http://www.voltairenet.org/article30038.html
Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Jimmy Carter’s former adviser, embodies the continuity of U.S. foreign policy whether it is democratic or republican. A great admirer of Henry Kissinger, Brzezinski has always defended, praised and shown an absolute respect for the master’s two diplomacy concepts: the balance of the powers theorized by Metternich and George Kennan’s containment doctrine. Zbigniew Brzezinski recommends how Russia should be militarily weakened and intimidated. He is convinced that the best way to achieve it is by destabilizing its border regions, a political strategy that arouse the interest of former presidential candidate John Kerry’s team who recruited his son Mark Brzezinski as its foreign policy adviser.
Based on George W. Bush’s speech during year 2000 presidential campaign, a rigid, even aggressive attitude towards Vladimir Putin’s Russia would have been expected -according to his adviser “hawk” Wolfowitz’s doctrine. But, instead, we have seen an unprecedented approach in the political relations of these two great nations. And this has happened after September 11, 2001.
For many observers and analysts there was an agreement between Putin and Bush not to criticize Russian military operations in Chechnya whereas Putin would ignore American interventions and interferences in the Middle East.
This explanation does not really value September 11 facts. It actually considers them as an abstraction and the same with Kremlin’s position on this. We can say that Republican administrations have always attached too much importance to the Middle East whereas Democrat’s political tradition on foreign policy has been more focused in Eurasia.
To design its strategy towards the former USRR and then on the Easter states, recently emancipated from the Soviet influence, Democrats have trusted -since Jimmy Carter took power- a brilliant, unscrupulous and anti-Russian man: Zbigniew Brzezinski.
This well-known professor’s doctrine has many followers outside of the Democratic Party because it has defined the actual imperative of the empire’s survival and prosperity: the conquest of Eurasia.
This professor was born in Warsaw in 1928, the son of a Polish diplomat. At the age of ten, Brzezinski immigrated to Canada when his father was distinguished. He did his degree and his master at the University of Mc Gill, Montreal, and then his PhD at Harvard in 1953. After that, he became an American citizen and married the daughter of Czechoslovakia’s former president Eduardo Benes.
Between 1966 and 1968 he was a member of the Council of Policy Planning of the State Department where he developed the “peaceful involvement” strategy towards the Soviet Union in the framework of the Cold War. In October 1966, he convinced President Johnson to modify the strategic priorities in order to have the “thawing-out” before the German reunification.
During 1968 presidential campaign, Brzezinski was the head of the working party in charge of democratic candidate Hubert H. Humphrey’s foreign policy, who would lose to Richard Nixon.
The Inspiring Leader of the Trilateral CommissionAt the beginning of the 1960s, Brzezinski distinguished himself as an analyst when prophetically announced the appearance of bigger actors in the world power. He was talking about Europe and Japan whose economies have had a rapid growth after WWII.
In an article published in Foreign Affairs magazine in 1970, he talked about his vision of this “new world order”. «A new and more daring vision is needed - the creation of a community of developed countries capable of efficiently handling the problems of mankind. Apart from the U.S. and Western Europe, Japan should be included (...) A good start would be a council formed by representatives of the U.S, Western Europe and Japan, which will hold regular meetings among the heads of governments and less relevant personalities.»
In 1970, Brzezinski also proposed new ideas in his new book Between two Ages [1] where he explained that the moment to balance world power had arrived and it had to be in the hands of a new global political order based on a trilateral economic tie between Japan, Europe and the U.S. The revolution in production techniques and the transformation of the heavy industry into electronics had to cause a disruption of political systems and a new generation of power elites. David Rockefeller, excited about these concepts, hired him to create the Trilateral Commission and appointed him director. The commission was officially established in 1973 and gathered important personalities related to world trade, the international banking system, governors and the big European, Japanese and American media.
When the first oil crisis took place, the main concern of these world finance masters was to get rid of the foreign debt of developing countries by strengthening the role of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). It was also about strengthening and extending U.S.’s hegemony - by that time vulnerable due to its military defeat in Viet Nam- in every geographical boundary of the Eurasian continent where they were very influential after WWII
This mission, if analyzed from an outsider’s point of view, depicts Brzezinski as a peace advocate, a man in favor of multilateral relations and diminishing world tension (Cold War) and -to the eyes of the extreme right- as a man inspired by Marxism.
