My 22 questions to Obama Transition Team on Change.gov

I am not ashamed to say I am a nationalist who puts America first. Here are the questions I posed for Obama Transition Team. I am not able to link to the list of my questions but you can find the roll of questions by search engine or popularity at this Change.gov page. The site stops accepting questions on Midnight, December 12th.

By the way, the parentheses at the end of some questions indicate the digit in form of "like this question | don't like this question" - number of votes by the time of this publication.

The most popular questions by votes will be answered by Obama Transition Team soon.

___________________

"Will you curb the influence by the lobbyists and agents for the State of Israel concerning foreign policy directive? Will United States gov return to a truly independent sovereign nation without the unwarranted, dangerous influence of foreign powers?" (21 | 8)

"Would you be willing to remove marijuana (cannibis) from Schedule I to decriminalize possession and regulate distribution through licensed vendors similar to liquor license? Will you modify DEA's power by directive to respect lawful users' rights?" (17 | 0)

"Will you grant amnesty to non-violent drug users convicted of possessing marijuana to reduce the overload in prisons across the nation and save or divert billions in state & federal operating costs towards viable treatment program?" (12 | 0)

"When the goal of green energy is achieved by drastically reducing dependence on foreign oil, will you return to neutrality with Saudi Arabia that have exceedingly poor human rights record and curb Saudi influence in the U.S.?" (10 | 4)

"Will you be willing to close dozens of U.S. military bases around the world to reduce operating costs and cut the Pentagon's budget in half or less to divert the taxpayer's money towards achieving peace, economic stability and positive programs?"

"Will you support the plan to reduce Federal Reserve's power to loan money and charge U.S. Government (subsidized by taxpayers) at interest and re-institute Executive Order 11110 authored and signed by President Kennedy? Google "executive order 11110"" (4 | 1)

"Will you respect the concept of lawful concealed carry for defensive purposes by not interfering with the Second Amendment as well as some state constitutions that grant the right to bear arms with the approval of the restrictive gun control bill?" (4 | 1)

"Will you be willing to close Federal Reserve if such a bill is passed to abolish this non-governmental institution that harms our American economy and hijacks our capitalist and monetary systems for its ends?(H.R. 2755 introduced by Rep. Ron Paul)" (6 | 5)

"Will you support homeschooling as a legitimate educational alternative on grounds of religious/moral belief, intellectual development of children and/or mistrust of bureaucratic authority, especially state propaganda & teacher union?" (5 | 4)

"Will you work towards achieving the goal of investing to accelerate affordable alternative energy to reduce U.S.'s dependence on foreign oil using billions of dollars in taxpayer money? Anti-trust on pro-carbon automakers that prevent green progress?"

"Would you be willing to repeal the trade agreements such as North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) to maintain the economic and moral integrity of the sovereign nation without excess outsourcing?"

"Will you agree to prosecute George W. Bush, Karl Rove, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Douglas Feith, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle and other members of the Neoconservative Cabal directly complicit in torture & Iraq War planning by abrogating the Constitution?"

"Will you abolish the embargo with Cuba to resume the diplomatic relations with Cuba on fair trade & other benefits that will help Cuba develop its economy rapidly in spite of government model disagreeable to US's idea of liberty? US trades with PRC."

"Will you be willing to negotiate with Iran diplomatically for peace and trade without attuning to Israel's unreasonable demands that Iran be dealt with harshly, even by warfare? Iran does NOT have a nuclear weapon and threats do NOT work."

"Will you respect the purpose of Second Amendment by not interfering with the upstanding, lawful American people's right to own cache of semi-automatic pistol & assault rifle for defense against violent trespassers during food riots & financial chaos?"

"Will you deal with the illegal immigration crisis by the plan to deport them to their home countries (no path to citizenship), build stronger borders and repeal Open Immigration Act of 1965? Real Americans need better JOB SECURITY to re-build economy" (4 | 6)

"Will you works towards repaying the national and trade debt to modify the relationship with People's Republic of China vis-a-vis trade policy? China should not influence the US on forced trade concessions favorable to China because of excessive debt"

"Will you ask Israel to stop being ambiguous about its nuclear warhead arsenal and nuclear development program in Dimona & elsewhere? That Israel be accountable with the agreement to sign Non-Proliferation Treaty? (Same apply to Pakistan and India.)"

"Assuming national and trade debts are paid off in seven years (two terms), will you overhaul policy w/ the world on tariff, &c. to keep American jobs safe and make U.S. the most sound and robust economic superpower on Earth?"

"Will you resist the influence of Neoliberalism by respecting national sovereignty in countries by ordering the CIA to cease its operations that violate human rights and stop meddling with state affairs in favor of US business interest?"

"How will you prepare America for catastrophic climate changes caused by Earth's pole shift during the orbital transition of Nibiru aka Planet X towards the end of 2012? Will you order police state to intrude on prepared people's rights? (YouTube it)"

Submitted by Nepos Libertas on Fri, 2008-12-12 02:01

Great job of covering a wide range of subjects. I would add a 23rd question:

"Will you reconvene a true 9/11 investigation and admit the obvious realities?  That steel and concrete buildings do not fall into their own footprints because of fire, especially one not hit by an airplane?  That "Al-CIA-Duh" is a concoction of U.S. propaganda?  Will you end the wars (and potential wars) based on such lies?" 

Bottoming out that unholy lie and all the directions it leads will help some.

