has received as much as $200m, almost half of his total donations, in amounts less than $200. That is below the threshold for donor information Mr. Obama has chosen to report to the FEC -- unlike the Clinton and McCain campaigns, which have reported all donor information. Of the $200m, between $30m and $100m are from the Mideast, Africa and other places Islamists are active. It is unclear whether, as seems likely, these funds come not only from Wahhabis, Muslim Brotherhood types and jihadists of other stripes but from non-US citizens. Such contributions would be not only worrying but illegal. Although the FEC has studiously ignored the problem to date, the matter finally appears to be the subject of a formal complaint by the Republican National Committee. Unfortunately, even if the commission finally bestirs itself to investigate the facts, it seems unlikely to render a finding before the jihadists' and others' votes are counted. Then there is the Democratic candidate's get-out-the-vote effort. In addition to the prospect that its "Arab-Americans for Obama" effort is recruiting Muslim Brotherhood elements to enhance turnout, the Obama campaign is trolling for voters in problematic places. Some are felons in prison systems long used by Islamists as centers for recruiting converts to their causes. Some, thanks to a radical group known as ACORN with which Barack Obama has had ties for many years and that has a serial problem with vote-registration fraud, are homeless. Their attitude toward the Islamist agenda, or for that matter any other aspect of national policy, can only be surmised.

Finally, there are the various well-known Islamists with whom Barack Obama has long had ties and/or who are actively promoting his campaign. These include: a former Black Panther convert to radical Islam who calls himself Khalid al-Mansour; an aggressive promoter of Wahhabi influence operations, Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal; a virulently anti-Israel and pro-suicide bomber Palestinian professor named Rashid Khalidi; and Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, who in a speech last February called Sen. Obama "the messiah". Even Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi has got into the act, describing Mr. Obama as "a black citizen of Kenyan African origins, a Muslim" (Philip Berg's contention) and declares ominously that "people in the Arab and Islamic world and in Africa ... may even have been involved in legitimate contribution campaigns to Obama." The next three weeks afford the American people - and the media, the courts and the FEC - an opportunity to get to the bottom of Barack Obama's ties to and affinity for jihadists who have their own reasons for relishing his promise of "change" for this country. Unfortunately, the change his Islamist supporters have in mind is for global theocratic rule under Shariah, and the end of our constitutional, democratic government.

Q, you are relapsing again  with Obimbo's charm .... it's time again for those dirty pics to wake U up!!

Here's Mcgoo

 Both of 'em .... #0000ff">zion approved slaves!!

...even though I cannot in conscience vote for him. (You know where I stand.)

McCain is a terrible choice, probably even worse than the impeachable and disastrous Bush 43 administration.

The only one thing I don't agree with Obama is gun control, but since I'm not a one-issue voter, I'll let Obama slip despite his contradictory attitude towards the U.S. Constitution as a former constitutional law professor.

I get mail (four) from NRA pleading for my money to donate to attack Obama's stance on gun control.

I will write back to tell them to shove it after NRA endorsed McCain instead of Bob Barr or Chuck Baldwin. I will tell them I may not be renewing membership and their absurdly narrow-minded attitude will prompt me to support Gun Owners of America further.

The reason why I hold NRA membership is for training programs. NRA's neoconservative politiking piss me off.

I may hate Obama's sucking up to Israel, but I hope for Obama's election if the third party cannot win enough votes, so America will not have to endure the pain of Neoconservative legacy again.

Neoliberalism, on the other hand, is another subject to discuss perhaps later.