The best to be done in order to implement the plans of the Trilateral Commission was to make one of its members the President of the United States.
Since the creation of the Trilateral Commission, shepherd Jimmy Carter was among the members of Rockefeller-Brzezinski’s team. He has opened the first trade offices of the state of Georgia in Brussels and Tokyo and this turned him into the ideal model or the founding concept of the Commission. [2] For his nomination as an election candidate and to the presidential election in 1976, Rockefeller used his relations in Wall Street and put Brzezinski to work, whose academic influence assisting democratic candidate Jimmy Carter was very helpful for wining the election. And, of course, when Carter won the elections, Brzezinski was appointed national security adviser. [3]
As president, Carter stated the reduction of the military nuclear arsenal of the two blocks (U.S. -USRR) as a priority. However, the Soviet SS-20 missile crisis aimed at Europe forced Carter to deploy the Pershing missiles, an action that ruined his efforts, whether they were sincere or not, and caused the reciprocal distrust of the two countries.
It can be affirmed that by that time, the Soviet block had good reasons to believe that its adversary was involved in double-dealing: the U.S. military defeat in Viet Nam forced it to keep certain reserve in the strategic and military fields whereas Brzezinski was working on his war plan to set a trap for the Soviet Union and force it to come into a peripheral conflict.
The destabilization of the Afghan communist regime and the financing and delivering of the first weapons to anticommunist Jihad followers in 1979 caused, as expected, the intervention of the Red Army in Afghanistan. Brzezinski had the support of Pakistan intelligence and espionage services, the fearful ISI.
When the French magazine Le Nouvel Observateur interviewed Brzezinski in 1998, he admitted that the equipping of Bin Laden’s anti-Soviet troops was before the Russian invasion and was aimed at provoking its reaction:
Le Nouvel Observateur: Former CIA director, Robert Gates, says in his memoirs: the American secret services assisted Afghan mujahedeen six months before the Soviet invasion. By that time, you were President Carter’s adviser and you played a key role on this. Do you confirm it?
Zbigniew Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of the story, the CIA began to assist mujahedeen in the year 1980, that is, after the invasion of the Soviet army against Afghanistan on December 24, 1979. But the truth that remained secret until today is quite different: it was on July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed his first order on the secret assistance to Kabul’s pro-Soviet regime opponents. That day I wrote a memorandum to the President in which I told him that that assistance would cause the Soviet intervention (...) we did not force the Russian intervention, we just, conscientiously, increase the intervention possibilities.
NO: When the Soviets justified their intervention by affirming they were fighting against a secret American interference nobody believed them, though they were telling the truth. Don’t you regret it?
Z. Brz.: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. Its objective was to lead the Russian to the Afghan trap, and you want me to regret it? The very same day the Soviets crossed the Afghan border I wrote the following to President Carter: «This is our chance to give Russia its Viet Nam» (...).
N.O.: Aren’t you sorry either for favoring Islamic fundamentalism and providing weapons and consultancies to future terrorists?
ZBrz.: What is the most important thing when you look at world history, the Taliban or the fall of the Soviet empire? Some excited Islamists or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the Cold War? [4]
When Brzezinski talked about «some excited Islamists» in this interview, he did not underestimate Al Qaeda’s power. He just described the reality of what the neo-conservatives has turned into a myth while justifying their world crusade. It is obvious that none of the members of the Council on Foreign Relations would be so categorical.
Objective Alliance with China and Unconditional Support to the Shah of IranEven when Nixon and Kissinger were cautious about besieging the Soviet Union and restored relations with China, a number of Carter’s closest advisers did not support this rapprochement Brzezinski had in mind.
When Carter became President, he stated he would establish a dialogue with the USRR and keep the People’s Republic of China at a distance. But, his Secretary of State, Cyrus Vance, opposed Brzezinski anti-Russian obsession and Carter had no choice but to conciliate its administration’s antagonism.
Usually, the mediator between these two poles was Richard C. Holbrooke, U.S. future ambassador to the UN and John Kerry’s foreign policy adviser during his campaign, along with Mark Brzezinski, Zbigniew’s son. According to Cyrus Vance and some others in favor of establishing the dialogue, like democrat renegade Averell Arriman, the triangular logic of besieging would only lead, at its best, to a misunderstanding with the USRR, not to mention war.