Rocker | Fri, 2008-12-12 11:31

There are dozens of the similar question.

Actually, if I ask like that, it will be marked "inappropriate" and promptly removed. Some questions about Obama's connection to that indicted Illinoise governor accused of corruption is also removed. You can find the list of questions by inputting key words in search engine -- "9/11 investigation" and "Blagojevich". Marijuana appears to be one of the most popular search key words.

Some 9/11 investigation questions receive a substantial downvote which is suspicious -- perhaps this supports the notion that the majority of Obama supporters are idiot sheep who resist the new 9/11 investigation. They don't want to hear the real truth why and how it happened.

Nepos Libertas | Fri, 2008-12-12 12:01

Obama's atomic umbrella: U.S. nuclear strike if Iran nukes Israel - Haaretz

U.S. President-elect Barack Obama's administration will offer Israel a "nuclear umbrella" against the threat of a nuclear attack by Iran, a well-placed American source said earlier this week. The source, who is close to the new administration, said the U.S. will declare that an attack on Israel by Tehran would result in a devastating U.S. nuclear response against Iran.

So Obama is offering to nuke Iran for Israel if Iran nukes it. I think Israel was already counting on that, dipshit. All this talk of a 'special relationship' has them thinking that it goes without saying. By the way, there is no such thing as an Iranian nuke, dipshit.

But America's nuclear guarantee to Israel could also be interpreted as a sign the U.S. believes Iran will eventually acquire nuclear arms.
Secretary of state-designate Hillary Clinton had raised the idea of a nuclear guarantee to Israel during her campaign for the Democratic Party's nomination for the presidency. During a debate with Obama in April, Clinton said that Israel and Arab countries must be given "deterrent backing." She added, "Iran must know that an attack on Israel will draw a massive response."
Clinton also proposed that the American nuclear umbrella be extended to other countries in the region, like Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States, if they agree to relinquish their own nuclear ambitions.

Notice that only the Arab states need to agree to relinquish their nuclear ambitions. Not Israel, which is armed to the teeth with nukes but insults the world with its policy of "nuclear ambiguity", repeatedly insisting that it "won't be the first country to introduce nuclear weapons into the Middle East", even after it already has done exactly that, forty years ago.

According to the same source, the nuclear guarantee would be backed by a new and improved Israeli anti-ballistic missile system. The Bush administration took the first step by deploying an early-warning radar system in the Negev, which hones the ability to detect Iranian ballistic missiles.

Obama said this week that he would negotiate with Iran and would offer economic incentives for Tehran to relinquish its nuclear program. He warned that if Iran refused the deal, he would act to intensify sanctions against the Islamic Republic.

Granting Israel a nuclear guarantee essentially suggests the U.S. is willing to come to terms with a nuclear Iran. For its part, Israel opposes any such development and similar opposition was voiced by officials in the outgoing Bush administration.

"What is the significance of such guarantee when it comes from those who hesitated to deal with a non-nuclear Iran?" asked a senior Israeli security source. "What kind of credibility would this [guarantee have] when Iran is nuclear-capable?"

The same source noted that the fact that there is talk about the possibility of a nuclear Iran undermines efforts to prevent Tehran from acquiring such arms.

A senior Bush administration source said that the proposal for an American nuclear umbrella for Israel was ridiculous and lacked credibility. "Who will convince the citizen in Kansas that the U.S. needs to get mixed up in a nuclear war because Haifa was bombed?

(What do you mean? You convinced them to go to war for Israel 5 years ago. What's the problem now?)

And what is the point of an American response, after Israel's cities are destroyed in an Iranian nuclear strike?"

The current debate is taking place in light of the Military Intelligence assessment that Iran has passed beyond the point of no return, and has mastered the technology of uranium enrichment. The decision to proceed toward the development of nuclear arms is now purely a matter for Iran's leaders to decide. Intelligence assessments, however, suggest that the Iranians are trying to first accumulate larger quantities of fissile material, and this offers a window of opportunity for a last-ditch diplomatic effort to prevent an Iranian bomb.

Crimes of Zion | Fri, 2008-12-12 15:26

the uncanny and mezmerizing hold the Israeli lobby has on US foreign policy, nevertheless, an US nuclear umbrella at the disposal of Israel could optimally, become a foundation for a nuclear free zone in the region.

Iran would also have less of an incentive -- although, not completely removed because in geopolitics, nuclear arms are a deterent to regime change -- to pursue weaponization of its civilian nuclear industry. The existential threat posed by the Israeli armaments would be removed.

Israel could then be reined in to sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty and a la South Africa compelled [even though S.A.'s course was voluntary]dismantle its nuclear arsenal under IAEA supervision.

As stated, this draw down of nukes will most likely be politically unfeasable however,  it is the logical  extension of an US nuclear umbrella extended to Israel -- that is, if we were living in a sane world.

Stern Gang | Fri, 2008-12-12 16:13

and why am I not surprised at censorship of such things (including lying/cover up Blago)?  Sigh. Frustrating. Think I may have seen you remark re 9/11/Obama/change here before.  Am new here and still getting sea leg.  I say stop the wars and occupations built on lies, and bring 'em all home.

Rocker | Fri, 2008-12-12 16:16
Panic | Fri, 2008-12-12 20:10

Wake Up From Your Slumber with 22 questions for the Obama transition team.

Islam And The West Accelerated Links

k_nomad | Sun, 2008-12-14 15:51

Tag Cloud

Popular content