If Tsar Nick had been able to feed his people and hadn't completely bungled the prosecution of WWI, maybe Nick and his family would have stayed on the throne.

http://thompkins_cariou.tripod.com/id52.html

 The above is one of the policies of the central bankers, world war 2 was a means towards that end. Whereever Jews have been given 'equality' the door was opened for Jew domination over the whole society.

The sooner this is reversed the better.

"If Tsar Nick had been able to feed his people and hadn't completely bungled the prosecution of WWI, maybe Nick and his family would have stayed on the throne."

Not true. The Jews had had it in for the Czar for many decades. The debacle of the Russo-Japanese War in 1905 was created by them deliberately to weaken the Czar.  WWI was also their work; and I assume that - as was the case in the lead-up to the French "Revolution" - they also manufactured famine in Russia in order to further their ends. 

... is not much of a choice. The whole notion of a monarchy is as laughable as that of a 'chosen' people. Both concepts are seriously beyond their sell-by date and ideas we can safely live without.

If you beleieve the Rothschilds were not pleased with the imposition of a Jewish-dominated soviet system,then I suggest you read "Jews in Russia" by Andrey Iv Diky.

It can be found at: http://www.iamthewitness.com/books/Andrey.Iv.Diky/Jews.in.Russia.and.in....

Please Sir,can I have some more (soylent green)?

If you have a concrete argument to set against Leese's argument regarding the confiscation of the oil wells, then give it.

Logically (as opposed to pinhead denials) what we need is more detail on TROTSKY's sucessive positions with regard to Kerensky and the Mensheviks (incidentally, Trotsky had a Menshevik, not a Bolshevik, background).

..check the proletariat in menshevik for bolshevik..

I'm making notes from it now, specifically on the role of Trotsky and the Mensheviks.

However, since I started this thread with a specific and to-the-point quotation from Arnold Leese (who was, if you don't know, the founder of the British so-called Imperial Fascist League), I don't think I am being unfair in calling you a pinhead - you just told me "go and read this," as if you were some sort of boss, instead of going to the same trouble I went to with Leese, of finding relevant quotations and posting them for discussion.

The representatives of Military Section of the Soviet were members of Socialist parties of the Soviet, but they were not Bolsheviks. The Provisional Government did not dare to arrest Trotsky. Judging from numerous memoirs written by participants of the events: Kerensky prevented them from arresting him. (p.156)

After the failure of the Bolshevik uprising in July 1917, an order was issued to arrest leaders of this uprising, including Trotsky and Nakhamkes. (As is known, the majority of the leaders had gone into hiding and did not appear before October). However Trotsky and Nakhamkes did not hide. They did not even run away, but continued their activity, ignoring the law and the very existence of the Provisional Government, which ought to have suppressed their activity but did not dare. (p. 159)

They were held in high esteem by the Provisional Government, and even by the Soviet Workers' and Soldiers' Deputies, in which the Bolsheviks at that time did not have a majority. (p.160)

A characteristic joke was spread on the eve of the Second World War in Europe. It was agreed to have a conference of the USSR ambassadors and trade delegates in Geneva representing the USSR in all large European countries. Of course, the English Intelligence Service wanted to know what the conversation would be about at the conference. The Englishmen installed microphones, found two Russian emigrants who spoke good English and one Englishman who spoke good Russian, and were set to take down in shorthand the whole talk of the conference. But a big confusion occurred: none of the three could write down anything, because the "Russian Diplomats" conducted their whole conference in Yiddish. (p. 222)

An explanation of that phenomenon which S. Schwartz calls "subsiding of the anti-Semitic wave" should be found perhaps in this last threat of the death penalty, stated on behalf of the government, and perhaps also in the insignificant number of court cases dealing with "anti-Semitism". Was it not the fear of the death penalty that closed the lips of the population so tightly and so reliably that even such experts on "anti-Semitism" as Solomon Schwartz could not discern these feelings? The death penalty for the show of feelings is an unheard punishment, not only in peace time but even in a war situation or an occupation. It is no wonder that the population of Russia kept silent and did not protest the new ruling class and all the experiments this new ruling class tried on the Russia which it had seized. At that time, during the second part of the Thirties, this new ruling class seized the power in the USSR widely and all-embracing. (p. 236)

By the middle of the Fifties, under the pressure of the general feelings of the whole USSR population, after the Jewish-Arab war and the subsequent creation of Israel, and in the interest of state security, Jews were removed from leading posts and the previous confidence in them ceased to exist. But no one persecuted them. And the establishments, previously filled to capacity with Jews, only gradually started to get replacements from the representatives of the native population of Russia. How slowly this process went is evident from the unrefuted assertion of Furtseva. After 30 years of ruling in Russia the Jews ceased to be the ruling class. (p. 230)