They recommended dialogues on disarmament and cooperation with the Soviet Union to neutralize the Third World conflicts. The re-establishment of relations with China kept on; Brzezinski even completed a joint program of strategic cooperation and managed to have good personal relations with Deng Xiaoping, something that has really helped him nowadays.
Brzezinski’s distrust towards the USRR can be perceived again in his attitude towards Iran, which under the Shah’s regimen was considered as a bastion against the Soviet influence in the Middle East. Brzezinski promised Shah his support until the last moment and requested U.S. military intervention to keep him in power even when part of Carter’s administration, led by his Secretary of State, opposed it.
However, Washington’s concrete actions were implemented according to the state Department’s point of view and despite all negotiations with the generals that defeated Shah to guarantee a moderate regime in the country; it was Khomeini who took power after a popular seafloor spreading. Khomeini joined Carter at Camp David negotiations in 1977 and played a key role in the peace agreement between Israel and Egypt without even being present in the most important debates. However, when the USRR was the main topic, he was always there.
The Russian Threat and the American SupremacyIn 1989, Brzezinski quit his job at Columbia University where he taught since 1960 to work on Ukraine’s independent status plan. This marks the beginning of his compromise to prevent the resurgence of Russia as a superpower. He defended Russia’s integration to the Western system and the “geopolitical multiparty system” in the territory of the former Soviet Union.
He also developed a “plan for Europe” that included NATO’s expansion to the Baltic republics, a dream that came true when three of them joined NATO in 2002. During the 90s he was the special envoy of the American President to promote the most important oil infrastructure project of the world: the Baku-Tbilissi-Ceyhan pipeline which was his best opportunity to prevent the resurgence of Russia. He has also been, since 1999, the president of the American Committee for Peace in Chechnya, whose headquarters are located at the Freedom House facility. This position allows him to intervene in peace negotiations between the Russian government and independence fighters led by Mashkadov. However, the truth behind these good will “democratic” activities is to assist independence followers to maintain a war in the area, like the Afghan one, to weaken Russian and to keep it away from the gains of the Caspian Sea.
Brzezinski’s doctrine («The power ruling Eurasia will control two of the most economically advanced and productive areas of the world») is related to NATO’s expansion to the East, something the Clinton’s Administration actively worked on. But, how could they sell NATO to Europeans? «The European region located in the Western border of Eurasia and next to Africa is much more exposed to the risks of the increasing global disorder than a more politically united, military powerful and geographically isolated America (...)., said Brzezinski to National Interest magazine in year 2000. [5] The whole thing is quite clear: the deployment of NATO’s forces around Russia was a preventive measure. If Russia’s reaction is to be defensive, it means that it is planning to restore its empire and totalitarianism.
The Europeans will be more exposed to risk if an imperialist chauvinism encourages Russia’s foreign policy»
Brzezinski has been working also as a consultant for BP-Amoco and Freedom House in Azerbaijan. His objective is to worship Heidar Alyiev’s image and in a New York Times interview he characterized the dictator as a «nice guy». [6] Brzezinski justifies Aliyev’s Anglo-Saxon support by explaining that after seven decades of communist government nobody can expect Azerbaijan and the former Soviet republics to become democratic nations in such a short period of time.
Even when Aliyev’s political repression increased during the last few years and the gains from the Caspian Sea diminished, Azerbaijan was still considered by Freedom House as a “partially free” country. In 1999, Secretary of State and Brzezinski’s disciple, Madeleine Albright, invited Heidar Aliyev to NATO’s anniversary ceremony. On their part, Georgia, Azerbaijan and Ukraine organized some joint military maneuvers, sponsored by NATO’s “Association for Peace” program, on April 16, 1996. [7]
Despite his activities as BP-Amoco and Freedom House’s consultant, Brzezinski assisted a system of funds and NGOs (non governmental organizations) in support of the former Soviet top-classes, intellectuals and elites.
As an initiative of the American Committee for Peace in Chechnya, whose chairman was Brzezinski, a meeting between the main leaders of the Chechnya movement was held from August 16 to August 18, 2002 in Lichtenstein, two months after the one held in Bassaiev and Maskhadov, where an agreement was signed on the mutual direction of the “Armed Forces of the Ichkeria Republic of Chechnya”. The participants concluded that Chechnya should not longer be a part of Russia, that a real autonomy was necessary and the time to negotiate with Maskhadov had arrived. But, was Beslán’s hostages event, as claimed by Bassaiev, part of Chechnya independence demand process or part of Russia’s destabilizing process? [8]
Several questions could be raised if we take into account that the main consequence of this action was a tightening of tensions between North Odessa (should be Ossetia instead) and neighboring Inguchia, that is, a much more relevant balkanization of the region.
