Have a look at those dirty little shills in the comments!

Please Sir,can I have some more (soylent green)?

if the building hadden fallen. Which is of course bullshit because it was taken down, but it's an admission that the building was pre-wired for demolition as a controlled demolition is impossible to set up in just a few hours.

This coincides with Silverstein's 'pull it' admission. There's been a lot of nonsensical debate over whether pull is a demolition industry used term or not, but really it just means to simply take something down. If something is taken off the air from television people say it was 'pulled' off the air.

I mean

"We had heard reports that the building was unstable and that eventually it would come down on its own or that it would be taken down - I would imagine it came down on its own."

Fire lieutenant David Rastuccio says he would "imagine" WTC7 came down on its own. Yet if the plan to take it down did not involve pre-wired charges, Rastuccio should have deduced it must have come down on its own because there was insufficient time to wire charges.

Of course, there was also insufficient time for Rastuccio to investigate the "Holocaust", the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Zionist false-flag terror and bogus hate crimes, Larry Silverstein's and Frank "Holocaust survivor" Lowy's takeover of the WTC lease six weeks previously, Silverstein's close friendships with three former Israeli PMs, his $3+ billion insurance against terrorism, his "dermatologist's appointment", Dov Zakheim's aircraft remote control command transmitter systems and his position as Comptroller at the Pentagon when it was announced that trillions of dollars "could not be tracked" the day before a terrorist attack took out the bookkeepers and auditors and outdated computer systems that might have traced the transactions with the result that now most of the liabilities can be audited but not the assets, the "Dancing Israelis with foreknowledge of 9/11", the Odigo warning, typical gas temperatures in compartment fires, heavily sulfidated steel, the mysterious death of witness Barry Jennings whose testimony contradicted NIST's "thermal expansion collapse" report that was published two days after Jennings died, etc, otherwise Rastuccio would have realised that his "deduction" regarding WTC7 and 9/11 was erroneous.

Rastuccio's failure to eliminate the possibility of pre-wired charges after he saw the building fall is a tacit admission that the plan to take it down involved pre-wired charges. Hence, his statement does not support the official "Arab hijackers" account.

WTC7's tenants included the CIA, DoD, IRS, and Rudi Giuliani's Office of Emergency Management. The Secret Service occupied all the 9th floor and all but the east side of the 10th floor, and the Securities and Exchange Commission on floors 11-13. There were no fires on Floor 10, only a very late fire on Floor 9, and the most severe fires were on floors 11-13.

A funny thing is, some posters at the JREF forum (down for a couple of days over the holiday period) are claiming the Rastuccio statement actually supports their view that there was no controlled demolitions!

---

My latest lead hypothesis and some supporting evidence:

The plan was to use thermate in the hollow perimeter columns in the impact zones (the three walls not targeted by aircraft) and in some critical box core columns in the basements. The impact zones were targeted to simulate "fire-induced" collapses that would appear as if the fires were responsible for collapses that initiated with inward bowing of perimeter columns around the impact / fire zone. Critical core columns were also taken out because the perps had to ensure global collapses would ensue - rather than partial collapse.

The first thing that went wrong was when the operator(s) steered Flight UA175 too far to the right, with the result that debris missed the core and damaged perimeter columns in the NE corner of WTC2 and the iron-sulfur slurry was filmed as it poured out of the building at ~ 1,000 deg C. The propagandists tried to spin the line that this was "molten aluminum" from the plane, formed after a "normal office fire" had burned for less than an hour.

NIST proceeded to publish their report about "floor sagging pulling in perimeter columns", even though the columns would have been much too strong. NIST claimed there was a maximum of 55 inches of inward bowing near column 316 on the 96th floor of WTC1, 15 minutes prior to collapse, yet this would have required failure of ten consecutive floors. The official account for the Towers was also heavily reliant on a theory about "dislodged fireproofing" - fireproofing that had allegedly got "knocked off" even though there was insufficient kinetic energy available from the aircraft to do so, AA11's descent angle would have limited the amount of damaged trusses and the orientation of the core columns would have shielded the webs and the flange on the opposite side.

The next thing that went wrong was when UA93 got shot down over Shanksville due to the Air Force stand-down not lasting quite long enough. With no aircraft available to hit WTC7 and the fires on the upper floors having died out, they had to resort to igniting thermate to take out the critical core columns in the lower section of the building, but leaving unreacted thermate in the upper columns.

So heavily sulfidated steel from unreacted thermate was found in the WTC7 debris pile. The forensics also included iron spherules in the WTC dust, including a sample taken well before the cleanup, which proved the iron had been in a previously molten state. A WTC dust sample was found to have a "mean of composition" of iron spheres of 5.87%, nearly 150 times higher than the 0.04% typically found in building dust. The proportion is too high to be accounted for by the likes of toner cartridges or welding fumes.

There are plenty of reports of molten metal and molten steel in the debris piles, even though a total of 4 million gallons of water percolated through the debris in the first 10 days, and 97% (by weight) of the debris was noncombustibles such as concrete and steel. According to the anti-truthers, the reports of molten steel (even though some were from PhD-level scientists and structural engineers) were "wrong", the molten metal was aluminum, and these heavily watered, smothered fires could go on to melt aluminum for weeks on end, almost whenever anyone looked at them!

NIST went on to publish its ludicrous "thermal expansion-induced collapse" report for WTC7, two days after the death of witness Barry Jennings, whose testimony contradicted it.

The perps had less problems with the two American Airlines aircraft. However, Flights AA11 and AA77 were both unscheduled on 9/11.