In case you thought there was going to be CHANGE - A record number of Jews in CONGRESS!!

For those of you naive enough to think that OBAMA and the Democrats are going to bring about any significant CHANGE in the ZOG (zionist Occupied Government), the Jerusalem Post has another plan:


A record number of Jews in Washington?

"Forget Mr. Smith - this year, Mr. Stein is going to Washington.

With an expected nationwide surge in Democratic turnout for Tuesday's US presidential elections, the number of Jews elected to Congress may reach record-levels.

With Jewish candidates positioning to match the 2006 record of 30 House members and 13 senators, Democrats are hoping to capture at least four new House districts - including Alaska's lone House seat, contested by would-be freshman Ethan Berkowitz, and another from the Phoenix area.

On the Republican side, Rep. Eric Cantor, a four-term congressman from Virginia who is currently the GOP's chief deputy whip, is rumored to be in the running for minority leader in the expected post-election changeover. The Senate total of Jewish leaders is expected to remain unchanged. ..."

AND THAT"S NOT EVEN COUNTING THE CRYPTOS!!!

Here's your CHANGE!

Submitted by Claymoremind on Tue, 2008-11-04 21:44

Effective photo there! 

The Great Revealer | Tue, 2008-11-04 21:53

For the record:

I never said OBAMA was going to CHANGE anything.  He may very well ride with the tide and go with the flow, as to not agitate his jewish neocon advisors..

I have been saying that CHANGES will occur while he is in office, or for that matter, regardless of who is in office.

However, it looks like Obama will be the one elected, and he will be there while the changes occur.

This is what I have been saying all along.

Rhiannon | Tue, 2008-11-04 22:11

 I think CMM  was refering to  & that will be Satan'sSeed or SS ;)

musique | Tue, 2008-11-04 22:15

No, I wasn't referring to you and I've even said positive things about Obama. I just know that there will be no significant change. Until we address the problem - zionist control - America is destined to be bled like the parasitic host that it is.

Claymoremind | Tue, 2008-11-04 22:27
McCain was just too much of a creepy clown from every side you look at him. 
 
What a predicament for Obama.  If he lets America down, he will pay more dearly than we can imagine.  Actually, he may be screwed either way.
 
 What a place to be. 
 
 He's at the top of the rollercoaster and the rails have been detached.
 
Meanwhile, Nader  [interviewed on Fox News] says America should hold Obama's feet to the fire.  I agree.  But which fire is that actually going to be?  The #993300">"christian" zionist fire, pro-israel foreign policy fire#993300"> or the #993300">anti-zionist #993300">fire?  Of course there are other fires, but they are mostly intertwined. 
 
He also mentions Obama possibly becoming an Uncle Tom.
 
And here in this video, Nader accuses Obama of talking "White".
    

Rhiannon | Wed, 2008-11-05 06:17

I did a post about this not long ago. The Senate is 13% Jewish, compared to the national percentage of just over 2%, and there are already 29 Jews in the House - only one Jew shy of the 2006 record of 30.

Washington is swamped with Jews, even though the Jewish population of Washington DC itself is only 0.7% - much less than the national percentage of 2.2%.

So the Senate is 13% Jewish, and the population of Washington is only 0.7%. Going by the population of Washington, Jews are over-represented in the Senate by a factor of 18.

Crimes of Zion | Wed, 2008-11-05 06:45

in that video that Rhiannon posted just above in this thread.

But I would say that the 'petrodollar-weapondollar coalition' (to borrow a phrase from economists Nitzan & Bichler) is squarely behind the GOP, and the other, lighter or more consumer-oriented industries are largely behind the Dems.

When a major crisis comes, my argument is, the functional sectors of the economy are forced to compete against one another, and this they do by using the political parties as proxies. War versus peace issues are often settled in this way, hence the popular perception that one party is the 'war party' and the other, if not exactly a 'peace party', is not as bellicose. This is not a 100% illusion. It reflects real, major choices that the economy as a whole has to make, regarding its overall industrial investment priorities - choices in which individual members of the ruling class have as great a personal stake, almost, as everybody else. Some of them can more easily move 'offshore' than others, I admit, but again, this indicates real divisions within the ruling class.  

RowanBerkeley | Wed, 2008-11-05 13:13

Tag Cloud

Popular content