Nowadays, Brzezinski is very active in CSIS but he still the brain of the Democrats foreign policy program, something that is quite evident in candidate Kerry and his partner John Edwards’s obsession with Russia. Following Mark Brzezinski’s advises they chose as their main priority Russia’s nuclear disarmament in a moment in which it has recovered the same oil production it had before its demise and is benefiting widely of the current oil prices which has allowed it to double its defense budget. Therefore, Russia’s nuclear arsenal is not, as John Kerry says, a present-day threat.
Kerry’s real objective is related to Zbigniew Brzezinski’s strategy of Russia’s subordination but, from now on, it will be much more difficult to convince the world public opinion of Russia’s evil and totalitarianism. [9] Therefore, it is necessary to provoke its reaction as was done with the Afghan case in 1979, because Russia will have no problems with its energy supply in the next decades, a real concern the U.S. has. This is why in some recent Wall Street Journal and Novaya Gazetta interviews, Brzezinski characterized Vladimir Putin as «Russian Benito Mussolini».
Arthur Lepic
Submitted by Fem on Thu, 2009-01-01 04:15
- Fem's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 387 reads
-
the PNAC boys have got russia pretty much boxed in and surrounded, at least in europe and central asia.
completion of the PNAC project, in absence of regime change in russia and PNAC puppets being re-installed (implying restoration of israeli russians to control of russian energy), requires that the part of russia hanging down to the black sea and caspian sea be chopped off, thus blocking russian access to tanker and pipeline export routes.
in september of 2001, israeli russians allied with PNAC were still controlling russian energy, and they were supposed to guarantee oil to israeli america as israeli america tore up the middle east.
1536 x 1017
i'm repetitive, boring, and a complete leaping gaping asshole.
but the noobs gotta know this stuff, and the rest of you will have to ignore me or or tolerate me or ban me, or maybe poison my quesadillas.
so the big question is: are these guys willing to sacrifice israel if israel gets too big for its britches?
and given israel's samson option, what kind of mess are they gonna make before they bow out?
I'm starting to doubt that the recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia was beneficial for Russia, although it seems to be so from the outside. Logically speaking, both regions give Russia a type of a 'buffer zone' when it comes to Georgia and a potential NATO deployment, and you can also say that by detaching both regions, Russia has somewhat weakened Georgia. There are few more reasons why it can be assumed that Russia came out as the winner in the short conflict, but after reading the above article, and it dawned on me that Russia is not the winner in this case.
There are two things evident for me...the containment of Russia through destabilization of its peripheral regions, mainly the Caucasus since it’s the energy route for the Jews, and the destabilization of Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan, which will create few provinces of its own.
I do not remember who came up with that famous map of the 'New Middle East', but the guy is a member of the CFR, and I tried to post that map here, but couldn't do it for some kind of a reason. I'm sure most, if not all, know which map I'm talking about..
Another thing.... When I looked at that map, I saw that Iraq was broken into 3 different areas. Obviously, the US won't just break it up while in Iraq. Even if it wants to do it know, it can't for obvious reasons. BUT...keep in mind that in 2011 the US troops are supposed to leave Iraq leavings things to the locals. I believe that this action is also planned because Iraq is as unstable as few years ago, nothing has really changed there, and we all can agree that hell will break loose over there once the US troops leave. I'm not advocating to have them stay there longer, but I'm trying to say that with the way things are there right now, it will get worse and the violence between different factions will further intensify. I think that the break up of Iraq will occur after 2011 when the US troops leave the country, and that's when the locals eat each other alive. I have a feeling that this is how the US is going to break up Iraq into 3 different regions (Kurdish, Sunni & Shia), and it will do it by pulling out, and having the locals do their job for them through violence towards each other, while the CIA controls the situation to its advantage from the outside, so that later on it won't be said that the US chopped up Iraq into three different areas itself. Assuming that the map is real in terms of the US geopolitical interests in the region for the next 25 years or so, this is how I see Iraq broken up.
...all this makes more sense.
this is the last chance for anyone to establish a global government before the oil runs out.
what i expect is a continuation of the PNAC/AEI/exxon project... the neocon philosophy seems to have metastasized into american standard operating procedure...
