Never has one group had so much power over so many millions, smug in the knowledge that - whoever runs Congress - they always win.
The tone of the U.S.-Israel relationship remains the same whoever controls Congress, but Democratic pledges to stringently oversee the Iraq war could affect how the United States confronts Iran.
* * *
Bipartisan support for Israel would be constant, Jewish and Israeli officials said, defying a pre-election barrage of Republic[an] Jewish Coalition ads that insisted that the Democratic Party’s support for Israel was eroding.
“It’s clear the 110th Congress will continue America’s long tradition of staunch support for a strong, safe and secure Israel and an abiding relationship between the United States and our most reliable ally in the Middle East,” said Josh Block, a spokesman for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.
Deadlock between Congress and the White House “will influence domestic policy — immigration, health care, taxes, social policies, the Supreme Court. It won’t influence foreign policy, with the possible exception of Iraq,” said Danny Ayalon, the Israeli ambassador to Washington, who is finishing his term. “For sure, not the U.S.-Israel relationship.”
What say we burst this bastard's bubble?
They deserve a harsh lesson for what they did in Iraq and plan to do in Iran.
And what they plan for others who don't cower to their whim . . .
Hadar Susskind, Washington director for the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, said that, like Israel, Darfur — the region of Sudan where government-allied militias have massacred tens of thousands of civilians — presents opportunities for bipartisan cooperation.
“Darfur is going to be a great test for Nancy Pelosi,” the California Democrat who leads the party and is set to become speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, “and the House Democrats on how they intend to work with the president and the House minority, because there’s a tremendous amount of agreement.”
Bush is considering imposing sanctions on Sudan if it does not allow in U.N. peacekeepers by Jan. 1. U.S. Jewish groups have led the movement to bring relief to the troubled region.
We must act, before they do us in.

pardon me.
thanks!
How is it that I've never seen this before (and I've seen a lot!)???
WTF is going on??? Where the hell is the 'ACLU'???
I had heard some Jews claim that a 'righteous Gentile' is one who lives by Noah's laws for all humanity. Other Jews believe that all Gentiles are lower than amimals and worth less than dung.
I was a bit shocked when I read the above comment about the Noah's Laws, and checked and discovered that it's true! But now that I think about it, it fits in with everything else going on in America. But the nastiest Zionists despise all goyim, and use their entertainment industry to try to steer the sheeple (goyim) away from a righteous lifestyle.
Am I the only one who's clueless, here?
I had no idea about all this stuff (except the false flags, which are fairly apparent to anyone who's familiar with the Mossad's MO).
all this information about Bush's geneology is good and well.
however, it's not important WHAT he calls himself, or what anyone calls themselves.
What's important is WHAT they do.
ACTIONS speak louder than WORDS.
Whether or not Bush is "Jewish" is inconsequential.
What matters is that he's a good for nothing, bloodthirsty criminal and must be brought to justice.
And Jews should not be singled out for their Jewishness - God forbid. That would be like saying all Christians are crusaders, etc.
Not only is it not helpful - because most people despise racism, but it is also categorically wrong and unjust.
It is important, however, to note how Bush and family intermarry, etc. - keeping the wealth within the Klan - TRIBALISM - that's what's evil.
The willingness to do whatever it takes to advance the interests of the TRIBE.
I think I saw it - but, thanks for bringing it to my attention.
It's a great site and he's a fabulous writer, as is Joanna whose work is often featured there as well.
I'll look for the piece you mentioned - got a link?