A while back there was heated discussion on the "authenticity" of Eric Hufschmid & clan. Quite honestly, throughout the years I had a natural adversion to them (i.e. didn't bother with their website, reminded me of Alex "Death Cult" Jones, Amy "The Goods" Goodman, Michael "The Mole" Moore).
Well, it seems an appropriate time we review this matter, as over time more of their inconsistencies and counterproductive actions, allow us to better judge.
Please continue share your knowledge and opinions (supporting by credible evidence) on this matter, so the rest of us "goyim" can benefit.
(Removed the likely false accusation/suggestion Poisedon was involved with EH. No sufficient evidence.)
Submitted by The Great Revealer on Tue, 2008-11-18 04:37
- The Great Revealer's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 185 reads
-
So we establish with credible evidence Eric Schmidt is a Zionist Gatekeeper.
What about Chris Bollyn?
What about Daryl Bradford Smith?
Smith & Bollyn's work is some of the best out there. Hufschmid's always been the problem child. Once in a while he makes an interesting or funny point but the guy's a joke overall.
This is`nt going to go down well with the "we`re all humans-happy-clappers",but my own political philosophy is the following:
1.Never trust a Jew about anything.
2.Never trust someone who trusts Jews.
Follow these simple rules,and you won`t go far wrong.
On a related matter,the "codex alimentarius" controversy has a Jew at the head of it,and guess what?
She is only advocating "amending" the legislation(because it`s impostion on us is "inevitable".
Back to the original article,I`d like to know why the "no-planes"
hypothesis is so wrong,given that the medias footage of the plane strikes is demostrably fake,and given the dearth of plane wreckage at the "crash" sites et al....
Whether Judy Wood is a fake,I have`nt looked into(but she does look Jewish:) ),but as the article states,to spread lies,some truth has to put in to the mix as well.The stuff on her website(pictures in particular) can`t all be tosh.
As to Morgan Reynolds being an "obvious shill",again,I don`t know,but lets at least try and fault his arguments and research if we`re going to write him off for his past association to government.
Please Sir,can I have some more (soylent green)?
(Removed the likely false accusation/suggestion Poisedon was involved with EH. No sufficient evidence.)