...which will require a continuation of the economic crash, and the establishment of a police state to control the unrest...
the object of the game being: use the remaining oil to fuel PNAC's armies as they continue the "benevolent global hegemony" project, with some oil siphoned off for use by the elites and the people protecting them.
so russia has to be contained until... when? ...until a missile defence system is installed that can pick off any russian missiles that survive a PNAC nuke first strike on russia?
necons' new map
google search: Results 1 - 10 of about 27,100 for "ralph peters" neocon
when that first rocket went off, it took me a couple nanoseconds to look at my watch and see that it's 2009.
...getting twitchy in my old age, i guess.
@ mparent7777: i was looking for my flack jacket, there for a minute.
@ fem: it looks to me like the focus on brzezinski is an attempt to shift blame for this fiasco away from the real ringleaders, the ringleaders being israelis and israeli americans.
the proof of the pudding will come when iran is attacked, seeing as how brzezinski is against attacking iran. ...if iran is attacked, then we'll know that the israelis are dominant, and brzezinski is a distraction.
Results 1 - 10 of about 66,700 for brzezinski against iran attack.
it's interesting that brzezinski warned of false flag attacks blamed on iran... what does that imply about his beliefs about 9/11?
and finally, there's this from haaretz:
there shouldnt be any doubt about who's behind the push to war with iran, and it aint brzezinski, who seems to be obsessed, with typical polakistanian paranoia, on russia.
the fact that brezizinski is a Polish Jew, it's a reason for me not to trust him. although I understand that he's against the Iran attack openly, but I can't seem to believe that he's completely against attacking Iran, if not through the US, then having someone elso do that job for him.
Even if he's not an Israeli citizen, he's still a Jew who also works for the interests of Israel; therefore, I can't seem to believe that he's only pro-US and has nothing to do with Israeli gains. But, you're right when you say that his main target is Russia and he might seem less interested in Middle East right now as the neo-cons have done enough job there themseleves over the past 8 years or so.
Brezizinski reminds me of Albright...both Jews; one form Czechoslovakia, the other from Poland. Both countries hate the Russians. I've always wondered why they look alike. Brezizinski is like the male version of Albright and both of them are warmongers. Both of them have their personalities imprinted on their face...both look so evil. Breziziznki looks like a devil if you closely look at his eyes.
can you find evidence of that?
...according to wikipedia.
so is brzezinski a red herring, stalking horse, scapegoat or... what?
...because it's not beyond the bounds of possibility that he's deliberately being "antisemitic", as per the thousands of google hits, to draw attention away from the real ringleaders.
...but the whole argument is fruitless, because so long as the wars are expanding to israel's advantage, it doesnt make much difference what these guys say in public, does it?
here's the deal...
so long as the israeli russians were controlling russian energy, russians were good guys.
putin dumps the israeli russians, the israeli american media and political establishment is outraged, and russians become shitheads... which is nice for brzezinski, seeing as how he's always hated russia...
so, in his old age, he's trotted out again for a little spot of sunshine, to deflect attention from the people who've been planning this middle east operation for decades.
...to stage 9/11 to get the project started.
Sometimes I think that Putin's arrest of some Jewish oligarchs was meant to throw a dust on peoples’ faces. First of all, Putin did not get rid of all the Jewish oligarchs. If he was sincere in his plan, then he could have finished his job completely. Some of them were not arrested, and they managed to escape the country. Putin could have stopped that. I also read that prior his arrest, Khodorkovsky managed to transfer his shares to Rothschild in London, so this is another reason that I think that those arrests were not sincere. Putin shouldn't have allowed Berezovky to flee Russia in the first place.
I've become a bit pessimistic in regards to Putin and his presidency since I'm starting to doubt him after he chose Medvedev as a successor. I've also read before that he had a secret closed door meetings with Kissinger. One should ask why Putin would want to have a secret meeting with Kissinger....a 'retired' Secretary of State. It shows who is in control of the US foreign policy even today.
