For some reason i feel compelled to form a cogent argument to justify my position. That is most unlike me, usually i am content in simply knowing i am right.
Truth be told, i am sick and tired of being right and getting screwed anyway. Thats why i bother to take the time to hammer out my shrill and strident sounding screeds. I really want things to be different. And not just different, i want things to be better
Anyway, I learned about this whole Zionism scheme fairly recently, during the democratic primary to be specific. It was a most surreal time in American politics.
I am something of an insomniac, always have been, so even though i live on the west coast it is not an unusual thing for me to be up at 3 AM. So, having been a news junkie for decades i would turn on MSNBC, because while they have some of the highest ranking Zionist propagandists they also have some decent and honest folks on staff as well, and i know the difference so am able to filter the wheat from the chaff so to speak...but i digress..
It was truly a bizzare experience to watch 'contract on America' henchman (and likely un-indicted murderer) former FL representative Joe Scarborough stumping for Hillary Rodham Clinton. Oh and it gets better, regular Morning Joe propagandist and Knight of Malta Pat Buchannon, who once accused HRC of being mossad joining in cheering for Clinton every fucking morning. I just couldnt get my mind around it. Until the Rev Wright story broke that is, prompting Scarboroughs shrill protestations and cries of anti-semitism which led to my own personal awakening to the Zionist mafia's doings.
So when Zio-douchebag Richard Mellon-Scaife, who used his propaganda machine to ferociously attack Bill Clinton for getting a blow job endorsed HRC it came as no surprise, and in fact it illuminated the reason for their attack against her husband over nothing, to soften up the public and give the likudniks in congress bogus cover for not impeaching Bush and Cheney. Thats my read on it anyway, you may have a different perspective.
On to the ninja stuff. Remember when Obama dropped Samantha Power like a hot potato after that Scottish paper reported that she referred to HRC as a monster? Total stealth move...they knew what they were doing, Power knew the comment would be picked up.
Why would Obama NEED distance from Ms. Power?
This little gem is posted at Israeli Insider
A video clip from a 2002 interview reveals Power calling for US moves that "might mean alienating a domestic constituency," she snickered coyly, "of tremendous political and financial import", candidly calling for "sacrificing ... billions of dollars not in servicing the Israeli military but rather investing in the new state of Palestine" and in a "mammoth protection force."
Noah Pollack of Commentary and Ed Lasky of American Thinker who early wrote about Power and her views about Israel, Palestine and A... here and here and posted the video clip above as "Power Uncut." But the full, truly uncut, 58 minute interview, screened on April 29,2002 with Harvey Kreisler of the Institute for International Studies at UC Berkeley doing the interview on "Conversations with History," is available here. It may prove to be history that Power and Obama would prefer to be suppressed.
Next time: more ju jitsu, dodging Rev Wright..
Submitted by Shootingsparks on Sun, 2008-10-26 02:46
- Shootingsparks's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 96 reads
-
not Zbigniew Brzezinski...
It certainly takes more effort than simple copy and pasting which some have taken to the extreme, although you may be accused of some type of "fanboyism" for realizing Obama is the better choice. I remember clearly how hard it was that Obama even got the nomination, and how the most of the Zionists I see on television or know about or well those that I know personally had disdain for Obama and preferred Clinton. Although it was very hard for me to watch Obama in front of AIPAC this year groveling, and picking Biden probably had something to do with helping secure that particular constituency, part of me says well sometimes you do what you have to do.
It also tells me that these events (elections) are not totally controlled only very strongly manipulated by various powers, I think McCain was an idiot for not picking Lieberman, even though I can't stand him, I think he would be doing much better now if he had.
I watched recently on the Real News interviews with Chomsky and Zinn (which I highly recommend watching), and although I have some very serious reservations about Chomsky and some doubts about Zinn, their views on this election still make some sense. Obviously if we are to have some real "Transformational" change, we the people need to do it ourselves, thats why this election is not about Obama as the media and his opponents and maybe even some here would like to have us believe it is the hope and oppurtunity for real change, the creation of an environment where through protest, organization we can press for an end to this war, and hopefully an end to Obama's ridiculous send more troops into Afghanistan idea. In a way he seems better because it seems like he will cave in to public pressure more especially if it is coming from his base, unlike a McCain or Bush who doesn't feel that pressure because that's not their base so they can ignore opposition, whereas with Obama his opposition would be the crazy nuts out there who want to nuke 'em all and take the oil.
This is a real no-brainer and instead of fighting over every stupid allegation that comes up against Obama we should instead be planning for the future to get something done, but I understand that we have been stuck for so long in this mode of just trying to stop the bad things from happening that it is hard for some people to shift gears and start coming up with something new, so yes with much love and props to the West Coast, We are the Change we have been waiting for.
thank you for your thoughtful response
Another cricket orgy I see.
Par for the course.
Enjoy, Spanky!
because that dude's full of shit.
A withdrawal timetable is 'dangerous', free healthcare is 'socialism', blah blah blah. What a wanker.
Your response is exactly what i expected to get from some quarters. I staked out a position, and stand ready to defend it with facts, Your response it complete shit...total agitprop and nonsense. You have apparently staked out no position, other than anti voting...
or some damn thing...
Yea it was in mockery of spanky the disruptor. Every time he posts one of his slathering Oreobamessiah suckfest sessions, I'll respond with some right wing material for balance.
Because that's what mr. google image search spank 'n Shoot wants and needs. Conflict.
Oreobamessiah ...wow playdough..
honestly i hadnt heard that one before.....you are seriously fucked up
and jeez, i thought my content was better than that, and incedentially, i didnt even mention Obama till the last paragraph...so, not only is your description of my post nakedly racist it is factually inaccurate.
Spanky:
Did you say nakedly racist?
Enjoy the tit for tat