I wish I'm wrong as I'd like to see a true patriot as Russia’s president, but my views on Putin are the following.....He's somewhat part of the cabal, but he's been given the present role in order to throw dust on peoples’ faces in believing that finally Russia has a patriotic RUSSIAN president, and that the days of the Jewish oligarchy are now over. As far as I know, he's close friends with Abrahamovich and Lazar. In addition, just because Russia is gradually prospering and Putin is heading his country in the right direction doesn't necessarily mean that it isn't done for a specific purpose. I don't think that the Jewish control of Russia is only meant to destroy it, although that's what we've seen for decades. Let's remember the protocols of Zion for a second...in there it is clearly stated that they will create a leader who seems to be against them, but he would be working for them in the background, so what makes us think that perhaps Putin is not that leader. Perhaps the reason why Putin is rebuilding his country and making it prosperous is due to the fact that the Jews want to see WW3 eventually, and for that reason you need a strong Russia for a greater damage on the opposing forces. Assuming that's what the Jews want eventually, of course. So these are the reasons that I cannot say that I'm 100% confident in Putin's sincerity.
Oh...I should also say that I find it very unlikely that after raping Russia of its wealth for years, suddenly, the Jews would allow all that control of the natural resources to slip away from their hands after Yeltsin. Yelstin was controlled by the same Jewish cabal in Russia, and I find it unlikely that Putin isn't one of their men who was placed after Yeltsin resigned. I bet that Putin was not selected by the crazy alcoholic Yeltsin, but by the forced who were controlling that alcoholic themselves. I really find it hard to believe that Yeltsin was in position to think clearly and critically and pick the right person, Putin, for Russia's prosperity. I think that we are simply given that illusion that Putin is against them, but Jews are famous for controlling both opposing sides. As the followers of the Hegelian dialectics, it makes sense that the Jews want to see the synthesis eventually, and by that they place the opposing (Putin) puppet on the throne.
I've also posted one video here long time ago where the Russian speaking Israeli TV news network was stating in Russian that Medvedev has said that he would like to apply for an Israeli citizenship since he has a right to do so. I can re-post it again in here if you want. Also, I've read few articles where it was stated that Medvedev's wife, Svetlana (Moesseivna) Linnik is a Jew. Medvedev does not look like a Russian. His eyes definitely don't look Russian...at least I haven't seen such Russian eyes lol and the wife has a typical Jewish female face. Assuming that Medvedev is a Jew, why would an anti-Jewish Putin have a Jew as the president of Russia. He hand picked Medvedev, so it doesn’t make any sense why he would do that, unless he has his own Jewish connections. With the way things are going in the world, nothing will surprise me what so ever.
Here's one article about Medvedev's Jewish roots....Please read it and come up with your own conclusions. The article is in Russian, but you can have it translated on google.
http://www.anticompromat.ru/medvedevd/temishev.html
I've read about Brezizinsky and his Jewish roots, but it's been couple of years now and I can't remember where exactly I read that, so I need to find that article first.,...if I can find it. Will post it if I do. I'm not surprised as he looks Jewish and he's close with Soros, Kissinger and the Rockefellers. He has to be a Jew as he has so much influence and power when it comes to the foreign policy of the US lol. You really think that the Jews would have allowed a non-Jew to take such a position back then? I find it very unlikely, since such seats are dominated by them to this day.
OK, so i decided to google translate it myself. Please keep in mind that google only translates word by word, so some of the meanings and few things might not make sense when reading it, but you will get the idea. Oh, and few words were not able to be translated for some kind of a reason, and my time it limited to have it translated properly, so I apologize for that. Nevertheless, it's an interesting read...There are some links/photos in the article, so make sure you also go to that site to check those out.
Russian nationalists have reacted to the appointment of the Chief Chekistom Russia Russian-speaking pahana Mit'ki Medvedev surge of anti-Semitism. They write (because of the vicious language author, we have a little podkorrektirovali - D.O):
«Jakob« Russian »evreychika Putin's face, many were purchased and cancel it all:« Russian president is! You know it better, but everything is not ». Now you can clearly define Russia as a Jewish state in which all authority belongs aggressive minority and natsbolshinstvo, Russian people, is nothing like people-slave, deprived of National. Independence and National. sovereignty.
This powerful factor vybivaet as the stool from under the feet of Kagan, the myth of a united Russia. Everything. Now finally with the Russians is nothing in this country. Now the president and a Jew. And his Jewish wife. Now everything is strange and all who support them, with a calm mind, you can take evreychikami and podevreychikami. It is not enough. What is worse, the better! Therefore, it is possible to take this country to stop the homeland and to have a normal guerrilla warfare to weaken the state.
This is how our ancestors were burned to the same city, and its the same village, blew up as a self-built railroad bridges that would be inherited scorched enemy territory. After all it will be possible to return and rebuild. But it is now important that the enemy was the ashes ».
Meanwhile, the bloody gebnya already received information about a new course of Russian nationalists, is aimed at destroying the infrastructure of the hated ethnic Russian Moscow Horde, in particular on the possible upcoming podryvah bridges, and very quickly and adequately react. So the case seriously, not guff on blogs and forums
[...] Meanwhile, the Russian actively discussing «Jewish» Medvedev: "What Medvedev Jew, I do not need proof, trimmed or not. I have enough of what he grandfather Abramovich. And besides, there are the eyes. Yes, the genes Medvedev did not raise doubts. "
In turn, the site «Stringer» reported the following details on the origin of Medvedev, referring to the Jewish publication "Panorama":
«He was born Sept. 14, 1965 in Leningrad, the Russian passport. Born in the «simple» family. The father - Anatoly Afanasevich Medvedev, professor of the Leningrad Institute of Technology (TRL) of Lensoviet (died 2004); his mother, Julia Veniaminovna, Jew - linguist, taught at the Herzen Pedagogical Institute, and later worked as a tour guide at the museum.
The only child in the family. The family lived in a neighborhood Kupchino on the outskirts of Leningrad. As a student years was fond of rock music, favorite team was the «Black Sabbath» (satanic «black sabbath», in Hebrew, «Black Shabbos (Saturday) - Na). Married, with his wife Svetlana, maiden name Linnik, studied at a school, married in 1989, his wife graduated from the Institute of Economics and Finance, working in Moscow and to organize public events in St. Petersburg. Son born Ilya 1996 ».
[NB: There are probably referring to Moscow (not related either to Israel or to the Jewish Diaspora) Information Research Center (IITS) "Panorama", but not on "Panorama", nor in its "database" Labyrinth ", nor in the newspaper "Panorama", nor in any of the publications IITS "Panorama" in the accuracy of the text is not available, in particular, "panoramskih" Biographical data on the nationality of his mother's Medvedev Yu Shaposhnikova nowhere specified, a musical group Black Shabbat "is not characterized as a" satanic "), there are, however, remains the same, and Russian-language media in California and Kazakhstan - note the librarian].
In turn, the Israeli news agency NewsRu.il passes:
«About Judaism Dmitry Medvedev write commentators from Israel. Many Israeli blogs (also) indicated that the wife of the future Russian president - Svetlana, maiden name was Jewish surname Linnik. The newspaper «Yedioth Ahronot» illustrates the material under the title «The President of Russia is its successor» photography, in which Dmitry Medvedev captured together with the Chief Rabbi of Russia Berl Lazar ». These photos also printed the Russian press.
Naturally, the fact that anti-Semites in writing «Stringer» lie, precisely half-truth. Estonian Jews, for example, it makes no sense to hide the true origin of «Medvedev», fearing reprisals FSB. Tallinn Jewish Kantor at a forum Estonian «Delphi» leads the true information about the pedigree Medvedev:
«Real name Dmitry Medvedev --
David Mendel Aaronovich (photo). Born September 14, 1965 in Leningrad in the «simple» family of Russian passport. His father - Aaron Abramovich Mendel, professor of Russian passport. Mother - Tsilia Viniaminovna, philologist, on passport Jew. This is the original names of the birth. In addition, his wife - Svetlana Moiseevna Linnik ». [NB: this is not Estonian Delphi, a Latvian, the text of the link does not exist, a similar (but not exactly this) fragment present in the Latvian "Delphi" in an anonymous article "Russia at the Crossroads" - approx. Librarian]
There is no indication that it was «taught» prof. Medvedev (or Mendel). And it immediately suggests that «teach» he could only «the only true teachings» - Marxism-Leninism.
"Delphi" is a school photograph Moiseevny Svetlana Linnik, the wife of the future President of the Russian Federation Aaronovicha David Mendel (operational moniker FSB «Medvedev»). Here's the picture. [The photo release 10 class of school number 61 in Frunze in 1984, where some prisustvuet S. Linnik (the third row is the top extreme right), but the wife of Dmitry Medvedev Svetlana Linnik zakanchivala class 10 Leningrad secondary school number 305 in Kupchino in 1982 - note the librarian].
In a more mature image of Madame Linnik often printed Ukrainian Agency Ryan. For example, here or here. Svetlana rented Moiseevna Linnik also «Novaya Gazeta», like this picture. Indeed, nothing paints the woman as hydrogen peroxide.
The site zlobstvuyuschego opposition, anti-Semites Golysheva points:
«A little ???? about a female bear karlikovogo successor: In April 2007, she chaired the board of trustees of ... with the blessing of Alexy II, and directs it (the program) Hieromonk Cyprian. As a board of trustees includes Volodin, the chairman of the board of directors of the company «United Europe-Elite» and the owner of a network of perfumes and cosmetics «Ile de Bote» ... October 24, saw her at the opening of the 18 th season of Fashion Week in Moscow, which opened Yudashkin. Medvedev's wife is a long-standing fan of the «couturier». Their acquaintance was at ????????? from Pugachyova in 2005 ». As we have seen, there «all our». Russian spirit of the environment, Svetlana Moiseevny and not smell.
Do not doubt that the TOV. Mendel (chekistsky General «Medvedev») pure Jew, not only in Estonia and Israel, but in Russia itself.
«Here at last, and Russians prezikom (that is, the president - D.O) will be 100% Jewish .... As the saying goes ... PRIEHALI », happily writes Russian« Hunter »in geste site« At malice ».
About David Aaronovicha religion other than his love for the rabbi, is known only that he «svechkoderzhets». Keep candles Judaism does not preclude its adeptam. Here is a photo.
Note that the concealment of Jewish origin Aaronovicha David Mendel ( «Dmitry Medvedev») chekistskimi media Russia is a flagrant manifestation of the mahrovogo, public rabid anti-Semitism, like in Judaism, there is something shameful, that you want to hide.
We wish all the same hope that any state anti-Semitism is not, and that David Aaronovich Mendel turned into Dmitry Medvedev because of camouflage and conspiracy as part of his semi-clandestine of hard work in public safety, for the benefit of their home in glory his Russia.
Meanwhile, Russia is now hate everything and everyone. Being at liberty, even politically nesoznatelnye people start to hate Russia.
sure, lots of jews survived the putin purge, but that's why we should call the guys that got purged "israeli russians"... seeing as how most of the yukos oil jews fled to israel.
i dont think there can be any doubt, in view of khodorkovsky's efforts to sell yukos to exxon as he was going under, that the israeli russians were allied with exxon and the AEI.
at the time of this attempted sale of yukos to exxon, the exxon CEO was none other than lee raymond, now vice-chairman of the board of the israeli american AEI think tank, which you will no doubt remember, spawned PNAC, and PNAC said they needed the "new pearl harbor", and the "new pearl harbor" materialized a few months after the PNAC signatories were installed ---by a phony election recount in a state governed by a PNAC member--- into positions from which they could make their "new pearl harbor" happen.
as far as those reports of yukos being sold to rothschilds, they are suspect, because there are more reliable reports of those shares going to dorky's right hand man, nevzlin, who is currently hiding out in israel as the charges against him, including murder charges, stack up against him in russia.
...dovetails so nicely with alex jones-type attempts to divert attention from the most likely suspects for 9/11.
it doesnt seem reasonable that the rothschilds would be real big fans of these doofus idiots, allied with radical israelis and israeli americans, who think they can run the world, and seem to be planning a nuke first strike on russia...
...or, failing at a successful nuke first strikes on russia and china, turning israel's samson option into a global samson option.
...but i guess the beeb could be protecting the rothschilds...
god knows they must need it.
...so long as you reserve enough lampposts to hang the israeli americans who are the driving force behind this bullshit.
They gave him millions of dollars illegally, possibly billions I forget. It was reported in the mainstream media. So they back all this shit. They are the most powerful of all the Jews/Zionists. They founded Israel. "Illuminati' is the Jewish crime network.
your google must be broke.
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1044633/lynn_forester_de_rothschild_to_back.html
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/03/14/mccain_invites_fundraisers_to.html
so where's the beef?
in those urls you posted, i dont see anything about "millions" or "billions" going to mccain from rothschilds.
what's up with that?
...as he explains in his own words who "the illuminati" are...
we have to go through this procedure since you've proven that sometimes you forget things, so we cant really take your word about the meaning of jones' "illuminati".
...is trying his best to deny the existence of israeli/israeli american/exxon motives to do their own "new pearl harbor" to kickstart the PNAC land and oil acquisition project...
...those motives being: peak oil and global warming.